Roadway Express, Inc.
Roadway Express, Inc.
Incorporated: 1930 as Roadway Express, Inc.
Sales: $2.67 billion (1997)
Stock Exchanges: NASDAQ
Ticker Symbol: ROAD
SICs: 4213 Trucking Except Local
Roadway Express, Inc. is the second-largest motor freight carrier company in the United States. It specializes in less-than-truckload (LTL) hauling, principally on two-day or longer trips. The company operates more than 400 shipping terminals in the United States. It also manages shipping facilities in Mexico, and operates a Canadian subsidiary. Roadway ships internationally to more than 60 countries worldwide. Its Asian Roadway Express joint venture offers transportation services between North America and Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand, with further links to other countries in Asia. Roadway also serves customers in Africa, Australia, Europe, and the Middle East. Roadway Express was formerly a subsidiary of Roadway Services, Inc., but since 1995 it has operated as an independent, publicly owned company. Roadway Services, its former holding company, now operates as Caliber System, Inc.
Roadway Express was founded in 1930 by brothers Galen and Carroll Roush in Akron, Ohio. Although trucking had made great strides during the 1920s, the motor carrier industry was still in its infancy. Railroads provided the primary transportation for goods from point of manufacture to point of sale. Trucks were used for less than full-load shipments, which was still Roadway’s primary market. In 1930 Roadway entered the business it would come to lead with a load of tires shipped from Akron to St. Louis, Missouri.
Roadway Express started with ten owner-operators, and moved shipments to Chicago; Houston, Texas; and Kansas City. Within several months terminals were opened in Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Birmingham, Alabama; Charlotte, North Carolina; Indianapolis, Indiana; Knoxville, Memphis, and Nashville, Tennessee; New York; and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Roadway’s rapid expansion reflected the growth of interstate trucking in general.
Before long, railroaders, fearful of unrestrained competition, began to clamor for regulation. In 1935 Congress passed the Motor Carrier Act, limiting the right to operate in interstate commerce to those carriers already in operation and to new ones that could prove “necessity and convenience.” The Interstate Commerce Commission would oversee standard rates, preventing particular customers from receiving preferential rates.
While regulation had its disadvantages, founder Galen Roush, originally trained as a lawyer, saw great potential in the new regulated business climate. Roadway had kept detailed records of its shipments over the years. These records became the basis of Roush’s claim to some of the busiest freight routes in the country. Regulation helped limit competition, and at the same time elevated the status of the trucking industry to the equivalent of a public utility. Although it took 16 years of court battles before Roadway’s routes were finally secured, the company held exclusive rights to its most lucrative routes.
The Roush brothers recognized the significance of hiring good managers, and instituted tight financial controls early on. Roadway was conservatively run, and kept a very low profile. It maintained this approach for decades.
World War II and Postwar Expansion
In the 1940s demand for truck transportation increased as the defense economy of World War II eliminated the last effects of the Great Depression. At the same time, new trucks were not being built as the necessary materials were being diverted for war goods. In 1945 Roadway Express began replacing owner-operators with hired drivers to run its own fleet. After the war, trucking gained significant ground from the railroad industry. By 1950 the ratio of truck to train ton-miles was 20 percent, twice that of two years earlier. Roadway began to stress its less-than-truckload service in the early 1950s. The price charged per pound shipped was sometimes three or more times the cost of a full load, and the flexibility of the service improved the chances of a return load.
Business boomed, and Roadway needed to establish a broader terminal network. The company’s excellent financial record helped Galen Roush convince Chase Manhattan Bank to loan Roadway millions of dollars for expansion. Trucking companies were previously poorly regarded by most financiers. By 1956 Roadway’s fleet and terminal expansion program had progressed to the point where Roadway no longer used owner-operators at all.
In 1956 Carroll Roush, the younger of the two founding brothers, decided to sell his interest in Roadway. He was barely speaking with his brother, Galen, and in a move designed at least in part to annoy him, Carroll sold his shares to the public for about $5 million. Traveling west, he bought ONC Fast Freight, which later became a part of ROCOR International.
In the late 1950s and 1960s, Galen Roush set out to expand the terminal network. Population centers were spreading out, and trucking needed to be less centered around big cities. The greater number of terminals allowed decentralized service. Roadway Express expanded its network from 60 terminals in 1958 to 135 in 1968.
At the same time, Roadway instituted the most sophisticated accounting procedures in the industry, which were the brainchild of cost accountant John L. Tormey. The company could identify profit and loss by route, commodity, weight bracket, and individual customer. As the company expanded rapidly, it was able to focus on profitable business and easily control costs. Roadway truckers continued to haul less-than-truckload shipments and produce higher profit margins. Each terminal was a profit-and-loss center, and aggressive managers were enriched with hefty bonuses.
New Horizons in the 1970s and 1980s
Roadway’s expansion during the 1960s required heavy borrowing, but the decision to risk the debt paid off later. The loans were paid off by the 1970s, and cash flow was high. Meanwhile Roadway’s competitors were still heavily burdened. When the recession hit in 1974–75, this financial strength kept Roadway in the leading position in the industry despite the economic hard times. Roadway’s return on investment averaged 20 percent a year in the early 1970s. Direct coverage grew to 40 states in the mid-1970s, and the company became a transcontinental carrier in 1977.
In 1980 deregulation of rates and services opened new avenues for motor carriers. This gave Roadway Express the opportunity to expand into new areas of business, but at the same time, the company faced new challenges from competitors. While other trucking companies slashed prices to attract customers, Roadway marketed itself as the high-quality carrier with the widest geographic coverage, and clung to its high margins. By 1982, however, with revenues slipping, Roadway chose to discount its prices. The company had fallen to third in market share, surpassed by Yellow Freight and Consolidated Freightways. Realizing the need to step out of the shadows and reassert its position, Roadway launched its first advertising campaign in history.
After the initial shock of deregulation settled, Roadway embarked on a campaign of acquisition and new services. In 1982 a holding company, Roadway Services, Inc., was set up with Roadway Express as its chief operating subsidiary. In 1984 Roadway Services acquired Spartan Express, Inc.; Nationwide Carriers, Inc.; and Roberts Express, Inc. Spartan Express, Roadway’s first acquisition, operated as a short-haul carrier in the South. Unlike Roadway Express, Spartan handled shipments with 24- and 48-hour service requirements. Nationwide Carriers specialized in irregular route truckload shipments throughout the continental United States. Nationwide hauled dry freight, temperature-controlled freight, and freight requiring flatbed transport. Roberts Express specialized in critical or fragile shipments needing special handling or speedy delivery.
In 1985 Roadway’s earnings dipped for the first time in 32 years. Conversion of Roadway’s truck fleet to twin trailers and start-up costs of a new unit were the chief reasons. The new subsidiary, Roadway Package System (RPS), got a slow start, but became a transportation success story in the 1980s.
RPS set out to take a piece of the $12 billion small-package surface delivery business, then dominated by United Parcel Service (UPS). RPS concentrated on business-to-business delivery of packages of up to 100 pounds, and implemented some innovative procedures to keep costs down. By selling or leasing RPS trucks to independent owner-operators, the company cut labor costs to 60 percent of UPS’s while giving each driver a personal stake in efficient service.
It took three years and $103 million in investments before RPS showed a profit, but considering the scale of the start-up, it was an impressive accomplishment. By 1988 the subsidiary boasted 130 terminals, and geographic coverage of 70 percent of the United States. By 1990, 147 terminal facilities served 42 states. While UPS had 20 times the revenue of RPS, Roadway’s subsidiary had carved a healthy niche out of a growing segment. RPS contributed one-fourth of Roadway Services’s profits in 1989. Growth prospects looked excellent.
Roadway’s mission is to contribute to customer success and satisfaction by providing reliable, responsive, and efficient service. Its principal product is LTL (less-than-truckload) transportation on two-day and longer lanes within North America, and on international lanes to and from North America.
Roadway Services, meanwhile, continued to seek less-than-truckload carriers that would complement its existing geographic coverage. In 1988 Roadway acquired Viking Freight, the largest regional carrier in the western United States. Viking had two operating subsidiaries: Viking Freight System, a regional LTL carrier, and VFS Transportation, an irregular-route truckload carrier. Viking was almost alone among carriers in being nonunion.
In 1989 Roadway closed its Nationwide Carriers subsidiary. Nationwide had been unprofitable despite reorganization. The Roadway Express unit struggled with discounted rates in the later 1980s, but successfully held its position against smaller carriers. In 1987 a New York City trucking firm, Lifschutz Fast Freight Inc., filed suit against trucking’s big three—Yellow Freight, Roadway Services, and Consolidated Freightways—charging predatory pricing and conspiracy to restrain trade and free competition in certain segments of the industry. The suit sought $598 million in damages. Lifshutz lost his case, but appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court. When the Supreme Court finally declined to hear the case in 1993, the big three trucking firms had spent more than $6 million in refuting the charges made by Lifshutz.
Competition from the railroad industry also grew fierce as the 1980s closed. Threatened by the prospect of bigger double and triple trailers hauling freight on highways, railroad lobbyists launched campaigns painting a grim picture of motor carriers’ safety standards. When one such group, the Coalition for Reliable and Safer Highways (CRASH), used a photo of a Roadway Express truck accident at government hearings in California, Roadway’s chairman Joseph Clapp objected, citing Roadway’s top safety record. Competition between railroaders and truckers promised to become increasingly heated in the 1990s.
Changes in the 1990s
In March 1990 Roadway’s Roberts Express unit launched a European subsidiary, Roberts Express, B.V., headquartered in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The subsidiary offered Roberts’s traditional services in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Germany. Roadway Express in 1990 set up a Mexican subsidiary, Roadway Bodegas y Consolidación, and expanded operations in Canada.
As Roadway Services entered the 1990s, its various units showed mixed results, although as a whole the company continued to expand. Roadway Express increased revenues and profits. Spartan Express was divided into two geographic divisions in 1988 but remained unprofitable; in 1990 it became a subsidiary of Viking Freight. Roberts Express’s growth was good, but less than expected. RPS and Viking Freight both performed well, but the latter’s VFS Transportation subsidiary did not, and was closed down in 1990. The surface transportation industry was in for some turmoil, as railroads promised to fight for their space, and as air transport became more competitive. Roadway had dropped its image as a stodgy company, and no longer hesitated to step into the public eye as had been characteristic of the company from its founding through the 1970s. The change at Roadway Services was characteristic of the industry as a whole, illustrated by the fact that in 1991 the Dow Jones transportation averages added Roadway Services as one of the key indicators of the industry’s overall performance.
A depressed economy and the pressure of low-cost competitors kept prices down for Roadway in 1991. Its two major competitors, Yellow and Consolidated Freightways, both announced price increases that year. But when Roadway declared that it would not hike its rates, the other two companies backed down. The whole LTL industry was operating with very narrow profit margins. In this environment, Roadway Express found that it was competing with its sibling companies for resources from parent Roadway Services.
Nevertheless, Roadway pressed for expansion. It began offering services to 20 countries in Europe in 1991, and opened export services to the Middle East two years later. It also extended its reach to 24 ports in the Pacific Rim. Much of its international business was shipped from North American origins to port cities, and then to England. From the English distribution site, cargo went on to further ports. Roadway developed an advanced internet tracking system to handle its international shipping.
Roadway Express differed from the newer companies that had come under the wing of Roadway Systems in that it was unionized. The Teamsters Union had negotiated salaries and benefits for their workers that were up to 30 percent more than non-union companies were paying. In 1994 the Teamsters called a strike at Roadway Express that lasted for 24 days. The union was trying to resolve issues of job security and the use of part-time labor. The strike put the Roadway Express in the red for $68 million for that quarter, and the company felt the effects for at least the next year.
So when Roadway Systems announced in August, 1995, that it was spinning off its principal subsidiary, analysts suspected that the company was trying to ditch its unprofitable unionized member. Roadway Systems changed its name to Caliber System, Inc., and moved out of the old Akron headquarters. Its components were then Roadway Package System, its small-package carrier; Roadway Global Air, its air and freight package carrier; and a group of small, non-union regional carriers including Roberts Express and Viking Freight. Roadway Express spun off as a debt-free company, with its own stock, listed on NASDAQ. Its revenues at the time of the spin-off were approximately $2.2 billion, and it served around 500,000 customers worldwide.
The expectation among trucking analysts seemed to be that Caliber would prosper, and Roadway Express might well go under. Its unionized workforce was seen as a huge disadvantage, and Caliber’s newer companies were expected to prevail. Instead the opposite happened. A year after the spin-off, Roadway announced profits of $21.8 million. Under its new organization, the company had taken measures to cut costs considerably, closing more than a hundred of its shipping terminals and saving on administrative costs by dividing its operations into four regional units instead of five. Roadway’s CEO, Michael Wickham, went to Teamsters headquarters and outlined a plan for cooperation between workers and management that would keep the company competitive. Wickham kept costs down without asking for monetary concessions from the union, and, as a result, got an extremely loyal workforce. Turnover at Roadway was less than three percent annually, while it was not unusual for similar firms to have turnover of close to 100 percent. Roadway did not need to expend resources recruiting and training, and that in itself translated into untold savings for the company.
Roadway seemed poised for greater success free of its holding company. In 1997 Roadway spent $15 million to acquire a Canadian trucking firm, Reimer Express Lines. It expanded its access to Asia by launching Asian Roadway Express, and it released a new computerized tracking system that allowed its agents worldwide quicker access to shipping information. In April 1998 Roadway reached agreement with the Teamsters on a new five-year contract. The contract offered a slight wage and benefit increase, but its longevity was considered its best feature. The five-year span promised a period of stability for both company and workers.
Reimer Express Lines, Ltd. (Canada); Roadway Express BV (The Netherlands); Roadway Express Inc. (Canada); Roadway Express International, Inc.; Roadway Express Special Services, Inc.; TNL-Roadway SA de CV (Mexico); Transcontinental Lease SA de CV (Mexico).
Adams, David, “Non-Union Employees Suffer Brunt of Teamsters Strike as Layoffs Mount,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, April 24, 1994, p. 04240085.
Briggs, Jean A., “Easing into High Gear,” Forbes, August 31, 1981.
“Doing It the Hard Way,” Forbes, December 1, 1975.
Hannon, Kerry, “Shifting Gears,” Forbes, December 11, 1989.
Hoffman, Kurt, “Spinning Off and Cutting Loose,” Distribution, November 1995, p. 85.
James, Robert P., “Supreme Court Ends Lifschutz’s Six-Year Crusade Against Big Three,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, December 5, 1993, p. 12050061.
Lazo, Shirley, “Trucker Declares Its First Payout,” Barron’s, April 15, 1996, p. 41.
Mathew, Anna Wilde, and Glenn Burkins, “Teamsters Reach Tentative Agreement with Truckers on a Five-Year Contract,” Wall Street Journal, February 10, 1998, p. A2.
Moore, Janet, “Akron-Based Roadway Express Completes Phase-In Export Service to Middle East,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, December 28, 1993, p. 12280112.
“Nation’s LTL Carriers Back Down on July Rate Increases,” Traffic Management, July 1991, p. 16.
“The No. 1 Trucker Joins a Price-Cutting Convoy,” Business Week, February 8, 1982.
Russell, John, “A Year Later, Spinoff Roadway Express Surpasses Parent Caliber Systems,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, February 23, 1997, p. 223B0942.
——, “Roadway Earnings Get Boost from Economy, UPS Strike,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, October 1, 1997, p. 1001B1080.
Salpukas, Agis, “A Whole Lot of Shaking Going On,” New York Times, May 5, 1991, p. F5.
—Thomas M. Tucker
—updated by A. Woodward
"Roadway Express, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 13, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/roadway-express-inc
"Roadway Express, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved November 13, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/roadway-express-inc
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.