Feynman, Richard Phillips
FEYNMAN, RICHARD PHILLIPS
physics, quantum theory, particle physics, science teaching.
Feynman was one of the most creative and influential physicists of the twentieth century. A veteran of the Manhattan Project of World War II and a 1965 Nobel laureate in physics, he made lasting contributions across many domains, from electrodynamics and quantum theory to nuclear and particle physics, solid-state physics, and gravitation. He also became a famous public persona. Several of his popular books—including two collections of autobiographical stories, telling of his lifelong love of playing bongo drums, puzzling through scientific mysteries, and distrusting authority figures—became runaway best sellers. Over his career—cut short after a long battle with cancer—Feynman produced 125 scientific articles and books, several of which remain at the forefront of modern physics.
Early Years . Feynman grew up in Far Rockaway, in the Queens section of New York City. His father, Melville, who harbored an interest in science, helped inspire young Richard with trips to museums, nature walks, the purchase of an Encyclopedia Britannica, and more. Melville was in the garment business—he sold uniforms to police officers, postal workers, and the like—and he taught Richard never to takeformal authority too seriously; he had, after all, seen the important figures before they acquired their fancy uniforms. Melville and his wife, Lucille Phillips, raised their two children (Richard and his younger sister, Joan) in the tradition of reformed Judaism, although religion never played a large role in Richard Feynman’s life.
Feynman raced through New York City’s public schools, teaching himself algebra and soon calculus, even inventing his own idiosyncratic notation to streamline his calculations. He entered the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1935 to begin his undergraduate studies. By his sophomore year Feynman was already enrolling in graduate-level courses in theoretical physics. He soon fell in with an equally precocious friend and study partner, Theodore (Ted) Welton. Together, Feynman and Welton dived into quantum mechanics, physicists’ bizarre yet successful description of the atomic domain, and general relativity, Albert Einstein’s notoriously difficult theory of gravitation. While still an undergraduate, Feynman published a brief letter to the editor of Physical Review with one of his professors, Manuel Vallarta, on the scattering of cosmic rays by interstellar magnetic fields. He also worked on a senior thesis with the renowned solid-state theorist John Clarke Slater, which resulted in an article of Feynman’s own, “Forces in Molecules,” published in Physical Review in 1939. This work treated the problem of molecular forces from a thoroughly quantum-mechanical point of view, arriving at a simple means of calculating the energy of a molecular system that continues to guide quantum chemists.
From MIT, Feynman went to Princeton University, in New Jersey, to pursue his PhD, starting in 1939. With the United States still trapped in the Great Depression, Feynman’s father worried that his son might not be able to find a job after all his fancy schooling. Princeton also had concerns: in those days, the physics department scrutinized every applicant of Jewish background who professed a desire to study theoretical physics, fearing that the field (if not the department) already had more than its fair share—a practice that faded soon after World War II. Undaunted, Feynman began his graduate studies and immediately impressed his young mentor, John Archibald Wheeler, who had arrived at Princeton himself, as an assistant professor, only the previous year.
Together with Wheeler, Feynman explored the ins and outs of electrodynamics. Since the middle of the nineteenth century, physicists had thought about electric and magnetic forces in terms of fields—wavelike entities extended throughout space that could act on charged particles and affect their motion. Wheeler and Feynman explored a radical alternative: what if fields did not exist, and all electrodynamic interactions arose from direct forces between particles? To make their equations yield the familiar (and well-tested) results, they needed to include two different types of interactions: “retarded,” which took into account the time required for an effect to propagate from one location to another, and “advanced,” effects that arrived at their destination before they had been emitted. Wheeler and Feynman demonstrated that the latter, while certainly paradoxical, behaved in a mathematically self-consistent manner. In a related line of thinking, Wheeler and Feynman realized that positrons—the antimatter cousins to electrons, bearing the same mass but the opposite electric charge—could be thought of as electrons traveling backward in time. In both cases, Feynman pushed particles to the forefront, rather than fields, picturing the particles’ zigzagging paths through space and time—an approach that he would continue to hone throughout his career. Feynman completed his PhD in 1942 and immediately married his high school sweetheart, Arline Green-baum, over his parents’ strenuous objections. (Arline suffered from tuberculosis.)
War Work . War was clearly on the horizon as Feynman finished his undergraduate studies in 1939; just three months after he graduated from MIT, Germany invaded Poland and World War II broke out in Europe. A college friend of his had already joined the Army Signal Corps, and Feynman thought seriously about joining, too. As Feynman later recalled, however, the army had not yet established any means by which scientifically trained people could contribute their special skills, so he elected to begin graduate studies at Princeton rather than basic training at an army boot camp. Two years later, in the midst of his studies, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and the United States entered the war. The surprise attack sent American defense efforts into high gear.
For years, a small, secret group of scientists in the United States had been studying whether it might be feasible to create a weapon using nuclear fission, the process by which large atomic nuclei can be split apart, releasing large amounts of energy. (Unbeknownst to these scientists, similar groups were also studying the issue in Great Britain, Germany, the Soviet Union, and Japan.) Immediately after Pearl Harbor, this sleepy commission was transformed into what would become the largest scientific and technical project the world had ever seen: the Manhattan Project. A young physics professor at Princeton, Robert Wilson, was among the earliest recruits for the top-secret project. He, in turn, convinced many members of the department—graduate students and faculty alike—to join him in the effort to design and build nuclear bombs. When Wilson approached Feynman with a cryptic message (no one was allowed to speak openly about the secret project), asking Feynman if he would join, the latter at first refused. A few hours later, Feynman changed his mind—the thought of Adolf Hitler acquiring nuclear weapons before the Allies did was too frightening—and so by that afternoon he was hard at work trying to figure out how to separate the fissionable variant of uranium (U-235) from the much more common species (U-238). At the age of twenty-three, he had joined the war effort.
Late in 1938 the Berlin chemists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann had detected fission of uranium nuclei; the surprising effect was first explained in terms of the physics of nuclear particles by Hahn’s former colleague, theoretical physicist Lise Meitner, and her nephew, Otto Robert Frisch, while vacationing in Sweden. (Meitner, an Austrian Jew, had been forced to flee Berlin just weeks before, after the Nazis annexed Austria.) The vast majority of naturally occurring uranium has an atomic mass of 238 (92 protons and 146 neutrons). These common nuclei are quite stable. A rare isotope, however, of atomic mass 235 (92 protons but only 143 neutrons), is highly susceptible to fission. The question Wilson posed to Feynman (and, indeed, the question on many scientists’ minds by this time) was how to separate the fissionable U-235 from the garden-variety U-238. The two types of nuclei could not be separated by chemical means; in any chemical reaction, U-235 and U-238 would behave in exactly the same way. Some physical means, exploiting the tiny mass difference, was needed. Several ideas had been advanced—some called for using powerful magnets to whip the uranium nuclei around in circles, during which time the heavier nuclei would move along slightly different paths than the lighter ones; others envisioned heating a uranium gas so that the molecules containing the lighter nuclei would drift down a chamber slightly more quickly than the heavier ones, and so on. Feynman’s first assignment was to assess the theoretical feasibility of these separation procedures and to brainstorm for other possibilities.
The Manhattan Project grew quickly; by war’s end, it had incorporated more than 125,000 people working at more than thirty sites throughout the United States and Canada. Central among these were huge, top-secret factory towns set up in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and in Hanford, Washington, and a brand-new laboratory established in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Oak Ridge specialized in separating the uranium nuclei (using, in the end, both the electromagnetic and the gaseous diffusion methods). Hanford took on a different task: building enormous nuclear reactors to turn ordinary uranium nuclei (U-238) into a still heavier and more fissionable nucleus, plutonium (Pu), which contained 94 protons and 145 neutrons. The Los Alamos laboratory worked on the design and production of fission bombs.
Feynman arrived at Los Alamos early in 1943, while the laboratory was still under construction. He joined the theoretical physics division, or T-division, led by Hans Bethe. Feynman’s job now was to figure out some way to calculate how neutrons would behave in various bomb configurations. In principle, the task seemed straightforward: a single starter neutron, if injected into a critical mass of fissionable material (such as uranium enriched with additional U-235), could trigger a chain reaction. The initiator neutron would split one uranium nucleus; among the detritus would be, on average, about two new neutrons released when the original nucleus split apart. Each of these newly released neutrons could split additional uranium nuclei, releasing more neutrons, and so on. Every time a nucleus split, it released energy as well as more neutrons (as Meitner and Frisch had first worked out). Simple in principle, the real mechanisms of neutron scattering, absorption, fission, and release proved remarkably difficult to calculate for any realistic design.
Feynman broke the problem into constituent parts: a given neutron had a certain probability to fly out of the region containing fissionable material altogether, without causing any nuclear reactions; it had a different probability to collide once with a nucleus and be absorbed, ending its usefulness; it had a still distinct probability of colliding and inducing fission; and so on. Moreover, the new neutrons released upon fission would come out with varying speeds and energies, which would affect their likelihood for undergoing various types of reactions later on. Feynman built up powerful calculational techniques to sum over all of these possibilities, a step-by-step accounting scheme that could help the physicists understand how neutrons would diffuse throughout a typical bomb assembly. He quickly impressed both the lab’s scientific director, theoretical physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer, and the T-division leader, Bethe. By early 1944 Feynman had been promoted to be a group leader within T-division, making him the youngest group leader in all of Los Alamos.
Feynman’s other main task during the war was to serve as a safety inspector for Oak Ridge. Engineers and architects at Oak Ridge had designed storage facilities for the enriched uranium. Oppenheimer deputized Feynman to inspect the Oak Ridge facilities and determine whether or not they were safe. This task, like his main job back at Los Alamos, ultimately came down to understanding how neutrons would behave in and around fissionable material. The original Oak Ridge plans looked safe until Feynman realized that any accident—a tub of enriched uranium spilling near other containers, or worse yet, a flood in one of the containment rooms, which would slow down any itinerant neutrons and make them more likely to induce fission—could lead to disastrous explosions and deadly levels of radioactivity. Although skeptical at first, the leadership at Oak Ridge heeded Feynman’s warnings and redesigned their storage facilities.
Like many other scientists at Los Alamos, Feynman often chafed at the laboratory’s military supervision. He delighted in sending coded messages back and forth with his wife, who was staying in a sanatorium for tuberculosis patients near Los Alamos, to taunt the laboratory’s censors. (Arline died in July 1945, a few days before the first test detonation of a fission bomb in the so-called Trinity test.) He also learned how to crack safes, surreptitiously testing codes to a given safe’s combination lock while its owner was distracted. Both activities provided Feynman a way to rebuff what he regarded as stifling military discipline at the laboratory.
Quantum Theory . As the war was ending and Allied victory looked more and more secure, physics departments across the country began jockeying to hire Feynman. In the end, he turned down several attractive offers and followed his wartime boss, Bethe, back to Bethe’s home department at Cornell University in upstate New York. At Cornell, Feynman perfected his approach to quantum theory, melding several of his prewar insights with the more pragmatic, numbers-driven approach he had honed during the war.
One of his first tasks was to publish a long article, based on his dissertation, that presented a brand-new approach to quantum mechanics. Published in 1948 under the title, “Space-Time Approach to Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics” in the journal Reviews of Modern Physics, his lengthy article focused on the “Lagrangian” function for a particle, a particular combination of kinetic and potential energy familiar from classical mechanics. The probability that a quantum object would travel from one location, x1, at a time t1, to some other location, x2, at a later time t2, Feynman showed, could be calculated by summing over—that is, integrating—all of the possible paths through space and time that connected these two end points. The contribution of each path to the total would be weighted by its classical Lagrangian function evaluated along that path; hence, the technique became known as path integrals. The main difference from the standard formalism lay not in outcomes, but in conceptual approach. Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr had argued vehemently during the 1920s that quantum mechanics spelled the end for any type of visualization of the atomic domain. Feynman countered with an intuitive approach, built around picturing the paths of particles through space and time.
His greatest success came on the heels of this path-integral approach. He returned to the problems of quantum electrodynamics (QED), physicists’ quantum-mechanical description of electric and magnetic forces. QED had been developed during the late 1920s and the 1930s by many of the discipline’s greatest theorists—Paul Dirac, Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Pascual Jordan, and many others. Yet as these greats had discovered, the equations of QED suffered from a dramatic sickness. When
pushed beyond the lowest approximation, they routinely broke down, yielding infinity rather than any finite predictions. After the war, Feynman tackled the problem diagrammatically. He began doodling simple space-time pictures to help keep track of the morass of separate algebraic terms that littered any given QED calculation. With a more effective accounting scheme, Feynman hoped, it would be easier to assess precisely where the equations broke down and the infinities sneaked in.
He began with the problem of electron scattering: why, on the quantum-mechanical level, two objects with the same electric charge repel each other. At the lowest order of approximation, Feynman pictured the scattering as in Figure 2. An electron came in from the lower right, while a second electron approached it from lower left. At some point, the right-side electron shot out a force-carrying particle, called a photon, or quantum, of light. Having given up some of its energy and momentum to the photon, this electron would recoil backward, much like a hunter upon firing a rifle. Hence it would veer off toward the top right. A little while later, the photon would strike into the second electron. This left-side electron would absorb the photon and its momentum, getting knocked off its course and heading toward the top left.
Feynman designed his diagram to stand in, one-forone, for the accompanying equation. For every leg of an electron’s motion, he plugged in a specific mathematical function (which gave the likelihood for an electron to travel, unperturbed, from one location to another). He plugged in a distinct function for every wavy photon line. Every “vertex,” or place within a diagram at which an electron line and a photon line met, corresponded to yet a different mathematical function (giving the likelihood for an electron to emit or absorb a photon). The diagram thus functioned, for Feynman, both as a picture of a specific physical process and as a clever mnemonic or bookkeeping device, helping him wade through QED’s famously complex calculational thickets.
The single-photon case had been easy enough to calculate even without Feynman’s diagrams. The real payoff came when considering more complicated scenarios. Quantum mechanically, the two incoming electrons could trade any number of photons back and forth—2 photons, 3 photons, 67 photons, 9,400,083 photons—and, at least in principle, every one of these possibilities had to be included in the overall calculation. The algebra became exponentially more protracted for every additional photon in the mix. Even the next-simplest level of approximation had proven tricky without Feynman’s diagrams. There were nine distinct ways the two electrons could trade just two photons back and forth. It had become frustratingly common to confuse or, worse, to omit some of these terms when working with the algebra alone. Feynman demonstrated that the various possibilities could be distinguished easily by their separate diagrams. Then their corresponding equations could be built up, piece by piece, just as the original term had been, by swapping in the appropriate mathematical expressions for every electron line, photon line, and vertex. Sure enough, when the dust settled from this extended calculation, Feynman showed that some of the infinities that had cropped up separately in several of these expressions exactly canceled each other out, leaving a finite number behind.
Feynman refined his diagrammatic approach over the course of 1947 and 1948. He first presented the new scheme at an elite, by-invitation-only conference in rural Pennsylvania in the spring of 1948—a presentation that went rather poorly. Few attendees had any idea what Feynman was doing at the blackboard, or how his strange-looking doodles fit in with the general tenets of quantum theory. Within months of the disappointing presentation, however, the younger generation of theoretical physicists began to pick up on Feynman diagrams, thanks especially to the tireless efforts of Feynman’s protégé, Freeman Dyson. Dyson had learned Feynman’s tricks while a graduate student at Cornell, and he quickly provided critical clarifications and powerful extensions. Dyson and Feynman each published a pair of influential articles on the new techniques in Physical Review during 1949.
Over the next two decades, Feynman’s diagrammatic approach revolutionized nearly every branch of theoretical physics, from QED to nuclear and particle physics, solid-state theory, and even gravitation. He won the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics for this work (sharing the award with Julian Schwinger and Shin’ichiro Tomonaga). Of all Feynman’s many contributions, his diagrams have remained his greatest scientific legacy, changing the way most physicists think about the microworld.
Soon after Feynman had perfected his diagrammatic approach, the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena lured Feynman away from Cornell. He moved to Caltech in 1950 and remained there for the rest of his career. Two years after he moved, he married Mary Louise Bell, whom he had first met at Cornell. The relationship quickly soured, and they divorced in 1956. Among Bell’s complaints: his drumming was too loud and his head was constantly lost in calculus problems, morning, noon, and night. In 1960 Feynman married Gweneth Howarth in what proved to be a far more successful relationship: they remained together until his death in 1988.
More and more during this period, the problems that Feynman worked on came from solid-state theory. He became especially interested in liquid helium. At ordinary temperatures and pressures, helium exists as a gas; but at extremely low temperatures (a few degrees above absolute zero), helium becomes a liquid—indeed, a liquid with strange properties. Liquid helium displays superfluidity, that is, it flows with no viscosity or friction at all (unlike ordinary liquids). The phenomenon had been discovered
experimentally during the 1930s, and the great Russian theorist Lev Landau had provided a successful phenomenological description during the 1940s. Feynman brought his newest tools to bear on the problem—path integrals and Feynman diagrams—to explain superfluidity on a rigorously quantum-mechanical basis. In addition to the particle-like quantum excitations that had been studied, Feynman realized that a new quantum effect also played a role: the formation of quantum vortices. Once again his intuitive, pictorial approach proved successful.
Particle Physics . By the mid-1950s, Feynman’s interests had returned to his original passion: high-energy physics. Since his triumph with QED, the field had moved on to a series of new conundrums. Among them loomed the nature of nuclear forces. One type of force, dubbed the “weak force,” led nuclei to decay, as in radioactivity. Although weak-force phenomena had been well studied for decades, a big shock came in the late 1950s, when experiments confirmed some theoretical speculations about the symmetries obeyed by this nuclear force. Until that time, most physicists simply assumed that the weak force obeyed parity; that is, reversing all spatial coordinates from plus (right-handed) to minus (left-handed) and vice versa would leave the underlying physics unchanged. Not so, as new experiments confirmed in 1957: the weak force violated parity. Nature was not ambidextrous after all.
Feynman had tentatively suggested as early as 1956 that the parity symmetry had been assumed but not really proven for the weak interactions. Two young theorists, Chen-Ning Yang and Tsung-Dao Lee—both working at the fabled Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey—picked up on Feynman’s suggestion and showed that, indeed, neither experiment nor theory compelled the weak force to obey parity. Soon after parity violation had been confirmed experimentally, Feynman developed a first-principles description of the weak force, one that incorporated this basic handedness from the start.
By this time, nearly all physicists assumed that the weak force, much like the other fundamental forces, arose from the exchange of certain particles (just as the electromagnetic force arose, at the quantum-mechanical level, from the exchange of photons, as described by QED). The question remained: what types of particles carried the weak force, and what were the means by which these force-carriers coupled with other types of matter? At a conference of high-energy physicists in 1957, Feynman suggested that the weak force might arise from a particular combination of couplings: part vector coupling and part axial vector, or V - A. (These designations refer to the behavior of the particles’ interactions under special-relativity transformations.)
Around the same time, Murray Gell-Mann— Feynman’s younger colleague and friendly rival at Caltech—arrived at the same conclusion. Rather than see his two star theorists devolve into a messy priority dispute, Caltech’s physics department chair, Robert Bacher, wisely suggested that Feynman and Gell-Mann publish an article together. Their paper, titled “Theory of the Fermi Interaction, arrived at Physical Review in September 1957, just days before another pair of theorists—the University of Rochester’s Robert Marshak and his graduate student, E. C. George Sudarshan—presented a similar theory at a conference in Italy. (In fact, Marshak and Sudarshan had visited with Gell-Mann in California a few months earlier, while Feynman was vacationing in Brazil.) Feynman often considered this work to be his greatest success: for the first time, he had discovered a genuine law of nature.
With the weak force conquered, many high-energy physicists turned their attention to a distinct nuclear force, known as the “strong” force. An attractive force between nuclear particles, the strong force was assumed to bind protons and neutrons together inside atomic nuclei. By the mid-1960s, Gell-Mann (and, independently, the theorist George Zweig) had postulated that protons and neutrons themselves had inner parts; Gell-Mann dubbed them quarks. With the introduction of quarks, the nature of the strong force shifted: now it was assumed to operate directly between constituent quarks, binding them together to make stable protons and neutrons; only secondarily did it give rise to attractive forces between these composite particles.
Many physicists were skeptical of the quark idea at first—was this, they wondered, just opening up an unending series of stacked Russian dolls, one layer hiding within the next? By the late 1960s a team of experimenters from Stanford University and MIT began trying to find evidence of structure within nuclear particles. They bombarded protons with high-energy electrons provided by the new, 2-kilometer-long Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. If protons were really elementary particles, then the electrons should scatter with a characteristic pattern. If, instead, some substructure lurked within the protons, the effects of these miniscule hard scattering centers should show up in the directions along which the electrons careened after scattering.
Most theorists assumed that calculating how the electrons would scatter if protons really did possess substructure would remain simply intractable. The strong force, after all, was in fact strong, and hence most of the tricks that theorists had learned from Feynman’s and others’ work on weaker forces would no longer apply. With weak forces, such as QED and the weak nuclear force, theorists could break a problem down into a long series of approximations, each more complicated step ultimately contributing less, numerically, to the overall result. Not so with the strong force.
Feynman approached the problem differently. With his characteristically visual approach, he imagined how a proton would look to a high-speed electron. From the electron’s point of view, the proton would be flattened like a pancake, thanks to the relativistic effect of length contraction. Moreover, if tiny particles did live inside protons—Feynman remained agnostic about Gell-Mann’s quarks, referring to the sub-proton particles as simply “partons,” that is, parts of a proton—then the strong forces between them would appear to act on a very slow timescale as far as the onrushing electron was concerned, owing to relativistic time dilation. So instead of seeing a horrible mess of closely packed partons teeming with the constant exchange of force-carrying particles, the electron would in effect see a handful of independent partons more or less sitting still—a far easier situation to analyze. Feynman’s parton ideas helped a young Stanford theorist, James Bjorken, finalize quantitative studies of the electrons’ scattering off of protons. Armed with Feynman’s theoretical simplification, the experimentalists’ data and Bjorken’s analyses helped convince most physicists that protons and neutrons really did contain smaller particles within them. By the mid-1970s, physicists had reconciled Feynman’s partons with Gell-Mann’s quarks.
Feynman’s other major contribution to high-energy theory concerned gravitation. Albert Einstein completed his general theory of relativity—his renowned theory of gravity—in 1915. To Einstein, gravity was nothing other than geometry: the warping of space and time accounted for how objects moved; “force” played no role at all. After a string of successes, Einstein’s elegant theory had fallen from most physicists’ attention by the 1930s, displaced by the new quantum theory, nuclear physics, and more. Feynman was among the handful of physicists who returned to the topic during the late 1950s. But where Einstein had banished force from his account of gravitation, Feynman put the notion of force—pictured, as he did the other physical forces, in terms of the exchange of force-carrying particles—center stage. In his reworked account of general relativity, Feynman replaced Einstein’s space-time curvature with a particular set of interactions among gravitons, which traveled along a perfectly smooth, flat background space-time. Though he published little on his new approach, Feynman delivered an influential course at Caltech on the topic in 1962–1963. Soon mimeographed copies of his lecture notes began to circulate widely, helping to inspire a new generation of theorists to think about gravity along these particle-physics lines. Combined with his path-integral approach, Feynman’s suggestive inroads led younger theorists, such as Bryce DeWitt, to make major progress on the topic of quantum gravity—the quest to combine general relativity with quantum mechanics in a self-consistent formulation.
Teaching and Service . Throughout his career, Feynman was a tremendously popular lecturer. Famously animated, he often acted out how electrons, photons, or protons would behave. During the late 1950s he was invited to teach Caltech’s large introductory physics course. In one sense, the course was a flop—even Feynman admitted that he had pitched his material at too advanced a level for the incoming undergraduates. Graduate and postdoctoral students, and even his fellow faculty, on the other hand, found his “elementary” course inspiring. With the aid of two Caltech colleagues, who transcribed his lectures for publication, his “flop” turned into one of the most renowned physics textbooks of all time, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (3 vols., 1963–1965). In later years, Feynman frequently gave informal lectures at nearby industrial laboratories, such as Hughes Aircraft. He also offered a popular class titled “Physics X,” open to anyone with questions about science.
Soon after The Feynman Lectures, Feynman began to publish a series of successful textbooks and popular books. The Character of Physical Law (1965), Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, with Albert R. Hibbs (1965), Photon-Hadron Interactions (1972), and QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1985). Each began as The Feynman Lectures had, with talks by Feynman as transcribed by colleagues. His most famous books, collections of autobiographical anecdotes and aphorisms— “Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” (1985) and What Do YOU Care What Other People Think?(1988)—likewise stemmed from tape-recorded, bongo-playing jam sessions with his friend, Ralph Leighton (the son of one of his Caltech colleagues).
Even as his fame grew, Feynman continued to shun the kinds of worldly, political affairs in which so many of his colleagues engaged. While many of his fellow Los Alamos veterans joined the Federation of Atomic Scientists (later renamed Federation of American Scientists) soon after the war, or the Union of Concerned Scientists twenty-five years later, Feynman famously avoided such groups. Feynman even made a bet with fellow physicist Victor Weisskopf that he would forfeit ten dollars if he ever allowed himself to become saddled with any sort of professional responsibility whatsoever.
Ironically, Feynman’s fame was capped by just such a position of responsibility. In January 1986 the space shuttle Challenger was ripped to pieces about seventy seconds after takeoff. President Ronald Reagan convened a blue-ribbon panel to investigate the disaster, and Feynman reluctantly agreed to join. Frustrated by what he considered the bureaucratic red tape and political niceties that he thought would stymie the commission, Feynman grabbed the spotlight during televised hearings in February 1986. He had been tipped off by an insider that the accident might have stemmed from the effects of cold weather on some O-rings (rubber seals inside the shuttle’s solid-rocket boosters). Waiting for just the right moment when the television cameras were focusing on him, Feynman dipped a piece of O-ring in a glass of ice water and demonstrated how quickly it lost its elasticity. Though the investigation lumbered on for several months, the O-ring explanation finally emerged as the most probable cause. Feynman’s dramatic demonstration fixed him in much of the public’s mind as just the kind of straight-talking, iconoclastic character whom he had described in his autobiographical sketches.
His contribution to the Challenger investigation proved to be his last major work. Two years later he died from kidney failure, a complication arising from his long battle with cancer. He was survived by his wife, Gweneth, and their two children, Carl and Michelle.
The Richard P. Feynman Papers, 1933–1988, at the Institute Archives, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, includes Feynman’s unpublished correspondence, course and lecture notes, talks and presentations, and research notes. Laurie M. Brown, ed., Selected Papers of Richard Feynman, with Commentary (River Edge, NJ: World Scientific, 2000), includes a complete bibliography of Feynman’s writings.
WORKS BY FEYNMAN
“Forces in Molecules.” Physical Review 56 (1939): 340–343.
“Space-Time Approach to Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 20 (1948):367–387.
“The Theory of Positrons.” Physical Review 76 (1949): 749–759.
“Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics.” Physical Review 76 (1949): 769–789.
With Murray Gell-Mann. “Theory of the Fermi Interaction.” Physical Review 109 (1958): 193–198.
With Robert Leighton and Matthew Sands. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. 3 vols. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1963–1965.
The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
“Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!”: Adventures of a Curious Character. New York: W.W. Norton, 1985.
What Do YOU Care What Other People Think?: Further Adventures of a Curious Character. New York: W.W. Norton, 1988.
Selected Papers of Richard Feynman, with Commentary. Edited by Laurie M. Brown. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific, 2000. Reprints many of Feynman’s most significant scientific articles.
Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman. Edited by Michelle Feynman. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
Galison, Peter. “Feynman’s War: Modelling Weapons, Modelling Nature.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics29B (1998): 391–434. A detailed analysis of Feynman’s wartime work and its influence on his later research.
Gleick, James. Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. New York: Pantheon, 1992. The best of several book-length biographies of Feynman, written by an award-winning science journalist.
Kaiser, David. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. A study of how Feynman’s diagrammatic approach entered the physics mainstream.
Schweber, Silvan S. QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. The most thorough analysis of Feynman’s research on electrodynamics and quantum theory.
Sykes, Christopher, ed. No Ordinary Genius: The Illustrated Richard Feynman. New York: W.W. Norton, 1994. Contains interviews and reminiscences from many of Feynman’s colleagues, students, and friends.
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Encyclopedia.com. (July 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/feynman-richard-phillips
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Retrieved July 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/feynman-richard-phillips
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.
Richard Phillips Feynman
Richard Phillips Feynman
Richard Feynman was born on May 11, 1918, in Far Rockaway, a suburb of New York City. He lived there until 1935, when he left to attend the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. After receiving a bachelor's degree in physics in 1939, he went to Princeton University, where he received a Ph.D. in 1942. While at Princeton, Feynman worked on the Manhattan Project, which eventually led him to Los Alamos, New Mexico, in 1943 to work on the atomic bomb. In 1946 he went to Cornell University, where he remained as an associate professor of theoretical physics until 1951. He spent half of that year in Brazil lecturing at the University of Rio and then became a Tolman professor of physics at the California Institute of Technology, where he stayed for more than 30 years. He had three wives and two children, Carl and Michelle.
Solves Problems in the Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics
Feynman's primary contribution to physics was in the field of quantum electrodynamics, which is the study of the interactions of electromagnetic radiation with atoms and with fundamental particles, such as electrons. Because the equations that compose it are applicable to atomic physics, chemistry, and electromagnetism, quantum electrodynamics is one of the most useful tools in understanding physical phenomena.
The field initially grew out of work done by P. Dirac, W. Heisenberg, W. Pauli, and E. Fermi in the late 1920s.
The original theory was constructed by integrating quantum mechanics into classical electrodynamics. It provided a reasonable explanation of the dual wave-particle nature of light by explaining how it was possible for light to behave like a wave under certain conditions and like a particle (a "photon") on other occasions. Dirac in particular introduced a theory that described the behavior of an electron in accordance with both relativity and quantum mechanics. His theory brought together almost everything that was known about particle physics in the 1920s. However, when the principles behind electromagnetic interactions were brought into Dirac's equation, numerous mathematical problems arose: meaningless or infinite answers were obtained when the theory was applied to certain experimental data.
Feynman found a way to bypass, though not solve, these problems. Be redefining the existing value of the charge and the mass of the electron (a process known as "renormalization"), he managed to make the "divergent integrals" irrelevant—these were the terms in the theory which had previously led to meaningless answers. Thus, while some divergent terms still exist in quantum electrodynamics, they no longer enter the calculations of measurable quantities from theory.
The significance of Feynman's contribution is enormous. He gave the theory of quantum electrodynamics a true physical meaning as well as an experimental use. The renormalized values for the electron's charge and mass provide finite, accurate means of measuring electron properties such as magnetic moment. This theory has also made a detailed description of the fine structure of the hydrogen atom possible. It also presents a precise picture of the collisions of electrons, positrons (anti-electrons), and photons in matter.
Feynman was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work in quantum electrodynamics in 1965, together with fellow American Julian Schwinger and Shinichiro Tomonaga of Japan, both of whom had separately developed similar theories, but using different mathematical methods. Feynman's theory was especially distinct from the other two in its use of graphic models to describe the intermediate states that a changing electrodynamic system passes through. These models are known as "Feynman diagrams" and are widely used in the analysis of problems involving pair production, Compton scattering, and many other quantum-electrodynamic problems.
Feynman was fond of using visual techniques to solve problems. In addition to his Feynman diagrams, he developed a method of analyzing MASER (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) devices that relies heavily on creating accurate pictorial representations of the interactions involved. A MASER device is one that uses the natural oscillations of molecules to generate or amplify signals in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum; they are used in radios and amplifiers, among other things. Feynman's method for analyzing these devices greatly simplified and shortened the solutions, as well as brought out the important features of the device much more rapidly.
Feynman also worked on the theory of liquid helium, supporting the work of the Russian physicist L. D. Landau. Landau had shown that below a certain temperature the properties of liquid helium were similar to those of a mixture of two fluids; this is known as the two-fluid model. Feynman showed that a roton, which is a quantity of rotational motion that can be found in liquid helium, is the quantum mechanical equivalent of a rapidly spinning ring whose diameter is almost equal to the distance between the helium atoms in the liquid. This discovery gave Landau's theory a foundation in atomic theory.
Contributes to Knowledge of Quarks
Richard Feynman did work in many other areas of physics, including important work on the theory of Beta-decay, a process whereby the nucleus of a radioactive atom emits an electron, thereby transforming into a different atom with a different atomic number. His interest in the weak nuclear force—which is the force that makes the process of radioactive decay possible—led Feynman and American physicist Murray Gell-Mann to the supposition that the emission of beta-particles from radioactive nuclei acts as the chief agitator in the decay process. As James Gleick explained in Genius, Feynman also contributed to a "theory of partons, hypothetical hard particles inside the atom's nucleus, that helped produce the modern understanding of quarks." Quarks are the most elementary subatomic particles.
Feynman wrote many theoretical physics books which are in use in universities around the country, as well as a series entitled Feynman's Lectures in Physics, which he put together based on several terms of physics lectures he gave at the California Institute of Technology in 1965. The lectures presented a completely revolutionary approach to teaching university physics, providing a valuable resource to all physics majors. He also dabbled in many areas outside of physics, including drumming and drawing.
Feynman received the Albert Einstein Award in 1954, and he was warded the Niels Bohr International Gold Medal in 1973. He was a member of the National Academy of Science and a foreign member of the Royal Society in London.
Explains Why the Shuttle Exploded
In January 1986, the space shuttle Challenge rexploded above Cape Kennedy, Florida. Feynman was named to the 12-member special (Rogers) commission that investigated the accident. When public hearings began in February, the discussion quickly turned toward the effect of cold temperatures on O-rings. These rubber rings seal the joints of the solid rocket boosters on either side of the large external tank that holds the liquid oxygen and hydrogen fuel for the shuttle. Using a glass of ice water, Feynman demonstrated how slowly the O-ring regained its original shape when it was cold. Because of the O-ring's slow reaction time, hot gases had escaped, eroded the ring, and burned a hole in the side of the right solid rocket booster, ultimately causing the explosion of the space craft.
In October 1979, Feynman was diagnosed with Myxoid liposarcoma, a rare cancer that affects the soft tissues of the body. The tumor from the cancer weighed six pounds and was located in the back of his abdomen, where it destroyed his left kidney. Feynman was diagnosed with another cancerous abdominal tumor in October 1987 and died of complications on February 19, 1988.
Feynman wrote two volumes of autobiographical sketches. Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman" (1985) is a collection of anecdotes that gives the reader an excellent sense of Feynman's personality. This was followed by What Do You Care What Other People Think? Further Adventures of a Curious Character (1988). A short biography of him and a slightly more detailed description of the work that led him to the Nobel Prize can be found in Nobel Prizes 1965, published by the Nobel Foundation. The physicist Freeman Dyson's autobiography, Disturbing the Universe (1979), tells about Feynman's method of work. An explanation of elementary particle and quantum physics, including Feynman diagrams, can be found in Douglas C. Gianocoli's Physics (1980). In Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick describes both the nature of the problems with which Feynman dealt and also the ways in which Feynman's solutions differed form those of other physicists. David L. and Judith R. Goodstein describe one of his solutions in Feynman's Lost Lecture: The Motion of Planets Around the Sun (1996).
Gribbin, John and Mary Gribbin, Richard Feynman: A Life in Science (1997).
Jagdish Mehra, The Beat of a Different Drum: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. Oxford University Press, 1994. □
"Richard Phillips Feynman." Encyclopedia of World Biography. . Encyclopedia.com. (July 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/richard-phillips-feynman
"Richard Phillips Feynman." Encyclopedia of World Biography. . Retrieved July 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/richard-phillips-feynman
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
Feynman, Richard Phillips
Richard Phillips Feynman (fīn´mən), 1918–88, American physicist, b. New York City, B.S. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1939, Ph.D. Princeton, 1942. From 1942 to 1945 he worked on the development of the atomic bomb. He taught (1945–50) at Cornell and became professor of theoretical physics at the California Institute of Technology in 1950. The Feynman diagram, proposed by him in 1949, shows the track of a particle in space and time and provides a clear means of describing particle interactions. Feynman also made significant contributions to the theories of superfluidity and quarks. In 1957 he and Murray Gell-Mann proposed the theory of weak nuclear force. Feynman shared the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics with Shinichiro Tomonaga and J. S. Schwinger for work leading to the establishment of the modern theory of quantum electrodynamics. He wrote the influential Feynman Lectures on Physics (commemorative issue, 3 vol., 1990), Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (1994), and Feynman Lectures on Computation (1996).
See his Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985), What Do You Care What Other People Think? (1988), QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1988, repr. 2006), and The Meaning of It All (1998); Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman (2005), ed. by M. Feynman; biographies by J. Gleick (1993), J. Mehra (1994), and L. M. Krauss (2011); C. Sykes, No Ordinary Genius: The Illustrated Richard Feynman (1996); D. L. Goodstein and J. R. Goodstein, Feynman's Lost Lecture (1996); J. Gribbin and M. Gribbin, Richard Feynman (1997); G. J. Milburn, The Feynman Processor (1999).
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Encyclopedia.com. (July 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/feynman-richard-phillips
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Retrieved July 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/feynman-richard-phillips
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
Feynman, Richard Phillips
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." World Encyclopedia. . Encyclopedia.com. (July 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/feynman-richard-phillips
"Feynman, Richard Phillips." World Encyclopedia. . Retrieved July 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/feynman-richard-phillips