Liberation in Indian Philosophy
Liberation in Indian Philosophy
LIBERATION IN INDIAN PHILOSOPHY
The concept of liberation presupposes someone's state of bondage and anticipates the possibility of his or her release into a state of freedom. From the philosophical perspective bondage marks the human predicament of leading a precarious existence in an unstable world. In Indian philosophy the state of bondage is termed saṁsāra (global flow) and understood as a beginningless process of life of beings who are born, die, and are constantly reborn. This process is governed by the eternal law called in mainstream Hinduism sanātana dharma. This expression is multivalent, having several layers of meaning; Indian thinkers regard it as a matrix encompassing reality in its totality. In Buddhism dharma occurs without the attribute "everlasting," but is understood as being beyond time.
The multivalency of sanātana dharma gives it at least three meanings. First, as the eternal law it represents an impersonal force inherent in everything so that reality is orderly rather than chaotic; processes of reality follow the law of cause and effect. Second, the aspect of timelessness of dharma implies the view that even the phenomenal reality has no conceivable beginning and end, but keeps renewing itself in cycles. In other words, the global world process—including the present universe—has no fixed origin, such as a creative act of God, and will never come to an end to be replaced by the eternal "new earth and new heaven" after a day of judgment. Rather, it undergoes periodic renewals: At the beginning of each period the world process starts with the emergence (sṛṣṭi ) of the universe from its hidden dimension into the state of manifestation; in the course of its duration (sthiti ) it evolves to a peak, followed by decline and end in universal dissolution into the unmanifest state (pralaya ) called cosmic night. After a period of latency, the whole process starts again.
The lives of individual beings proceed within this global framework from birth to adulthood, old age, death and rebirth in a never-ending round of saṁsāric existences. During the cosmic night they subsist in a kind of limbo or oblivion. Third, the concept of dharma also refers to the timeless and absolute reality beyond the manifested one; it represents the final goal of religious and philosophical quest equated with the ultimate truth. This truth is eternal, outside time, and independent of the changeable phases of the phenomenal reality manifested within time. The manifestation of the eternal truth or law within the universe dominated by time does not make the world everlasting in the sense of a lineal duration, but provides for its cyclic nature, its recurring rise and fall.
The concept of dharma understood as the absolute truth and ultimate reality has still another connotation—that of consciousness, awareness, or intelligence. Truth makes sense only if it is known. Indian philosophy, unlike Western science, has never conceived of reality without consciousness. Thus, a verse in one of the earliest Indian philosophical texts (1500–1000 BCE), the creation hymn of the Ṛg Veda (10, 129, 4), describes the primordial oneness (tad ekam ) as experiencing desire (kāma ), the earliest seed of its mind (manaso retaḥ ), which led to manifestation. The dimension of consciousness as an inherent quality of reality in its ultimate state evokes two fundamental insights. First, the idea of the ultimate personality (puruṣottama ), albeit an infinite one, conceived as the personality of God, the free agent behind the world process, although not an omnipotent one. Second, it suggests that the individual human consciousness, being an instance of the universal dimension of consciousness, has—despite its present limitations—the potential of grasping reality on the ultimate level: Man has the capability to develop an understanding and vision of the absolute truth. Extricating himself thus from the conditionality of his phenomenal existence and attaining final liberation (mokṣa, mukti ), he enters the timeless dimension of the absolute without having to participate in the world process and undergo repeated incarnations.
While in bondage, he is governed by sanātana dharma in all its aspects. Its aspect of causality operates in human life on a higher level as the law of karma, which is much more complicated than the law of cause and effect in the material universe, yet it can be expressed in the simple saying "as you have sown, so you will reap." Every volitional act in thought, speech, or deed generates a force that produces sooner or later—in one's present life or some future existence—results that shape one's external circumstances and appearance, forming one's character and determining one's fortune. The aspect of timelessness of dharma makes the lives of individual beings in the sequence of reincarnations appear to be without a conceivable beginning and end. However, the aspect of dharma as the timeless and absolute reality beyond the manifested world lends individual beings an affinity with the ultimate truth and the potentiality of realizing it by direct conscious experience, which brings about the termination of their bondage and the attainment of liberation outside time.
This necessitates entering a spiritual path, a training to deepen one's perception of reality up to the point of the final vision. Volitional input is essential for this purpose—as it is also within the karmic process to sow only wholesome deeds to earn future good results. The spiritual path was eventually systematized and became known as yoga.
The previous outline is valid in principle for all schools of Indian philosophy, including the earlier phases of Indian thought before the formation of philosophical systems. Despite the difference in terminology and sophistication of language, the ideas occur even in the oldest strata of Vedic scriptures in mythological guise, although nineteenth-century pioneers of Vedic scholarship failed to recognize them.
The Vedas and UpaniṢads
The Ṛg Veda uses the verb muc (hence mokṣa and mukti ) in the creation myth when the god Indra periodically liberates the cosmic waters (= creative forces) from the clutches of the demon Vṛtra (10, 104, 9; 1, 32, 11; 4, 22, 7), thereby enabling the manifestation of the universe. As to humans, they are subjected to successive lives (anūcīnā jīvitā, 4, 54, 2), so liberation for them means being granted immortality (amṛta, amṛtatva ). It is therefore ardently prayed for: "Lead us to immortality!" (5, 55, 4) "May I be released from death, not reft of immortality!" (7, 59, 12) "Place me in that deathless, undecaying world … make me immortal" (9, 113, 7–11). Certain "long-haired ascetics" (keśins ) even claimed to have won immortality during their lifetime: "Due to our sagehood we have mounted upon the winds, only our bodies do you mortals see" (10, 136, 3). The pleas for immortality show that everlasting life was not automatically granted even if one reached heaven as a result of good deeds (10, 14, 8) and religious fervor (tapas, 10, 54, 2). Repeated death (punarmṛtyu ) lurked even there as is later asserted by Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa (10, 4, 3, 10), so the search for immortality continues.
The ideas of rebirth under cosmic law and liberation from it are subsequently clearly spelled out in the oldest Upaniṣads (700–600 BCE): "One becomes pure by pure actions, bad by bad ones" (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 3, 2, 13), and when one dies, knowledge (vidyā ), deeds (karmāṇi ), and previous experience (pūrva prajñā ) follow one (4, 4, 2). One may live in higher worlds while the merits of one's actions last, but eventually returns to this world (4, 4, 4–6). But one has affinity with the Ultimate; one's inner self (ātman ) is, at bottom, identical with the core of reality (brahman, 4, 4, 5). When one realizes it and can proclaim "I am brahman," one becomes the self of everything, including gods (1, 4, 10), and is freed from reincarnation. Thus, liberation is the result of the direct knowledge of one's inmost self and thereby of the inner essence of everything else brought about by meditational effort (dhyāna ) and by renouncing external desires. Later Upaniṣads started developing methods of acquiring the liberating knowledge, thus foreshadowing the classical system of Yoga.
Two schools of thought and practice outside the Vedic tradition, Jainism and Buddhism, also systematized the path. Both emerged from the circles of wanderers (śramaṇas ) striving for liberation from the round of rebirths by asceticism. In contrast to the Brahmanic tradition, they regarded the state of liberation as beyond description and used the negative term nirvāṇa (blowing-out) for it.
The term used in the teachings of Jina Mahāvīra (599–467 BCE) for individual beings is jīva (animate substance, soul, spirit-monad) or ātman. In its pure form a jīva is perfect, omniscient, eternal, and formless and enjoys unlimited energy and infinite bliss. When he succumbs to the influx (āśrava ) of passions (kaṣāya ) from the phenomenal world of modalities (saṁsāra ), the jīva takes shape, assuming a body born from his actions (karmaṇa-śarīra ), and he loses his perfection and becomes a mundane pilgrim (saṁsāri ) through innumerable forms of life whose quality is determined by the ethical quality of his actions. Good actions secure his temporary well-being in saṁsāra, but do not lead to liberation. Of bad actions injury to life is the most detrimental one. Liberation (mokṣa, mukti, nirvṛti ) is achieved by purging off (nirjarā ) of karmic burdens accumulated by past actions and stopping (saṁvara ) further influxes by renunciation so that the soul rises above involvement in any actions. In the last stages of ascetic practice (tapas ), the abstention from action may involve stopping even intake of food and drink; liberation is reached on the point of death by starvation. If the saṁsāri achieves liberation before death, he becomes a perfect one (siddha ) or a tīrthaṅkara (ford-maker, the teacher of others). Discarnate siddhas in nirvāṇa enjoy four infinite accomplishments: knowledge, vision, strength, and bliss. The Jain elaborate path to liberation shows overlaps with the Buddhist one and with Patañjali's Yoga.
Early Buddhist sources largely abstain from conceptual descriptions of the nature of beings, liberation, and ultimate reality. The Buddha (563–483 BCE) of the Pāli Canon maintained noble silence about such issues and focused pragmatically on analysis of the existential situation of man as it is accessible to everybody's experience and on practical procedures for gaining liberation and direct knowledge of true reality; called awakening or enlightenment (bodhi ), this achievement does not include omniscience as in Jainism. Man's experience of himself is described in terms of five constituent groups of clinging (upādānakkhandhas ):
(1) Bodily awareness or the experience of having a form (rūpa )
(2) Feelings (vedanā ) that are pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral
(3) Perception (saññā ) experienced through six channels—the five senses and the mind, the latter having the function of coordinating the fivefold sensory data into conceptually grasped objects
(4) Inner volitional dynamism described as the group of mental coefficients (saṅkhāras ), such as instincts, urges, desires, wishes, decisions, and aspirations
(5) Consciousness (viññāṇa ) or the direct awareness of being conscious of visual and other sensory objects and of mental images and concepts
None of these constituents represents the inner core, substance, or soul (atta/ātman ) of the personality—they are anatta —and no such core is either postulated or denied. The structural unity of the personality is expressed by the term nāmarūpa (name and form), occasionally also puggala (Sanskrit: pudgala ) or purisa (Sanskrit: puruṣa ); its constituents constantly change, yet its individuality is preserved by its continuity as a process: The Buddha frequently referred to his and others' past lives.
Bondage to the round of births and deaths governed by the laws of karma results from ignorance (avidyā, moha ) of the true nature of reality (dhamma ). Beings are then subject to craving (taṇhā, lobha ) directed to fleeting and basically substanceless pleasurable experiences and develop hate (dosa ) if somebody obstructs their aims. The beginning of the individuals' saṁsāric sojourn cannot be found, but liberation is possible when beings realize its unsatisfactoriness, recognize desire as its cause, understand that renouncing desire will free them from rebirth, and embark on the path toward that final goal.
This is the gist of the Buddha's "four noble truths," the fourth one being the eightfold path of systematic training, the first comprehensive formulation of a liberating technique. On reaching liberation a Buddha's disciple becomes an arahat (worthy one) and is equal to the Buddha in the acquired state of freedom, while the Buddha surpasses him in wisdom, thus enabling him to be the "teacher of gods and men." Individuals who attain liberation on their own without the guidance of a buddha become solitary enlightened ones (paccekabuddhas ), who do not assume a teaching mission. Early Buddhism does not admit descriptions of or speculation about the state of a liberated one (tathāgata ) after death. Here, too, the Buddha maintains "noble silence," expressly denying only the validity of the four alternatives put to him by questioners, namely that he "is," "is not," "both is and is not," and "neither is nor is not." "The final truth (dhamma ) is deep, unfathomable, understood only by the wise" (Majjhima Nikāya 72)—an Enlightened One.
Despite this injunction, speculation did not cease and some Hīnayāna schools of thought, including Theravāda, interpreted the Buddha's description of personality factors (khandhas ) as unsubstantial (anatta ) to mean denial of an inner core or any other feature that would lend individuals identity in successive lives and continuity into nirvāṇa. This was challenged by the Pudgalavāda school, which maintained that personality (pudgala ) as such is as eaqually undefinable as tathāgata and that it is independent of the individual's status, whether bound or liberated, which means that it persists throughout successive lives and into nirvāṇa. This doctrine was adopted by many sects and remained influential for centuries.
Mahāyāna schools of thought do not appear to have had problems with personal continuity. Innumerable tathāgatas are active from within their spheres of influence (buddhakṣetras ), helping beings to liberation, assisted by bodhisattvas, individuals developing ten perfections (pāramitās ) on the path to buddhahood that proceeds through ten stages (bhūmis ). Some bodhisattvas vow not to enter final nirvāṇa until all beings are liberated "down to the last blade of grass," an innovation that envisages universal liberation. This is viewed as possible on the basis of the philosophy of emptiness (śūnyavāda ), which developed as a result of meditational experience: The mind, emptied of all contents derived from sensory perception and conceptual activity, can make the final breakthrough into nirvāṇa, which is equally empty because it is inaccessible to sensory perception and undefinable. Thus, emptiness (śūnyatā ) came to be regarded as underlying both saṁsāra and nirvāṇa, making them, at bottom, identical. Liberation occurs by shifting one's perspective.
Such tendencies to hypostatize śūnyatā were checked by Nāgārjuna (flourished c. 150–250), the protagonist of the Mādhyamaka school, who used the dialectical method to refute conflicting theses; truth lay in the middle, but beyond dialectics. It is accessible only to direct vision—as the Buddha taught. Tendencies to hypostatization appeared also in the Vijñānavāda school, which regards pure consciousness as the basis for not only saṁsāra but also nirvāṇa, since its achievement cannot but be a conscious experience. Saṁsāric phenomena are mental constructs projected from the universal storehouse consciousness (ālaya-vijñāna ), yet the emptiness and purity of the root consciousness (mūla-vijñāna ) and of a liberated one's consciousness remain unaffected.
Hindu Systems of Philosophy
During the golden age of Indian civilization under the Gupta dynasty (320–510), philosophical discussions flourished between various schools of thought. Six of them came to be recognized as valid Hindu angles of viewing (dṛṣṭi, hence darśaṇa ) of reality and were systematized. All accept the basic teaching about saṁsāric bondage and the desirability of liberation, but differ in ontological conceptions and methodical approaches.
(1) Pūrva-Mīmāṁsā (original elucidation) regards the Vedas as eternal and pursues the path of ritual action (karma-mārga ), which parallels cosmic processes and terrestrial events governed by the inherent law of ṛta (the Vedic equivalent of dharma ), which is independent of any divine agency. Right rituals achieve anything, including rebirth in the highest existential spheres and liberation, although in advanced stages of the path ritual is interiorized and becomes a process of meditation.
(2) Vaiśeṣika (discrimination) is a kind of natural philosophy focusing on classifying reality into categories (padārthas ). Reality is subjected to the invisible law (adṛṣṭa dharma ) operating also in the ethical sphere independently of God (īśvara ), an eternally free, omniscient spirit (not a creator) who can assist beings on the path of knowledge (jñána-mārga ) based on a meditational analysis of saṁsāric categories that leads to liberation from them.
(3) Nyāya (guidance) analyses logical and epistemological processes that supply beings with their picture of the world. In testing its validity, Nyāya thinkers discovered syllogism that, however, required verification by experience. Logical analysis is the start of the path of knowledge (jñāna-mārga ). It sharpens the mind, preparing it for meditational viewing, which culminates in direct knowledge of the final truth equaling liberation.
(4) Sāṅkhya (enumeration) is a dualistic metaphysical system with no God. It recognizes an infinite number of originally pure and free eternal spirits (puruṣas ) and the creative force of nature (prakṛti ), which conjures up the world process for puruṣas. As they show interest in this spectacle, prakṛti creates for them bodies with senses and mental functions. The puruṣas, fascinated by the antics of prakṛti, identify with their prakṛtic personalities and forget their true status. When a puruṣa recognizes this bondage, he can liberate himself by mentally discriminating between prakṛtic evolutes and his original pure consciousness; this is a variety of jñāna-mārga. His worldly personality dissolves and he regains total freedom in isolation (kaivalya ) from prakṛti.
(5) Yoga (union) as one of the six darśaṇas is chiefly a systematic eightfold path to liberation called classical Yoga, expounded by Patañjali (second century BCE). However, chapter 4 of his Yoga Sūtras shows that it had been a philosophical system in its own right before its ontology was overshadowed by Sāṅkhya. Still, it retained the notion of God (īśvara ), an eternally free puruṣa who may assist other puruṣas (entangled in saṁsāra ) struggling for liberation but is neither the Creator nor the focus of a religious cult. The discipline of the Yoga path aims at experiencing liberation as autonomy (kaivalya ) from limiting forms of existence, accompanied by the final vision of or cognitive unification with the totality of truth (dharmamegha-samādhi ).
(6) Uttara Mīmāṁsā (higher elucidation) or Vedānta (end of Veda, meaning Upaniṣads, its base) split into three subschools. In the Advaita (nondualistic) Vedānta of Śankara (700?–750?) brahman, the Upaniṣadic source and core of the manifested universe, is regarded as the sole reality; the individual bondage in saṁsāra is an illusion (māyā ). Liberation is achieved when this illusion is dispersed by treading the path of knowledge (jñāna-yoga ) that culminates in samādhi experienced as the unity of being, consciousness, and bliss (sat-cit-ānanda ). The liberated one realizes that he is and has always been brahman and that nothing else really exists. The Viṣiṣṭa Advaita (qualified nondualistic) Vedānta of Rāmānuja (c. 1077–1137) interprets the Upaniṣadic brahman as the eternal God who created the world out of his own subtle body by transforming it into a gross one. Beings are attributes of God, but possess their own self-conscious existence. They retain it even when liberated in mystic union with God accomplished with his grace (prasāda ) after surrendering to him on the path of devotion (bhakti-mārga ). Upaniṣadic passages with traces of a dualistic worldview (foreshadowing Sāṅkhya) enabled even the Dvaita (dualistic) Vedānta of Madhva (c. 1199–c. 1278) to claim Vedic authority for its interpretation. It accepts the eternal existence of prakṛti and the plurality of jīvas, who retain their individuality even in the state of liberation granted as God's grace to those who live pure lives and embrace bhakti-mārga. Others may transmigrate in saṁsāra forever. Some evildoers may even reach a point past redemption and face eternal damnation in infinite remoteness from God.
A modern approach to liberation appears in the writings of Aurobindo (1872–1950). He envisioned a new phase in the world's evolution: if enough individuals prepare themselves through yoga for receiving the cosmic consciousness, then they could bring about the spiritualization of the earth or even the whole universe. This idea of universal liberation has its origin in the vow of Mahāyāna bodhisattvas to liberate all beings "down to the last blade of grass."
See also Brahman; Causation in Indian Philosophy; God/Isvara in Indian Philosophy; Karma; Knowledge in Indian Philosophy; Meditation in Indian Philosophy; Mind and Mental States in Buddhist Philosophy; Negation in Indian Philosophy; Self in Indian Philosophy.
Blackstone, Kathryn R. Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha: Struggle for Liberation in the Therigatha. London: Curzon Press, 1998.
Buswell, Robert E., and Robert M. Gimello. Paths to Liberation: The Mārga and Its Transformations in Buddhist Thought. Delhi, India: Banarsidass, 1994.
Chakraborti, Haripada. Asceticism in Ancient India. Calcutta, India: Punthi Pustak, 1973.
Châu, Thích Thiên. Les sectes personnalistes (Pudgalavādin) du bouddhisme ancien. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, 1977.
Dange, Sadashiv A. "Metempsychosis and the Ṛgveda." Journal of the University of Bombay 43 (79) (1974): 1–12.
Eckel, Malcolm David. To See the Buddha: A Philosopher's Quest for the Meaning of Emptiness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.
Fort, Andrew O. "Going on Knowledge? The Development of the Idea of Living Liberation in the Upanishads." Indian Philosophy 22 (4) (1944).
Fort, Andrew O. Jīvanmukti in Transformation: Embodied Liberation in Advaita and Neo-Vedanta. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.
Gethin, Rupert. The Buddhist Path of Awakening: A Study of the Bodhi-Pakkiyā Dhammā. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 1992.
Gonda, Jan. The Vision of the Vedic Poets. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton, 1963.
Harvey, Peter. "The Nature of the Tathāgata." In Buddhist Studies, Ancient and Modern, edited by P. Denwood and A. Piatigorsky. London: Curzon Press, 1983.
Jacobsen, Knut A. Prakṛti in Sāṃkhya-Yoga: Material Principle, Religious Experience, Ethical Implications. Delhi, India: Banarsidass, 2002.
Jaini, Padmanabha Shrivarma. The Jaina Path of Purification. Delhi, India: Banarsidass, 1979.
Johansson, R. The Psychology of Nirvana. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969.
Klostermaier, Klaus K. Mythologies and Philosophies of the Salvation in the Theistic Traditions of India. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984.
Lad, Ashok Kumar. A Comparative Study of the Concept of Liberation in Indian Philosophy. Burhanpur, India: Girdharlal Keshavdas, 1967.
Larson, Gerald James, and Ram Shankar Bhattacharya. "Sānkhya: A Dualist Tradition in Indian Philosophy." In Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Vol. 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.
Miller, Jeanine. The Vedas. London: Rider, 1974.
Miller, Jeanine. The Vision of Cosmic Order in the Vedas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
Oberhammer, Gerhard. La Délivrance, dès Cette Vie (jīvanmukti). Paris: Édition-Diffusion de Boccard, 1994.
Oldmeadow, Harry. "Delivering the Last Blade of Grass: Aspects of the Bodhisattva Ideal in the Mahāyāna." Asian Philosophy 7 (3) (1997): 181–194.
Orofino, Giacomella, trans. Sacred Tibetan Teachings on Death and Liberation. Bridport, U.K.: Prism Press, 1999.
Verpoorten, Jean-Marie. Mīmāṁsā Literature. Wiesbaden, Germany: O. Harrassowitz, 1987.
Welbon, G. R. The Buddhist Nirvāṇa and Its Western Interpreters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Werner, Karel. "Bodhi and Arahattaphala : From Early Buddhism to Early Mahāyāna." Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 4 (1981): 70–84.
Werner, Karel. "Indian Conceptions of Human Personality." Asian Philosophy 6 (2) (1996): 93–107.
Werner, Karel. "Indian Concepts of Human Personality in Relation to the Doctrine of the Soul." Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1988 (1): 73–97.
Werner, Karel. "The Longhaired Sage of Ṛg Veda 10, 136: A Shaman, a Mystic, or a Yogi?" In The Yogi and the Mystic: Studies in Indian and Comparative Mysticism, edited by Karel Werner, 33–53. London: Curzon Press, 1989, repr. in 1994.
Werner, Karel. "A Note on Karma and Rebirth in the Vedas." Hinduism 83 (1978): 1–4.
Werner, Karel. "Symbolism in the Vedas and Its Conceptualisation." In Symbols in Art and Religion: The Indian and the Comparative Perspectives, edited by Karel Werner, 27–45. London: Curzon Press, 1990.
Werner, Karel. "The Vedic Concept of Human Personality and its Destiny." Journal of Indian Philosophy 5 (1978): 275–289.
Werner, Karel. Yoga and Indian Philosophy. Delhi, India: Banarsidass, 1977, reprint in 1980 and 1998.
Whicher, Ian. The Integrity of the Yoga Darśana. New York: SUNY Press, 1998.
Whicher, Ian, ed. Yoga: Tradition and Transformation. Richmond, Australia: Curzon, 2001.
Karel Werner (2005)