Attorney General

views updated May 29 2018


The chief law enforcement officer of the United States or of a state government, typically serving in anexecutive branchposition. The individual represents the government in litigation and serves as the principal advisor to government officials and agencies in legal matters.

The attorney general is head of the u.s. justice department and chief law officer of the federal government. He or she represents the United States in legal matters generally and gives advice and opinions to the president and to other heads of executive departments as requested. In cases of exceptional gravity or special importance, the attorney general may appear in person before the U.S. Supreme Court to represent the interests of the government.

As head of the Justice Department, the attorney general is charged with enforcing federal laws, furnishing legal counsel in federal cases, construing the laws under which other executive departments act, supervising federal penal institutions, and investigating violations of federal laws. The attorney general also supervises and directs the activities of the U.S. attorneys and u.s. marshals in the various judicial districts. (U.S. attorneys prosecute all offenses against the United States and prosecute or defend for the government all civil actions, suits, or proceedings in which the United States is concerned; U.S. marshals execute all lawful writs, processes, and orders issued under authority of the United States.)

The office of the attorney general was created by the First Congress in the judiciary act of 1789 (An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States, ch. 20, § 35, 1 Stat. 73, 92–93). The First Congress did not expect the attorney general—a part-time employee with scant pay, no staff, and little power—to play a major role in the emerging federal government. As the members of the First Congress established a system for the enforcement of federal laws, their primary concern was to protect state and individual freedoms and to avoid the creation of a central legal system that would allow the tyrannies they had experienced as American colonists under George III. Therefore, the Judiciary Act gave the attorney general just two principal duties: (1) to prosecute and conduct all suits in the supreme court of the united states that concerned the United States and(2) to give an opinion on questions of law when asked to do so by the president or heads of other executive departments.

The early attorneys general spent little time arguing before the Supreme Court because few cases had traveled through the nation's developing court system and even fewer warranted Supreme Court review. Together, the first three attorneys general—Edmund Randolph, william bradford, and Charles Lee—represented the United States in the Supreme Court only six times in their collective years in office.

Furthermore, early attorneys general were specifically restricted by the Judiciary Act from participating in lower-court actions. District attorneys (known in the early 2000s as U.S.

U.S. Attorneys General
Edmund Randolph1789-1794Washington
William Bradford1794-1795Washington
Charles Lee1795-1801Washington & John Adams
Levi Lincoln1801-1805Jefferson
John Breckenridge1805-1806Jefferson
Caesar A. Rodney1807-1811Jefferson & Madison
William Pinkney1811-1814Madison
Richard Rush1814-1817Madison
William Wirt1817-1829Monroe & John Q. Adams
John M. Berrien1829-1831Jackson
Roger B. Taney1831-1833Jackson
Benjamin F. Butler1833-1838Jackson & Van Buren
Felix Grundy1838-1839Van Buren
Henry D. Gilpin1840-1841Van Buren
John J. Crittenden1841Harrison & Tyler
Hugh S. Legare1841-1843Tyler
John Nelson1843-1845Tyler
John Y. Mason1845-1846Polk
Nathan Clifford1846-1848Polk
Issac Toucey1848-1849Polk
Reverdy Johnson1849-1850Taylor
John J. Crittenden1850-1853Fillmore
Caleb Cushing1853-1857Pierce
Jeremiah S. Black1857-1860Buchanan
Edwin M. Stanton1860-1861Buchanan
Edward Bates1861-1864Lincoln
James Speed1864-1866Lincoln & Johnson
Henry Stanberry1866-1868Johnson
William M. Evarts1868-1869Johnson
Ebenezer R. Hoar1869-1870Grant
Amos T. Akerman1870-1872Grant
George H. Williams1871-1875Grant
Edwards Pierrepont1875-1876Grant
Alphonso Taft1876-1877Grant
Charles Devens1877-1881Hayes
Wayne MacVeagh1881Garfield
Benjamin H. Brewster1881-1885Arthur
Augustus H. Garland1885-1889Cleveland
William H.H. Miller1889-1893Harrison
Richard Olney1893-1895Cleveland
Judson Harmon1895-1897Cleveland
Joseph McKenna1897-1898McKinley
John W. Griggs1898-1901McKinley
Philander C. Knox1901-1904McKinley
William H. Moody1904-1906Roosevelt
Charles J. Bonaparte1906-1909Roosevelt
George W. Wickersham1909-1913Taft
James C. McReynolds1913-1914Wilson
Thomas Watt Gregory1914-1919Wilson
A. Mitchell Palmer1919-1921Wilson
Harry M. Daugherty1921-1924Harding
Harlan Fiske Stone1924-1925Coolidge
John G. Sargent1925-1929Coolidge
William D. Mitchell1929-1933Hoover
Homer S. Cummings1933-1939Roosevelt
Frank Murphy1939-1940Roosevelt
Robert H. Jackson1940-1941Roosevelt
Francis Biddle1941-1945Roosevelt
Tom C. Clark1945-1949Truman
J. Howard McGrath1949-1952Truman
James P. McGranery1952-1953Truman
Herbert Brownell Jr.1953-1957Eisenhower
William P. Rogers1957-1961Eisenhower
U.S. Attorneys General
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Justice.
Robert F. Kennedy1961-1964Kennedy
Nicholas de B. Katzenbach1965-1966Johnson
Ramsey Clark1967-1969Johnson
John N. Mitchell1969-1972Nixon
Richard G. Kleindienst1972-1973Nixon
Elliot L. Richardson1973Nixon
William B. Saxbe1974-1975Nixon
Edward H. Levi1975-1977Ford
Griffin B. Bell1977-1979Carter
Benjamin R. Civiletti1979-1981Carter
William French Smith1981-1985Reagan
Edwin Meese III1985-1988Reagan
Richard Thornburgh1988-1991Reagan & George Bush
William Barr1991-1993George Bush
Janet Reno1993-2001Clinton
John Ashcroft2001-George W. Bush

attorneys) held the authority to represent the United States in district and circuit courts. Each district attorney could independently decide which cases to pursue and on what grounds—a situation that soon resulted in a number of contradictory legal positions for the federal government. Because the attorney general had no power to direct district attorneys in their lower-court litigation, the officeholder was often unaware of litigation that concerned the interests of the United States.

In a letter to President george washington dated December 26, 1791, Attorney General Randolph expressed concern about the limitations of his office and complained specifically about the lack of a defined relationship with the district attorneys. Randolph was the first of many attorneys general to point out that their prescribed duties did not allow them to fully look after the interests of the United States, and he was the first to propose an expansion of the office's duties and jurisdiction.

Ignoring complaints and proposals, Congress remained reluctant to expand the duties of the attorney general and often passed legislation that assigned special legal functions to officials in other government departments. For example, in the early 1800s, Congress created a solicitor of the treasury to handle all suits for the recovery of money or property in the United States—a move that further complicated the attorney general's efforts to fully look after the interests of the government.

With court appearances limited by the lack of both cases before the Supreme Court and jurisdiction to oversee lower-court cases, opinion writing consumed most of the time of early attorneys general. Together, Attorneys General Randolph, Bradford, and Lee wrote more than 40 formal opinions on such diverse issues as immunity for diplomats, applications for patents, and the choice of directors for the nation's first federal bank. However, early attorneys general were not required to provide the government with written records of their opinions. When william wirt, the eleventh attorney general, took office in 1817, he found that his predecessors had provided no record of their past opinions to guide his deliberations. Understandably, early attorneys general, who received only a small stipend for their services and relied on the private practice of law for their personal income, spent little money to hire clerks to transcribe and preserve their work. They simply relied on the recipients of their opinions to retain them for future reference. Still, legislative attempts to provide the attorney general with an office, a clerk, and supplies continually failed to win support.

The limited duties outlined for the attorney general by the First Congress, along with the lack of perquisites for the office, made it hard for presidents to attract qualified appointees and keep them in office. Even President Washington had difficulty convincing his personal attorney and long-time friend, Randolph, to take the job. Washington finally won Randolph over by pointing out that service as attorney general might enhance his earning opportunities in private practice. In fact, Randolph did not profit much from the prestige of the office during or after his tenure. Subsequent attorneys general did profit handsomely from the experience, but early officeholders often had difficulty balancing the dual commitments to private practice and public service.

The commitment to public service for early attorneys general was further complicated by institutional tensions between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, which all claimed the officeholder's time, services, and allegiance. It has been said that the attorney general serves "three masters": the president, the Congress, and the courts (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research 1968). Although the attorney general advises the president, the basic authority of the office is derived from Congress and the functions of the office are subject to congressional control. In addition, the attorney general is a member of the bar and therefore an officer of the court subject to the directives of the judicial branch.

Although the First Congress defined the relationship between the attorney general and the president, it did not define the relationship between the attorney general and Congress. And it was notably silent regarding who was ultimately to decide when and whether the interests of the United States were "concerned": nothing in the Judiciary Act of 1789 specified who should control the attorney general or to whom she or he should report. Early attorneys general took orders from the Congress as well as from the president and the heads of other executive departments. Attorneys general were often asked to deliver opinions to Congress on legislative proposals, and they came to be viewed as authorities on constitutional issues—much to the chagrin of both legislators, who frequently disagreed with their interpretations, and members of the judiciary, who assumed that they themselves were the final arbiters in constitutional matters.

The attorney general has also been said to straddle the legal and political worlds. When Congress created the executive departments, it did not specify who should or should not be members of the president's cabinet, and it could not predict the level of influence held by any one individual. In the early years, the attorney general did not have cabinet rank but served as counsel to those who did. However, as Washington's personal legal adviser, Randolph participated in cabinet meetings as early as 1792, establishing the precedent for attorneys general to have a hand in making policy as well as in interpreting and enforcing the laws. The attorney general's role in policy making soon brought into question the extent to which party lines and presidential preferences influenced his or her legal advice. Over time, some attorneys general handled the dilemma with more integrity and less partisanship than others.

The lack of centralized authority and the lack of basic institutional support for the office of the attorney general began to be remedied by Congress in the early nineteenth century. Subsequently, many of the issues caused or influenced by conflicting allegiances were dissolved or clarified through administrative policy and legislation.

In 1814, during the term of Attorney General richard rush, President james madison made the first move to expand formally the presence (if not the duties) of the attorney general, by proposing a requirement that the attorney general reside in or near Washington, D.C., while Congress was in session. The residency requirement had previously been resisted by some attorneys general. Although it made the officeholder available to the president and Congress when the attorney general was most needed, it also made the private practice of law more inconvenient to an attorney general who lived far from the Capitol.

Attorney General Wirt (1817–29), under Presidents james monroe and john quincy adams, was the first to comprehend fully the officeholder's need for administrative structure. During his tenure, the attorney general was finally given government office space, a transcribing clerk, and a small fund for office supplies. The practice of providing opinions to Congress was also curtailed during this period, when Wirt presented a paper to President Monroe outlining the extent of his congressional workload and his objections. Wirt told the president that opinions had been provided to Congress in the past as a courtesy—not as a matter of law. Wirt told the president the practice would not continue unless Congress revised the law and made it mandatory.

By 1853, when caleb cushing became attorney general under President franklin pierce, the officeholder had four clerks and—for the first time—a salary comparable to those of other cabinet officers. Also in 1853, Cushing decided it was no longer appropriate to continue the private practice of law while in office. He was the nation's first full-time attorney general.

Recommendations that a department of law be created by Congress were discussed as early as 1830 and were championed by numerous presidents and attorneys general. A department of justice was first suggested in 1851 by Alex H. H. Stuart, secretary of the newly established department of the interior.

No action was taken by Congress until February 25, 1870, when the Joint Committee on Retrenchments (appointed to find ways of reducing government expenditures) drafted a bill to consolidate legal functions and create a department of justice. The bill was made into law four months later, and the Justice Department officially came into existence on July 1, 1870 (An Act to Establish the Department of Justice, §17, 16 Stat. 162 [June 22, 1870]).

The June 22, 1870, law created a new position, that of solicitor general, whose holder is in charge of representing the government in suits and appeals in the Supreme Court and in lower federal trial and appellate courts, in cases involving the interests of the United States. The law also provided for two assistant attorneys general. It gave the attorney general complete direction and control of the U.S. attorneys and all other counsel employed on behalf of the United States. And it finally gave the attorney general supervisory powers over the accounts of district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the court involved in federal matters.

The first attorney general to head the new department was amos t.  akerman , of Georgia, appointed by President ulysses s. grant in 1870. So, 81 years after the creation of the office of the attorney general, the nation finally had a full-fledged organization to administer and enforce its laws. Evolution in the position of attorney general culminated in the formation of the Justice Department.

In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, U.S. attorneys general, including janet reno and john david ashcroft, have been at the center of extensive media attention. Reno, for example, was the subject of intense scrutiny for her role in the deaths of about 80 members of the Branch Davidians, an armed religious sect, near Waco, Texas in 1993. The deaths occurred when the federal bureau of investigation, following a long standoff, set fire to the group's compound during an attempted raid. Reno later took responsibility for the FBI actions. Subsequently, Reno was involved in the return to Cuba of a refugee child named Elian Gonzalez in April 2000. Reno ordered officers of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to raid the home of the child's relatives in Miami in order to return the child to his father, who remained in Cuba. Ashcroft, a former U.S. senator and governor of Missouri, was at the center of attention throughout the investigation of terrorists following the september 11th attacks on the United States.

The growth of the office of the attorney general from a part-time, one-person operation into a vast and complex law enforcement organization is an inseparable part of the story of the United States and the development of its institutions. As the role of government has expanded, so too has the role of the nation's attorney general. Moreover, though the attorney general's role continues to grow and evolve, the basic duties of the office and the structure of its supporting organization have been in place since the Civil War.

State Attorneys General

State attorneys general possess many of the same powers and responsibilities as their counterpart in the federal government. A state attorney general's office is typically a part of the executive branch of the state government. He or she is generally entrusted with the duties of prosecuting suits and proceedings involving state government and advising the governor and other administrative officers of the state government. Many state statutes also establish the state attorney general as the official legal advisor or representative of various departments and agencies.

In some states, the power of the attorney general is limited to those specified by statute. The powers of most attorneys general are subject to the desires of the legislature, although powers in some states are prescribed by statute. In fulfilling the advisory function of the office, attorneys general are often requested to draft advisory opinions related to the application of the law to a particular agency or official. These opinions are generally not considered binding on the general public, though in some instances they may be binding upon the officials that request them.

further readings

American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. 1968. Roles of the Attorney General. Washington: D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Baker, Nancy V. 1985. Conflicting Loyalties: Law and Politics in the Attorney General's Office, 1789–1990. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.

Justice Department. 1990. 200th Anniversary of the Office of Attorney General, 1789–1989. Washington, D.C.: Justice Department.

Powell, H. Jefferson. 2002. A Community Built on Needs: The Constitution in History and Politics. Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.


Justice Department; Officers of the Court; Supreme Court of the United States; Question of Law; Washington, George.

Attorney General

views updated May 29 2018


Gonzales Resigns as Attorney General Amid Controversies

Faced with calls for a no-confidence vote on his position as Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales in August 2007 resigned from the position after less than three years in office. The fallout

from his handling of the dismissal of eight federal prosecutors in 2006 was a major cause that led members of Congress to express their doubts in his leadership.

The son of a migrant farm worker and later a graduate of Harvard Law School, Gonzales spent much of his career as a corporate lawyer. In 1994, Gonzales joined George W. Bush's administration when Bush served as governor of Texas. About three years later, Bush appointed Gonzales as the Texas secretary of state. Bush in January 1999 appointed Gonzales to fill a vacancy on the Texas Supreme Court.

Gonzales joined Bush when the latter was elected President in 2000. Gonzales became the first Hispanic to serve the role as White House counsel. During this time, he wrote a number of memos that later sparked controversy. In January 2002, he wrote a memo to Bush suggesting that the Geneva Conventions were “quaint” and “obsolete” and that the protections for prisoners outlined in those documents did not apply to “enemy combatants” who were captured in Afghanistan. Also in 2002, Gonzales wrote a memo that narrowed the definition of torture, such that the memo justified controversial interrogation tactics that were being used by the Defense Department and the Central Intelligence Agency. The White House later rescinded this memo.

When John Ashcroft resigned as Attorney General following Bush's presidential election victory in 2004, Bush nominated Gonzales to fill the position. Gonzales' appointment met with immediate resistance as Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee vigorously opposed his nomination. Nevertheless, Republicans viewed him as more moderate than Ashcroft, and the Senate as a whole approved his appointment by a vote of 60–36.

In 2005 and 2006, Gonzales led an eventually successful effort to advocate the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act. However, his position with regard to civil rights in relation to national security continued to cause a stir. The New York Times in 2005 reported that Bush had authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct warrantless searches on individuals within the United States. Gonzales responded to the report by noting that the program was supported by the broad war powers given to Bush following the 2001 terrorist attacks. In July 2006, Gonzales testified before the Senate that Bush had blocked the JUSTICE Department from investigating the spying program. Gonzales was one of the government officials who had authority to review the program every 45 days. Facing pressure from Congress, Gonzales in 2007 announced that the NSA's warrantless eavesdropping program would be reviewed by a secret national intelligence court.

In addition to the controversy surrounding Gonzales' handling of the eavesdropping program, Gonzales became embroiled in a dispute over the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. He reportedly met in November 2006 to discuss the dismissal of seven prosecutors, a plan that was approved by the White House about a week later. On December 7, 2006, the Justice Department dismissed these seven attorneys, providing no reason for the firings. Reports later showed that the majority of those who were dismissed were given favorable evaluations during the periods of time that they held their positions. As the controversy continued to heat up, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty testified that the attorneys were dismissed due to poor performance rather than political reasons.

Senator Charles Schumer (D.-N.Y.) led an investigation into the attorneys' firings. He criticized the Justice Department for what he concluded were politically motivated decisions. He noted, “As we feared, the comprehensive evaluations show these U.S. attorneys did not deserve to be fired. To the contrary, they reveal they were effective, respected and set appropriate priorities.” Justice Department officials countered that the reviews did not “take into account whether the U.S. attorneys carried out departmental priorities,” apparently meaning that the prosecutors did not follow priorities established by the Justice Department. However, the reports themselves indicated that the prosecutors had indeed established the goals that the Justice Department had set as high priorities.

Calls for Gonzales' resignation became more prevalent in March 2007. Schumer stated that Gonzales “either doesn't accept or doesn't understand that he is no longer just the president's lawyer, but has a higher obligation to the rule of law and the Constitution, even when the president should not want it to be so.” Arlen Specter, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, openly questioned whether Gonzales' tenure as Attorney General had run its course. Gonzales lost more support on March 14 when Senator John Sununu (R.-N.H.) became the first Republican to call for Gonzales' resignation.

Gonzales responded to allegations about the dismissal of the attorneys by noting that though he should be held accountable, he was not involved with seeing memos or with other discussions about the proposed firings. About two months later, evidence surfaced that Gonzales indeed saw memos about the firings and had consulted with aides prior to the dismissals. Moreover, former Deputy Attorney General James Comey testified that in 2004, Gonzalez had pressured then-Attorney General Ashcroft to approve the eavesdropping program. This occurred while Ashcroft was in an intensive-care unit.

Congressional Democrats stepped up their efforts to pressure Gonzales to resign. House and Senate members introduced no-confidence votes in both chambers of Congress. Nonetheless, Bush continued to express support for Gonzales. Amid accusations of perjury for his earlier testimony, however, Gonzales finally gave in and announced his resignation on August 27. Bush claimed that Gonzales' name had been “dragged through the mud for political reasons,” but even some Republican lawmakers said that the time for the resignation had come.

In November 2007, the Senate approved the nomination of former federal judge Michael Mukasey as the new Attorney General. During the time after his resignation, Gonzales has spoken at such institutions as Washington University in St. Louis, Ohio State University, and the University of Florida. However, according to a report in the New York Times, he has had difficulty finding a job at a law firm.


views updated Jun 11 2018

attorney-general. The chief law officer of the crown who acts as the crown's representative in legal proceedings. The origins of the office are disputed but have been attributed to the medieval king's attorney and the king's serjeant. The title attorney-general of England was first used in 1461. The attorney-general acted as assistant to the House of Lords but had ceased to attend by 1700. After some dispute, it was confirmed in 1670 that the attorney-general could be a member of the House of Commons and this has been the case since then. During the 17th cent. the attorney-general was often accused of undue subservience to the monarch and of being over-zealous and overbearing in prosecuting in state trials, as in the notorious prosecution of Sir Walter Ralegh by Coke in 1603. The modern attorney-general is a hybrid member of the government in that he is the government's legal adviser and representative, but also has historic functions relating to the administration of the law, e.g. the issue of a nolle prosequi to prevent the continuance of a prosecution, the giving of consent to certain prosecutions and the bringing of ‘relator actions’ on behalf of the public in certain cases, e.g. public nuisance. In these cases he is required to be non-political.

Maureen Mulholland

attorney general

views updated Jun 08 2018

attorney general Principal law officer. In the USA, the attorney general is the highest law officer of the government and head of the department of justice, and advises the president and heads of the executive department. In the UK, it is the chief law officer of the crown and head of the English bar, and also legal adviser to the House of Commons and the government.

About this article

Attorney General

All Sources -
Updated Aug 13 2018 About content Print Topic