Skip to main content

Āryadeva

ĀRYADEVA

RYADEVA , often called simply Deva (Tib., ʾPhagspa-lha); an important Buddhist dialectician, linked with several other names such as Kāadeva, Nīlanetra, Pigalanetra, Pigalacaku, and Kararipa, although the identification with some of these is doubtful. In China, he is known both by the transcription of his name, Tibo or Tiboluo (Jpn., Daiba or Daibara), and by the translation of his name, Cheng-t'ien, (Jpn., Shōten).

Scholars have identified at least two ryadevas. The first, who will be referred to as "ryadeva I," was a Madhyamaka (Mādhyamika) dialectician, the most eminent disciple of Nāgārjuna, who lived between the third and fourth centuries ce. The second, "ryadeva II," was a Tantric master whose date has been variously proposed as in the seventh to tenth centuries (most probably at the beginning of the eighth century), because he cites the Madhyamakahdayakārikā of Bhāvaviveka (500570) and the Tarkajvālā, its autocommentary, in his Madhyamakabhamaghāta, and because verse 31 of his Jñānasārasamuccaya is cited in the Tattvasagra-hapañjikā of Kamalaśīla (740795).

Biographies are available in Chinese sources (T.D. no. 2048; see also T.D. no. 2058, chap. 6), in Tibetan materials (Bu ston, Tāranātha, etc.), and partially but most genuinely in Sanskrit documents (Candrakīrti's Catuśatakaīkā, the Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa, etc.). If the Chinese sources are concerned solely with ryadeva I, the Tibetan ones in general combine and do not adequately distinguish between the two ryadevas. Both traditions confuse history and legend, and now it is almost impossible to separate them. However, if one singles out only the most plausible elements, the two individuals can be described as follows. ryadeva I was born in Sri Lanka (Sinhaladvīpa) as the son of a king but abandoned his glorious career and went to South India. After traveling throughout India, he met Nāgārjuna at Pāaliputra and became his disciple. He showed his talent in debate and converted many Brahmanic adherents to Buddhism. He is called Kāadeva ("One-eyed Deva") because he offered his eye to a non-Buddhist woman (according to Tāranātha), to a tree goddess (according to Bu ston), to a woman (according to the Caturaśīti-siddha-pavtti, or Biography of the Eighty-four Siddhas ), or to a golden statue of Maheśvara (according to the Chinese sources).

ryadeva II studied alchemy at Nālandā under the Tantric Nāgārjuna, who was a disciple of Saraha and founder of the ʾPhags-lugs lineage of the Guhyasamāja Tantra. The story of offering one eye is related about him also, but this might be an interpolation from the biography of ryadeva I.

All of the texts ascribed to ryadeva in the Chinese canon and most of the texts so ascribed in the Madhyamaka section of the Tibetan canon can be considered as the works of ryadeva I. The most famous is his Catuśataka (Derge edition of the Tibetan Tripiaka 3846, hereafter cited as D.; Bejing edition of the Tripiaka 5246, hereafter cited as B.; T. D. no. 1570 [the second half only], see also T.D. no. 1517), which consists of sixteen chapters, the first eight being concerned with the preparation of those who practice the path and the last eight explaining the insubstantiality of all dharma s. The Śatakaśāstra, a so-called abridged version of the Catuśataka available only in Kumārajīva's translation (T. D. no. 1569), and the Akaraśataka (T.D. no. 1572), said to be composed by Nāgārjuna in Tibetan versions (D. 3834, B. 5234), are especially noteworthy as the works of ryadeva I.

On the other hand, all the works ascribed to ryadeva in the Tantric section of the Tibetan canon are unquestionably attributed to ryadeva II. The most important and well-known texts among them are the Cittaviśuddhiprakaraa (D. 1804, B. 2669), a Sanskrit version of which was edited by P. B. Patel (Calcutta, 1949); the Caryāmelāpakapradīpa (D. 1803, B. 2668); and the Pradīpoddyotana-nāma-īkā (D. 1794, B. 2659). There are also some texts in the Madhyamaka section of the Tibetan canon that can, on the basis of their contents, be attributed to ryadeva II: the Madhyamakabhamaghāta (D. 3850, B. 5250), most of which simply consists of extracts from the Madhya-makahdaya and the Tarkajvālā of Bhāvaviveka; the Jñānasārasamuccaya (D. 385l, B. 5251), a siddhānta text exposing the philosophical tenets of non-Buddhist and Buddhist schools; and the Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi (D. 3847, B. 5247), consisting of non-Buddhist objections and Buddhist answers.

The Hastavālaprakarana (D. 3844, B. 5244 and 5248; see also autocommentary, D. 3845, B. 5245 and 5249), attributed to ryadeva in its Tibetan versions, is now considered to be a work of Dignāga, as indicated in the Chinese version (T.D. nos. 1620, 1621). If the identification of Pigalanetra (Chin., Qingmu) with ryadeva is correct, ryadeva I also composed a commentary on the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (T.D. no. 1564).

See Also

Mādhyamika.

Bibliography

Lamotte, Étienne. Le traité de la grande vertu de sagesse, vol. 3. Louvain, 1970. See especially pages 13701375.

Lindtner, Christian. "Adversaria Buddhica." Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 26 (1982): 167194. See page 173, note 21.

Robinson, James B. Buddha's Lions: The Lives of the Eighty-four Siddhas. Berkeley, Calif., 1979.

Ruegg, David S. The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India. Wiesbaden, 1981.

New Sources

Aryadeva, Candrakirti, and Karen Lang. "Aryadeva and Candrakirti on Self and Selfishness." In Buddhism in Practice, edited by Donald S. Lopez, Jr., pp. 380398. Princeton, 1995.

Jong, J. W. de. "Materials for the Study of Aryadeva, Dharmapala and Candrakirti: The Catuhsataka of Aryadeva." Indo Iranian Journal 36 (1993): 150153.

McClintock, Sara. "Knowing All through Knowing One: Mystical Communion or Logical Trick in the Tattvasamgraha and Tattvasamgrahapanjika." Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 23, no. 2 (2000): 225244.

Mimaki Katsumi (1987)

Revised Bibliography

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Āryadeva." Encyclopedia of Religion. . Encyclopedia.com. 13 Nov. 2018 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Āryadeva." Encyclopedia of Religion. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 13, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/aryadeva

"Āryadeva." Encyclopedia of Religion. . Retrieved November 13, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/aryadeva

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.