Loving, Alvin 1935–

views updated

Alvin Loving 1935–

Artist

The 20th-century artistic style known as abstract expressionism, with its emphasis on patterns, geometrical shapes, and works that focus on the process of making art, has grown into a generally accepted part of the American cultural vocabulary. For much of the earlier part of his career, the artist Alvin Loving was recognized as the foremost African-American exponent of abstract expressionism. His works always bore a distinct personal stamp, and in recent years he has extended abstract expressionist ideas in highly original ways.

Alvin Loving Jr., often known as Al, was born in Detroit on September 19, 1935. His father, the first black teacher in Detroit’s public high schools, had worked as a sign painter and taken some art classes. The elder Alvin Loving would later become a pioneering educator, ascending to a university professorship and then a deanship in the University of Michigan system and serving in teaching and administrative posts in India and Nigeria on special leaves. When his son was twelve, Alvin Loving Sr. had him copy landscapes and watercolors he had done himself. Soon Loving was painting sets for plays presented at Detroit’s Northern High School.

Lived with Family in India

Loving moved to Cass Tech High School after exhausting Northern’s art offerings, and graduated in 1954. He took classes at Wayne State University and a local art school the following year, but then moved with his family to India for a year instead of continuing school. The distance from his home gave Loving perspective on his ambitions, and he decided to pursue a career in the fine arts—at a time when the number of working African-Americans fine artists was minuscule—rather than as a commercial artist.

At this crucial formative stage, Loving came under the influence of artist Al Mullen, who himself had been a student of the German abstract expressionist Hans Hoffmann. Hoffmann’s paintings featured large, intensely colored rectangles with indistinct edges that seem to float in backgrounds of a related color; he is regarded as one of abstract expressionism’s pioneers, and his style influenced Loving directly. Having settled on his choice of career, Loving proceeded methodically to acquire his education as an artist; he was interrupted only by two years during which he worked as a propaganda illustrator at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Loving received an associate’s degree from Flint Junior College (now Mott Community College) in 1958, a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree from the University of Illinois in 1963, and a Master of Fine Arts from the University of Michigan in 1965.

Loving taught briefly at Eastern Michigan University in the late 1960s, but he felt the need to make an impact with his own art and headed for New York, the art world’s mecca. (Later, ironically, he would find a strong market for his work in Detroit and would come to be impressed by the sophistication of that city’s art buyers.) A Detroit gallery owner smoothed the way by introducing Loving to her counterparts in New York, and his career took off with surprising speed. Producing new works inspired by Hoffmann and by another

At a Glance…

Born September 19, 1935, in Detroit, Ml; son of Alvin Loving, an educator and Mary Helen (Green) Loving; married Wyn Cortes Reiser, 1969; children: Alvin III, Laurie, Alicia, Ann. Education: Flint Junior College, associate’s degree, 1958; University of Illinois, B.F.A., 1963; University of Michigan, M.F.A., 1965.

Career: Works exhibited in one-person show at Whitney Museum of American Art, 1969; numerous exhibitions in United States and worldwide; guest lecturer and artist-in-residence posts at University of California at San Diego, Ohio University, Skowhegan School of Painting and Sculpture, Maryland Institute, University of Kansas, Virginia Commonwealth University, Noire Dame University, Universtiy of Vermont ai Johnsonville, Cornell University; joined faculty of City College of New York, 1988, named associate professor, 1992.

Selected awards: National Endowment for the Arts fellowships, 1970, 1971, 1975, 1976, 1985; Guggenheim fellowship, 1986.

Addresses: Gallery —G. R. N’Namdi Gallery, 66 E. Forest, Detroit, Ml 48201-1814.

arch-abstractionist, Josef Albers, Loving hit on what would for a time become a trademark style: representations of open-insides cubes whose edges interlock.

Works Exhibited at Whitney Museum

In 1969 Loving snared the Holy Grail of many a young artist: a one-person show at New York’s Whitney Museum of American Art. The show was part of a series intended to explore the world of African-American art, and Loving’s work stood out for its seeming disengagement from the turbulent racial issues of the late 1960s. But it likewise was distinctive on its own terms, brilliantly fusing pure abstraction with the feel of the optical-illusion paintings of the popular Hungarian artist Viktor Vasarely. The result was that in the 1970s, Loving found his work in demand for gallery and museum shows all over the country—and himself in demand as a university teacher and artist-in-residence. In 1969 he married Wyn Cortes Riser; the couple has four children.

University residencies at the University of California at San Diego, Ohio Universtiy, the University of Kansas, Notre Dame University, and other institutions helped to pay the bills, but Loving began to feel trapped by his trademark style. “Basically, I was trying to liberate myself from those cubes, that box,” he told the Detroit Free Press. “I couldn’t find a way out.” But the series of experiments Loving undertook continued to raise his standing in the art world. By the late 1990s, Loving’s major works would sell for over $70, 000 apiece.

In the mid-1970s Loving began to create works that used the gallery space itself as his “canvas,” tacking strips of actual painted canvas to the walls and ceilings and draping them across the room—an idea counted as quite radical at the time, although it later became fairly common. Once again, Loving fused two trends in contemporary art, for his work retained an element of geometric abstraction—the hung pieces of canvas would be sewn into various geometrical shapes. In the next stage of Loving’s career he collapsed this style based on sewn cloth back into the space of the traditional picture frame, creating woven-fabric surfaces that critic John Canaday (later quoted in the Boston Globe) dubbed “soft sculpture.” The tactile nature of Loving’s works during this period suited them for public spaces such as a station of the Detroit People Mover downtown parking shuttle.

Learned Papermaking Craft

In the 1980s and 1990s, Loving continued to make new stylistic turns, building at each point on his own previous work. He turned to the collage medium, working at first with paint and corrugated cardboard that, sculpture-like, jutted out from the surface plane of the work. Loving also became known for a signature use of color; he tended toward “hot” colors, such as red, accented with cool touches. Collage, Loving told the Detroit Free Press (in an interview quoted by Michigan State University’s Shannon Bonner) “has a wonderful ability to make a string of extreme things go together.” In the 1980s Loving learned the craft of papermaking and incorporated his own handmade paper into his collage works.

It is tempting to liken Loving’s abstract creations with the vivid abstract patterns that appear in certain traditions of African art. Nevertheless, asked by Bonner whether he consciously tried to incorporate African elements into his work, Loving replied, “I absolutely never think about it.” Loving has argued that African Americans will produce works that differ stylisticaly from those of their white counterparts, but he is skeptical about the existence of a specifically African-American aesthetic or artistic outlook.

Loving, who joined the faculty of the City University of New York in 1988, has recently worked in a style he calls material abstraction; it is marked by the use of paper that is spattered or sprayed with paint, cut into shaped pieces, and then arranged on a surface. In the 1990s and early 2000s the prices his works commanded were helped by the emergence of a strong market for art among African Americans. His works were often shown at the G. R. N’Namdi galleries in Detroit and Chicago, and he found that Detroit, from which he had fled as a young man in the late 1960s, actually provided him with his strongest sales.