Skip to main content

Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1 (1967)

LOVING v. VIRGINIA 388 U.S. 1 (1967)

For more than a decade following its decision in brown v. board of education (1954) the Supreme Court avoided direct confrontation with the constitutionality of miscegenation laws. In Loving, the Court faced the issue squarely and held invalid a Virginia law forbidding any interracial marriage including a white partner. The decision is a major precedent in the area of racial discrimination as well as the foundation of the modern "freedom to marry." (See marriage and the constitution.)

A black woman and a white man, Virginia residents, went to the district of columbia to be married, and returned to live in Virginia. They were convicted of violating the Racial Integrity Act and given one-year prison sentences, suspended on condition that they leave Virginia. The Virginia appellate courts modified the sentences but upheld the constitutionality of the law. The Supreme Court unanimously reversed; Chief Justice earl warren wrote for the Court.

Citing the suspect classification language of Korematsu v. United States (1944) (see japanese american cases), Warren said that a "heavy burden of justification" must be carried by a state seeking to sustain any racial classification. The fact that the law punished both the white and black partners to a marriage did not relieve the state of that burden. The law's announced goal of "racial integrity" was promoted only selectively. A white was prohibited from marrying any nonwhite except the descendants of Pocahantas; a black and an Asian, for example, could lawfully marry. The law's obvious goal was the maintenance of white supremacy; it had no legitimate purpose independent of racial discrimination and thus violated the equal protection clause. pace v. alabama (1883) was assumed to be overruled.

The Court's opinion also rested on an alternative ground: the statute violated substantive due process, by interfering with "the freedom to marry." Quoting from the sterilization case, skinner v. oklahoma (1942), Chief Justice Warren called marriage "one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival." (See zablocki v. redhail; freedom of intimate association.)

justice potter stewart, concurring, merely repeated his earlier statement in McLaughlin v. Florida (1964) that a state could never make an act's criminality depend on the race of the actor.

Kenneth L. Karst

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . 24 Jan. 2019 <>.

"Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . (January 24, 2019).

"Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved January 24, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.