Skip to main content

Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale

Rosenbergs Self-Esteem Scale

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Morris Rosenbergs (1965) Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is perhaps the most widely used instrument for the assessment of trait self-esteem, defined as relatively stable feelings of overall self-worth. The importance of self-esteem in the prediction of other self-attitudes and behavior in conjunction with the ease of administration and scoring of the RSES make the instrument useful for social scientists in many different settings.

Rosenberg originally designed the RSES as a face valid, unidimensional measure of self-esteem designed to assess adolescent self-worth. Example items from the RSES include I feel that I am a person of worth, at least on an equal basis with others and At times I think I am no good at all. Negatively worded items are reversescored to create an overall score. The underlying view of self-esteem on which the scale was founded defines self-esteem as a positive or negative attitude about the self. People with high self-esteem respect and consider themselves worthy. Rosenberg noted that high-self-esteem people do not necessarily feel that they are better than others, but they do not consider themselves to be worse than others. People with low self-esteem express self-rejection, self-dissatisfaction, and self-contempt (Rosenberg 1965, p. 31). According to Rosenberg, low-self-esteem people do not respect themselves and wish that they could evaluate themselves more favorably.

Though Rosenberg fashioned the RSES as a ten-item Guttman scale, researchers most commonly adopt five- or seven-point Likert-style response formats anchored by, for example, 1 = not at all like me to 7 = very much like me. (Blascovich and Tomaka 1991). Internal consistency estimates for the scale typically fall in a range from.77 to.88, indicating acceptable internal reliability. Additionally, test-retest estimates for the RSES range from.85 to.82, revealing that the RSES demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability.

In addition to being reliable, the RSES surfaces as a valid measure of self-worth as well. RSES scores are positively related to an abundance of conceptually related constructs such as confidence and social acceptance, as well as to other self-esteem scales (Blascovich and Tomaka 1991). Moreover, RSES scores are negatively associated with constructs that are typically symptomatic of low self-worth, including anxiety, depression, and feelings of rejection.

Researchers have adapted the RSES for use with different populations (i.e., younger children; Rosenberg and Simmons 1972) and for different purposes. By modifying instructions for the RSES, asking that respondents answer according to how they feel about themselves right now, at the present moment, researchers may assess state self-esteem, an evaluation of self-worth that is more variable than trait self-esteem using the RSES (Kernis, Grannemann, and Barclay 1992).

Although the RSES is a conceptually and psychometrically sound measure of unidimensional self-esteem, it does not assess all facets of self-worth. Researchers who are interested in assessing domain-specific elements of self-esteem (e.g., appearance self-esteem, school competence, moral self-worth) should include domain-specific measures in addition to or instead of the RSES, depending on their research questions. Additionally, the RSES is transparent, or face valid, making it easy for the respondent to surmise that they are completing a measure of self-esteem. Such obvious face validity might result in artificially inflated self-esteem scores. Researchers who are more interested in peoples automatic or uncontrolled ratings of self-worth should make use of available implicit measures of self-worth.

SEE ALSO Anxiety; Depression, Psychological; Guttman Scale; Likert Scale; Psychology; Psychometrics; Reliability, Statistical; Scales; Self-Concept; Self-Esteem; Self-Perception Theory; Self-Presentation; Self-Representation; Social Psychology; Validation; Validity, Statistical

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Blascovich, Jim Robert, and Joseph Tomaka. 1991. Measures of Self-Esteem. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, ed. John P. Robinson, Phillip R. Shaver, and Lawrence S. Wrightsman, 115160. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Kernis, Michael H., Bruce D. Grannemann, and Lynda C. Barclay. 1992. Stability of Self-Esteem: Assessment, Correlates, and Excuse Making. Journal of Personality 60 (3): 621644.

Rosenberg, Morris. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rosenberg, Morris, and R. G. Simmons. 1972. Black and White Self-Esteem: The Urban School Child. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

Jorgianne Civey Robinson

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Encyclopedia.com. 11 Mar. 2019 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Encyclopedia.com. (March 11, 2019). https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/rosenbergs-self-esteem-scale

"Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Retrieved March 11, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/rosenbergs-self-esteem-scale

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.