Skip to main content

neutral theory of molecular evolution

neutral theory of molecular evolution The theory, originally proposed in the late 1960s by Motoo Kimura (1924–94) and others, that most evolutionary changes at the molecular level are due to the random process of genetic drift acting on mutations, rather than natural selection. Its proponents, while recognizing the importance of selection in determining functionally significant traits, hold that the great majority of the differences in macromolecular structures observed between individuals in a population are of no adaptive significance and have no impact on the reproductive success of the individual in which they arise. Hence, frequencies of the corresponding mutant alleles are governed by purely random events. This contrasts with the orthodox neo-Darwinian view that nearly all evolutionary changes have adaptive value for the organism and arise through natural selection. For example, many enzymes exhibit polymorphism with regard to their amino acid sequence, giving rise to morphological variants that are detectable by electrophoresis. However, these variants may apparently perform equally well, and `neutralists' would argue that evolution consists essentially of random shuffling between them. The `selectionists' retort that such variants are likely to have subtle differences in function and are susceptible to selective forces, such as minor environmental changes. The degree to which the neutral theory applies to polymorphisms in proteins and nucleic acids is still a matter of controversy and debate.

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"neutral theory of molecular evolution." A Dictionary of Biology. . 21 Jan. 2019 <>.

"neutral theory of molecular evolution." A Dictionary of Biology. . (January 21, 2019).

"neutral theory of molecular evolution." A Dictionary of Biology. . Retrieved January 21, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.