An early anonymous Summa on the Decretum of gratian. It constitutes an important link in the development of the science of Canon Law. A modern edition of the only known manuscript (Bamberg) has been published. The Parisian origin of the work, knowledge of which is based upon a close examination of its contents, has never been questioned. The author's references to northern Italy, to the laws of the Lombards, and especially to the magistri Boloniensis suggest that he was a student in that area, probably at Bologna. His references to France in general, to the French language and usages, to the general region of Paris—Sens, Saint-Denis, etc. and his adherence to the teaching of the "Paris School," as well as his knowledge of the Parisian teachers of the time, are clues that he was writing at Paris.
The work can be dated about 1160. The style, the method of referring to the Decretum, the paleae, the absence of any mention of the legislation of Alexander III, the authorities quoted, and other internal evidence point to an early date in the decretist writings. The work contains no commentary on the De consecratione or on Causae 27–29. The remarks on the De poenitentia are limited to eight lines. The author had firsthand knowledge of older collections such as the false decretals and those of ivo of chartres. He did not cite burchard of worms. He used the Summa Rolandi and had the Summa of paucapalea always at hand. He did not use the Summa of rufinus. Among the 12th-century writers whom he quoted are Gerlandus, peter lombard, Magister P. or Pe. (peter of poitiers?), Gilbert of Poitiers, Gerard Pucelle, Magister G. (Gandulphus?) and Magister C. The author had considerable knowledge of the Roman law of Theodosius and Justinian and cited commentators on the latter—Placentinus, Martinus, Roger, and especially Bulgarus. The work was used by the Pseudo-Rufinus, by the Summa "Antiquitate et tempore," the "Distinctiones Monacenses," and perhaps by Stephen of Tournai.
Bibliography: The Summa Parisiensis on the Decretum Gratiani, ed. t. p. mclaughlin (Toronto 1952), with references to earlier studies of Maasen, Schulte, Gillmann, etc. t. p. mclaughlin, "The Formation of the Marriage Bond according to the Summa Parisiensis," Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953) 208–212. s. kuttner, Repertorium der Kanonistik (Rome 1937) 177–178. c. lefebvre, Dictionnaire de droit canonique, ed. r. naz, 7 v. (Paris 1935–64) 6:1230–31.
[t. p. mclaughlin]
"Summa Parisiensis." New Catholic Encyclopedia. . Encyclopedia.com. (December 14, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/summa-parisiensis
"Summa Parisiensis." New Catholic Encyclopedia. . Retrieved December 14, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/summa-parisiensis
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.