Skip to main content

Zhen dong

Zhen dong (gzhan.stong, ‘Emptiness of Other’). At one time a heretical theory in Tibetan Buddhism that contributed to the downfall of the Jonang school, but which was later resurrected to underpin the great eclectic Rimé movement of the Tibetan Renaissance. The theory asserts that the two levels of truth—ultimate truth (paramārtha satya) and conventional truth (saṃṿrti satya)—are two distinct ‘entities’, in other words that ultimate truths (i.e. emptinesses) are empty of being the objects that are the basis of their imputation, and that objects (e.g. tables) are empty of being the emptiness that may be imputed on them. This involves the belief that a conventional truth (tables are just tables) is true from a conventional point of view, and that an ultimate truth (emptiness is empty of any phenomenal basis of imputation) is only true from a standpoint of meditative insight at which point all phenomena apparently cease. The Geluk, who adopt the rang dong theory and who condemned the Jonang for heresy, point out several errors, notably that the separation and independence of the two levels of truth amounts to substantialism by reifying the ‘absolute’; that their understanding of an ultimate truth contradicts the Prajñāpāramitā (Perfection of Wisdom) by separating emptiness from form; and that the absence of emptiness can never be true at any level.

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Zhen dong." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. . 26 Mar. 2019 <>.

"Zhen dong." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. . (March 26, 2019).

"Zhen dong." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. . Retrieved March 26, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.