Skip to main content

Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 453 U.S. 367 (1981)

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 453 U.S. 367 (1981)

A 1971 amendment to the communications act of 1934 permits the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to revoke a broadcaster's license for failure to allow reasonable access to a candidate for federal office. The Supreme Court here interpreted this provision to create a right of access for an individual candidate. Further, reaffirming the much criticized precedent of red lion broadcasting co. v. fcc (1969), the Court sustained the law, as so interpreted, against a first amendment challenge. The dissenters argued that the statute created no right of access.

Kenneth L. Karst
(1986)

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 453 U.S. 367 (1981)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. 21 May. 2019 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 453 U.S. 367 (1981)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (May 21, 2019). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/columbia-broadcasting-system-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-453-us-367-1981

"Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 453 U.S. 367 (1981)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved May 21, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/columbia-broadcasting-system-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-453-us-367-1981

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.