Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U.S. 568 (1941)
CHAPLINSKY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE 315 U.S. 568 (1941)
In Chaplinsky, Justice frank murphy, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, introduced into first amendment jurisprudence the two-level theory that "There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or " fighting words "—those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace." Chaplinsky itself arose under a "fighting words" statute, which the state court had interpreted to punish "words likely to cause an average addressee to fight." In this narrow context the decision can be seen as an application of the clear and present danger test. cohen v. california (1971), emphasizing this rationale, offered protection to an obscenity that created no danger of violence.
In its broader conception of categories of speech excluded from First Amendment protection, the case served as an important doctrinal source for many later obscenity and libel decisions.
"Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U.S. 568 (1941)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 19, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire-315-us-568-1941
"Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U.S. 568 (1941)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved November 19, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire-315-us-568-1941
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.