Eusebius (265–339 or 340)
(265–339 or 340)
Eusebius, the church historian and Christian apologist, was bishop of Caesarea (Palestine) early in the fourth century. He is best known for his enthusiastic support of the emperor Constantine and for his pioneering Historia Ecclesiastica, intended to show how the church expanded but always remained the same because of its leaders' fidelity to tradition. Though Eusebius was essentially a historian rather than a philosopher, he did produce one work of significance for the history of philosophy. This is his Praeparatio Evangelica (Preparation for the Gospel), probably written between 312 and 318. It consists of fifteen books, perhaps because Porphyry's treatise, Kata Christianon (Against the Christians), contained the same number. Eusebius claimed that his treatise went beyond earlier works of controversy or exegesis; the novelty seems to have lain in the method of quoting passages in which philosophers contradict one another, although he obviously found materials for this technique in some of his pagan sources.
The Praeparatio may be outlined thus: the earliest cosmogony (I. 7–8); the earliest theology (I. 9); Phoenician theology (I. 10); Egyptian theology (II. 1); Greek mythology (II. 2–8); Greek "physical" theology (III. 1–17); Greek oracles (IV–VI), leading on to the doctrines of Greek philosophers on fate, free will, and foreknowledge (VI); Hebrew doctrines (VII–IX); the chronological priority of Hebrew learning to Greek (X); the agreements and disagreements of Greek philosophy with the Hebrew oracles (XI–XIII); and the inconsistency of Greek philosophy, culminating with a transcription of part of the treatise "On the Doctrines of Philosophers" ascribed to Plutarch (XIV–XV).
The sources used by Eusebius reflect the predominantly Platonic character of the books assembled in church libraries, especially at Caesarea, by Origen and others. Eusebius made extensive use of Plato and Philo, but not of Aristotle. His other sources include the textbooks by Arius Didymus and Pseudo-Plutarch, as well as works by eclectic Platonists of the second Christian century (Atticus, Numenius, Plutarch, Severus) and a few of their contemporaries (the Peripatetic Aristocles, the Epicurean Diogenianus, the Cynic Oenomaus). From the third century he used the treatise "On Fate" by Alexander of Aphrodisias, the school text of Plotinus (earlier than that found in Porphyry's edition), several works by Porphyry ("On Abstinence," "Letter to Anebo," "Against the Christians," "Philological Lectures," "On the Philosophy to Be Derived from Oracles," "On the Soul against Boethus," "On Statues"), and a fragment by a Christian Neoplatonist named Amelius.
His basic viewpoint is that of a Christian ecclesiastic and a historian; he has considerable sympathy for his favorite philosophers (especially Plato), but he is not really at home with them. Indeed, in his later work, Theophania (On the theophany), written after 337, his attitude toward philosophy is markedly hostile.
In later times the Praeparatio was used as a mine of philosophical quotations by such Christian apologists as Theodoret and Cyril of Alexandria (Cyril often looked up Eusebius' sources and provided slightly different quotations). It would appear that this is its principal value.
works by eusebius
The best Greek texts are in Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte, published by the Berlin Academy from 1902 on, although the first volume needs to be reedited (see F. Winkelmann, Die Textbezeugung der Vita Constantini des Eusebius von Caesarea, Berlin: Akademie_Verlag, 1962). Translations include H. J. Lawlor and J. Oulton, Eusebius: The Ecclesiastical History and the Martyrs of Palestine, 2 vols. (London, 1928), valuable commentary; W. J. Ferrar, The Proof of the Gospel (Demonstratio Evangelica ), 2 vols. (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1920); and E. H. Gifford, Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparationis Libri XV, 4 vols. in 5 (Oxford, 1903).
works on eusebius
Full bibliography in J. Quasten, Patrology (Utrecht: Spectrum, 1960), Vol. III, pp. 309–345 (on the Praeparatio, pp. 329–331). Later titles include D. S. Wallace-Hadrill, Eusebius of Caesarea (London: A.R. Mowbray, 1960) and J. Sirinelli, Les vues historiques d'Eusèbe de Césarée (Dakar, Senegal, 1961). On early use of Eusebius' works see Pierre Canivet, Histoire d'une entreprise d'apologétique au Ve siècle (Paris: Bloud & Gay, 1958); R. M. Grant, "Greek Literature in the Treatise De Trinitate and Cyril Contra Julianum, " Journal of Theological Studies 15 (1964): 265–279.
Robert M. Grant (1967)
"Eusebius (265–339 or 340)." Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Encyclopedia.com. (October 19, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/eusebius-265-339-or-340
"Eusebius (265–339 or 340)." Encyclopedia of Philosophy. . Retrieved October 19, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/eusebius-265-339-or-340
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.