Skip to main content

Cherokee Inc.

Cherokee Inc.

6835 Valjean Avenue
Van Nuys, California 91406
U.S.A.
(818) 908-9868
Fax: (818) 908-9191

Public Company
Incorporated:
1973
Employees: 15
Sales: $13.9 million
Stock Exchanges: NASDAQ
SICs: 6794 Patent Owners & Lessors

Cherokee Inc. is a licenser whose namesake brand appears on clothing, housewares, accessories, footwear, and other consumer goods in retail outlets around the world. During the first half of its 26-year history, the company evolved from a tiny shoe repair shop into a highly profitable, multimillion-dollar manufacturer of shoes and apparel. Heavy debt from a management-led leveraged buyout in the late 1980s led to multiple bankruptcy reorganizations. In the mid-1990s, the scaled-back company staked its future on the cultivation of the Cherokee label as a megabrand and the creation of a global licensing operation. In the process, Cherokees sales have shrunk from a high of $236.9 million in 1991 to just under $14 million in 1995. After scoring annual profits of more than $10 million in the late 1980s, the firm failed to record a single year in the black from 1990 to 1995.

Corporate Foundations in 1970s

Cherokee was founded in 1971 by James Argyropoulos. With his familyincluding a twin brotherArgy had emigrated to Chicago from Greece in 1958 at the age of 14. Over the next four years, he learned the English language in high school and the shoemaking trade from his father. But Argy was not interested in becoming a cobbler when he graduated. At 18, he moved to Los Angeles to pursue a career as an electric guitarist for a rock n roll band. He chased that dream for about four years, until the financial demands of a new wife and baby drew him back into the footwear business.

Argyropoulos launched a shoe repair shop in 1968, and like his father before him was soon selling custom-made footwear to hippies and flower children from his Venice, California, garage. His comfortable leather and wood shoes, sandals, and clogs were embellished with hand-painted symbols. Especially popular was a geometric Indian motif. With orders growing, Argy founded the Cherokee Shoe Co. in 1971 and incorporated two years later.

Over the course of the 1970s, the twenty-something entrepreneur expanded his line to include sandals with an injection-molded sole known as the Beep Bottom, as well as closed shoe lines. With orders from national department store chains like Macys, Bloomingdales, and Dayton-Hudson, Argyropoulos was able to increase his production to 1.5 million pairs per year. Sales volume tripled from 1979 to nearly $34 million in 1980. It was around this time that the entrepreneur decided to pursue a major brand extension.

Union with Robert Margolis in 1983

Argyropoulos found a like-minded entrepreneur in skiing-buddy-turned-business-partner Robert Margolis. Margolis brought with him another partner, Jay Kester, and about a decade of experience in the bargain clothing segment. The three formed a joint venture, Cherokee Apparel Inc., in 1981. In acknowledgment of his new colleagues expertise in the clothing industry, Argyropoulos put up 75 percent of the start-up funds, but only kept a 55 percent stake in the new affiliate.

Writing for Forbes magazine in 1986, journalist Ellen Paris described Argyropoulos and Margolis as a natural fit, noting that Margolis contacts with the apparel buyers opened up shelf space for Cherokee shoes at important accounts like Burdines in Florida. And Argyropoulos shoe account contacts cleared rack space for Margolis apparel lines in a chain like Nordstrom.

Growth Follows 1983 Initial Public Offering

With a focus on womens and childrens apparel, sales at the new affiliate soon outstripped shoe revenues, growing from $15.1 million in 1983 to $51.6 million in 1984. In 1983, Argyropoulos took Cherokee Shoe public and used $5.3 million of the $9 million proceeds to retire short-term debt and acquire the remaining 45 percent of Cherokee Apparel Corp. he did not own. The initial public offering was structured so that the principals would gain some cash without relinquishing control: the founder retained a one-third stake in his company, his twin brother Arthur Argyris (who had Anglicized his name) held another 10 percent, and Margolis (who became president of the reincarnated Cherokee Inc. in 1984) owned about 6 percent.

The partners used several strategies to bring their brand to national status in the early 1980s. National advertising via print and television helped support the companys business with nationwide department stores. Argyropoulos also hoped to expand a fledgling chain of Cherokee stores from its roots in California into a nationwide chain of 100 franchised outlets by the end of the decade.

By mid-decade it was apparent that brand licensing had become a very successful and prolific program. In exchange for a royalty of 7 percent2 to 3 percent of which was earmarked for the corporate advertising budgetCherokee sold other clothing manufacturers the right to use the trademark and Indian head logo on everything from menswear to accessories and childrens clothing. By 1986, the company had over a dozen licensees, including international affiliates in New Zealand, Australia, and Canada.

In keeping with its thoroughly American name and image, all of Cherokees clothing and footwear was made in the U.S.A. (The company did make a brief stab at importing, but soon found that Californian immigrant labor made up for its relative expense with quick turnarounds and reliable quality.) At the time of the merger, the companys sales ratio was about 60 percent shoes, 40 percent apparel. Within two years, that equation was turned on its head, with 65 percent of sales generated from womens clothing. Along with this corporate transformation came skyrocketing annual sales and a mounting stock price. Revenues tripled from $33.97 million in 1980 to $104 million in 1986, and net income multiplied tenfold, from $690,000 to $6.8 million during the same period. A tripling of Cherokees stock price during this period left some analysts eagerly speculating that the apparel company was another [Liz] Claiborne.

Forbes s Paris wrote admiringly of Argyropoulos innate business sense, noting that while he was only a high school graduate, he was what many eager business school applicants think they can somehow learn to bea successful entrepreneur, creator of a dynamic business. We wish them luck. Entrepreneurs of this type are born, not made. Of course, Paris could not have predicted that those eager business school types would later cut the natural out of his own company.

Early in 1986, Argyropoulos announced ambitious financial performance goals for the remainder of the decade, among them 20 percent annual sales and earnings growth. That April brought a secondary equity offering totaling 2.5 million shares, 700,000 of which had been held by the principals. The cash-out reduced Argyropoulos stake to 15 percent, while Argyris and Margolis held on to 1 percent each. Cherokee used part of the proceeds to purchase a controlling interest in clothing manufacturer Code Bleu from Bayly Corp. in December 1987 and outright control of shoemaker Pallmark International two months later.

Cherokee exceeded its founders goals in fiscal 1987 (ending November 30), achieving year-over-year increases of 34 percent in sales and 53 percent in earnings. And while sales growth fell somewhat short of projections, at 16.6 percent on the 1988 fiscal year (which, since it ended May 31, overlapped the previous period), profits continued their upward climb at a 23 percent rate, to $12.8 million. It was the most prosperous 12 months in Cherokees history, and would be its last profitable year for quite some time.

Leveraged Buyout in 1988

With the aid of investment firm Deutschman & Co.s Green Acquisition Co., Cherokee president Robert Margolis led a corporate mutiny against Jimmy Argyropoulos in May 1988. The $150 million, $12.50 per share bid offered to exchange shares in the newly-formed Green Acquisition for Cherokee shares held by officers and directors Margolis, Jay Kester, and Cary Cooper, making them the principal officers of the privately-held Green in the process. The offer made no mention of Argyropoulos, even though he continued to own about 14.5 percent of the company.

When a special committee of Cherokees board of directors rejected the bid in June, the executivesthis time joined by Argyropoulosbrought a second, $13 per share, $156 million, offer to take the company private. By July, however, Argy had defected, asserting that the high debt the managers would have to assume in order to buy out their fellow shareholders would hamstring the company and require severe layoffs and other cutbacks. The special committee of the board agreed and rejected this second offer in August.

The third time proved a charm for Green Acquisition. In September, its $173.6 million bid for control was approved over the nays of Argyropoulos and a small cadre of loyal directors. Unwilling to admit defeat, the founder sought a white knight and solicited a court injunction to block the takeover, but both efforts were fruitless. Argy resigned from Cherokee that October, no doubt taking some solace in a $31 million settlement.

Company Perspectives:

As dress down Friday continues to sweep the nation, casual clothes are becoming more important. Now, corporate America is learning what CHEROKEE customers have known for years. When it comes to casual dressingno one does it better than CHEROKEE!

Margolis and companys leveraged buyout proceeded in two steps: in October 1988, the group paid about $84.7 million for a 50 percent stake. Green acquired the remaining equity for $13.99 per share ($12 cash and an unsecured $1.99 per share bond) and merged the company in May 1989. This privatization process was financed almost entirely with debt, loading Cherokee with over $170 million in long-term liabilities. Interest on the loans was set at 15.75 percent.

Losses, Bankruptcy Reorganizations in Late 1980s, Early 1990s

Debt service proved a powerful impetus for growth in the post-LBO era. Cherokee adopted several new strategies and revised some old ones in its quest for increased cash flow. In an effort to raise sales volume, the clothing company began to lower its wholesale prices and concentrate more on mass merchandisers like Mervyns and Wal-Mart, and less on its traditional department store customers. A long-resisted shift to overseas production helped cut production costs. Cherokee vastly increased its licensing programs as well, accumulating a total of 26 licensees authorized to make everything from belts to beach towels by 1989. Overseas licenses were a particular focus. By the end of the decade, the company had added affiliates in Mexico and Japan. Corky Newman, president of marketing and licensing, predicted that The Cherokee label will be a dominant label in the Nineties and the Nineties is a decade of the megabrand, in a September 26, 1989 WWD article. The company also boosted its advertising budget from about $3 million in 1990 to $7 million in 1991.

While these efforts succeeded in increasing Cherokees sales from $156.2 million in fiscal 1988 to over $236.9 million in fiscal 1991, the company lost over $2 million in the ensuing years, ending the latter year with a negative tangible book value of $126.2 million. Despite an injection of cash from a public offering of 2.5 million shares at $6.50 each in early 1991, the company continued to struggle with its debt. In November 1992, Cherokee missed an interest payment on the $105 million liability that remained, and was forced to enter Chapter 11 bankruptcy negotiations with its creditors. The company emerged from the proceedings June 1, 1993, having reduced its annual fixed charges by $14 million.

Margolis resigned Cherokees chairmanship and chief executive office that November, citing familial responsibilities and a desire to pursue other entrepreneurial opportunities. Jay Kester, Margoliss long-time partner and Cherokees president of worldwide marketing, followed suit later that month, giving virtually identical reasons for his departure. The board of directors selected Bryan Marsal, a management consultant, to act as interim CEO and hired Joseph M. Elles as president. Formerly general merchandising manager at Lee Apparel Co., Elles implemented several strategies in the hopes of getting Cherokee back on track.

A label overhaul abolished Cherokees Indian-head logo, which Elles thought was inappropriate for the politically-correct 1990s. In an effort to streamline production, he eliminated 75 percent of the companys styles to focus primarily on jeans. He also instituted a market research program, increased the advertising budget, and raised inventory levels to better serve the department stores that he hoped to target. As he told WWDs Janet Ozzard in January 1994, Elles had high hopes for Cherokee, noting that it would be a disappointment if we did not run substantial double-digit [sales] growth in the ensuing year. But these hopes evaporated along with Cherokees revenues in the ensuing months. Results for the year ending May 31, 1993, showed a 19 percent decline in sales to $157.3 million and a near-doubling of its annual shortfall to $20.3 million. The disparity only grew worse in the following year, with revenues declining to $114.1 million and a $24.8 million loss. Elles resigned in November 1994 as the company once again sought bankruptcy protection.

His successor, Jim Novak, joined WWDs Kim-Van Dang in blaming high inventory costs for pushing the company into its second bankruptcy reorganization in as many years. Commenting for an April 1995 article, Novak said that It was not a bad idea, but this company is not financially structured to handle [costly inventories]. The support was not here for him. Novak resurrected Cherokees Indian-head logo and planned to reinstate many of the companys trouser and shirt lines, but early in 1995 former chairman and CEO Robert Margolis re-emerged with a radically different idea.

Licensing Sole Focus Beginning in 1995

By this time, Margolis had accumulated about one-fourth of Cherokees devalued stock via an investment group. It only seemed natural for him to accept bondholders requests that he reprise his role at the troubled companys helm. He started with a corporate garage sale, pawning off everything from sewing machines to buttons and even the proverbial garage, a 110,000-square-foot factory. Margolis used the $20 million proceeds to eliminate Cherokees remaining debt. The elimination of all manufacturing operations shrunk the companys payroll from over 400 in 1993 to less than two dozen in 1995 and reduced its overhead to less than $2 million.

Margolis based his new strategy, which he dubbed private label with a label, strictly on licensing the Cherokee brand and logo. But the company would not limit its client base to manufacturers, as it had in the past. Instead, it sought strategic alliances with retailers, to whom it would license the brand for whole categories of soft goods. This tactic followed the successful lead of such retailer-owned brands as J.C. Penneys Arizona and Wal-Marts Kathy Lee. Cherokees first major deal in this vein, a 1995 agreement with Dayton Hudson Corporations Target chain, guaranteed it a minimum of $5.5 million in royalties for the fiscal year ended that May.

By 1997, Margolis could point to several signs that his innovative program was succeeding. The company had about 30 licensees, several of whom had confidently signed on since the latest corporate reincarnation. In January, the company announced net income of $2.8 million on sales of $3.7 million for the six-month period ending November 1996. The company optimistically instituted a quarterly dividend early that year, and forecast that it would have $8 million cash and be unencumbered by debt at year-end (May 1997).

Further Reading

Bloomfield, Judy, Labels Stretching Out Via Licensing, WWD, June 7, 1989, pp. 2021.

Cherokee Files Initial Order, Footwear News, October 10, 1983, pp. 12.

Cherokee Founder Left Out of $150 Million Buyout, Daily News Record, May 26, 1988, p. 2.

Cole, Benjamin Mark, Cherokee Cedes Control in LBO; Drexel Underwriting Deal Gives Firm the Upper Hand, Los Angeles Business Journal, January 16, 1989, pp. 12.

Dang, Kim-Van, New Frontiers for Cherokee, WWD, November 17, 1993, p. 16.

, Cherokees New Chapter, WWD, April 12, 1995, p. 10.

, Cherokees New Trail, WWD, July 5, 1995, p. 12.

Dodds, Lyn Strongin, Home Is Where the Profits Are, Financial World, November 13, 1985, pp. 9697.

Forman, Ellen, Franchising: Racing on a Fast Track, WWD, March 6, 1986, pp. 78.

Jaffe, Thomas, Smoke Signals? Forbes, May 18, 1987, p. 267.

Lippincott, Liz, Cherokee: Power Moves, WWD, July 28, 1993, p. 10.

Macintosh, Jean, Argyropoulos Opposes Cherokee Buyout Bid, Footwear News, July 25, 1988, pp. 12.

, Cherokee Emerges Stronger Than Ever, WWD, December 1, 1988, p. 13.

, Buyout Is a $31M Bonanza for Cherokee Founder, WWD, April 27, 1989, p. 8.

, Planning to Slice the DebtA Bit, WWD, May 13, 1991, p. 7.

, Cherokee Loses $5.3M in Quarter, $9.8M in Year, WWD, September 3, 1992, p. 2.

Margolis Rejoins Cherokee, WWD, May 8, 1995, pp. 23.

Marlow, Michael, Cherokee: Back on the Public Path, WWD, May 13, 1991, pp. 67.

Newman, Morris, Apparel Maker Cherokee Suffers Steep Stock Drop, Los Angeles Business Journal, September 26, 1994, pp. 5A-6A.

Ozzard, Janet, Cherokee Blazes a New Trail, WWD, January 26, 1994, p. 16.

Rottman, Meg, Cherokees Initial Offer Comes in at $9 a Share, Footwear News, December 12, 1983, pp. 23.

, 30.5% Of Cherokee Sales Are East of Mississippi, Footwear News, January 13, 1986, pp. 23.

, Argy Leaves All Cherokee Positions, Footwear News, October 24, 1988, pp. 12.

, Jim Argyropoulos: Looking Back, Thinking Ahead, Footwear News Magazine, February 1989, pp. S46-S49.

, Cherokee Group Feeling Strong After Years Hurdles, Footwear News, February 6, 1989, pp. 46.

, Cherokee Rescinds Stock Offering Plans, Footwear News, October 8, 1990, pp. 45.

Rottman, Meg, and Jean Macintosh, Cherokee Stock Climbs After Takeover Attempt, Footwear News, May 30, 1988, pp. 23.

Ruben, Howard G. Ex-Cherokee Executives Form Firm, WWD, March 8, 1989, p. 40.

Rutberg, Sidney, Wall St. Analysts Beating Drums for Cherokee, WWD, February 13, 1986, p. 6.

April Dougal Gasbarre

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Cherokee Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. 24 Sep. 2018 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Cherokee Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. (September 24, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/cherokee-inc

"Cherokee Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved September 24, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/cherokee-inc

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.