(b Saluzzo, Italy, 20 August 1863; d. Turin, Italy, 18 May 1924)
Segre studied under Enrico D’Ovidio at the University of Turin, where he formed a long friendship with his fellow student Gino Loria. Segre submitted his doctoral dissertation in 1883, when he was only twenty; and in the same year he was named assistant to the professor of algebra and to the professor of analytic geometry. Two years later he became an assistant in descriptive geometry, and from 1885 to 1888 he replaced Giuseppe Bruno in the courses on projective geometry. In 1888 he succeeded D’Ovidio in the chair of higher geometry, a post he held without interruption until his death.
Segre was much influenced by D’Ovidio’s course on the geometry of ruled spaces (1881–1882). D’Ovidio started from the ideas of Plücker, which had been taken up and developed by Felix Klein. According to these ideas, the geometry of ruled space is equivalent to the study of a quadratic variety of four dimensions imbedded in a linear space of five dimensions. In his lectures D’Ovidio examined the works of Veronese on the projective geometry of hyperspaces and those of Weierstrass on bilinear and quadratic forms. These topics inspired much of Segre’s research, beginning with his thesis. The latter consists of two parts: a study of the quadrics in a linear space of arbitrary dimension and an examination of the geometry of the right line and of its quadratic series. Before completing his thesis, Segre collaborated with Loria on a twenty-two-page article in French that they sent to Klein, who published it in Mathematische Annalen (1883). A long and active correspondence between Segre and Klein then ensued.
Segre’s mathematical work can be divided into four distinct areas, all of which are linked by a common concern with the problem of space. The first of these areas comprises Segre’s articles on the geometric properties that are invariant under linear transformations of space. In this connection Segre showed the value of investigating hyperspaces in the study of three-dimensional space S3. For example, a ruled surface of S3, which is composed of right lines, can be represented by a curve in S5; it thus becomes possible to reduce the classification of surfaces to that of curves. The insufficiencies of the earlier theories proposed by A. Möbius, Grassmann, Cayley, and Cremona were thus soon revealed.
According to Segre, a ruled surface in a space S2 can also be considered a variety of ∞2 points distributed on ∞1 right lines. Further, Segre generalized the theory of the loci formed by ∞1 right lines Sn to the theory of the loci formed by ∞1 planes. He took as his point of departure certain problems on bundles of quadrics that Weierstrass and L. Kronecker had treated in a purely algebraic manner.
At this time it was known that the intersection of two quadrics of S3 is a quartic the projection of which from a point exterior to it onto a plane is a quartic with two double points. John Casey and Gaston Darboux had shown that its study is useful for that of fourth-order surfaces, called cyclides. Segre reexamined and generalized the problem by placing the two quadrics in a space S4. He also investigated the locus resulting from the intersection of two quadrics of S5 and discovered that it is no longer a surface but rather a three-dimensional variety that can be interpreted as a complex quadratic of S3. From this result he confirmed in an elegant manner the famous fourth-order surface with sixteen double points, which had been found by Kummer in 1864 and bear his name. Before Segre’s findings, the study of this surface required the use of extremely complicated algebraic procedures.
Segre next began a series of works on the properties of algebraic curves and ruled surfaces subjected to birational transformations. Alfred Clebssch, Paul Gordan, Alexander Brill, and Max Noether had already studied these transformations with a view toward giving a geometric interpretation to the theory of Abelian functions. Segre showed the advantage gained by operating in a hyperspace. His article of 1896 on the birational transformations of a surface contains the invariant that Zeuthen had encountered under another form in 1871, now called Zeuthen-Segre invariant.
Segre’s interest in 1890 in the properties of the Riemann sphere led him to a third area of research: the role of imaginary elements in geometry. He laid the basis of a new theory of hyperalgebraic entities by representing complex points of Sn by means of the ∞2n real points of one of the varieties V2n. (This variety has since been named for Segre.) Certain of Segre’s hyperalgebraic, and he was led to enlarge the concept of a point. To this end, he introduced points that he called bicomplex, which correspond to the ordinary complex points of the real image. Their coordinates are bicomplex numbers constructed with the aid of the two unities i and j. such that:
i · j = j · i
i2 = j2 = –1.
Later, in 1912, Segre returned to this subject, when, utilizing the works of Von Staudt, he studied another type of complex geometry.
Darboux’s Leçons sur la théorie générale des surfaces. which Segre often used in his courses, inspired him to investigate (from 1907) infinitesimal geometry. Extending the work of Darboux, Segre studied a certain class of surfaces in Sn defined by second-order linear partial differential equations. These surfaces are described by a moving point of which the homogeneous coordinates-functions of two independent parameters u and v-are the solutions of a second-order partial differential equation. Among the surfaces of a hyperspace, Segre was particularly interested in those that lead to a Laplace equation. In an article of 1908 on the conjugate tangents of a surface, he established a relationship between the points of the tangent plane and those of the planes passing through the origin. To establish this relationship he employed infinitesimals of higher order in a problem concerning the neighborhood of a point. This procedure led him to introduce a new system of lines, analogous to those studied by Darboux, traced on the surface: they were named Segre lines, and their differential equation was established by Fubini. It may be noted that Segre’s last publication dealt with differential geometry. Segre wrote a long article on hyperspaces for the Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, containing all that was then known about such spaces. A model article, it is notable for its clarity and elegance.
Segre became a member of the Academy of Turin in 1889. He long served on the editorial board of the Annali di matematica pura ed applicata, on which he was succeeded by his former student Severi of the University of Rome.
Through his teaching and his publications, Segre played an important role in reviving an interest in geometry in Italy. His reputation and the new ideas he presented in his courses attracted many Italian and foreign students to Turin. Segre’s contribution to the knowledge of space assures him a place after Cremona in the ranks of the most illustrious members of the new Italian school of geometry.
I. Original Works. The complete works of Segre have been published as Opere, 4 vols. (1957–4963), but it does not contain the paper “Mehrdimensionale Räume” (see below). A complete list of Segre’s publications, 128 titles, is given in G. Loria (see below). A. Terracini lists ninety-eight titles. See also Poggendorff, V. 1151–1152.
Segre’s most important works include “Sur les différentes espèces de complexes du 2e degré des droites qui coupent harmoniquement deux surfaces du 2e ordre.” in Mathematische Annalen, 23 (1883), 213–234., written with G. Loria: “Studio sulle quadriche in uno spazio lineare ad un numero qualunque di dimensioni,” in Memorie dell’Accademia delle scienze di Torino, 36 (1883), 3–86: “Sulla geometria della retta e delle sue serie quadratiche,” ibid., 87–157: “Note sur les complexes quadratiques dont la surface singulière est une surface du 2e degré double,” in Mathematische Annalen, 23 (1883), 235–243: “Sulle geometric metriche dei complessi lineari e delle sfere e sulle loro mutue analogie,” in Atti dell’Accademia delle scienze19 (1883), 159–186: “Sulla teoria e sulla classificazione delle omografie in uno spaxio lineare ad un numero qualunque di dimensioni,” in Memorie della R. Accademia dei Lincei, 3rd ser., 19 (1884), 127–148:and “Étude des différentes surfaces du quatrième ordre à coniaue double ou cuspidale (générale ou décomposée) considéréles comme des projections de l’intersection de deux variété quadratiques de l’espace à quatre dimensions,” in Mthematische Annalen, 24 (1884), 313–444.
Later writings are “Le coppie di elementi imaginari nella geometria proiettiva sintetica,” in Memorie dell’ Academia dell scienzze di Torino, 38 (1886), 3–24: “Recherches générales sur les courbes et les surfaces réglées algébriques,” in Mathematische Annalen, 30 (18870, 203–226. and 34 (1889), 1–25; “Un nuovo campo di richerche geometriche,” in Atti dell’Academia delle scienze, 25 (1889), 276–301, 430–457, 592–612, and 26 (1890), 35–71: “Su alcuni indrizzi nelle investigazioni geometriche,” in Rivista di matematica, 1 (1891), 42–66, with English trans, by J. W. Young as “On Some Tendencies in Geometric Investigations,” in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 2nd ser., 10 (1904), 442–468: “Le rappresentazioni reali delle forme complesse e gli enti iperalgebrici,” in Mathematische Annalen, 40 (1891),413–467: “Intorno ad un carattere delle superficie e delle varietà superiori algebriche,” in Atti dell’Accademia delle scienze, 31 (1896), 485–501: and “Su un problema relativo alle intersezioni di curve e superficie,” ibid., 33 (1898), 19–23.
See also:“Intorno ai punti di Weierstrass di una curva algebrica,” in Atti dell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei, Rendiconti, 5th ser., 8 (1889), 89–91: “Gli ordini delle varieta che annullano i determinanti dei diversi gradi estratti da una data matrice,” ibid., 9 (1900), 253–260: “su una classe di superficie degli iperspazi, legata con le equazioni lineari alle derivate parziali di 2° ordine,” in Atti dell’ Accademia delle scienze, 42 (1907), 1047–1079; “Complementi alla teoria delle tangenti coniugate di una superficie,” in Atti dell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 17 (1908). 405–412; “Mehrdimensionale Räume,” in Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, III, pt. 3, fasc. 7 (1918), 769–972: “Sulle corrispondenze quadrilinearitra forme di prima specie e su alcune loro rappresentazioni spaziali,” in Annali di matematica pura ed applicata, 3rd ser., 29 (1920), 105–140; “Sui fochi di 2° ordine dei sistemi infiniti di piani e sulle curve iperspaziali conuna doppia infinita di piani plurisecanti,” in Attidell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 30 (1921), 67–71: “Le superficie degli iperspazi con una doppia infinita di curve piane o spaziali,” in Attidell’ Accademia delle scienze, 56 (1921), 143–157: “Sugli elementi lineari che hanno comuni la tangente e il piano osculatore,” in Atti dell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 33 (1924), 325–329; “Le curve piane d’ordine n circoscritte ad un (n + l) = latero completo di tangenti ed una classe partikcolare di superficie con doppio sistema coniugato di coni circoscritti,” in Atti dell’ Accademia delle scienze, 59 (1924), 303–320.
II. Secondary Literature. Obituary notices are L.Berzolari, in Rendiconti dell’l stituto lombardo di scienze e lettere. 57 (1924), 528–532; G. Castelnuovo, in Atti dell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 33 (1924), 353–359: E. Pascal, in Rendiconti dell’ Accademia delle scienze fisiche e matematiche, 30 (1924), 114–116; and V. Volterra, in Atti deell’ Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 33 (1924), 459–461. See also Poggendorff, VI 2407, for a list of notices.
On segre and his work, see H. F. Baker’s article in Journal of the London Mathematical Society1 (1926), 263–271, with trans. by G. Loria in Bollettino dell’ Unione matematica italiana, 6 (1927), 276–284: J. L. Coolidge, in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 33 (1927), 352–357: G. Loria, in Annali di matematica pura ed applicata, 4th ser., 2 (1924). 1–21: and A. Terracini, in Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematikervereinigung, 35 (1926), 209–250, with portrait. The articles by Loria, Terracini, and Baker are especially helpful.