United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Company 259 U.S. 344 (1922) Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers 268 U.S. 295 (1925)
UNITED MINE WORKERS v. CORONADO COAL COMPANY 259 U.S. 344 (1922) CORONADO COAL COMPANY v. UNITED MINE WORKERS 268 U.S. 295 (1925)
In two nearly identical cases, the Supreme Court provided opposite answers to the same question: does the sherman antitrust act apply to local strikes that indirectly restrain commerce? The United Mine Workers (UMW) struck to prevent an employer from closing its mines despite valid union contracts; violence and property damage resulted. The company sued the union claiming a Sherman Act conspiracy to restrain interstate commerce. In its defense, the UMW claimed that it was exempt from suit because it was unincorporated and, because mining was local, that there had been no Sherman Act violation. On appeal to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice william howard taft declared for a unanimous bench that, although unions (even though unincorporated) could clearly be sued, the union had not violated the Sherman Act here. Mining was merely local; any interference concerned the production rather than the distribution of goods. Taft said no restraint of trade existed, absent an explicit showing of intent to restrain trade, unless the obstruction had "such a direct, material and substantial effect to restrain [commerce] that intent reasonably may be inferred." Taft thus introduced new tests of reasonableness (see rule of reason) and intent.
The company soon appealed with new evidence. Again unanimous, the Supreme Court now said that when intent to restrain trade attended a decrease in production, a previously "indirect and remote obstruction" became a direct interference in violation of the law. The Court asserted that the evidence at the second trial demonstrated such intent. The Court's near reversal, a finding of intent where none had previously existed, probably resulted from a fear of the implications of the first decision. The effect of the later opinion was to hamper union organizing efforts and cast doubt on the legality of strikes generally; certainly intent could be found by Justices who were looking for it.
(see also: Labor and the Antitrust Laws.)
"United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Company 259 U.S. 344 (1922) Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers 268 U.S. 295 (1925)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. 23 Jan. 2019 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.
"United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Company 259 U.S. 344 (1922) Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers 268 U.S. 295 (1925)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (January 23, 2019). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/united-mine-workers-v-coronado-coal-company-259-us-344-1922-coronado-coal-company-v-united-mine
"United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Company 259 U.S. 344 (1922) Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers 268 U.S. 295 (1925)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved January 23, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/united-mine-workers-v-coronado-coal-company-259-us-344-1922-coronado-coal-company-v-united-mine
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.