Skip to main content

Reitman v. Mulkey 387 U.S. 369 (1967)

REITMAN v. MULKEY 387 U.S. 369 (1967)

By an overwhelming majority, California's voters adopted an initiative measure ("Proposition 14") adding to the state constitution a provision repealing existing open housing laws and forbidding the enactment of new ones. Following the lead of the state supreme court, the Supreme Court held, 5–4, that the circumstances of Proposition 14's adoption demonstrated state encouragement of private racial discrimination in the sale and rental of housing. Justice byron r. white, for the majority, said this encouragement amounted to state action in violation of the fourteenth amendment. Justice john marshall harlan, for the dissenters, argued that Proposition 14 merely withdrew the state from regulation of private conduct; the state court determinations of "encouragement" were not fact findings, but mistaken readings of the Supreme Court's own precedents.

Taken seriously, the Reitman decision implies an affirmative state obligation to protect against private racial discrimination in housing. The Supreme Court, far from reading the decision in this manner, has consistently rejected litigants' efforts even to invoke the "encouragement" doctrine there announced. Reitman thus lies in isolation, awaiting resurrection. But the trumpet call announcing the end of the world of state action doctrine, seemingly so close in the final years of the warren court, now seems far away.

Kenneth L. Karst

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Reitman v. Mulkey 387 U.S. 369 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . 21 Apr. 2019 <>.

"Reitman v. Mulkey 387 U.S. 369 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . (April 21, 2019).

"Reitman v. Mulkey 387 U.S. 369 (1967)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved April 21, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.