Skip to main content

Boddie v. Connecticut 401 U.S. 371 (1971)

BODDIE v. CONNECTICUT 401 U.S. 371 (1971)

An indigent sought to file for divorce in a state court but was unable to pay the $60 filing fee. The Supreme Court held, 8–1, that the state had unconstitutionally limited the plaintiff's access to the courts. For a majority, Justice john marshall harlan rested decision on a procedural due process theory. The marriage relationship was "basic" in our society, and the state had monopolized the means for legally dissolving the relationship. Justice william o. douglas, concurring, would have rested decision on an equal protection theory.

Two subsequent 5–4 decisions, United States v. Kras (1971) and Ortwein v. Schwab (1971), made clear that Boddie had not implied a general right of access in all civil cases. Boddie 's due process approach, rather than equal protection, has guided the Court's subsequent dealings with wealth discrimination in the civil litigation process.

Kenneth L. Karst
(1986)

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Boddie v. Connecticut 401 U.S. 371 (1971)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. 19 Nov. 2018 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Boddie v. Connecticut 401 U.S. 371 (1971)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 19, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/boddie-v-connecticut-401-us-371-1971

"Boddie v. Connecticut 401 U.S. 371 (1971)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved November 19, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/boddie-v-connecticut-401-us-371-1971

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.