Imperial Holly Corporation

views updated

Imperial Holly Corporation

One Imperial Square, Suite 200
8016 Highway 90-A
Sugar Land, Texas 77478
(713) 491-9181
Fax: (713) 242-6850

Public Company
Incorporated: 1924 as Imperial Sugar Company
Employees: 1,600
Sales: $660 million
Stock Exchanges: American
SICs: 2062 Cane Sugar Refining; 2063 Beet Sugar

One of the leading sugar producers in the United States, Imperial Holly Corporation refines raw cane sugar in Texas and processes beet sugar in California, Wyoming, Montana, and Texas. Imperial Holly traces its history back to 1843, when a sugar refinery was erected on a small sugar plantation in Sugar Land, Texas. The fledgling sugar enterprise grew as the nation grew, adopted the name Imperial Sugar Company during the early twentieth century, then merged in 1988 with Holly Sugar Companya beet sugar producer with roots stretching back to 1905. Together, these two companies represented one of the largest and oldest sugar producers in the country.

In 1820, a rush of Anglo-American settlers began colonizing the vast region that 25 years later would become the state of Texas. Through the recruiting efforts of Moses and Stephen Austin, who promised to carry out their fathers plan to populate the territory, Texass population swelled enormously in the years following 1820, jumping from 7,000 in 1821 to 50,000 by 1836by far exceeding Stephen Austins promise to bring at least 300 families into the area. Texas became an independent republic in 1835, and its citizens voted the following year in favor of annexation by the United States. Statehood would be another nine years away, however, delayed as lawmakers debated whether or not to extend slavery into the new region. Another 60 years would pass before oil, the chief engine that would drive the states economy, first erupted from a well near Beaumont, Texas. During the six decades that separated Texass admittance to the Union and the discovery of oil, other agricultural and manufacturing industries fueled the regions growth, including the cultivation and processing of sugar cane.

Although the first sugar refinery in the United States began operations in 1689, sugar production did not become a major U.S. industry until the 1830s. Early settlers into Texas took up the trade upon their arrival. One such colonist was Samuel May Williams, who owned a sugar crop on Oakland Plantation in Southeast Texas in a community that later would be aptly named Sugar Land. Initially, the sugar cane was used to produce syrupy sweeteners, but by 1843two years before Texas became a U.S. stateWilliams and other neighboring farmers were harvesting sufficient sugar cane to warrant the construction of a commercial raw sugar mill. Completed that same year, the mill enabled the cooperative of sugar farmers to make granulated sugar. Imperial Sugar Company was spawned from this first mill, with the site Williams chose for Sugar Lands first sugar refinery serving as the site of Imperial Hollys sugar production over the next 150 years.

Before long, Williamss Oakland Plantation and the mill were sold to W. J. Kyle and B. F. Terry, under whose stewardship the property became known as Sugar Land Plantation, one of several sugar cane farms in a region referred to as the sugar bowl. Kyle and Terry profited from their investment, as Sugar Land Plantation flourished in the years leading up to the Civil War, but the outbreak of the war signalled more prosaic growth for many of the sugar bowls farmers. Once the war ended, sugar production in the region declined considerably and the number of sugar mills dropped to slightly more than a handful.

After the deaths of Kyle and Terry, Sugar Land Plantation and a majority of the other plantations in the area that had withstood the effects of the depressed agricultural climate were purchased by Edward H. Cunningham. Cunningham spent a considerable amount of money modernizing Sugar Land Plantation, investing more than a million dollars in machinery and construction projects by 1890. Slightly more than a decade later, however, Cunninghams holdings devolved into receivership and were stripped away from him by disgruntled and unpaid creditors. Sugar Land Plantation, along with the other properties formerly belonging to Cunningham, was acquired in 1906 by I. H. Kempner, his mother, and siblings, as well as W. T. Eldridge.

In the nearly 60 years since the first sugar mill was erected in Sugar Land, the property had passed through three sets of hands, and now, with the arrival of the new century, Kempner and Eldridge had become its fourth owners. There it would stay, remaining in the Kempner family for the next 80 years. I. H. Kempner and his descendants steered the company through its development from a small collection of sugar production properties to one of the largest sugar producers in the United States.

Kempner and Eldridge, like Cunningham, poured capital into their newly acquired properties, renovating the sugar production facilities and the community of Sugar Land itself. Toward the end of the nineteenth century Sugar Land was ignomini-ously branded Hell Hole of the Brazosa swampy area populated by ex-convicts, drifters, professional gamblers, and deserters from ships sailing to and from the port of Galveston. Kempner and Eldridge sought to ameliorate this disreputable image of their town by draining the land and paving new gravel streets. In the process, Sugar Land became a company town, managed by the company, with company-owned storessuch as the Imperial Mercantile Company general storecatering to the residents. Later, churches, hospitals, and schools were constructed, additions that attracted more respectable Sugar Land denizens and gave Kempner and Eldridge a community upon which to build their sugar empire.

The sugar properties owned by Kempner and Eldridge were known as Sugarland Industries until 1924. At that time, Imperial Sugar Companythe predecessor to Imperial Holly Corporationwas incorporated to take over the properties owned by Sugarland Industries, including Sugar Land Feed Company and Imperial Mercantile Company. The name Imperial came from New York Citys Hotel Imperial, one of the lavish hotels that graced the citys Herald Square in the 1890s. As a college student, Kempner had visited the hotel, been impressed by it, and decided to borrow its name as the name of his sugar company, co-opting the crown symbol from the hotels stationery as well.

Imperials sugar refinery by this point could produce 1.5 million pounds of sugar per day, a production capacity that required the importation of raw sugar from Cuba and the West Indies to keep the facility in operation throughout the year. Raw sugar was shipped to Galveston, unloaded in 300-pound burlap bags, then sent by rail to the refinery at Sugar Land, where granulated sugar was packaged in 25-, 50-, and 100-pound cloth bags bearing the Imperial brand name. By 1927, the company was producing slightly more than 300 million pounds of sugar per year and annual revenues had climbed to nearly $19 million. These results were encouraging, but the company would not eclipse these figures until the eve of World War II.

When the Great Depression descended on the country, stifling economic growth and forcing many businesses into bankruptcy, Imperial Sugar was not immune to its effects. The companys yearly sugar production and revenue totals both dropped substantially during the decade-long economic downturn. Revenues plunged from $18.8 million in 1927 to $6.3 million in 1932, while annual sugar production during the period fell from 219 million pounds to 165 million poundsexceeding the magnitude of the recessive conditions following the Civil War. Moreover, the decline recorded between 1929 and 1932 did not represent the end of Imperial Sugars financial woes. As the Depression dragged on into the mid-1930s, the company went into the red and was forced to cut its work force from 500 to 373. Imperial Sugar lost money every year between 1932 and 1937, recording its greatest loss in 1932, when the company showed nearly $300,000 in negative net income, down from the $750,000 gain it had posted in 1928.

Despite the losses, Imperial Sugarthrough a wholly owned subsidiary named Fort Bend Utilities Companyspent $300,000 on a power plant, which supplied the sugar producers energy needs. When the power plant was completed in 1937, the company was beginning to emerge from the effects of the Depression, generating $15.9 million in revenues that year and $19.7 million the following year, at last eclipsing the total recorded in 1927. Annual sugar production increased as well, climbing to nearly 400 million pounds in 1938, offering persuasive proof that the hard times were over.

After the war, the Eldridges sold their stake in Imperial Sugar and the Kempners became majority owners of the company, which by the end of the 1940s was recording nearly one million dollars a year in net income. The production capacity of the refinery at Sugar Land by this time had been increased to two million pounds per day, and by a decade later reached 2.25 million pounds per day, as the company expanded to meet rising demand during the postwar economic boom period. During the 1950s, Imperial Sugars financial performance fluctuated wildly, partly due to President Eisenhowers embargo against Cuba, then the companys principal source of raw sugar. The companys annual net income wavered between $395,000 and $1.2 million during the decade, which hinted at more difficult years to come.

Since the beginning of the century, the sugar industry had been subjected to federal regulation which, as time wore on, threatened to price sugar out of the U.S. market. During the 1960s and 1970s, as regulatory measures continued to inflate the price of domestic raw sugar, Imperial Sugar avoided much of the damage incurred by sugar producers located elsewhere. The migration of candy factories and bottlers into the Sun Belt during the period buoyed the companys business. By the end of the 1970s, however, the sugar industry had changed significantly and Imperial Sugars position began to appear tenuous.

Sugar use experienced a precipitous decline during the 1970s, falling even as total sweetener consumption remained steady. From 1973 to 1983, Americans consumed 124 pounds of sweetener per person annually, yet sugars share dropped from 107 pounds of the annual total to 71 pounds during the ten-year period. Corn sweeteners moved into the breach, increasing in usage by 130 percent. Exacerbating matters for sugar cane processors was the burgeoning popularity of artificial sweeteners such as saccharin and aspartame, as well as the rising price of domestic raw sugar. By the early 1980s, domestic raw sugar sold for 22 cents a pound, double the world market price. Imperial Sugars management, now led by I. H. Kempner III, searched for a solution to the difficulties that lay ahead.

Imperial Sugar by this time was generating roughly $230 million a year in revenue, recording nearly $13 million a year in net income, and producing nearly a billion pounds of sugar annually. The totals were prodigious for a producer in the U.S. sugar industry, but they also reflected the uncertainties of a business derived exclusively from the refining of sugar cane. What the company lacked was a stake in those segments of the sugar market that were expanding, including companies that produced sugar from stock feed other than sugar cane. The realization of this need brought Imperial Sugars management in contact with Holly Sugar Company, a producer that used sugar beets instead of sugar cane to make sugar. The resulting association between the two companies would alter Imperial Sugars future dramatically.

In 1905, one year before Kempner and Eldridge acquired Sugar Land Plantation, the first Holly Sugar factory was constructed in Holly, Colorado, just in time for the sugar beet harvest that year. From the harvest the fledgling company produced 60,000 100-pound bags of sugar, enough to justify and help pay for the addition of a second factory in Swink, Colorado. Several years later, in 1911, expansion continued, this time across state borders into California, where Holly Sugar constructed a beet sugar factory in Huntington Beach. A year after the company extended the geographic scope of its business into Wyoming in 1915, a wealthy Colorado businessman named A. E. Garitón acquired the company and spearheaded its subsequent vigorous growth. Either through acquisition or plant construction, Holly Sugar added ten factories to its growing list of facilities between 1916 and 1931. As the company expanded its sugar beet operations, it also diversified into other business arenas, including livestock feeding operations and oil production and refining. By the mid-1980s, however, as Imperial Sugar was weighing its future moves in an increasingly volatile sugar market, Holly Sugar had been forced to close 12 beet sugar factories and divest its other business interests.

Imperial Sugars management began actively courting Holly Sugar in 1987, convinced that the two companies would be more capable of competing in the sugar industry together than they would be apart. In October 1987, Imperial offered to pay Holly Sugars stockholders $68 for each of Holly Sugars 1.1 million outstanding shares, in addition to giving them one share in the combined company, which would cede a 23 percent stake in the merger to Holly Sugars stockholders. Imperial Sugars offer, however, was not the only one Holly Sugars management had to consider.

Just prior to Imperial Sugars attempt at effecting a merger between the two companies, a Melville, New York-based investment group named Plum Associates, led by Illinois businessman Peter R. Harvey, offered Holly Sugar a $94.3 million, two-stage takeover plan. Holly Sugar initially rebuffed Imperial Sugars proposal, favoring instead Plum Associates offer, but before two months had passed, Plum Associates cut its tender offer to $85 million. As a result, negotiations with Imperial Sugar resumed, leading to a definitive agreement between the two in December 1987 that stipulated Imperial Sugar would acquire Holly Sugar for $78.5 million plus cede a 25 percent stake in the merged company. The following April, Holly Sugars shareholders approved the merger, joining together Holly Sugars eight beet sugar processing facilitiesfour in California, two in Wyoming, and one in each Montana and Texasand Imperial Sugars Sugar Land refinery, which created a new $660 million sugar concern named Imperial Holly Corporation.

After the merger, Imperial Hollys annual revenues initially rose to $717 million in 1990, but then the company recorded consecutive declines in 1991, 1992, and 1993. Entering the mid-1990s, Imperial Holly continued to suffer from external market forces that prevented the company from realizing the true benefits of the 1988 merger. The most damaging of these developments continued to be the depressed prices for refined sugar, which fell 11 percent between 1989 and 1994. More unexpected were losses resulting from adverse weather and disease in 1994, which froze beets in the Midwest and infected them in California, contributing to the $7.9 million loss the company recorded in 1994.

As Imperial Holly plotted its course beyond the mid-1990s, it looked forward to the return of more favorable market conditions. Despite the adverse conditions the company faced, however, it remained a formidable presence in the sugar industry, as a result of more than 150 years of development.

Principal Subsidiaries

Holly Sugar Co.; Fort Bend Utilities Co.; CSCO Inc.; Imperial Sweetener Distributors, Inc.

Further Reading

Baldwin, William, Bitter Taste, Forbes, November 7, 1983, p. 128.

Imperial Sugar Agrees to Buy Holly for Cash and a Portion of Stock, Wall Street Journal, December 28, 1987, p. 24.

Shareholders Approve Merger with Texas Sugar Concern, Wall Street Journal, April 27, 1988, p. 7.

Sugar Processor Cuts Payout by Two-Thirds, Sets Layoffs, Wall Street Journal, October 29, 1993, p. B9A.

Totty, Michael, Holly Sugar Receives Bid by Texas Firm, Wall Street Journal, October 13, 1987, p. 4.

Jeffrey L. Covell