Once Woeful, Alabama Is Model in Child Welfare

views updated

Once Woeful, Alabama Is Model in Child Welfare

Newspaper article

By: Erik Eckholm

Date: August 20, 2005

Source: Eckholm, Erik. "Once Woeful, Alabama Is Model in Child Welfare."New York Times. (June 16, 2005): A1.

About the Author: Erik Eckholm has been both a reporter and editor with theNew York Timessince 1985, including five years as the Beijing bureau chief. Eckholm holds an MA in international affairs from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C.


The Family Services Partnership of the Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) uses sixty-seven local agencies to carry out the state's child welfare programs—protecting children from neglect and abuse. Intervention may include providing social services to families struggling to pay bills or helping a family find daycare for children while a parent is at work. In other cases, parents and other caregivers are required to attend support meetings or other service programs aimed at building proper disciplinary techniques and other parenting skills. If neglect and abuse is ongoing or an imminent threat, children are removed from the home and placed in state-supervised care.

In 1988, a federal lawsuit was filed against Alabama's DHR on behalf of a child diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder who was living in foster care. The claim stated that the child, identified by the initials R.C., was not given the proper medical treatment while in foster care. The case was settled with the R.C. Consent Decree, which required the state system offer individualized services based on family strengths and increase efforts to keep families together. Specifically, DHR was to develop a system that focused on preventing foster care placement through early intervention, the reunification of families, and the involvement of children and parents in planning the services administered. An improved system of quality assurance, training, and rights protection was also required. The deadline to meet the decree's goals was originally set for 1999, but was later pushed back to 2002 to give Alabama more time to locate the necessary funding to train and hire staff members.

Funding for Alabama's child welfare initiatives have come from several state and federal funds, including the Children's Trust Fund administered by the the Alabama Department of Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention. In 1998, a new source of funding, the Children First Trust Fund was established with money from tobacco company settlements. Most of Alabama's portion of the multibillion dollar settlement has gone into the Children First Trust Fund.


Once Woeful, Alabama Is Model in Child Welfare

Erik Eckholm

MONTGOMERY, Ala. As a mother, Stephanie Harris seemed hopeless. She was 29 and a determined crack addict back in 1993, when she was sent to prison for neglecting her six children, including infant twins. The authorities had little choice, she now agrees, but to give custody of her children to relatives.

"It didn't bother me," she recalled in a recent interview. "All I wanted to do was get high."

She served eight months, failed a urine test, and went back to prison for a year. If history were the guide, in Alabama or perhaps any other state, Ms. Harris might never have regained her children, child welfare officials here say. More likely, the children would have been shuffled among relatives and foster homes.

But officials here had, under court supervision, begun a wholesale overhaul of the child protection system to make it more pro-family, and they did not give up on Ms. Harris. Today she is off drugs, has a job and has custody of all but one of her children, whom an aunt is fighting to keep. Her case illustrates what experts in child welfare say has been one of the country's most sweeping transformations of the handling of neglected and abused children. What by all accounts had been a dys-functional system in Alabama, scarring too many children by sending them to foster-care oblivion while ignoring others in danger, has over the last 14 years become a widely studied model. But it has not been cheap, and in some ways Alabama has had to be dragged onto its pedestal because of political and philosophical resistance to the reforms and in spite of the state's endemic poverty.

"Alabama set the pace," said Richard Wexler, director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, a private group in Alexandria, Va. "Though they've had some setbacks, I still view Alabama as a national model."

Forced by a legal settlement to make changes after parents and advocates filed a class-action lawsuit charging that the system failed to aid troubled families or protect children from neglect or abuse, Alabama has more than quadrupled its spending on child welfare since 1990, even as it has trimmed other programs in recent years.

One former governor, Fob James, complained about federal interference and questioned whether so much devotion to helping irresponsible parents was leaving children in harm's way. While Mr. James's successors have accepted the changes, they still resent being monitored; in a court brief this month, Attorney General Troy King said that the continuing court supervision defied the principle of "democratic self-rule through officials answerable to the people."

While Alabama's system is far from perfect, local officials and independent experts say, the system now is more likely than before to keep children with their parents, safely, and tries to provide whatever aid might help that happen.

Typical caseloads for social workers have been trimmed to 18 from 50, allowing far more intensive monitoring of families and help. Where reports of neglect or abuse sometimes lay unchecked for months, investigators are now usually on the scene within a day when danger is imminent, and within five days more than 90% of the time, officials report.

In what many call the best measure of a system's ability to protect children from abuse—the share of children who are mistreated after intervention by social workers—Alabama has steadily improved its record. In recent years, a second abuse incident within 12 months of the first one occurred in roughly 5% of cases, down from about 13% in the early 1990's. Studies indicate that the comparable national average is about 11%.

And in a recent federal survey of child welfare systems, Alabama was one of only six states found to be "substantially in compliance" with norms for protecting children from neglect or abuse.

"When the lawsuit was filed, we didn't have the services that could keep children at home safely," said Carolyn B. Lapsley, the state's deputy commissioner for children and family services and a veteran social worker. "Now we're very proud; we have changed the system in every single county."

Though Alabama says it has made enough progress that it should be released from court supervision, skeptics question whether the new, labor-intensive practices can be maintained in the face of stringent budgets, high poverty and other social ills, including methamphetamine use, which state officials blame for a recent rise in the number of children removed from homes.

"We do not dispute that the agency has made progress," said James Tucker, a children's advocate and a lawyer in the suit that produced court monitoring.

"However, we believe that their recent efforts have focused more on creating a paper trail that looks like reform than producing the real reforms we seek," Mr. Tucker said, adding that some counties were lagging substantially, for example, in provision of vital family services.

Judge Ira DeMent of Federal District Court in Montgomery ruled in May that the state had not proved it could sustain its gains and declined to end the oversight for now. The state has asked him to reconsider.

When the class-action suit was filed, in 1988, "those who looked at the Alabama system invariably judged it as one of the worst in the country," Mr. Tucker said.

The 1991 settlement committed the state to a series of principles: quick investigations to head off danger, family preservation if possible, wide-ranging services for struggling parents and faster adoption for those requiring it, among others.

Ira Burnim, a lawyer with the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law in Washington who helped draw up the agreement, said parents were often seen more as threats than as potential partners. And, Mr. Burnim said, "there's a traditional tendency to focus on 'saving' the children but also to see them as damaged goods."

Child-welfare spending that totaled $71 million in 1990, including $47 million in federal money, rose to $285 million in 2004, $179 million of it from the federal government. Some of that came from Medicaid money the state had not previously tapped.

The state hired hundreds of new social workers and thinned caseloads. Workers could now spend more than 10 hours a week in some homes.

Cindy Letson, who lives in the small town of Moulton in the corn and poultry country of northern Alabama, has seen firsthand how the system works.

Her face weathered beyond her 48 years, Ms. Letson described a history of family violence and recalled the day in 2001 when the police took her for psychiatric evaluation.

She returned home within a day cleared of any serious disorder, she said, but was sent for counseling and help in breaking an addiction to antiseizure drugs. Her twin boys had already been removed and were sent to foster parents.

She followed the directives and was allowed to visit her boys for one hour a week. After repeated entreaties she regained custody two years ago, and now lives on welfare with her 7-year-old boys, Kyle and Kenley.

"I was ready to give up, but in the end the system worked," Ms. Letson said.

Elements of Alabama's approach have been adopted by other states. "A lot of the ideas we used came from the Alabama example," said Benjamin Wolf of the Illinois ACLU, who has helped design changes to the system in Illinois, which is also operating under court supervision.

Alabama's method of evaluating its own system— choosing individual cases and closely examining how each was handled—has been adopted by the federal government for its assessment of child-welfare systems in each state, said Olivia A. Golden, a former federal welfare official now with the Urban Institute in Washington. New York City has also adopted the method.

But here, as in every state, there remain lapses. [On Wednesday, a state judge criticized the Jefferson County Department of Human Resources for failing to protect 2-year-old Sean Porter, who suffered severe bruising to his groin last December, two weeks after school officials reported suspicious bruises on his sister, TheBirmingham Newsreported.]

In a report last November, Ivor D. Groves, a welfare expert from Florida who is Alabama's court-appointed monitor, said the state's progress toward the original reform goals had varied by county.

But without question, Mr. Groves said, "the egregious conditions of impossible caseloads and large numbers of uninvestigated" abuse and neglect reports "have been eliminated."

Some Alabama counties show "the best child-welfare practice in the country," Mr. Groves wrote.

Ms. Harris, in Montgomery, has been a beneficiary of Alabama's progress. As she emerged from work-release and a third drug-treatment program in 1995, she showed that she was serious about going straight. So caseworkers, while requiring regular drug tests, helped Ms. Harris rebuild her life and then regain her children.

They paid for years of counseling and helped with expenses like child care, utility bills and, at one point, Christmas presents and shoes for the children.

Ms. Harris has since borne two more children and lives in a subsidized red-brick house in Montgomery with five of her children.

She works the day shift as a carhop and scrambles to provide for her boisterous clan, supplementing her income with Social Security payments for a child needing special education and a father's child support for two of them.

"My social worker was there for me," she said. "I've learned to pay my bills and manage my life."

In June, the child agency finally closed its books on Ms. Harris, satisfied that she could provide a decent home.


In addition to the R.C. Consent Decree, Alabama has strengthened its social services for children and low-income families in accordance with federal welfare reforms that were outlined in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996. The act called for the creation of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Fund (TANF) in 1997, which has been used to fund a wide scope of programs, including assistance to families with children. In 2000, Alabama used TANF funds to expand child care programs, substance abuse screening and treatment, transportation initiatives for low-income residents, and other programs aimed at reducing the incidence of child abuse in families. One such program, the Alabama Fatherhood Initiative, focuses on enabling noncustodial fathers to have more constructive involvement in their children's lives, giving them counseling, education, workforce training, and assistance in finding employment opportunities.

Concern has been raised about the lack of coordination between the agencies that administer general social welfare programs and those that administer child welfare and protection services. The DHR encourages its staff and social workers to collaborate between agencies, and to develop joint plans to address community needs, particularly through the Consolidated Child and Family Services Plan (CCFSP), which coordinates several child services programs that serve the same communities.

The State of Alabama filed a legal motion in late 2005 to dismiss the R.C. Consent Decree, claiming all requirements under the decree had been met. The motion cited the training of social workers in all Alabama counties, an improved child welfare oversight system, development of a quality assurance program that repairs weaknesses in the system when they arise, and the securing of funding needed to pay for welfare reforms.



Everett, Joyce E., Sandra P. Chipungu, and Bogart R. Leashore.Child Welfare Revisited: An Africentric Prespective. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2004.

Mallon, Gerald P. and Peg M. Hess.Child Welfare for the 21st Century: A Handbook of Practices, Policies, & Programs. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.


Holcomb, Pamela A., et al. "Recent Changes in Alabama Welfare and Work, Child Care, and Child Welfare Systems."The Urban Institute, State Update. No. 10 (October 2001).

Usher, Charles L., Judith B. Wildfire, and Deborah A. Gibbs. "Measuring performance in child welfare: secondary effects of success."Child Welfare. 78:(Jan./Feb. 1999): 31–51.

Web sites

Alabama Department of Human Resources. "Child Protective Services." 2005 <http://www.dhr.state.al.us/page.asp? pageid=312> (accessed May 25, 2006).

Administration for Children and Families. "National Clearing-house on Child Abuse and Neglect Information." May 16, 2006 <http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/index.cfm> (accessed May 25, 2006).