Skip to main content

Pure Land Schools


The MahĀyĀna sūtras developed considerable lore based on the idea of different buddhas and bodhisattvas dwelling in buddha-fields (buddhakṣetra). It is common for practitioners to meditate on, make offerings to, chant sūtras about, and recite the name or mantra of a particular buddha or bodhisattva. These Mahāyāna expressions developed out of the darśana complex, which is well documented in the earliest materials, and were seen as part of the overall institutional fabric of Indian Mahāyāna. (Buddha darśana refers to "seeing" the buddha and entering his nirvanic power, which leads to spriritual progress.) The core Mahāyāna idea is to cultivate a darśanic relationship with the buddha and thus gain awakening, or one could aim at future birth in the buddha-field. The genre of Mahāyāna literature that developed these ideas was instrumental in the formation of the tantras. AmitĀbha Buddha and his accompanying bodhisattvas, Avalokiteśvara and Mahāsthāmaprāpta, are the focus of the Pure Land tradition in East Asia.

Pure Land teachings in China

In China, the institutionalization of the Pure Land teachings and the first line of transmission began with the founding of the White Lotus Society by Huiyuan (334–416) on Mount Lu. This society's practice was based on the PratyutpannasamĀdhisŪtra. The lead devotee was Liu Yimin, one of the eighteen sages of Mount Lu, who wrote the society's manifesto and a collection of chants. The area became a center of Pure Land teachings.

The Larger SukhĀvatĪvyŪhasŪtra, a major text in the tradition, had been translated twice by the mid-third century. In 402 the Amitābha Sūtra (also called the Amida Sūtra or Smaller Sukhāvatīvyūha-sūtra) and later the Daśabhūmikavibhāṣā (Treatise on the Ten Stages), attributed to NĀgĀrjuna (ca. second century), were translated by KumĀrajĪva (350–409/413). The Guan Wuliangshou jing (Contemplation of the Buddha of Limitless Life Sūtra) is claimed by tradition to have been translated between 424 and 453, though it is probably a Chinese or Central Asian composition. Once these three major sūtras and one main commentary became available, the Pure Land teachings moved away from being solely based on the Pratyutpannasamādhi-sūtra.

Tanluan (476–542) became interested in Pure Land teaching through the influence of Bodhiruci (sixth century), who translated the Jingtu lun (Discourse on the Pure Land) attributed to Vasubandhu (fourth century) in 531. Tanluan wrote an extensive commentary to this work, as well as Zan Amitofo ji (Verses in Praise of Amida Buddha) and Lüe lun anlejingtu yi (An Abridged Discourse on the Pure Land of Peace and Bliss). Tanluan accepted the Daśabhūmikavibhāṣā's distinction of the difficult path (the path of sages) and the easy path (the Pure Land path). He believed that Amitābha's Pure Land was the ultimate reality; that reciting Amitābha's name (Chinese, nianfo; Sanskrit, buddhānusmṛti) eliminates negative karma; and that the practice of nianfo requires a mind of true "confidence." He also described how an accumulation of positive karma aids rebirth and is distributed when returning to aid sentient beings, and he accepted the divisions of the dharmakāya into a dharma-nature aspect and an expedience aspect. Tanluan coined the term other power, meaning not relying on one's false notion of a self and its abilities but on the nirvanic power of Amitābha, a refinement of the Mahāyāna concept of adhiṣṫhāna (base, power, approach, establish). According to Japanese sources, this constitutes a second transmission lineage.

One of the greatest successors in Tanluan's line is Daochuo (562–645), who, inspired by Tanluan's writings, wrote Anle ji (A Collection of [Passages Concerning Birth in the Land of] Peace and Bliss), and promoted the idea of the decline of the dharma and the idea that the nianfo samādhi was the highest samādhi. Shandao (613–681) was the most influential master in this lineage. At first he studied on Mount Lu and achieved some success practicing according to the Pratyutpannasamādhi-sūtra. He later became Daochuo's disciple and was able to attain the nianfo samādhi. Shandao reaffirmed Tanluan's and Daochuo's positions while developing further the overall doctrine. Although he discussed many Pure Land practices, he placed great emphasis on nianfo; he taught that nianfo was sufficient for rebirth in the Pure Land and that Amitābha was a saṃbhogākaya buddha. Shandao delineated three types of confidence: sincere confidence, deep confidence, and confidence that seeks rebirth. Shandao also taught visualization methods and repentance, and developed the famous parable of the two rivers (fire-anger and water-greed) and the white path (the Pure Land path leading from saṂsĀra to nirvĀṆa) over the rivers. On the near side Śākyamuni stands, indicating that we should cross. On the far side, Amitābha stands, indicating that we should come.

A third line of Pure Land began with Cimin (680–748), who had traveled in India and began spreading Pure Land teachings after his return. Cimin composed Jingtu cibei ji (The Pure Land Compassion Collection; partially extant), Xifang zan (Western Quarter Chant), and Pratyutpannasamādhi Chant. His teachings emphasized meditation, study, recitation, and precepts.

The line that developed from the Pratyutpannasamādhi-sūtra also become part of the Tiantai school as Zhiyi (538–597) incorporated it into his system of practice. Zhiyi was a devotee of Amitābha (and other buddhas). In addition, he worked on the problem of classifying the different types of Pure Lands and developed the constant walking samādhi, which is focused on Amitābha, a core practice for Tiantai.

From the Tang dynasty on, Tiantai forms of Pure Land practice were influenced by developments both within the school and from outside. Tiantai followers helped make Pure Land part of daily life during the Song dynasty (960–1279) and thereafter by forming White Lotus societies and engaging in other activities to spread the tradition.

The Pure Land teachings were also influential in the Chan school. The Tiantai form influenced the fourth Chan patriarch Daoxin (580–651). Xuanshi, a disciple of the fifth patriarch, Hongren (688–761), founded the Southern Mountain Chan of the Nian Fo Gate school. Baizhang (749–814) incorporated Pure Land practices into his Chan rules, which are the behavioral code for Chan monasteries. Yanshou (904–975) was influenced by Cimin's line. Of particular note is Yinyan Longqi (1592–1673), who became the founder of the Ōbaku Zen school in Japan. The idea of Pure Land practice even becomes the kŌan, "Who recites the nian fo."

There were many significant figures in Chinese Buddhist history who, although masters of different teachings such as Huayan and Sanlun, were influential in the overall development of Pure Land thought and practice. In fact, Pure Land teachings became so ubiquitous in Chinese Buddhism that to speak of them as a school is a misnomer.

Pure Land teachings in Japan

Gyōgi (668–749), while cultivating donations for the building of Tōdaiji in Nara, spread the Pure Land teachings to the populace by publicly reciting the nenbutsu (Chinese, nianfo) and teaching people about the Pure Land in their homes. Chikō (709–780), a resident of Nara's Gangōji, wrote a now lost commentary to Vasubandhu's Discourse and had a maṆḌala painted after his vision of the Pure Land. These are the major Pure Land activities during the early period.

SaichŌ (767–822), the founder of Tendai (Chinese, Tiantai) in Japan, introduced the teachings on Amitābha associated with this line of transmission. Ennin (794–864), Saicho's main disciple in addition to those mentioned above, learned the "nianfo in five movements" while in China. Upon his return to Japan, he blended the "constant walking samādhi" with the "five movements" and created the nonstop (fudan) nenbutsu. He also seems to have known some esoteric aspects of Amitābha lore. With these beginnings Tendai became the fountainhead of Pure Land teachings in Japan for many centuries with masters like Ryōgen (912–985), Ryōnin (1072–1134), and many more. Of special distinction is the great master and prolific writer Genshin (942–1017), who composed some twenty works on Pure Land teachings, including the celebrated Ōjōyōshū (Essentials for Birth).

The Heian period witnessed Amitābha sages who helped spread the teachings to the general population. Several of these are historically significant. Kōya (903–972), a Tendai monk, performed many good works and taught the nenbutsu in the Nagoya, Kyoto, and northern Japan. Senkan (918–983), Kōya's disciple, wrote Gokurakukoku Mida wasan (Sukhāvatī Realm Amida Chant) and many other works. Kōya strictly observed the precepts and established eight rules and ten vows for his disciples. In addition, masters associated with many other schools of Japanese Buddhism also practiced and promoted Pure Land teachings.

The Kamakura period saw an emphasis on finding the one primary practice that was sufficient for awakening, an effort that brought theretofore exclusive practices to the fore and led to a simplification of considerable lore throughout Japanese Buddhism. The first major figure to address this effort as it related to Pure Land teachings was HŌnen (1133–1212), a learned Tendai priest. He wrote a commentary to Genshin's work, which became the standard of interpretation. In 1198 Hōnen wrote Senchaku hongan nenbutsu shū (Passages on the Selection of the Nenbutsu in the Original Vow), which explained the essentials of the nenbutsu way, including exclusive recitation, theory of the Pure Land lineage, emphasis on the three sūtras, and welcoming by Amitābha at the time of death. Hōnen's writings generally accepted the interpretation of the Shandao line. He also transmitted the bodhisattva precepts, and his teachings formed the basis of the Jōdo school.

Among Hōnen's important disciples, Shinran (1173–1262) is of particular note. Like Hōnen, Shinran was first trained as a Tendai scholar-practitioner. He lived as an openly married priest and propagated Pure Land teachings near eastern Tokyo. He wrote a number of works including Kyōgyōshinshō (Teaching, Practice, Faith, and Attainment). A new sect (Jōdo Shinshū) was based on his interpretations of the Pure Land teachings. Shinran considered Amitābha to be the Adi Buddha, and he emphasizes "other power," exclusive nenbutsu, crosswise transcendence (instant and gradual attainment of awakening with Pure Land birth), the disadvantages of the path of sages, and the advantages of the Pure Land path. He also emphasized one vehicle (the nenbutsu), the dharma ending age, and that "confidence" or "faith" is endowed by the Tathagata, is Buddha-nature, and is the key to liberation.

The last great Pure Land master of the Kamakura period was Ippen Chishin (1239–1289), who studied under a second-generation disciple of Hōnen. Ippen had an awakening while in retreat at Kumanojin-ji and afterward spread the "dancing nenbutsu" teaching, which expresses the joy of the liberating power of Amitābha. The Ji school is based on his teachings.

Although Chinese and Japanese practices and interpretations have developed along different lines, taken as a whole they help form a rich fabric for the tapestry of the greater Pure Land tradition.

See also:Buddhānusmṛti (Recollection of the Buddha); Hōryūji and Tōdaiji; Kamakura Buddhism, Japan; Nenbutsu (Chinese, Nianfo; Korean, Yŏmbul); Pure Land Buddhism


Foard, James; Solomon, Michael; and Payne, Richard K.; eds. The Pure Land Tradition: History and Development. Berkeley: Regents of the University of California, 1996.

Haar, B. J. ter. The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1992.

Inagaki, Hisao. The Three Pure Land Sūtras. Kyoto: Nagata Bunshodo, 1994.

Ono, Gemmyo. "On the Pure Land Doctrine of Tz'u-Min." Eastern Buddhist 5, nos. 2–3 (1930): 200–210.

A. W. Barber

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Pure Land Schools." Encyclopedia of Buddhism. . 18 Sep. 2019 <>.

"Pure Land Schools." Encyclopedia of Buddhism. . (September 18, 2019).

"Pure Land Schools." Encyclopedia of Buddhism. . Retrieved September 18, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.