Sherbert v. Verner 374 U.S. 398 (1963)
SHERBERT v. VERNER 374 U.S. 398 (1963)
Sherbert, a Seventh-Day Adventist, lost her job after the mill at which she had been working went on a six-day work week and she refused Saturday work. She filed for unemployment compensation, was referred to a job, but declined it because it would have required Saturday work. By declining proffered employment she was no longer "available for work" under South Carolina's rules and hence no longer eligible for unemployment benefits.
Justice william j. brennan, speaking for the Supreme Court, concluded that the disqualification imposed a burden on Mrs. Sherbert's free exercise of religion. The first amendment, he declared, protected not only belief but observance. Even an incidental burdening of religion could be justified only if the state could show a compelling state interest in not granting an exemption.
This decision was a significant departure from the secular regulation approach to free exercise claims which had been affirmed by the Court as recently as Braunfeld v. Brown (1961). Brennan made little attempt to distinguish Sherbert from Braunfeld. Justice william o. douglas, concurring, rejected the secular regulation approach.
Justice potter stewart concurred in the result, disassociating himself from Brennan's reasoning. Stewart saw tension developing between the Court's interpretation of the free exercise and establishment clauses. To grant free exercise exemptions from otherwise valid secular regulations preferred religious over nonreligious people. In establishment clause cases, however, any governmental action that had the effect of advancing religion was forbidden. Stewart would have relieved the tension by relaxing the establishment clause rule.
Justice john marshall harlan, joined by Justice byron r. white, dissented. For Harlan, the notion of a constitutional compulsion to "carve out an exception" based on religious conviction was a singularly dangerous one.
Richard E. Morgan
"Sherbert v. Verner 374 U.S. 398 (1963)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (January 16, 2019). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sherbert-v-verner-374-us-398-1963
"Sherbert v. Verner 374 U.S. 398 (1963)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved January 16, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sherbert-v-verner-374-us-398-1963
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.