Skip to main content

Gerrymander (Update)

GERRYMANDER (Update)

By the mid-1980s the focus of attention in racial gerry-mandering controversies had shifted from the fourteenth amendment to the voting rights act of 1965, which Congress had amended in 1982 to assist minority-group plaintiffs. In Thornburgh v. Gingles (1986) the Supreme Court laid down guidelines for application of the revised Section 2 of the act.

While constitutional controversy over racial gerrymandering was subsiding, the issue of partisan gerrymandering was nearing its climax. In Davis v. Bandemer (1986) a 6–3 majority held that attacks on partisan gerrymanders under the equal protection clause were justiciable, but only two Justices voted to strike down the districting plan that was being challenged by Indiana Democrats.

Justice byron r. white's plurality opinion for the four Justices who believed the question was justiciable but that the Indiana plan was constitutional has received divergent interpretations. In one common view, the opinion is simply confused or self-contradictory. Others have read it to mean that plans yielding a legislative seat distribution sharply disproportionate to the statewide partisan vote will be struck down.

In Davis, the Republican National Committee supported the Indiana Democrats in an amicus curiae brief, while the Democratic congressional delegation from California supported the Indiana Republicans. This apparent display of political disinterestedness might have been influenced by the pending Republican challenge to the California congressional districting plan on similar grounds. After Davis, a lower court dismissed the California case, interpreting White's opinion in Davis to require pervasive discrimination against the plaintiff group beyond the gerrymander that is being challenged. Under this interpretation, major-party gerrymandering claims would rarely if ever be successful. The Supreme Court refused to review the California dismissal in Badham v. Eu (1988).

After much sound and fury, the prospects for judicial invalidation of partisan gerrymanders may have been no greater at the end of the 1980s than at the beginning.

Daniel H. Lowenstein
(1992)

Bibliography

Grofman, Bernard, ed. 1990 Political Gerrymandering and the Courts. New York: Agathon Press.

Symposium 1985 Gerrymandering and the Courts. UCLA Law Review 33:1–281.

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Gerrymander (Update)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. 16 Nov. 2018 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Gerrymander (Update)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 16, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gerrymander-update

"Gerrymander (Update)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved November 16, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gerrymander-update

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.