Dionisio, United States v. 410 U.S. 1 (1973)

views updated

DIONISIO, UNITED STATES v. 410 U.S. 1 (1973)

A gambling suspect refused a federal court's order to provide a voice sample to a grand jury, and was adjudged in civil contempt and committed to custody. The Supreme Court affirmed. The Court rejected, 7–2, a claim that the order violated the suspect's right against self-incrimination, saying that the voice sample was to be used only for identification, not for the content of the statements. A 6–3 majority also rejected a claim that the order violated the fourth amendment. Because there was no "seizure" here, there was no need to demonstrate the reasonableness of the grand jury's request.

David Gordon
(1986)

About this article

Dionisio, United States v. 410 U.S. 1 (1973)

Updated About encyclopedia.com content Print Article