Betts v. Brady 316 U.S. 455 (1942)
BETTS v. BRADY 316 U.S. 455 (1942)
In Betts an indigent defendant was convicted of robbery after his request for appointed counsel was denied. The Court held that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment required states to furnish counsel only when special circumstances showed that otherwise the trial would be fundamentally unfair. Here, because the defendant was of "ordinary intelligence" and not "wholly unfamiliar" with criminal procedure, the Court found no special circumstances.
Over the next two decades, Betts was consistently undermined by expansion of the "special circumstances" exception, resulting in the appointment of counsel in most felony cases, until it was finally overruled in gideon v. wainwright (1963).
Barbara Allen Babcock
(1986)
More From encyclopedia.com
Gideon V Wainwright , Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established an in… Right To Counsel , The legal responsibility for the government to provide every defendant in a criminal action withlegal representationthat also must be deemed effectiv… Miranda V Arizona , Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), in the field of criminal proced… Brief for the Petitioners , Brief for the Petitioners
In the Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1963
No. 39
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, PETITIONER,
V.
L. B. SULLIV… Plea Bargaining , The process whereby a criminal defendant and prosecutor reach a mutually satisfactory disposition of a criminal case, subject to court approval.
Plea… Arraignment , A criminal proceeding at which the defendant is officially called before a court of competent jurisdiction, informed of the offense charged in the co…
About this article
Betts v. Brady 316 U.S. 455 (1942)
You Might Also Like
NEARBY TERMS
Betts v. Brady 316 U.S. 455 (1942)