Skip to main content

Interest, Own Rate of

Interest, Own Rate of

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The concept of own rates of interest can be traced back to Irving Fishers Appreciation and Interest (1896, pp. 8ff.). It was then revived and extended by Piero Sraffa (1932) to the determination of commodity rates of interest on all durable assets in his critique of Friedrich August Hayeks Prices and Production (1931), and subsequently taken up by John Maynard Keynes in chapter 17, The Essential Properties of Interest and Money, in his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936). There Keynes used the concept to demonstrate that the rate of interest on money plays a crucial role in setting a limit to production below full employment.

Keynes used Sraffas notion that for every durable commodity there is a rate of interest for it in terms of itself, as, for example, a cotton rate of interest or a wheat rate of interest. Three components enter into the own-rate of interest of assets: a physical yield or output q, a carrying cost c, and its liquidity-premium l. Thus qi ci + li is the own-rate of interest ρi of any commodity i, with q, c, and l measured in terms of itself as the standard. These commodity rates of interest may differ between commodities, just as interest rates are likely to differ between different currency areas. For purposes of comparison, these commodity rates must be converted into a common standard of value (numéraire), usually money. Furthermore, one has to consider the expected rate of appreciation or depreciation of the price of a commodity δi, t in terms of money, determined on spot and forward markets. If, for example, the spot price of 100 quarters of wheat is pt, the forward price in θ periods pt + θ, and the money rate of interest (the own-rate of interest on money) for θ periods it, θ, then the own rate of interest of wheat between t and t + θ equals

If the spot price of wheat is £100, the forward price for delivery in a year hence £107, and the money rate of interest 5 percent per annum, then the wheat rate of interest is about 2 percent per year (see Keynes 1936, p. 223).

According to Keynes, the own rate of interest of any commodity i in terms of money thus can be written as

ii, t = ρi + δi = qi ci + li + δi + ρiδi

The difference between the wheat rate of interest and the money rate of interest indicates that the market for wheat is not in long-run equilibrium. Although at any moment in time there might exist as many natural rates of interest as there are commodities, they would not be equilibrium rates, as has been emphasized by Sraffa in his critique of Hayek. It is only in equilibrium that the spot and the (discounted) forward price for all commodities coincide and that all the natural or commodity rates are equal to one another, and to the money rate (Sraffa 1932, p. 50), which is regarded by Sraffa as the normal rate of interest for the economy as the whole.

The latter concept has no meaning in modern general equilibrium theory of the Arrow-Debreu type, in which a complete break with the classical concern with long-period equilibria has taken place. Commodities are specified not only in physical terms, but also with regard to their date of availability. The set of intertemporal equilibrium prices consists of prices paid on current markets for commodities to be traded at a future date. Although there is some technical similarity in the calculation of own rates of interest with a multiplicity of these rates in intertemporal equilibrium, there remains the crucial difference that the concept of a long-run equilibrium, in which all rates of interest are equal in terms of the standard of value and equal to the own rate of interest of that numéraire, is missing.

In contrast to modern general equilibrium theory, there are no complete future markets in Keyness economics. In his General Theory Keynes came to the conclusion that in the long run, the economy may end up in an unemployment equilibrium, and that, in absence of rigid money wages, it is the level of the money rate of interest that rules the roost and creates a barrier to full employment. The reasons are to be found in three essential properties of money: (1) (near) zero elasticity of production, which makes it scarce because it cannot be produced privately; (2) (near) zero elasticity of substitution, a potential bottomless sink for purchasing power when money demand increases; and (3) a yield of nil with negligible carrying costs while comprising a substantial liquidity premium. This opens the way for the liquidity trap as the decisive cause for the money rate of interest to fall inadequately. Keynes used Sraffas ideas in his analysis of the determination of the volume of investment. However, it is doubtful whether Keynes fully understood Sraffas arguments (Kurz 2000). This is reflected in Keyness ambiguous use of a short-run rate of interest and a long-run equilibrium rate of interest, and in the fact that his schedule of marginal efficiency of capital cannot be independent of the rate of interest (Barens and Caspari 1997).

SEE ALSO Arrow-Debreu Model; Carrying Cost; General Equilibrium; Keynes, John Maynard; Liquidity; Liquidity Premium; Liquidity Trap; Long Period Analysis; Sraffa, Piero; Yield

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barens, Ingo, and Volker Caspari. 1997. Own-Rates of Interest and Their Relevance for the Existence of Underemployment Equilibrium Positions. In A Second Edition of the General Theory, Vol. 1, eds. Geoffrey C. Harcourt and Peter A. Riach, 283303. London and New York: Routledge.

Fisher, Irving. 1896. Appreciation and Interest. New York: Macmillan.

Hayek, Friedrich A. 1931. Prices and Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.

Kurz, Heinz D. 2000. The Hayek-Keynes-Sraffa Controversy Reconsidered. In Critical Essays on Piero Sraffas Legacy in Economics, ed. Heinz D. Kurz, 257301. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Sraffa, Piero. 1932. Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital. Economic Journal 42 (1): 4253.

Harald Hagemann

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Interest, Own Rate of." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Encyclopedia.com. 16 Feb. 2019 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Interest, Own Rate of." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Encyclopedia.com. (February 16, 2019). https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/interest-own-rate

"Interest, Own Rate of." International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. . Retrieved February 16, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/interest-own-rate

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.