Mathematics and the EighteenthCentury Physical World
Mathematics and the EighteenthCentury Physical World
Overview
During the eighteenth century mathematicians and physicists embraced mathematics in general, and the calculus in particular, as an increasing powerful set of analytic techniques useful in the description of the physical world. Advancements in mathematical methods fueled increasingly detailed descriptions and investigations of the physical world. Caught between the rise of empirical science and the demands of the fledgling Industrial Revolution, the application of mathematics often outpaced its theoretical footing. Although there were sporadic attempts throughout the century to reconcile mathematical theory with its practical applications, it was a mostly French school of mathematicians in the later half of the century that undertook the task of producing a rigorous, selfconsistent, mathematical system that was closely correlated to natural phenomena. The end result of these efforts to reintroduce rigorous analysis provided the foundation for the construction and rise of pure mathematics during the nineteenth century.
Background
A set of mathematical techniques known as the calculus was developed during the last decades of the seventeenth century by English mathematician and physicist Sir Isaac Newton (16421727) and, independently, German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (16461716). Although not fully developed in terms of logic, the calculus quickly found wide application, and its use provided a number of key new insights into the fields of physics, astronomy, and mathematics. The calculus became an essential tool to describe a clockwork universe that supported Western theological concepts of an unchanging, immutable God who ruled the universe through mechanistic laws.
In this regard the calculus fulfilled the intents of Newton, who developed his techniques and nomenclature in his important and influential Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy). In Principia Newton described the results of gravity (i.e. the effects of gravitational forces) in great detail. There was, however, no explanation of the underlying mechanisms of gravity. In a similar fashion, the calculus was shown to work in many situations, but the underlying mechanisms went unexplained. Although Leibniz's work was much more mathematically rigorous than Newton's, as the calculus developed throughout the eighteenth century it remained better used than it was understood. That calculus worked was often proved by its close correlation with natural phenomena (i.e. the predictions of calculus were in accord with experimental or observational evidence). Why calculus worked, however, remained a question that eluded mathematicians.
Despite great success reaped from the applications of the calculus, a philosophical void remained with regard to the logical underpinnings of calculus. Into this void stepped a number of critics, chief among them Anglican bishop George Berkeley (16851753), to cast doubt upon the logic of calculus. In his 1734 work titled The Analyst; Or, a Discourse Addressed to an Infidel Mathematician, Berkeley argued that the theorems of calculus were derived from logical fallacies and that its apparent harmony with the natural world resulted from the mutual cancellation of fundamental errors in reasoning. Through such arguments diminishing mathematics, critics hoped to reclaim some role for scripture as a basis of insight into natural phenomena. Mathematicians took these philosophical criticisms seriously and set out to support the logical foundations of calculus and other developing forms of analysis with wellreasoned proofs.
Impact
Eighteenthcentury mathematics allowed mathematicians, scientists, and philosophers deep and precise insights into the workings of the natural world. Indeed, the Age of Enlightenment was chiefly characterized by an increasing reliance on scientific and mathematical descriptions of nature as opposed to purely philosophical or traditional theological descriptions. Among eighteenthcentury scientists, mathematics triumphed over scripture as the preferred tool of reason.
Eighteenthcentury mathematics emphasized a practical, engineeringlike analysis of the material parts of physical systems. In Newtonian kinematics, for example, objects were often idealized as to shape, reduced to point masses, or treated only with regard to the motion of their center of mass. Instead of focusing on details, there was an emphasis on the elaboration of the behavior of systems as a whole.
Throughout the eighteenth century there was a continuing advancement of mathematical applications. Scottish mathematician John Napier's (15501617) seventeenthcentury advancement of logarithms greatly simplified the mathematical descriptions of many phenomena, and during the eighteenth century Napier's work provided a mathematical basis for generations of important preelectronic calculating tools, including early versions of the slide rule. French mathematician Gaspard Monge (17461818) invented differential geometry. Swiss mathematicians Jakob Bernoulli (16541750) and Johann Bernoulli (16671748) both made substantial application of calculus to physical problems, and the Bernoulli brothers' work eventually allowed Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler (17071783) to more fully develop variational calculus (calculus of variations) as an extension of calculus dealing with maxima and minima of definite integrals. Euler and French mathematician Jean Le Rond d'Alembert (17171783) applied theoretical, deductive thought to a variety of physical problems, in a process they termed "amixed mathematics," wherein pure mathematical analysis as embodied by such disciplines as algebra and geometry was separated from the "mixed" mathematics applied to astronomy, physics, mechanics, etc. In a very fundamental way, mathematics became increasingly linked with physical reality and, as such, separated from its logical and philosophical (latter to be specifically termed "logical") foundations.
Although the Bernoulli brothers, Euler, and other mathematicians used calculus to attack a variety of mathematical and physical problems ranging from thermodynamics to celestial mechanics, even Euler's texts devoted to the methods of calculus failed to offer formal mathematical proofs regarding the new techniques. This "looseness" with math was also reflected in its incorporation by the French philosopher Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de Condorcet (17431974) and by French economist AnneRobertJacques, baron de L'auline Turgot (17271781) into sociological analysis. For the French mathematician and astronomer PierreSimon Laplace (17491827), mathematics was created as a tool to explain the universe.
For other mathematicians and scientists, however, the development of theory and proofs remained highly important. French mathematician JosephLouis Lagrange (17361813), in his 1788 work Mécanique analytique (Analytical Mechanics), applied differential equations to the field of mechanics. Mécanique analytique is notable for its attempt to provide a more rigorous logical framework for mathematical analysis. In fact, Lagrange's attempt to reintroduce analytical rigor in Mécanique analytique was not limited to calculus; Lagrange also made substantial effort toward the reintroduction of logical development in geometry. Lagrange subsequently attempted a theory of functions and the principles of differential calculus in his 1797 work titled Théorie des fonctions analytiques.
A modest disregard for formal mathematical proof was driven by the beginnings of the Industrial Revolution in the later half of the eighteenth century. The demands of navigation and especially the practical engineering embodied in Scottish inventor James Watt's (17361819) invention of the steam engine provided a rapid pace of innovation that placed emphasis on applications of mathematics as opposed to development of theory. The application of the calculus and other tools of mathematical analysis without a welldeveloped foundation of proof was, however, a departure from tradition and was indicative of a major philosophical shift. Driven by the practical need to measure and explore, eighteenthcentury mathematicians and scientists essentially introduced a revolutionary epistemology (i.e. the study of human knowledge and the how truth is defined). Truth was increasingly defined by what worked—in other words, what results were in best accord with the natural world. More importantly, fully developed mathematical proofs were not required in order to apply tools of analysis to problems in order to obtain accurate, precise, and predictive data regarding the natural world. In essence, a working knowledge often supplanted philosophical reasoning.
With particular regard to the calculus, during the eighteenth century mathematicians and scientists failed to precisely define the derivative and the integral, nor were they able to provide proofs of the theorems underlying their use. Mathematicians were, however, able to determine and apply the correct derivatives of most functions. Although there was no satisfactory explanations as to why these derivatives were correct, calculations utilizing such derivatives proved useful and in accord with nature. Ironically, the tolerance for the working defense of calculus (i.e., it was mathematically and philosophically defensible simply because it worked) gained its ultimate expression in the early nineteenthcentury work of French scientist NicolasLéonardSadi Carnot (17961832), who, despite his own emphasis on rigor and mathematical formalities, defended calculus as a "compensation of errors." Such defenses were, if not abhorrent, at least insufficient for many mathematicians.
During the eighteenth century explanations of the rational basis of mathematical analysis tended to be more descriptive than explanatory. For example, the explanation of derivatives as a quotient of infinitesimals (an infinitely small but nonzero quantity) was not supportable by formal proof. The theoretical proof, involving epsilondelta notations, that a function tends to a limit at a given point under certain conditions was not fully developed until the nineteenthcentury work of French mathematician Augustin Louis Cauchy (17891857) and German mathematician Karl Theodor Weierstrass (18151897).
By the early 1820s Cauchy developed rigorous definitions of an integral, and by 1830 in his work Leçons sur le Calcul Différential, Cauchy set forth a coherent definition of a complex function of a complex variable. In addition, through his work on limits and continuity, Cauchy introduced rigor into calculus (and to other branches of mathematics as well) that enabled the rise of pure mathematics and modern analysis. Cauchy's work provided a philosophically and mathematically logical approach to calculus based upon the concepts of finite quantities and the limit. Interestingly, in the later half of the twentieth century Germanborn mathematician Abraham Robinson (19181974) developed nonstandard analysis, which provides a rationale for calculus based on a concept of infinitesimals similar to the reasonings of Newton and Leibniz.
By the end of the eighteenth century the renewed emphasis on mathematical rigor began to silence the critics of analysis, and in intellectual circles there was a growing acceptance of an understanding of nature based upon mathematics and empirical science. In turn the development of such Enlightenment thinking sent sweeping changes across the scientific, political, and social landscape.
K. LEE LERNER
Further Reading
Boyer, C. B. A History of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
Brooke, C., ed. A History of the University of Cambridge. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1988.
Dauben, J. A. W., ed. The History of Mathematics from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Garland, 1985.
Kiln, M. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

MLA

Chicago

APA
"Mathematics and the EighteenthCentury Physical World." Science and Its Times: Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. . Encyclopedia.com. 18 Nov. 2018 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.
"Mathematics and the EighteenthCentury Physical World." Science and Its Times: Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 18, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopediasalmanacstranscriptsandmaps/mathematicsandeighteenthcenturyphysicalworld
"Mathematics and the EighteenthCentury Physical World." Science and Its Times: Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. . Retrieved November 18, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopediasalmanacstranscriptsandmaps/mathematicsandeighteenthcenturyphysicalworld
Citation styles
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the mostrecent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html
American Psychological Association
Notes:
 Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
 In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.