Skip to main content

Tartaglia (also Tartalea or Tartaia). Niccolò


(b. Brescia, Italy, 1499 or 1500; d. Venice, Italy, 13 December 1557)

mathematics, mechanics, topography, military science.

The surname Tartaglia, which Niccolò always used, was a nickname given to him in his boyhood because of a speech impediment resulting from a wound in the mouth (tartagliare means “to stammer”). According to his will, dated 10 December 1557 and now in the Venice State Archives, he had a brother surnamed Fontana, and some historians have attributed that surname to Niccolò as well.

Tartaglia’s father, Michele, a postal courier, died about 1506, leaving his widow and children in poverty. Six years later, during the sack of Brescia, Niccolò, while taking shelter in the cathedral, received five serious head wounds. It was only through the loving care of his mother that he recovered. At the age of about fourteen, he went to a Master Francesco to learn to write the alphabet; but by the time he reached “k,” he was no longer able to pay the teacher. “From that day,” he later wrote in a moving autobiographical sketch, “I never returned to a tutor, but continued to labor by myself over the works of dead men, accompanied only by the daughter of poverty that is called industry” (Quesiti, bk. VI , question 8).

Tartaglia began his mathematical studies at an early age and progressed quickly. He moved to Verona, probably sometime between 1516 and 1518, where he was employed as “teacher of the abacus.” Certain documents dating from 1529–1533, preserved in the Verona section of the State Archives, testify that he had a family, that he was in reduced financial circumstances, and that he was in charge of a school in the Palazzo Mazzanti. In 1534 he moved to Venice, where he was “professor of mathematics.” Tartaglia also gave public lessons in the Church of San Zanipolo (Santi Giovanni e Paolo). Nearly all his works were printed in Venice, where he remained for the rest of his life except for a return to Brescia for about eighteen months in 1548–1549. During this time he taught at Sant’Afra, San Barnaba, San Lorenzo, and at the academy of the nearby village of Rezzato. He died in Venice, poor and alone, in his dwelling in the Calle del Sturion near the Rialto Bridge.

The most important mathematical subject with which Tartaglia’s name is linked is the solution of third-degree equations. The rule for solving them had been obtained by Scipione Ferro in the first or second decade of the sixteenth century but was not published at the time. It was rediscovered by Tartaglia in 1535, on the occasion of a mathematical contest with Antonio Maria Fiore, a pupil of Ferro: but Tartaglia did not publish it either. On 25 March 1539, Tartaglia told Girolamo Cardano about it at the latter’s house in Milan. Although Cardano had persistently requested the rule and swore not to divulge it, he included it in his Ars magna (1545), crediting Ferro and Tartaglia. This breach of promise angered Tartaglia; and in the Quesiti (bk. IX ), he presented his own research on third-degree equations and his relations with Cardano, whom hediscussed in offensive language.

Lodovico Ferrari, who devised the solution of fourth-degree equations, rose to Cardano’s defense and sent a notice (cartello) of mathematical challenge to Tartaglia. Between 10 February 1547 and 24 July 1548 they exchanged twelve printed brochures (Ferrari’s six Cartelli and Tartaglia’s six Risposte, all usually known as Cartelli), which are important for their scientific content and are notable for both polemical liveliness and bibliographical rarity. The exchange was followed by a debate between Tartaglia and Ferrari in the Church of Santa Maria del Giardino, in Milan, on 10 August 1548. The scientific portion of the dispute consisted of the solution of sixty-two problems that the two contestants had posed to each other. Although centering mainly on arithmetic, algebra, and geometry, the questions also dealt with geography, astronomy, architecture, gnomonics, and optics. They offer a vivid picture of the state ofthe exact sciences in mid-sixteenth-century Italy.

Tartaglia’s other mathematical contributions concern fundamentals of arithmetic, numerical calculations, extraction of roots, rationalization of denominators, combinatorial analysis, and various other problems that are now considered quaint and amusing. “Tartaglia’s triangle,” the triangular array of binomial coefficients also known as “Pascal’s triangle,” is found in the General trattato (pt. II [1556]) but also appears in earlier works by other authors, although in a different configuration.

The Cartelli also contain an extreme-value problem proposed by Ferrari that Tartaglia solved without including the relevant demonstration.

In geometry Tartaglia was a pioneer in calculating the volume of a tetrahedron from the lengths of its sides and in inscribing within a triangle three circles tangent to one another (now called Malfatti’s problem). In the Cartelli Ferrari and Tartaglia contributed to the theory of division of areas and especially to the geometry of the compass with fixed opening—subjects to which Tartaglia returned in the General trattato. Of special importance to geometry, as well as to other fields, was Tartaglia’s Italian translation, with commentary, of Euclid’s Elements (1543), the first printed translation of the work into any modern language.

Tartaglia’s contribution to the diffusion of the works of the great classical scientists was not confined to this translation, however. One of the first publishers of Archimedes, he produced an edition (1543) of William of Moerbeke’s thirteenth-century Latin version of some of Archimedes’ works. Tartaglia returned to Archimedes in 1551, publishing an Italian translation, with commentary, of part of Book I of De insidentibus aquae that was included in the Ragionamento primo on the Travagliata inventione. Material left by Tartaglia provided the basis for Curtius Troianus’ publication in 1565 of De insidentibus aquae (books I and II ) and of Jordanus de Nemore’s Opusculum de ponderositate. The latter work, entitled Liber Jordani de ratione ponderis in various thirteenth-century manuscripts, is important in the history of mechanics because it contains the first correct solution of the problem of the equilibrium of a heavy body on an inclined plane. (Tartaglia had also published such a solution in the Quesiti.)

Yet, despite these contributions to the dissemination of knowledge, Tartaglia drew criticism–sharp at times– by apparently presenting William of Moerbeke’s translation as his own, by not crediting Jordanus with the solution of the inclined plane problem, and by proposing in the Travagliata inventione a procedure mentioned by others for raising submerged ships. Any unbiased judgment must take into consideration that an extremely easygoing attitude then obtained with regard to literary property.

Tartaglia’s contributions to the art of warfare aroused widespread and lasting interest, and the broad range of his competence in nonmathematical areas is also demonstrated in the Quesiti. In this work Tartaglia dealt with algebraic and geometric material (including the solution of the cubic equation), and such varied subjects as the firing of artillery, cannonballs, gunpowder, the disposition of infantry, topographical surveying, equilibrium in balances, and statics. His various proposals on fortifications were praised by Carlo Promis. In his attempts at a theoretical study of the motion of a projectile–a study in which he was a pioneer–Tartaglia reached the following notable conclusions: the trajectory is a curved line everywhere; and the maximum range, for any given value of the initial speed of the projectile, is obtained with a firing elevation of 45°. The latter result was obtained through an erroneous argument, but the proposition is correct (in a vacuum) and might well be called Tartaglia’s theorem. In ballistics Tartaglia also proposed new ideas, methods, and instruments, important among which are “firing tables.”

Problems of gunnery led Tartaglia, in Nova scientia, to suggest two instruments for determining inaccessible heights and distances. The historian Pietro Riccardi considered them “the first telemeters” and cited their related theories as “the first attempts at modern tachymetry.” In the Quesiti, Tartaglia showed how to apply the compass to surveying, and in the General trattato he presented the first theory of the surveyor’s cross. Hence Riccardi also asserted that he was responsible for “the major advances in practical geometry of the first half of the sixteenth century.”

Tartaglia’s attitude toward military matters is shown in his letter dedicating Nova scientia to Francesco Maria della Rovere, duke of Urbino; the letter eloquently demonstrates his discreet reticence and effectively reflects his ethical qualities.

The short work Travagliata inventione deals not only with raising sunken ships but also with diving suits, weather forecasting, and specific weights. Tartaglia’s experiments on the latter are described in Jordanus de Nemore’s De ponderositate.

Tartaglia’s pupils included the English gentleman Richard Wentworth, who was probably the author of an Italian manuscript now at Oxford (Bodleian Library, MS 584), in which Tartaglia is mentioned several times; Giovanni Antonio Rusconi, author of a book on architecture (Venice, 1540); Maffeo Poveiano, author of a work on arithmetic (Bergamo, 1582); and the mathematician and philosopher Giovanni Battista Benedetti, who in his noted work on the geometry of the compass with fixed opening (Venice, 1553) stated that he began the study of Euclid with Tartaglia.


I. Original Works. Tartaglia’s works are Nova scientia (Venice, 1537); Euclide Megarense (Venice, 1543); Opera Archimedis (Venice, 1543); Quesiti et inventioni diverse (Venice, 1546); Risposte to Lodovico Ferrari, 6 pts. (1–4, Venice, 1547; 5–6, Brescia, 1548); Travagliata inventione (Venice, 1551), with Ragionamenti and Supplimento; General trattato di numeri et misure, 6 pts. (Venice, 1556–1560); Archimedis De insidentibus aquae (Venice, 1565); and Iordani Opusculum de ponderositate (Venice, 1565). For further information on the various editions see Pietro Riccardi, Biblioteca matematica italiana (Modena, 1870–1928; repr. Milan, 1952), I2, 496–507, with supplements in the series of Aggiunte.

The original copies of the Cartelli are very rare, as is the autographed ed. (212 copies) by Enrico Giordani, I sei cartelli di matematica disfida . . . di Lodovico Ferrari, coi sei contro-cartelli in risposta di Niccolò Tartaglia (Milan, 1876), Facs. eds. of the Quesiti (Brescia, 1959) and the Cartelli (Brescia, 1974) have been published with commentaries by Arnaldo Masotti.

Some of Tartaglia’s works on the art of warfare were translated during his lifetime into German (1547) and French (1556). Modern ed. include the following:

1. The new. ed. with English trans. and commentary by E. A. Moody, of Jordanus de Nemore’s De ponderositate, based on thirteenth-fifteenth-century MSS with Tartaglia’s ed. as guide, and prepared with the assistance of R. Clements, A. Ditzel, and J. L. Saunders. It is included in E. A. Moody and Marshall Clagett, The Medieval Science of Weights (Scientia de ponderibus) (Madison. Wis., 1952; 2nd ed., 1960), 167–227, 330–336, 388–413.

2. The new eds. of Thomas Salusbury’s seventeenth-century versions of Travagliata inventione with Ragionamenti and Supplimento, and Archimedis De insidentibus aquae, in Mathematical Collections and Translations. In Two Tomes by Thomas Salusbury. London 1661 and 1665 in facs., with analytical and biobibliographical intro. by Stillman Drake (London–Los Angeles, 1967), II, 331–402, 479–516.

3. The English versions, by Stillman Drake, of long excerpts concerning mechanics, from Nova scientia and the Quesiti, in Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy, selections from Tartaglia et al., translated and annotated by S. Drake and I. E. Drabkin (Madison, Wis., 1969), 61–143.

Tartaglia’s correspondence (or extracts from it) are in the Quesiti and in the Terzo ragionamento on the Travagliata inventione. Two letters dealing with fortifications were exchanged in 1549 with the military engineer Jacopo Fusto Castriotto: copies, perhaps from the writers’ own time, are at the old city archives, at the University of Urbino. They were published by Vincenzo Tonni-Bazza, “Di una lettera inedita di N. Tartaglia,” in Atti dell’Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti, 5th ser., 10 (1901), 39–42; and “Frammenti di nuove ricerche intorno a N. Tartaglia,” in Atti del Congresso internazionale di scienze storiche, Roma, 1903, XII (Rome, 1907), 293–307. Facsimiles of the letters are in Masotti, Studi su N. Tartaglia (see below), pls. xxiii, xxiv.

II. Secondary Literature. Works within each section are listed chronologically.

On Tartaglia’s life and works, see Baldassarre Boncompagni, “Intorno ad un testamento inedito di N. Tartaglia,” in In memoriam Dominici Chelini–Collectanea mathematica (Milan, 1881), 363–412, with full-page facs. of his will; Antonio Favaro, “Intorno al testamento inedito di N. Tartaglia pubblicato da Don B. Boncompagni,” in Rivista periodica dei lavori dell’ Accademia di Padova, 32 (1881′1882), 71–108; Vincenzo TonniBazza, “N. Tartaglia nel quarto centenario natalizio,” in Commentari dell’Ateneo di Brescia (1900), 160–179; Antonio Favaro, “Per la biografia di N. Tartaglia,” in Archivio storico italiano, 71 (1913), 335–372; and “Di N. Tartaglia e della stampa di alcune sue opere con particolare riguardo alla ‘Travagliata inventione,’” in Isis, 1 (1913), 329–340; Ateneo di Brescia–Scoprendosi il monumento a N. Tartaglia (Brescia, 1918); Commentari dell’Ateneo di Brescia (1918), 77–151; Arnaldo Masotti, “Commemorazione di N. Tartaglia,” ibid. (1957), 25–48; “Sui ‘Cartelli di matematica disfida’ scambiati fra L. Ferrari e N. Tartaglia,” in Rendiconti dell’Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere, Classe di scienze, sec. A. 94 (1960), 31–41; “Su alcuni possibili autograft di N. Tartaglia,” ibid., 42–46; and “N. Tartaglia,” in Storia di Brescia, II (Brescia, 1963), 597–617, with 4 full-page plates. Masotti’s Studi su N. Tartaglia (see below) contains many bibliographical details.

On Tartaglia’s works, their translations, and certain MSS by Tartaglia or related to him, see “N. Tartaglia e i suoi “Quesiti’” and “Rarità tartagliane,” in Atti del Convegno dis storia delle matematiche, promosso dall’Ateneo di Brescia nel 1959 in commemorazione del quarto centenario della morte del Tartaglia (Brescia, 1962), 17–56, 119–160, with 37 full-page plates, which are also in A. Masotti, Studi su N. Tartaglia (Brescia, 1962).

Tartaglia’s algebra is treated in Pietro Cossali, Origine, trasporto in Italia, primi progressi in essa dell’algebra, II (Parma, 1799), 96–158; Silvestro Gherardi, “Di alcuni materiali per la storia della Facoltà matematica nell’antica Università di Bologna,” in Nuovi annali delle scienze naturali (Bologna), 2nd ser., 5 (1846), 161–187, 241–268, 321–356, 401–436, with additions translated into German by Maximilian Curtze in Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, 52 (1870–1871), 65–205; Ettore Bortolotti, “I contributi del Tartaglia, del Cardano, del Ferrari, e della scuola matematica bolognese alla teoria algebrica delle equazioni cubiche,” in Studi e memorie per la storia dell’Università di Bologna, 10 (1926), 55–108; and The Great Art or The Rules of Algebra, by Girolamo Cardano, translated and edited by T. Richard Witmer, with foreword by Oystein Ore (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), 8, 9, 52, 96, 239, as well as the foreword and preface, passim.

On his contributions to geometry, see Antonio Favaro, “Notizie storico-critiche sulla divisione delle aree,” in Memorie del R. Istituto veneto di scienze, lettere ed arti, 22 (1883), 151–152; J. S. Mackay, “Solutions of Euclid’s Problems, With a Ruler and One Fixed Aperture of the Compasses, by the Italian Geometers of the Sixteenth Century,” in Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 5 (1887), 2–22; W. M. Kutta, “Zur Geschichte der Geometrie mit constanter Zirkel-öffung,” in Nova acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae germanicae naturae curiosorum, 71 (1896), 80–91; Giovanni Sansone, “Sulle espressioni del volume del tetraedro,” in Periodico di matematiche, 4th ser., 3 (1923), 26–27; Harald Geppert, “Sulle costruzioni geometriche che si eseguiscono colla riga ed un compasso di apertura fissa,” ibid., 9 (1929), 303–309, 313–317; and Giuseppina Biggiogero, “La geometrica del tetraedro,” in Enciclopedia delle matematiche elementari, II , pt. 1 (Milan, 1936), 220, 245.

Statics and dynamics are discussed in Raffaello Caverni, Storia del metodo sperimentale in Italia, 5 vols. (Florence, 1891–1900), I, 53–54; IV , 190–198; Pierre Duhem, Les origines de la statique, I (Paris, 1905), 111–112, 119–120, 199; Alexandre Koyré, “La dynamique de N. Tartaglia,” in La science au seizième siècle-Colloque international de Royaumont 1957 (Paris, 1960), 91–116; and S. Drake, “Introduction” to Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy (see above), 16–26, which also includes Tartaglia’s links with Archimedes and Euclid as well as with Jordanus de Nemore.

Tartaglia’s contributions to the military sciences are treated in Max Jähns, Geschichte der Kriegswis-senschaften, 3 vols. (Munich–Leipzig, 1889–1891; facs. repr. New York, 1965). xix, 507, 596–605, 626, 707–712, 718, 797–802, 850, 985, 1008.

On fortifications, see Carlo Promis, “Della vita e delle opere degl’ italiani scrittori di artiglieria, architettura e meccanica militare da Egidio Colonna a Francesco Marchi 1285–1560,” in Francesco di Giorgio Martini, Trattato di architettura civile e militare, pt. 2 (Turin, 1841), 69–71, 78; H. Wauvermans, “La fortification de N. Tartaglia,” in Revue belge d’art, de sciences et de technologie militaires, 1, IV (1876), 1–42; and Antonio Cassi Ramelli. Dalle caverne ai rifugi blindati – Trenta secoli di architettura militare (Milan, 1964), 320, 326, 346, 354, 360.

Tartaglia’s ballistics is discussed in P. Charbonnier, Essais sur l’;histoire de la balistique (Paris, 1928), 3, 6, 8–38, 41, 54, 66, 75, 87, 266; A. R. Hall, Ballistics in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1952). 33, 36–43, 45–52, 55, 61, 68–70, 81, 83, 95, 105; and E. G. R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England 1485–1714 (Cambridge, 1954,), which mentions Tartaglia especially in connection with William Bourne and Cyprian Lucar, who translated Tartaglia’s writings on ballistics into English–see 17, 30–31, 33, 42, 176, 321, 323, 328, 370.

On Tartaglia’s topography, see Giovanni Rossi, Groma e squadro ovvero storia dell’agrimensura italiana dai tempi antichi al secolo XVII° (Turin, 1877), 7–8, 115–116, 122–138, 140, 142, 156, 157, 161, 166, 169–171, 213; P. Riccardi, “Cenni sulla storia della geodesia in Italia dalle prime epoche fin oltre la metà del secolo XIX, ” pt. 1. in Memorie dell’Accademia delle scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna, 3rd ser., 10 (1879), 474–478; R. T. Gunther, Early Science in Oxford, I (Oxford, 1920; repr. London, 1967), 310, 339, 368; and E. G. R. Taylor, “Cartography, Survey and Navigation,” in C. Singer et al., A History of Technology, III (Oxford, 1957). 539.

Arnaldo Masotti

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Tartaglia (also Tartalea or Tartaia). Niccolò." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . 17 Oct. 2018 <>.

"Tartaglia (also Tartalea or Tartaia). Niccolò." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . (October 17, 2018).

"Tartaglia (also Tartalea or Tartaia). Niccolò." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Retrieved October 17, 2018 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.