Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
GERTZ v. ROBERT WELCH, INC. 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
In this major case on libel and the first amendment, the Supreme Court in an opinion by Justice lewis f. powell held, 5–4, that the rule of new york times v. sullivan (1964) did not apply when the party seeking damages for libel is not a public official or a public figure. New York Times had applied the rule of "actual malice": the First Amendment bars a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his conduct in office unless he proves that the publisher or broadcaster made the statement knowing it to be false or "with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Court had extended that rule in 1967 to public figures. In Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc. (1971) a plurality ruled that if the defamation concerned a public issue the actual malice rule extended also to private individuals, who were not public figures. In Gertz the Court, abandoning that rule, held that a private plantiff had to prove actual malice only if seeking punitive damages; the first amendment did not require him to produce such proof merely to recover actual damages for injury to reputation.
Powell reasoned that public officers and public figures had a far greater opportunity to counteract false statements than private persons. Moreover, an official or a candidate for public office knowingly exposes himself to close public scrutiny and criticism, just as public figures knowingly invite attention and comment. The communications media cannot, however, assume that private persons similarly expose themselves to defamation. Powell declared that they "are not only more vulnerable to injury than public officials and public figures; they are also more deserving of recovery." Their only effective redress is resort to a state's libel laws. So long as a state does not permit the press or a broadcaster to be held liable without fault and applies the actual malice rule to requests for punitive damages, the Court held that the First Amendment requires a "less demanding showing than that required by New York Times " and that the states may decide for themselves the appropriate standard of liability for media defendants who defame private persons.
Each of the dissenting Justices wrote a separate opinion. The dissents covered a wide spectrum from greater concern for the defamed party to alarm about the majority's supposedly constrictive interpretation of the First Amendment. Chief Justice warren e. burger worried that the party libeled in this case was a lawyer who ought not to be invidiously identified with his client. Justice william o. douglas thought all libel laws to be unconstitutional. Justice william j. brennan preferred the actual malice test to be applied to private individuals in matters of public concern. Justice byron r. white, opposing the Court's restriction of the common law of libels, condemned the nationalization of so large a part of libel law.
Leonard W. Levy
"Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 418 U.S. 323 (1974)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 20, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gertz-v-robert-welch-inc-418-us-323-1974
"Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 418 U.S. 323 (1974)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved November 20, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gertz-v-robert-welch-inc-418-us-323-1974
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.