Skip to main content

Frontiero v. Richardson 411 U.S. 677 (1973)

FRONTIERO v. RICHARDSON 411 U.S. 677 (1973)

In Reed v. Reed (1971) a unanimous Supreme Court had invalidated a state law preferring the appointment of men, rather than women, as administrators of decedents' estates. The Court had used the rhetoric of the rational basis standard of review but had in fact employed a more rigorous standard of judicial review. Conceding the rationality of eliminating one type of contest between would-be administrators, the Court had concluded that the preference for men was an "arbitrary legislative choice" that denied women the equal protection of the law.

In Frontiero, two years later, the Court came within one vote of radically restructuring the constitutional doctrine governing sex discrimination. Under federal law, a woman member of the armed forces could claim her husband as a "dependent" entitled to certain benefits only if he was, in fact, dependent on her for more than half his support; a serviceman could claim "dependent" status for his wife irrespective of actual dependency. Eight Justices agreed that this discrimination violated the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee, but they divided 4–4 as to their reasoning.

Justice william j. brennan, for four Justices, concluded that sex, like race, was a suspect classification demanding strict scrutiny of its justifications. Four other Justices merely rested on the precedent of Reed. Justice lewis f. powell, writing for three of them, added that it would be inappropriate for the Court to hold that gender was a suspect classification while debate over ratification of the equal rights amendment was still pending. Justice william h. rehnquist dissented.

The confusion in the wake of Frontiero ended three years later, in craig v. boren (1976), when the Justices compromised on an intermediate standard of review.

Kenneth L. Karst

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Frontiero v. Richardson 411 U.S. 677 (1973)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . 25 Apr. 2019 <>.

"Frontiero v. Richardson 411 U.S. 677 (1973)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . (April 25, 2019).

"Frontiero v. Richardson 411 U.S. 677 (1973)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved April 25, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.