Skip to main content

Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954)

BOLLING v. SHARPE 347 U.S. 497 (1954)

In the four cases now known as brown v. board of education (1954), the Supreme Court held that racial segregation of children in state public schools violated the fourteenth amendment's guarantee of the equal protection of the laws. Bolling, a companion case to Brown, involved a challenge to school segregation in the district of columbia. The equal protection clause applies only to the states. However, in previous cases (including the japanese american cases, 1943–1944) the Court had assumed, at least for argument, that the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of due process of law prohibited arbitrary discrimination by the federal government.

The Court in Bolling also drew on obiter dicta in the Japanese American Cases stating that racial classifications were suspect, requiring exacting judicial scrutiny. Because school segregation was "not reasonably related to any proper governmental objective," the District's practice deprived the segregated black children of liberty without due process. Chief Justice earl warren wrote for a unanimous Court.

The Court concluded its Fifth Amendment discussion by remarking that because Brown had prohibited school segregation by the states, "it would be unthinkable that the same Constitution would impose a lesser duty on the Federal Government." Critics have suggested that what was "unthinkable" was the political implication of a contrary decision. But the notions of liberty and equality have long been understood to overlap. The idea of national citizenship implies a measure of equal treatment by the national government, and the "liberty" protected by the Fifth Amendment's due process clause implies a measure of equal liberties. Doctrinally as well as politically, a contrary decision in Bolling would have been unthinkable.

Kenneth L. Karst

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . 19 Mar. 2019 <>.

"Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . (March 19, 2019).

"Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954)." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. . Retrieved March 19, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.