(b. Chalcis, Syria, ca. A.D. 250; d. ca. A.D. 330)
Iamblichus’ parents were Syrian and he taught philosophy in Syria. Otherwise almost nothing is known of his life. It is clear from later writers that he was of major importance in the elaborate systematization of Neoplatonism that occurred after Plotinus. He wrote an encyclopedic work on Neopythagorean philosophy which included arithmetic, geometry, physics, and astronomy. But what has survived of this work has virtually no philosophical or scientific interest. We have only the traditional “Pythagorean” claims that all sciences are based on Limit and the Unlimited, that numbers are generated form the One and a principle of plurality, and that geometric solids are generated form unit points, lines, and surfaces. Because this “procession” of the One generates also beauty and then goodness, the study of mathematics and of the sciences based on mathematics is said to be the path to true virtue; individual numbers moreover are symbols of individual gods of the Greek pantheon. But Iamblichus makes all these claims in only a compressed and dogmatic manner. His Life of Pythagoras has no historical value.
Iamblichus’ commentaries on Aristotle are lost. They contained some acute, if unoriginal, defenses of Aristotelian doctrine as well as some less welljudged attempts to incorporate Neoplatonic metaphysics. For example, he correctly defended Aristotle’s definition of motion as incomplete or potential against the claims of both Plotinus and the Stoics that motion was activity and actuality (energeia). He argued that Aristotle was concerned with the concept of “being potentially (possibly) so and so” as opposed to “being actually so and so,” while his opponents confused this notion with the concept of possibility itself, as opposed to actuality or activity (see simplicius, “In Aristotelis Categorias,” pp. 303 ff.). Historians have perhaps failed to notice the significance of Iamblichus’ influential commentary on Aristotle’s psychology. By sharpening the distinctions that his Neoplatonic forerunners had blurred between soul and intellect and between a human soul and a pure or disembodied soul, he showed how Platonic prejudices need not stand in the way of separating psychology from metaphysics.
Like most Platonists of his age, Iamblichus was attracted by the prevalent Gnostic and sometimes magical practices that were supposed to lead to salvation. His work On the Egyptian Mysteries is a characteristic attempt to reconcile these practices with Platonic philosophy. Although it rationalizes them (more than has been recognized), the work is without scientific significance. In the Renaissance, however, it was partly responsible for the fascination with hieroglyphics and other supposed symbols of the East.
I. Original Works. E. Des Places, ed., Les Mystéres d’Égypte (Paris, 1966), contains Greek text with French trans. and intro. De vita pythagorica, Protrepticus, Theologumena arithmeticae, and De communi mathematica scientia are in various eds. of Teubner Classics (Leipzig & Hildesheim)
II. Secondary Literature Simplicius’ commentaries on Aristole’s On the Soul and Categories are in Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, II (Berlin, 1882), and VIII (Berlin, 1907), respectively—see indexes under Iamblichus.
See also A. H. Armstrong, ed., Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 295-301.
A. C. Lloyd
"Iamblichus." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Encyclopedia.com. (April 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/iamblichus
"Iamblichus." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Retrieved April 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/iamblichus
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.
Iamblichus (īăm´blĬkəs), d. c.330, Syrian philosopher, a leading exponent of Neoplatonism. A pupil of Porphyry, he was deeply impressed by the doctrines of Plotinus. In his own teachings he combined with Plato's ideas many of those of Pythagoras and much that was mystical and even magical, derived from Asia. His following was large and enthusiastic in his own time, and in the 15th and 16th cent. he was studied with admiring interest. Of his writings on mathematical and philosophical subjects there remain several parts of an extensive work on the philosophy of Pythagoras. His work On the Egyptian Mysteries survives, but his commentaries on Plato and Aristotle have disappeared.
See J. Finamore, Iamblichus and the Theory of the Vehicle of the Soul (1985); S. Gersh, Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition (2 vol., 1986).
"Iamblichus." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Encyclopedia.com. (April 22, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/iamblichus
"Iamblichus." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Retrieved April 22, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/iamblichus