Concurrent Computer Corporation
Concurrent Computer Corporation
4375 River Green Parkway, Suite 100
Duluth, Georgia 30096
Telephone: (678) 258-4000
Toll Free: (877) 978-7363
Fax: (678) 258-4300
Web site: http://www.ccur.com
Incorporated: 1966 as Interdata, Inc.
Sales: $78.7 million (2005)
Stock Exchanges: NASDAQ
Ticker Symbol: CCUR
NAIC: 334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing
Concurrent Computer Corporation is a global supplier of high performance computer systems. The company has been a pioneer in the field of real-time computing and parallel processing. Formed in the 1960s to serve the scientific and engineering market, Concurrent has expanded its reach to the financial and medical administration industries. Its hardware and software powers a wide variety of applications including video-on-demand, process control, data acquisition, and simulators. Leading products include the MediaHawk video-on-demand and RedHawk, a Linux-based, real-time processing system. The company is active in more than 30 countries.
Interdata, Inc. was established in 1966 by former IBM engineer Daniel Sinnott and others. A pioneer in the minicomputer industry, Interdata focused on the technical market and was turning a profit by the end of the decade.
In 1974 Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Norwalk, Connecticut producer of scientific instruments, optics, and semiconductor manufacturing equipment, acquired Interdata Communications Inc. for $63.6 million. By this time, Interdata had annual sales of $19 million; Perkin-Elmer's were about 12 times greater. Interdata soon moved into a new headquarters in Oceanport, New Jersey.
Later in the decade, Interdata underwent a management shift and focused on the high end of the market for 32-bit minicomputers, which included applications in flight simulation, seismic analysis for the energy industry, and transaction processing for the financial services industry, noted the New York Times.
Interdata claimed the first full 32-bit computer in 1974. The company then became a proponent of the parallel processing approach to number crunching, wherein multiple tasks were performed at once, rather than one by one as in serial processing. This made real-time computing a possibility, with a plethora of applications in business and other markets.
The Interdata name was lost as the company became the basis for Perkin-Elmer's Data Systems Group. The business had a bad year in 1982 and underwent some cost-cutting before the parent company decided to spin it off.
Spun Off in 1985
Concurrent Computer Corporation (formerly Interdata) became an independent company in November 1985. Its initial public offering on the NASDAQ raised $37 million; Perkin-Elmer retained about 80 percent of equity.
Concurrent soon entered a partnership with Nippon Steel Corp. to develop a presence in Japan. However, the newly independent company was experiencing a difficult start. A nine-month product delay of a new $1 million parallel processing system compounded the company's troubles in a slow market. Sales slipped 7 percent to $244.8 million as profits were halved to $6 million in the company's first year of independence.
Perceiving a market shift towards cheaper open systems, in October 1988 Concurrent merged with Massachusetts Computer Corp. (Masscomp), a $76 million producer of UNIX-based microcomputers whose equipment had been used in the Space Shuttle program. Though smaller, Masscomp was the surviving entity, and changed its name to Concurrent. The deal cost Masscomp $240 million, two-thirds of it borrowed.
The original Concurrent had about 2,800 employees then, four times as many as Masscomp. James K. Sims, the president and CEO of the original Concurrent, also headed the merged company. He had originally joined Interdata in 1974 as a sales representative.
The newly combined company had the ambition of becoming number one in the real-time computing market. However, in spite of unique tax advantages, some cost savings from layoffs, and a leading position in the $5 billion real-time systems market, there were signs of danger from the beginning.
Early 1990s Debt Crisis
Sales were about $300 million in 1990. Concurrent went through some hard times in the early 1990s as defense spending fell. A new CEO, former Penn Central Industries Group Inc. head Denis Brown, arrived in September 1990 just as the company was going into default on its heavy debt from the Masscomp merger. There were reportedly also considerable corporate culture differences to overcome after moving Masscomp production to Concurrent's New Jersey facility, leading to a significant delay in a new UNIX product.
To put the company back on track, Brown stalled with the company's lenders and bondholders (some of which, including the Bank of New England and a couple of troubled thrifts, were facing insolvency themselves) while letting go of more than a quarter of Concurrent's 3,200-strong workforce and cutting back on research and development and real estate. (Company CFO James P. McCloskey discussed the contentious financial negotiations in some detail with American Banker in early 1992.)
Revenues were down to $222 million by fiscal 1992. Brown was looking for growth from more advanced battlefield simulators as well as a new line of administrative products for hospitals. Concurrent had sales of $179 million in 1994. It would soon grow with a major acquisition, the purchase of the rival real-time business of Harris Corporation in 1996.
This business had been formed in 1967 as Datacraft. Harris bought it in the early 1970s and renamed it the Harris Computer Systems Division. It was spun off as Harris Computer Systems Corp. in 1994. In June 1996, Concurrent acquired the spinoff's $40 million-a-year real-time computer business in a stock swap worth $30 million. (Harris Computer Systems was subsequently renamed CyberGuard Corp. after its remaining firewall product.) Concurrent had previously rebuffed an offer to itself be acquired by Harris Computer.
Concurrent introduced its MediaHawk Video Server in 1998. This soon became the basis for video-on-demand services from several leading cable operators. It could also provide streaming content for distance learning, video conferencing, and in-flight entertainment.
New Home in 1999
In 1999 Concurrent relocated its headquarters to the Atlanta area, which was also the site of its new video-on-demand (VOD) division, dubbed XStreme. The Integrated Solutions unit remained in Fort Lauderdale. (Concurrent later did away with the divisional structure a few years later.) Also in 1999, Concurrent acquired a competitor in VOD servers, Vivid Technologies of Chalfont, Pennsylvania.
The company soon claimed the leading position in the emerging broadband video-on-demand market. VOD business with cable operators as far away as Asia accounted for $12 million of the company's fiscal 2000 sales ($68 million). By fiscal 2002, VOD revenues had quadrupled, and accounted for more than half the company's total sales of $89 million.
Concurrent was also maintaining its legacy real-time computing business. It was involved with the Aegis radar system that monitored threats for the Navy. The company was beginning to outfit Navy ships entirely with UNIX-based, COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) technology.
In 2005, Concurrent was acquiring Cleveland's Everstream Holdings in a stock swap worth $15 million. Everstream, formed in 1999, produced business intelligence software. The two companies had been involved in a VOD advertising joint venture.
Concurrent is a worldwide leader in providing digital on-demand systems to the broadband industry and real-time computer systems for industry and government. The company's two business areas, On-Demand and Real-Time, leverage the best of Concurrent's technology and mission-critical experience to deliver solutions to a diverse global customer base.
- Interdata, Inc. is formed.
- Datacraft is formed.
- Harris-Intertype acquires majority interest in Datacraft.
- Perkin-Elmer Corporation acquires Interdata.
- Concurrent Computer Corporation (formerly Interdata) is spun off.
- Concurrent merges with Masscomp.
- Harris Computer Systems (formerly Datacraft) is spun off.
- Concurrent acquires Harris Real-Time Computer Systems.
- Concurrent's MediaHawk Video Server is introduced.
- Headquarters moves to Atlanta area as company pursues video-on-demand (VOD) market.
- VOD accounts for half of total revenues.
Concurrent Computer Asia Corporation; Concurrent Computer Canada, Inc.; Concurrent Computer Corporation (France) (USA); Concurrent Computer Corporation Pty. Ltd. (Australia); Concurrent Computer France S.A.; Concurrent Computer GmbH (Germany); Concurrent Computer Hispania, S.A. (Spain); Concurrent Computer Holding Corporation; Concurrent Computer Hong Kong Limited; Concurrent Computer New Zealand Limited; Concurrent Realisations Limited (U.K.); Concurrent UK Ltd.; Concurrent Federal Systems, Inc.; Concurrent Nippon Corporation (Japan); Concurrent Securities Corporation.
C-COR Incorporated; Silicon Graphics, Inc.; SeaChange International, Inc.; Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Alper, Alan, "Perkin-Elmer's Year-Old Data Systems Spin-Off Floundering," Computerworld, November 17, 1986, p. 118.
Appleton, Elaine L., "Concurrent Computer Corp.," The Datamation 100, Datamation, June 15, 1992, p. 154.
Barnes, Peter W., "Perkin-Elmer Organizes New Computer Firm—Up to 19% of Growing Line Will Be Sold to Public; Better Visibility Sought," Wall Street Journal, November 14, 1985.
Baumgartner, Jeff, "Getting in the Game: A New Crop of VOD Players Want to Crack Cable's Starting Lineup, But Will There Be Enough Business to Sustain Them?" CED, June 2003, pp. 28+.
"Company Interview: Walt Ungerer, Concurrent Computer Corporation," Wall Street Transcript, May 2003.
"Company Interview: Walt Ungerer, Concurrent Computer Corporation," Wall Street Transcript, June 2004.
"Company Profile," Computer Weekly, January 30, 1986, p. 20.
"Concurrent Computer, Formerly Perkin-Elmer's Data Systems Group, and Before That Interdata, Is Now Establishing Itself in a Technical Niche," Computer Weekly, October 15, 1987, p. 46.
Dickson, Glen, "VOD Gains Ground," Broadcasting & Cable, May 1, 2000, p. 81.
Fisher, Lawrence M., "Concurrent Chief to Get Top Jobs After Merger," New York Times, Sec. D, August 3, 1988.
French, Desiree, "MASSCOMP Lays Off 225 As Part of Merger Deal," Boston Globe, August 2, 1988, p. 46.
Goodwin, William, "Banks on the Brink Test CFO's Mettle," American Banker, February 3, 1992, pp. 1+.
Haber, Carol, "Harris Computer Systems, Concurrent Square Off in Deal Talks Gone Awry," Electronic News, March 6, 1995, p. 14.
Harris, Catherine L., "Perkin-Elmer Tries to Become Two Household Words," Business Week, December 9, 1985, p. 86.
Knowles, Ann, "A Slow Start for Start-Up Concurrent," Electronic Business, September 1, 1986, pp. 32+.
Kozma, Robert J., "Perkin-Elmer Unleashes Its Data Systems Group; New Independent Concurrent Computer Corp. Plans to Build on Its Past Minicomputer Success," Electronics, November 25, 1985, pp. 64+.
Lacob, Miriam, "Concurrent Solos on Parallel Flight," Computer Decisions, July 15, 1986, pp. 49+.
Lubove, Seth, "Cleanup Man," Forbes, November 9, 1992, pp. 66+.
Margolis, Nell, "Can Concurrent Make a Comeback?" Computerworld, December 10, 1990, pp. 103+.
――――, "Masscomp Buys Concurrent; Merged Company to Target Top Real-Time Slot," Computerworld, August 8, 1988, p. 6.
McNair, James, "Harris Computer Systems Closes Sale to Concurrent Computer Corp." Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, June 28, 1996.
"Perkin-Elmer's Big Growth Started with a Small Research Contract," New York Times, Financial Sec., July 18, 1981.
Saunders, Christopher, "Everstream, Concurrent Eye Video-On-Demand," ClizkZ News, November 21, 2001, http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/927741.
Shandle, Jack, "Concurrent Is Sitting Pretty After an Unconventional Buyout," Electronics, April 1989, pp. 119+.
"Sims' Challenge," Management Today, July 1987, p. 14.
Stedman, Craig, "Concurrent Chairman/CEO Exits; Firm Loses $38M in 4th Quarter," Electronics News, September 17, 1990, p. 13.
――――, "Concurrent Layoff Raises '90 Total to Near 800," Chilton's Electronic News, December 17, 1990, p. 21.
――――, "Concurrent UNIX Effort Snagged," Electronic News, November 19, 1990, p. 1.
"Two 'Low-Profile' Vendors Make Bids for the IS Spotlight," Infosystems, May 1986, pp. 20+.
Verity, John W., "This Computer Tracks Flicks—and Flack," Business Week, December 19, 1994, p. 116.
"Concurrent Computer Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. (October 18, 2018). http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/concurrent-computer-corporation
"Concurrent Computer Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved October 18, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/concurrent-computer-corporation
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.