Skip to main content

Multisystem Method

Multisystem Method

Serologists (scientists who study blood serum , and immune factors in blood serum) Brian Wraxall and Mark Stolorow pioneered the "multisystem method" for the simultaneous separation of three isoenzymes (glyoxalase I, esterase D, and phosphoglucomutase) from bloodstains in 1978. They also created and developed a multisystem method involving the use of electrophoresis analysis and an immunoelectrophoretic technique for use in forensic identification of bloodstains. The goal of the multi-system method is to carry out several different procedures simultaneously, thereby vastly reducing the amount of bloodstain needed for the analysis (cutting it by two-thirds), multiplying accuracy, markedly reducing the time previously involved in the sequential analysis of all three isoenzyme components, and accomplishing all of this without any loss in sensitivity or resolution.

Blood remains the single most important type of evidence in the world of forensic science and of criminal investigation. It can link perpetrator to act of violence, to victim, to crime scene, and to other evidence. A bloodstain is first typed for blood group. While quite useful, this is considered only class evidence (evidence that links to a specific group), as it can exclude suspects, but cannot conclusively identify a specific individual. At a slightly higher level of sophistication, the sample can then be typed for Rh factor, and sub-grouped beyond this.

In order to type the stain to the greatest possible level of specificity, with the goal of accurately linking a sample or bloodstain to a single individual, the typing of proteins and enzymes is utilized. Blood proteins and enzymes share the characteristics of isoenzymes, or polymorphisms; that is, they exist in multiple molecular forms that have the same or very nearly identical enzyme activities and therefore, they have subtypes. Among the more common isoenzymes found in blood (and in bloodstains) are: transferrin, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, esterase D, adenyl kinase, glutamic pyruvate transaminase, glyoxalase I, erythrocyte acid phosphatase, adenosine deaminase, and phosphoglucomutase. Each isoenzyme, as well as every blood group subtype, has a known population distribution. By breaking the blood sample down to the level of maximum specificity, it is possible to progressively exclude the population of suspects until only one individual is left who could possibly match the set of specific blood group, type, and polymorphism markers. For example: the sample and the suspected perpetrator both have blood type A (42% of the population), and basic subtype A2 (25%), protein adenyl kinase (15%), and enzyme phosphoglucomutase (6%). The probability that there could be two individuals with this exact blood type is: (0.42 x 0.25 x 0.15 x 0.06), or less than 0.000945 percent.

By creating multisystem methods for bloodstain typing, Wraxall and Stolorow revolutionized the field of individualized blood typing, and made lasting contributions to the accuracy, validity, and reliability of forensic science, by dramatically decreasing required sample size, increasing efficiency and saving considerable cost by allowing for the simultaneous testing of three isoenzymes, and doing so without sacrificing either resolution or accuracy.

see also Antibody; Antigen; Bloodstain evidence.

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Multisystem Method." World of Forensic Science. . 19 Jan. 2019 <>.

"Multisystem Method." World of Forensic Science. . (January 19, 2019).

"Multisystem Method." World of Forensic Science. . Retrieved January 19, 2019 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.