Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Humes 115 U.S. 512 (1885)

views updated

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD v. HUMES 115 U.S. 512 (1885)

a corporation, invoking the fourteenth amendment, employed substantive due process against a state statute, but the Supreme Court, led by Justice stephen j. field, unanimously construed due process in an exclusively procedural sense. A statute might seriously depreciate the value of property, Field declared, but "if no rule of justice is violated in the provisions for the enforcement of such a statute," it could not be said to deprive a person of property without due process. The case was a replay of Davidson v. New Orleans (1878), which Field quoted. In 1886, the Court began to abandon the Davidson-Humes view of due process.

(See stone v. farmers' loan & trust co.)

Leonard W. Levy
(1986)

About this article

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Humes 115 U.S. 512 (1885)

Updated About encyclopedia.com content Print Article

NEARBY TERMS

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Humes 115 U.S. 512 (1885)