Skip to main content

Stahl, John M.

STAHL, John M.



Nationality: American. Born: New York City, 21 January 1886. Education: Educated in New York City public schools. Family: Married Roxana Wray, 1932. Career: Actor on stage and later in films, from 1901; hired by Vitagraph Studio, Brooklyn, as director, 1914; moved to Hollywood, worked for Louis B. Mayer in independent productions, then at MGM, 1917; vice president and directorial producer, Tiffany-Stahl Studios, 1928; sold interest in studio and joined Universal, 1930. Died: 12 January 1950.


Films as Director:


(incomplete listing prior to 1918)

1914

The Boy and the Law

1917

The Lincoln Cycle (14-reeler distributed in six chapters including My Mother, My Father, My Self, The Call to Arms)

1918

Scandal Mongers; Wives of Men (+ sc); Suspicion

1919

Her Code of Honor; A Woman under Oath

1920

Greater than Love; Women Men Forget; The Woman in HisHouse; Sowing the Wind; The Child Thou Gavest Me (+ pr)

1922

The Song of Life; One Clear Call (+ pr); Suspicious Wives

1923

The Wanters (+ pr); The Dangerous Age (+ pr)

1924

Why Men Leave Home; Husbands and Lovers (+ pr)

1925

Fine Clothes

1926

Memory Lane (+ pr, co-sc); The Gay Deceiver

1927

Lovers? (+ pr); In Old Kentucky (+ pr)

1930

A Lady Surrenders

1931

Seed; Strictly Dishonorable

1932

Back Street

1933

Only Yesterday

1934

Imitation of Life

1935

Magnificent Obsession

1937

Parnell

1938

Letter of Introduction (+ pr)

1939

When Tomorrow Comes (+ pr)

1941

Our Wife

1942

The Immortal Sergeant

1943

Holy Matrimony

1944

The Eve of St. Mark; The Keys of the Kingdom

1946

Leave Her to Heaven

1947

Forever Amber (replaced by Otto Preminger); The Foxes ofHarrow

1948

The Walls of Jericho

1949

Father Was a Fullback; Oh, You Beautiful Doll



Publications


By STAHL: article—

"Oh, the Good Old Days," in The Hollywood Reporter, 16 May 1932.

On STAHL: books—

Glèdhill, Christine, editor, Home Is Where the Heart Is: Studies inMelodrama and the Woman's Film, London, 1987.


On STAHL: articles—

Obituary, in The New York Times, 14 January 1950.

Sarris, Andrew, "Esoterica," in Film Culture (New York), Spring 1963.

Morris, G., "John M. Stahl: The Man Who Understood Women," in Film Comment (New York), May/June 1977.

Pulleine, Tim, "Stahl into Sirk," in Monthly Film Bulletin (London), November 1981.

Renov, Michael, "Leave Her to Heaven: The Double Bind of Post-War Women," in Journal of the University Film and VideoAssociation, Winter 1983.


* * *

John Stahl was a key figure in the development of the Hollywood "women's melodrama" during the 1930s and 1940s, and quite possibly in the 1910s and 1920s as well. Although he began directing in 1914, and apparently made as many films before sound as after, only two of his silents (Her Code of Honor and Suspicious Wives) seem to have survived. Yet this is hardly the only reason that the ultimate critical and historical significance of his work remains to be established. More pertinent is the critical disrepute of the "tearjerker" genre in which he worked almost exclusively—a genre which had to await the discovery of Douglas Sirk's melodramas and the reworking of the form by R.W. Fassbinder to attract serious critical attention.

Comparisons between Sirk's baroquely aestheticized and Stahl's straightforwardly unadorned treatments of equally improbable plots is somewhat useful, and virtually inevitable, given that Sirk remade three of Stahl's classic 1930s "weepies": Imitation of Life (1934/1959), Magnificent Obsession (1935/1954), and When Tomorrow Comes (1939), which became Interlude (1957). In a genre focusing on the problems presented by the social/sexual order for the individual (most frequently, the bourgeois female), Sirk tended to abstract dramatic conflicts in the direction of Brecht, while Stahl chose to emphasize the effects of social rigidities through the emotions of his characters.

Stahl's career seemed to flourish most at Universal in the 1930s with the production of the highly accomplished Back Street, Only Yesterday, and the three films Sirk remade, all of which present emotionally similar heroines buffeted by twists of fate which wreak havoc on their socially determined modes of behavior. In his version of Fannie Hurst's Back Street (remade in 1941 and 1961), Stahl encourages sympathy for Irene Dunne, an independent working woman who gives up everything to be "kept" in isolation by the respectable married man she loves. Audacious contradictions emerge from the very simplicity with which Stahl presents outrageous plot twists. Dunne meets the "kept woman" next door to her back street apartment, for example, only when the woman literally catches on fire and must be rescued. Recognizing a sister in shame, Dunne counsels the injured woman against allowing herself to be exploited by the man she loves; yet what seems to be a dawning moment of self-awareness on the part of our heroine is instantly obscured by a romantic haze when her own lover walks through the door in the middle of her diatribe. Similarly powerful contradictions abound in Imitation of Life (based on another Hurst novel), where best friends Claudette Colbert and Louise Beavers find themselves incapable, despite their best intentions, of breaking the social conventions which keep the black woman subservient to the white, even when the former is responsible for the latter's wealth and success.

Given material such as the Fannie Hurst novels, the "inspirational" message of Lloyd C. Douglas's Magnificent Obsession, and the hopelessly romantic Only Yesterday (virtually remade as Max Ophüls' Letter from an Unknown Woman), and considering the period during which Stahl worked, the point of reference seems not to be Sirk so much as Stahl's better-appreciated contemporary Frank Borzage. It is Borzage's unrelenting romanticism which is usually assumed to characterize the "weepies" of the 1920s and 1930s; yet Stahl's work offers another perspective. While he clearly encourages emotional identification with his heroines, Stahl seems more interested in exposing their romantic illusions than in relishing them. In fact, his meditative restraint in such situations has prompted George Morris to suggest that "it is Carl Th. Dreyer whom Stahl resembles more than directors like Sirk or Borzage."

Yet ultimately, Stahl's visual style seems largely dependent upon studio and cinematographer, a fact most clearly demonstrated by Leave Her to Heaven, a preposterously plotted drama of a psychotically duplicitous woman shot in Technicolor by Leon Shamroy on the modernesque sets of 20th Century-Fox, where the director's mise-enscène emerges as florid and baroque as Sirk in his heyday—and a full decade earlier.

It seems that Stahl's films represent something of a missing link between Borzage's romanticism and Sirk. Certainly, an examination of his work expands an understanding of the variety of Hollywood's strategies in personalizing overtly ideological questions of sex, status, and money. In fact, if film scholars are serious about studying the melodrama in any depth, then the films of John Stahl remain a top and current priority.

—Ed Lowry

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Stahl, John M.." International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. . Encyclopedia.com. 14 Dec. 2018 <https://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Stahl, John M.." International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. . Encyclopedia.com. (December 14, 2018). https://www.encyclopedia.com/movies/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/stahl-john-m

"Stahl, John M.." International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. . Retrieved December 14, 2018 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/movies/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/stahl-john-m

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.