|
Search over 100 encyclopedias and dictionaries: |
Research categories | Follow us on Twitter |
Research categories
View all topics in the newsView all reference sources at Encyclopedia.com |
|||
General Motors Corporation
General Motors Corporation300 Renaissance Center Public Company General Motors Corporation (GM) is the world’s largest full-line vehicle manufacturer and marketer. Its North American nameplates include Chevrolet, Pontiac, GMC, Oldsmobile, Buick, Cadillac, and Saturn. Opel, Vauxhall, Holden, Isuzu, Saab, Buick, Chevrolet, GMC, and Cadillac comprise General Motors’ international nameplates. Through its system of global alliances, GM holds a 49 percent stake in Isuzu Motors Limited, 20 percent each of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. and Fiat S.p.A.’s Fiat Auto S.p.A. unit, and ten percent of Suzuki Motor Corporation. Other principal businesses include Hughes Electronics Corporation, a provider of digital entertainment, information, and communications services; and General Motors Acceptance Corporation and its subsidiaries, providers of financing and insurance to GM customers and dealers. 19th-Century OriginsThe beginning of General Motors can be traced back to 1892, when R.E. Olds collected all of his savings to convert his father’s naval and industrial engine factory into the Olds Motor Vehicle Company to build horseless carriages. For a number of years, however, the Oldsmobile (as the product came to be known) did not get beyond the experimental stage. In 1895 the first model, a four-seater with a petrol engine that could produce five horsepower and reach 18.6 mph, went for its trial run. Olds proved himself not only an innovative engineer but also a good businessman and was very successful with his first model, of which relatively few were built. As a result of his success, he founded the first American factory in Detroit devoted exclusively to the production of automobiles. The first car was a luxury model costing $1,200, but the second model was introduced at a list price of $650 and was very successful. Two years later, at the turn of the century, Olds had sold more than 1,400 cars. That same year, an engineer named David Buick founded a factory under his own name in Detroit. A third factory for the Cadillac Automobile Company also was built in Detroit. This company was founded by Henry Leland, who was already building car engines with experience gained in the Oldsmobile factory, where he worked until 1901. By the end of 1902 the first Cadillac had been produced—a car distinguished by its luxurious finish. In the following year, tiller steering was re-placed by the steering wheel, the reduction gearbox was introduced, and some cars were fitted with celluloid windscreens. Oldsmobile also reached its projected target of manufacturing 4,000 cars in one year. By 1903, a time of market instability, so many different manufacturers were operating that the financially weakest disappeared and some of the remaining companies were forced to form a consortium. William Durant, a director of the Buick Motor Company, was the man behind the merger. The nephew of a Michigan governor, and a self-made millionaire, Durant believed that the only way for the automobile companies to operate at a profit was to avoid the duplication that occurred when many firms manufactured the same product. General Motors Corporation was thus formed, bringing together Olds-mobile and Buick in 1903, and joined in 1909 by Cadillac and Oakland (renamed Pontiac). Positive financial results were immediately seen from the union, although the establishment of the company drew little attention. Other early members of the General Motors family were Ewing, Marquette, Welch, Scripps-Booth, Sheridan, and Elmore, together with Rapid and Reliance trucks. General Motors’ other U.S. automotive division, Chevrolet, became part of the corporation in 1918. Only Buick, Oldsmobile, Cadillac, and Oakland continued making cars for more than a short time after their acquisition by GM. By 1920 more than 30 companies had been acquired through the purchase of all or part of their stock. Two were forerunners of major GM subsidiaries, the McLaughlin Motor Company of Canada (which later became General Motors of Canada Limited) and the Fisher Body Company, in which GM initially acquired a 60 percent interest. By 1911 the company set up a central staff of specialists to coordinate work in the various units and factories. An experimental or “testing” laboratory also was established to serve as an additional protection against costly factory mistakes. General Motors’ system of administration, research, and development became one of the largest and most complex in private industry. About the same time that General Motors was establishing itself in Detroit, an engineering breakthrough was taking place in Dayton, Ohio: the electric self-starter, designed by Charles F. Kettering. General Motors introduced Kettering’s invention in its 1912 Cadillacs, and with the phasing out of the dangerous and unpredictable hand crank, motoring became much more popular. Kettering’s Dayton Engineering Laboratories were merged into General Motors during 1920 and the laboratories were relocated in Detroit in 1925. Kettering later became the scientific director of General Motors, in charge of its research and engineering programs. During World War I General Motors turned its facilities to the production of war materials. With no previous experience in manufacturing military hardware, the U.S. automobile industry completed a retooling from civilian to war production within 18 months. Between 1917 and 1919, 90 percent of General Motors’ truck production was for the war effort. Cadillac supplied army staff cars, V-8 engines for artillery tractors, and trench mortar shells, while Buick built Liberty airplane motors, tanks, trucks, ambulances, and automotive parts. It was at this time that Alfred Sloan, Jr., who went on to guide General Motors as president and chairman until 1956, first be-came associated with the company. In 24 years, Sloan had built a $50,000 investment in the Hyatt Roller Bearing Company to assets of about $3.5 million. When Hyatt became part of General Motors, Sloan joined the corporate management, becoming president in 1923. Overseas expansion soon commenced, with the 1925 purchase of U.K. automaker Vauxhall Motors and the 1931 acquisition of Germany’s Adam Opel. Mid-Century: Surviving the Depression and Contributing to the War EffortGeneral Motors suffered greatly under the effects of the Great Depression, but it emerged with a new, aggressive management. Coordinated policy control replaced the undirected efforts of the prior years. As its principal architect, Sloan was credited with creating not only an organization that saved General Motors, but a new management policy that was adopted by countless other businesses. Fundamentally, the policy involved coordination of the enterprise under top management, direction of policy through top-level committees, and delegation of operational responsibility throughout the organization. Within this framework management staffs conducted analysis of market trends, advised policy committees, and coordinated administration. For a company comprised of many varied divisions, such a system of organization was crucial to its success. By 1941 General Motors accounted for 44 percent of the total U.S. automotive sales, compared with 12 percent in 1921. In preparation for America’s entry into World War II, General Motors retooled its factories. After Japan struck at Pearl Harbor in 1941, the industrial skills that General Motors had developed were applied with great effectiveness. From 1940 to 1945 General Motors produced defense materiel valued at a total of $12.3 billion. Decentralized and highly flexible local managerial responsibility made possible the almost overnight conversion from civilian production to wartime production. General Motors’ contribution included the manufacture of every conceivable product from the smallest ball bearing to large tanks, naval ships, fighting planes, bombers, guns, cannons, and projectiles. The company manufactured 1,300 airplanes and one-fourth of all U.S. aircraft engines. Postwar ExpansionCar manufacturing resumed after the war, and postwar expansion resulted in increased production. The decade of the 1950s was characterized by automotive sales records and innovations in styling and engineering. The public interest in automatic gears convinced General Motors to concentrate their research in this field; by 1950, all of the models built in the United States were available with an automatic gearbox. Car body developments proceeded at the same time and resulted in better sight lines and improved aerodynamics. Company PerspectivesVision: To be a world leader in transportation products and related services. We will earn our customers’ enthusiasm through continuous improvement driven by the integrity, teamwork, and innovation of GM people. During the Korean war, part of the company’s production capacity was diverted into providing supplies for the United Nations forces (although to a smaller extent than during World War II). The reallocation reached 19 percent and then leveled off at about five percent from 1956 onward. Between 1951 and 1955 the five divisions of General Motors—Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and Cadillac—all began to feature a new V-8 engine with a higher compression ratio. Furthermore, the electrical supply was changed from six to the more reliable 12 volts. Power-assisted steering and brakes appeared on all car models and the window dimensions were increased to further enhance visibility. Interior comfort was improved by the installation of the first air conditioning systems. Also during this period General Motors completely redesigned its classic sedans and introduced front seat safety belts. The period between 1950 and 1956 was particularly prosperous in the United States, with a rise in demand for a second car in the family. Americans, however, were beginning to show real interest in smaller European cars. By 1956, a year of decreasing sales, Ford Motor Company, Chrysler Corporation, and General Motors had lost some 15 percent in sales while imports were virtually doubling their market penetration. The longer Detroit’s automobiles grew, the more popular imports became. In 1957 the United States imported more cars than it exported, and despite a recession, imports accounted for more than eight percent of U.S. car sales. Although General Motors promised that help was on its way in the form of smaller compact cars, the new models failed to generate much excitement; the company’s market share slipped to just 42 percent of 1959’s new car sales. The 1960s were difficult years in Detroit. The 1967 riot in the ghettos surrounding General Motors’ facilities forced management to recognize the urban poverty that had for so long been in their midst and they began to employ more workers from minority groups. Much of the new hiring was made possible by the expansionist policies of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. General Motors prospered and diversified; its interests now included home appliances, insurance, locomotives, electronics, ball bearings, banking, and financing. By the late 1960s after-tax profits for the industry in general reached a 13 percent return on investment, and General Motors’ return increased from 16.5 percent to 25.8 percent. Declining Fortunes from the 1970s Through the Early 1990sLike the rest of the industry, General Motors had ignored, in large part, the importance of air pollution control, but new, costly federal regulations were mandated. By the early 1970s, however, the high cost of developing devices to control pollution was overshadowed by the impact of the oil embargo. General Motors’ luxury, gas-guzzling car sales were down by 35 percent in 1974, but the company’s compacts and subcom-pacts rose steadily to attain a 40 percent market share. Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors had been caught unaware by a vast shift in consumer demand, and General Motors suffered the greatest losses. The company spent $2.25 billion in 1974 and 1975 to meet local, state^and federal regulations on pollution control. By the end of 1977 that figure had doubled. Key Dates
Under the leadership of President F. James McDonald and Chairman Roger Smith, General Motors reported earnings declines from 1985 to 1992. The only respite came from an accounting change in 1987, which effected an earnings in-crease. McDonald and Smith attempted to place these losses in perspective by arguing that they were necessary if General Motors was to develop a strong and secure position on the worldwide market. Since the start of the 1980s, General Motors had spent more than $60 billion redesigning most of its cars and modernizing the plants that produce them. The company also acquired two major corporations, Hughes Aircraft, in 1986, and Electronic Data Systems (EDS), in 1984. Though expensive, the EDS purchase provided General Motors with better, more centralized communications and backup systems, as well as a vital profit center. GM also purchased a 50 percent stake in Saab Automobile AB, a Sweden-based maker of premium cars, in 1990. That same year Saturn Corporation was created as a subsidiary to produce compact cars in a Japanese-influenced factory in Tennessee; Saturns became popular because of their quality and the no-haggle method employed to sell them. General Motors’ market share dropped steadily from 1982 to 1992. In 1987 Ford’s profits exceeded GM’s for the first time in 60 years. From 1990 to 1992, the corporation suffered successive and devastating annual losses totaling almost $30 billion. Problems were myriad. Manufacturing costs exceeded competitors’ due to high labor costs, overcapacity, and complicated production procedures. GM faced competition from 25 companies, and its market share fell from almost 50 percent to about 35 percent. Mid-1990s and Beyond: Profits Despite U.S. Market Share ErosionIn 1992 Jack Smith, Jr. advanced to General Motors’ chief executive office. He had earned respect as the engineer of GM Europe’s late 1980s turnaround, and he quickly applied those strategies to the parent, focusing on North American Operations (NAO). During 1993, Smith simplified the NAO, cut the corporate staff, pared product offerings, and began to divest GM’s parts operations. He was hailed for his negotiations with the United Auto Workers. In 1993 he pledged $3.9 billion in jobless benefits, which raised the blue-collar payroll costs about 16 percent over three years. But at the same time the contract gave Smith the ability to cut 65,000 blue-collar jobs by 1996 in conjunction with the closure of nearly 24 plants. Salaried positions were not exempted from Smith’s job-cutting scalpel: staffing at the corporate central office was slashed from 13,500 to 2,300 in 1992. In the early 1990s GM began to recapture the automotive vanguard from Japanese carmakers, with entries in the van, truck, and utility vehicle markets and the launch of Saturn. GM also gained an advantage in the domestic market because the weak dollar caused the price of imported cars to increase much faster than domestics. Market conditions along with Smith’s strategies effected a stunning reversal in 1993, when GM re-corded net income of $2.47 billion on sales of $138.22 billion. Riding the booming economy, the company recorded record profits of $6.88 billion on record sales of $163.86 billion in 1995. Despite the improved financial performance, General Motors’ share of the U.S. car market continued its steady decline, falling to slightly more than 31 percent by 1995. The company’s North American operations continued to be criticized by observers for its inability to produce innovative models, the glacial speed of its new product development, and the inefficiencies inherent in running six separate car divisions and a GMC truck division. The mid-to-late 1990s saw a number of important initiatives in GM’s non-automaking operations. In 1994 the renamed Hughes Electronics unit introduced Direct TV, a satellite-based direct-to-home broadcast service. The 1995 sale of the company’s National Car Rental business was followed by the spinoff of EDS the following year. One year later, Hughes Electronics was revamped through the sale of its defense electronics operations to Raytheon Company and the merging of its auto-motive electronics activities (Delco Electronics) into GM’s auto parts subsidiary, Delphi Automotive Systems. Hughes began concentrating on digital entertainment, information, and communications services and made a key acquisition in 1999 when it paid $1.3 billion for the direct-to-home satellite business of Primestar. In early 2000 Hughes made a further divestment of a now noncore unit when it sold its satellite manufacturing operations to the Boeing Company for about $3.75 billion. Delphi, meanwhile, was completely separated from GM through a May 1999 spinoff to shareholders. General Motors remained profitable through the end of the decade, but its U.S. market share dipped below 30 percent by 1999—at times GM’s share was less than that of the combined share of all Asian automakers, an unprecedented development. While continuing to attempt to reverse the now three-decades-long fall, GM began looking for future growth from Asia, where early 21st-century growth in car sales was expected to surpass both North America and Europe. Instead of attempting to directly sell its own models, GM began assembling a network of alliances with key Asian automakers for its push into that emerging continent, aiming to increase its market share across Asia from its late 1990s level of four percent to ten percent by 2005. The company already had a 34 percent stake in Isuzu Motors Limited, which it had bought in 1971, and a three percent stake in Suzuki Motor Corporation, obtained in 1981. In 1998 GM increased its stake in Suzuki to ten percent and agreed to build cars with the Japanese automaker. The following year General Motors increased its stake in Isuzu to 49 percent; acquired a 20 percent stake in Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., maker of Subaru all-wheel-drive vehicles; and entered into an alliance with Honda Motor Co., Ltd. involving Honda producing lowemissions gasoline engines for GM and Isuzu producing diesel engines for Honda. In May 2000 GM, Fuji, and Suzuki agreed to develop compact cars for the European market. Another deal involving Europe was reached in early 2000, when GM agreed to acquire a 20 percent stake in the Fiat Auto S.p.A. unit of Fiat S.p.A., the number six automaker in the world, in exchange for Fiat taking a 5.1 percent stake in GM. Through this deal, General Motors aimed to grab a larger share of the market for the small vehicles that are popular in Europe and Latin America but shunned in the United States. In mid-2000 GM and Fiat jointly bid to acquire troubled South Korean carmaker Daewoo Motor Co., but were outbid by Ford. Also in 2000, General Motors acquired the 50 percent of Saab Automobile that it did not already own. In another key early 2000 development, General Motors agreed to join with DaimlerChrysler AG and Ford to create an Internet-based global business-to-business supplier exchange, Covisint, that would be open to all suppliers and automakers. This would potentially create the world’s largest virtual market-place, although the Federal Trade Commission quickly opened a preliminary antitrust inquiry into the plan. The company also began building a factory in Lansing, Michigan, its first new plant in 15 years. In June 2000 G. Richard Wagoner was promoted from president to CEO, with Smith remaining chairman. At the age of 47, Wagoner became the youngest CEO in GM history and faced the daunting task of running what was still considered by many observers to be an excessively bureaucratic and overly complex organization, which was extremely resistant to change and seemingly unable to anticipate most market trends. Principal SubsidiariesGeneral Motors Acceptance Corporation; General Motors Investment Management Corporation; Hughes Electronics Corporation; Saturn Corporation; Holden, Ltd. (Australia); General Motors do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil); General Motors of Canada, Ltd.; Adam Opel Aktiengesellschaft (Germany); General Motors de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.; Saab Automobile AB (Sweden); Vauxhall Motors Limited (U.K.). Principal DivisionsAllison Transmission Division; Buick Motor Division; Cadillac Motor Car Division; Chevrolet Motor Division; Electro-Motive Division; Oldsmobile Division; Pontiac-GMC Division; Pontiac-GMC Truck Division. Principal Operating Unitse-GM Group; GM Asia Pacific; GM Europe; GM Latin America, Africa and Mid-East; GM Locomotive Group; GM North America; GM Powertrain Group; GM Truck Group. Principal CompetitorsAmeriCredit Corp.; Bayerische Motoren Werke AG; Credit Acceptance Corporation; DaimlerChrysler AG; Ford Motor Company; Ford Motor Credit Company; General Electric Capital Corporation; General Electric Company; Honda Motor Co., Ltd.; Hyundai Motor Company; Mazda Motor Corporation; Mitsubishi Motors Corporation; Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.; PSA Peugeot Citroen S.A.; Renault S.A.; Suzuki Motor Corporation; Toyota Motor Corporation; Volkswagen AG. Further ReadingBary, Andrew, “How to Fix GM,” Barren’s, July 5, 1999, pp. 18–19. Cray, Ed, Chrome Colossus: General Motors and Its Time, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980. Dassbach, Carl H.A., Global Enterprises and the World Economy: Ford, General Motors, and IBM, the Emergence of the Transnational Enterprise, New York: Garland, 1989. De Lorean, John Z., On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors, London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1980. Geyelin, Milo, “Lasting Impact: How an Internal Memo Written 26 Years Ago Is Costing GM Dearly,” Wall Street Journal, September 29, 1999, pp. A1 +. Hamper, Ben, Rivethead: Tales from the Assembly Line, New York: Warner Books, 1992. Jacobs, Timothy, A History of General Motors, New York: Smithmark, 1992. Keller, Maryann, Collision: GM, Toyota, Volkswagen, and the Race to Own the 21st Century, New York: Currency Doubleday, 1993. ______, Rude Awakening: General Motors in the 1980s, New York: Morrow, 1989. ______, Rude Awakening: The Rise, Fall and Struggle for Recovery of General Motors, New York: HarperCollins, 1990. Kerwin, Kathleen, “For GM, Once Again, Little Ventured, Little Gained,” Business Week, March 27, 2000, pp. 42–43. Kerwin, Kathleen, and Joann Muller, “Reviving GM,” Business Week, February 1, 1999, pp. 114-K Kuhn, Arthur J., GM Passes Ford, 1918–1938: Designing the General Motors Performance-Control System, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986. Madsen, Axel, The Deal Maker: How William C. DurantMade General Motors, New York: Wiley, 1999. May, George S., R.E. Olds, Auto Industry Pioneer, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1977. Meredith, Robyn, “Can GM Return to the Passing Lane?,” New York Times, November 7, 1999, Sec. 3, p. 1. Miller, Scott, “Open No Quick Fix for GM’s ‘Mr. Fix It,’” Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2000, p. A22. Osterland, Andrew, “Al and Me: Why General Motors Will Finally Get Serious About Downsizing,” Financial World, December 16,1996, pp. 39–41. Palmer, Jay, “Reviving GM,” Barren’s, June 22, 1998, pp. 31–35. Pollack, Andrew, “Paper Trail GM After It Loses Injury Suit,” New York Times, July 12, 1999, Sec. A, p. 12. Ramsey, Douglas K., The Corporate Warriors: Six Classic Cases in American Business, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987. Rothschild, Emma, Paradise Lost: The Decline of the Auto-Industrial Age, New York: Random House, 1973. Shirouzu, Norihiko, “GM Cracks Japan’s Market with Its Wallet, Not Its Cars: Network of Alliances Aids Asia Expansion by Filling Gaps in Product Line,” Wall Street Journal, January 26, 2000, p. A17. Simison, Robert L., Fara Warner, and Gregory L. White, “Big Three Car Makers Plan Net Exchange,” Wall Street Journal, February 28, 2000, pp. A3, A16. Simison, Robert L., Gregory L. White, and Deborah Ball, “GM’s Linkup with Fiat Opens Final Act of Consolidation Drama for Industry,” Wall Street Journal, March 14, 2000, pp. A3, A8. Sloan, Alfred, Jr., My Years with General Motors, New York: Doubleday, 1964. Smith, Roger B., Building on 75 Years of Excellence: The General Motors Story, New York: Newcomen Society of the United States, 1984. Taylor, Alex, III, “GM’s $11 Billion Turnaround,” Fortune, October 17, 1994, pp. 54–56 +. ______, “GM: Some Gain, Much Pain,” Fortune, May 29, 1995, pp. 78–80, 84. ______, “GM: Time to Get in Gear,” Fortune, April 28, 1997, pp. 94–96 +. ______, “GM: Why They Might Break Up America’s Biggest Company,” Fortune, April 29, 1996, pp. 78–82, 84. ______, “Is Jack Smith the Man to Fix GM?,” Fortune, August 3, 1998, pp. 86 +. Weisberger, Bernard A., The Dream Maker: William C. Durant, Founder of General Motors, Boston: Little Brown, 1979. White, Gregory L., “As GM Courts the Net, Struggling Saturn Line Exposes Rusty Spots,” Wall Street Journal, July 11, 2000, pp. A1, A10. Zachary, Kamerine, “Shopping Spree: GM Plunks Down Hard Cash to Add Strength in Asia,” Ward’s Auto World, February 29, 2000. Zesiger, Sue, “GM’s Big Decision: Status Quo,” Fortune, February 21, 2000, pp. 101–02, 104. —April Dougal Gasbarre —updated by David E. Salamie |
|
|
Cite this article
"General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 31 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 31, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2844000062.html "General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 2001. Retrieved May 31, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2844000062.html |
|
General Motors Corporation
General Motors Corporation3044 West Grand Blvd. Public Company General Motors Corporation is the world’s largest full-line vehicle manufacturer and marketer. Its American nameplates include Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, Cadillac, GMC Truck, and Saturn. Opel, Vauxhall, Saab, and Isuzu comprise General Motors’ international nameplates. The company’s Automotive Components Group Worldwide brings vertical integration to General Motors’ manufacturing, and also supplies components and systems to every major automotive manufacturer. Other principal businesses include GM Hughes Electronics Corporation, a manufacturer of automotive electronics, commercial technologies, telecommunications, and space and defense electronics; Electronic Data Systems corporation, a global information technologies company; and General Motors Acceptance Corporation and its subsidiaries, providers of financing and insurance to GM customers and dealers. The beginning of General Motors can be traced back to 1892, when R. E. Olds collected all his savings in order to convert his father’s naval and industrial engine factory into the Olds Motor Vehicle Company to build horseless carriages. For a number of years, however, the Oldsmobile (as the product came to be known) did not get beyond the experimental stage. In 1895 the first model, a four-seater with a petrol engine that could produce five horsepower and reach 18.6 mph, went for its trial run. Olds proved himself not only an innovative engineer but also a good businessman and was very successful with his first model, of which relatively few were built. As a result of his success, he founded the first American factory in Detroit devoted exclusively to the production of automobiles. The first car was a luxury model costing $1,200, but the second model was introduced at a list price of $650 and was very successful. Two years later, at the turn of the century, Olds had sold over 1,400 cars. That same year, an engineer named David Buick founded a factory under his own name in Detroit. A third factory for the Cadillac Automobile Company was also built in Detroit. This company was founded by Henry Leland, who was already building car engines with experience gained in the Oldsmobile factory, where he worked until 1901. By the end of 1902 the first Cadillac had been produced—a car distinguished by its luxurious finish. In the following year, tiller steering was replaced by the steering wheel, the reduction gearbox was introduced, and some cars were fitted with celluloid windscreens. Oldsmobile also reached their projected target of manufacturing 4,000 cars in one year. By 1903, a time of market instability, so many different manufacturers were operating that the financially weakest disappeared and some of the remaining companies were forced to form a consortium. William Durant, a director of the Buick Motor Company, was the man behind the merger. The son of a Michigan governor, and a self-made millionaire, Durant believed that the only way for the automobile companies to operate at a profit was to avoid the duplication that occurred as many concerns manufactured the same product. General Motors was thus formed, bringing together Oldsmobile and Buick in 1903, and joined in 1909 by Cadillac and Oakland (renamed Pontiac). Positive financial results were immediately seen from the union, although the establishment of the company drew little attention. Other early members of the General Motors family were Ewing, Marquette, Welch, Scripps-Booth, Sheridan, and Elmore, together with Rapid and Reliance trucks. General Motors’ other U.S. automotive division, Chevrolet, became part of the Corporation in 1918. Only Buick, Oldsmobile, Cadillac, and Oakland continued making cars for more than a short time after their acquisition by GM. By 1920 more than 30 companies had been acquired through the purchase of all or part of their stock. Two were forerunners of major GM subsidiaries, the McLaughlin Motor Company of Canada (which later became General Motors of Canada Limited) and the Fisher Body Company, in which GM initially acquired a 60 percent interest. By 1911 the company set up a central staff of specialists to coordinate work in the various units and factories. An experimental or “testing” laboratory was also established to serve as an additional protection against costly factory mistakes. General Motors’ system of administration, research, and development became one of the largest and most complex in private industry. About the same time that General Motors was establishing itself in Detroit, an engineering breakthrough was taking place in Dayton, Ohio: the electric self-starter, designed by Charles F. Kettering. General Motors introduced Kettering’s invention in its 1912 Cadillacs, and with the phasing out of the dangerous and unpredictable hand crank, motoring became much more popular. Kettering’s Dayton Engineering Laboratories were merged into General Motors during 1920 and the Laboratories were relocated in Detroit in 1925. Kettering later became the scientific director of General Motors, in charge of its research and engineering programs. During World War I General Motors turned its facilities to the production of war materials. With no previous experience in manufacturing military hardware, the American automobile industry completed a retooling from civilian to war production within 18 months. Between 1917 and 1919, 90 percent of General Motors’ truck production was for the war effort. Cadillac supplied Army staff cars, V-8 engines for artillery tractors, and trench mortar shells, while Buick built Liberty airplane motors, tanks, trucks, ambulances, and automotive parts. It was at this time that Alfred Sloan, Jr., who went on to guide General Motors as president and chairman until 1956, first became associated with the company. In 24 years, Sloan had built a $50,000 investment in the Hyatt Roller Bearing Company to assets of about $3.5 million. When Hyatt became part of General Motors, Sloan joined the corporate management. General Motors suffered greatly under the effects of the Depression, but it emerged with a new, aggressive management. Coordinated policy control replaced the undirected efforts of the prior years. As its principal architect, Sloan was credited with creating not only an organization which saved General Motors, but a new management policy that was adopted by countless other businesses. Fundamentally, the policy involved coordination of the enterprise under top management, direction of policy through top-level committees, and delegation of operational responsibility throughout the organization. Within this framework management staffs conducted analysis of market trends, advised policy committees, and coordinated administration. For a company comprised of many varied divisions, such a system of organization was crucial to its success. By 1941 General Motors accounted for 44 percent of the total U.S. automotive sales, compared with 12 percent in 1921. In preparation for America’s entry into the Second World War, General Motors retooled its factories. After Japan struck at Pearl Harbor in 1941, the industrial skills that General Motors had developed were applied with great effectiveness. From 1940 to 1945 General Motors produced defense material valued at a total of $12.3 billion. Decentralized and highly flexible local managerial responsibility made possible the almost overnight conversion from civilian production to wartime production. General Motors’ contribution included the manufacture of every conceivable product from the smallest ball bearing to large tanks, naval ships, fighting planes, bombers, guns, cannons, and projectiles. The company manufactured 1,300 airplanes and one-fourth of all U.S. aircraft engines. Car manufacturing resumed after the war, and postwar expansion resulted in increased production. The decade of the 1950s was characterized by automotive sales records and innovations in styling and engineering. The public interest in automatic gears convinced General Motors to concentrate their research in this field; by 1950, all the models built in the United States were available with an automatic gearbox. Car body developments proceeded at the same time and resulted in better sight lines and improved aerodynamics. During the Korean war, part of the company’s production capacity was diverted into providing supplies for the United Nations forces (although to a smaller extent than during the Second World War). The reallocation reached 19 percent and then leveled off at about five percent from 1956 onwards. Between 1951 and 1955 the five divisions which today form General Motors—Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and Cadillac—all began to feature a new V-8 engine with a higher compression ratio. Furthermore, the electrical supply was changed from six to the more reliable 12 volts. Power assisted steering and brakes appeared on all car models and the window dimensions were increased to further enhance visibility. Interior comfort was improved by the installation of the first air-conditioning systems. Also during this period General Motors completely redesigned its classic sedans and introduced front seat safety belts. The period between 1950 and 1956 was particularly prosperous in the United States, with a rise in demand for a second car in the family. However, Americans were beginning to show real interest in smaller European cars. By 1956, a year of decreasing sales, Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors had lost some 15 percent in sales while imports were virtually doubling their market penetration. The longer Detroit’s automobiles grew, the more popular imports became. In 1957 the United States imported more cars than it exported, and despite a recession, imports accounted for more than eight percent of U.S. car sales. Although General Motors promised that help was on its way in the form of smaller compact cars, the new models failed to generate much excitement; the company’s market share slipped to just 42 percent of 1959’s new car sales. The 1960s were difficult years in Detroit. Riots in the ghettos surrounding General Motors’ facilities forced management to recognize the urban poverty that had for so long been in their midst and they began to employ more workers from minority groups. Much of the new hiring was made possible by the expansionist policies of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. General Motors prospered and diversified; its interests now included home appliances, insurance, locomotives, electronics, ball bearings, banking, and financing. By the late 1960s after-tax profits for the industry in general reached a 13 percent return on investment, and General Motors’ return increased from 16.5 percent to 25.8 percent. Like the rest of the industry, General Motors had largely ignored the importance of air pollution control, but new, costly federal regulations were mandated. However, by the early 1970s, the high cost of developing devices to control pollution was overshadowed by the impact of the oil embargo. General Motors’ luxury, gas guzzling car sales were down by 35 percent in 1974, but the company’s compacts and subcompacts rose steadily to attain a 40 percent market share. Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors had been caught unaware by a vast shift in consumer demand, and General Motors suffered the greatest losses. The company spent $2.25 billion in 1974 and 1975 in order to meet local, state, and federal regulations on pollution control. By the end of 1977 that figure had doubled. Under the leadership of president F. James McDonald, and chairman Roger Smith, General Motors reported earnings declines from 1985 to 1992. The only respite came from an accounting change in 1987, which effected an earnings increase. McDonald and Smith attempted to place these losses in perspective by arguing that they are necessary if General Motors is to develop a strong and secure position on the worldwide market. Since the start of the 1980s, General Motors had spent over $60 billion redesigning most of its cars and modernizing the plants that produce them. The company also acquired two major corporations, Hughes Aircraft and Electronic Data Systems (EDS). Though expensive, the EDS purchase provided General Motors with better, more centralized communications and backup systems, as well as a vital profit center. General Motors’ market share dropped steadily from 1982 to 1992. In 1987 Ford’s profits exceeded GM’s for the first time in sixty years. From 1990 to 1992, the corporation suffered successive and devastating annual losses totaling almost $30 billion. Problems were myriad. Manufacturing costs exceeded competitors’ due to high labor costs, over capacity, and complicated production procedures. GM faced competition from 25 companies, and its market share fell from almost 50 percent to about 35 percent. In 1992 Jack Smith, Jr. advanced to General Motors’ chief executive office. He had earned respect as the engineer of GM Europe’s late 1980s turnaround, and quickly applied those strategies to the parent, focusing on North American Operations (NAO). During 1993, Smith simplified the NAO, cut the corporate staff, pared product offerings, and began to divest GM’s parts operations. He was hailed for his negotiations with the United Auto Workers. In 1993 he pledged $3.9 billion in jobless benefits, which raised the blue-collar payroll costs about 16 percent over three years. But at the same time the contract gave Smith the ability to cut 65,000 blue-collar jobs by 1996 in conjunction with the closure of nearly 24 plants. Salaried positions were not exempted from Smith’s job-cutting scalpel: staffing at the corporate central office was slashed from 13,500 to 2,300 in 1992. In the early 1990s GM began to recapture the automotive vanguard from Japanese carmakers, with entries in the van, truck, and utility vehicle markets and the launch of Saturn Corp. GM also gained an advantage in the domestic market because the weak dollar caused the price of imported cars to increase much faster than domestics. Market conditions along with Smith’s strategies effected a stunning reversal in 1993, when GM recorded net income of $2.47 billion on sales of $138.22 billion. The CEO noted his corporation’s strategic advantages: “a large customer base; a large and excellent car and truck dealer network; strong brands; a global presence in engineering, manufacturing, and marketing; a management team with broad international experience; and, most of all, a worldwide team of diverse, capable, and motivated employees.” Principal Subsidiaries:Electronic Data Systems Corp.; GM Hughes Electronics Corp.; General Motors Acceptance Corporation; Saturn Corp. The company also has subsidiaries in the following countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, England, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay, Venezuela, Germany, and Zaire. Further Reading:Cray, Ed, Chrome Colossus: General Motors and Its Time, New York: McGraw Hill, 1980. Dassbach, Carl H. A., Global Enterprises and the World Economy: Ford, General Motors, and IBM, the Emergence of the Transnational Enterprise, New York: Garland, 1989. De Lorean, John Z., On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors, London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1980. Hamper, Ben, Rivethead: Tales From the Assembly Line, New York: Warner Books, 1992. Jacobs, Timothy, A History of General Motors, New York: Smithmark, 1992. Keller, Maryann, Rude Awakening: General Motors in the 1980s, New York: Morrow, 1989. ______, Rude Awakening: The Rise, Fall and Struggle for Recovery of General Motors, New York: HarperCollins, 1990. Kuhn, Arthur J., GM Passes Ford, 1918-1938: Designing the General Motors Performance-Control System, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986. May, George S., R.E. Olds, Auto Industry Pioneer, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977. Ramsey, Douglas K., The Corporate Warriors: Six Classic Cases in American Business, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987. Rothschild, Emma, Paradise Lost: The Decline of the Auto-Industrial Age, New York: Random House, 1973. Sloan, Alfred, Jr., My Years with General Motors, New York: Double-day, 1964. Smith, Roger B., Building on 75 Years of Excellence: The General Motors Story, New York: Newcomen Society of the United States, 1984. Weisberger, Bernard A., The Dream Maker: William C. Durant, Founder of General Motors, Boston: Little Brown, 1979. —April Dougal Gasbarre |
|
|
Cite this article
"General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 1995. Encyclopedia.com. 31 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 1995. Encyclopedia.com. (May 31, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2841400115.html "General Motors Corporation." International Directory of Company Histories. 1995. Retrieved May 31, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2841400115.html |
|
General Motors Corporation
General Motors
|
|
|
Cite this article
"General Motors Corporation." Leading American Businesses. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. 31 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "General Motors Corporation." Leading American Businesses. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. (May 31, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3498000052.html "General Motors Corporation." Leading American Businesses. 2003. Retrieved May 31, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3498000052.html |
|
General Motors
GENERAL MOTORSGENERAL MOTORS is a worldwide corporation that produces everything from microchips to locomotives. William Crapo Durant of Flint, Michigan and a small group of investors formed the General Motors Company (GM)16 September 1908 in Trenton, New Jersey. Durant, who already owned Buick Motor Company, bought small car and parts manufacturers and incorporated them into GM. Among Durant's first acquisitions were Oldsmobile, Cadillac, and Oakland (Pontiac). By 1920 GM had purchased more than 30 companies. After World War I GM experienced a decline so severe Durant resigned his post as president. In 1923 the Board of Directors elected Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. president (10 May 1923–3 May 1937)and Chairman of the Executive Committee (3 May 1937–2 April 1956). Sloan, whose Hyatt Roller Bearing Company joined GM in 1919, utilized creative management techniques that made GM the largest car and truck manufacturer in the world. Under Sloan's leadership, GM developed a number of firsts including independent front wheel suspension and the automatic transmission. While GM participated in all U. S. war efforts, its most dramatic contribution was during World War II. From 1942 through the end of the war, GM's plants stopped all non-military production. Producing ball bearings to bombers, GM was responsible for 13,000 planes and a fourth of the engines produced for all planes. In all, GM produced 12. 3 billion dollars worth of military materials. After the war GM experienced its share of the postwar boom, and by the sixties and seventies it was taking advantage of new technologies to make cars more efficient and safe even before government regulations went into effect. During the oil crisis of the 1970s GM experienced a decline in sales but responded by designing lighter and more economical autos. During the 1980s and 90s, GM continued to expand and opened plants in Germany, Brazil, Thailand, and Spain. In order to compete with an expanding import market GM developed Saturn located in Spring Hill, Tennessee, in 1990 and in 1996 it developed its own version of the electric car. GM has also been involved in various humanitarian projects such as a housing project with Habitat for Humanity for its employees in Mexico and the "Care and Share" program to collect food. BIBLIOGRAPHYCray, Ed. Chrome Colossus: General Motors and its Times. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1980. Madsen, Axel. Deal Maker: How William C. Durant Made General Motors. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. Smith, Roger B. Building on 75 Years of Excellence: The General Motors Story. New York: The Newcomen Society of the United States, 1984. Lisa A.Ennis |
|
|
Cite this article
"General Motors." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. 31 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "General Motors." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. (May 31, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401801671.html "General Motors." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Retrieved May 31, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401801671.html |
|
General Motors
General Motors. See Automotive Industry.
|
|
|
Cite this article
Paul S. Boyer. "General Motors." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 31 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. Paul S. Boyer. "General Motors." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 31, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O119-GeneralMotors.html Paul S. Boyer. "General Motors." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Retrieved May 31, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O119-GeneralMotors.html |
|