(b. Cyzicus, Turkey, ca. 370 b. c.),
One of the great astronomers of ancient Greece, Callippus belonged to the distinguished line of mathematicians and astronomers who, with Eudoxus at their head, were associated with the Academy and the Lyceum. References to him, although rare, clearly establish the magnitude of his achievements. He continued the work of Eudoxus on the motion of the planets, made accurate determinations of the lengths of the seasons, and constructed a seventy-six-year cycle to harmonize the solar and lunar years. This “Callippic period” was used by all later astronomers to record and date observations of heavenly phenomena.
The main biographical information on Callippus is found in Simplicius’ commentary on Aristotle’s Decaelo. It states: “Callippus of Cyzicus, having studied with Polemarchus, Eudoxus’ pupil, following him to Athens dwelt with Aristotle, correcting and completing, with Aristotle’s help, the discoveries of Eudoxus” (Heiberg, ed., p. 49). It seems Callippus was in Athens in the decade before the death of Alexander in 323 b.c., Ptolemy says in the Almagest (Heiberg, ed., I, p. 206) that the year 50 of the first Callippic period was forty-four years after the death of Alexander, thus placing the beginning of the period in 330/329 b.c.
The discoveries of Eudoxus that Callippus corrected and completed are described by Aristotle in Metaphysics, Λ. In order to “save the appearances,” as Plato had proposed, Eudoxus fixed each planet on a sphere that rotated on poles attached inside another sphere rotating in a different direction at a different rate, and this sphere in another until enough concentric spheres were so arranged and moving as to account by their combined uniform motions for the observed irregularities of the planet’s motion. Aristotle tells us that Callippus found it necessary to add two spheres each for the sun and moon, and one for each of the other planets except Jupiter and Saturn. These changes in Eudoxus’ system are perhaps testimony to Callippus’ careful observations.
A papyrus, the so-called Ars Eudoxi, states that Callippus had determined the lengths of the seasons more accurately than Meton, giving them as ninety-four, ninety-two, eighty-nine, and ninety days, respectively, from the vernal equinox. The error is much less than that in Meton’s determinations, made a century earlier.
From such calculations Callippus was led to see that Meton’s nineteen-year cycle was a trifle too long. He therefore combined four nineteen-year periods into one cycle of seventy-six years and dropped one day from the period. Thus he brought the measure of the year closer to its true value, and his period became the standard for later astronomers. Many of the observations cited by Ptolemy are given in reference to the Callippic period. Hipparchus, in Ptolemy’s references, seems to have used that period regularly.
Although the system of concentric spheres gave way to epicycles and eccentrics, Callippus’ period became the standard for correlating observations accurately over many centuries, and thus contributed to the accuracy of later astronomical theories.
Ancient sources are Aristotle, Metaphysics, Sir David Ross, ed. (Oxford, 1924), ref. in text to 1073b32–38; Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle’s De caelo, J. L. Heiberg, ed. (Berlin, 1894), vol. VII of Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, which gives details from Eudemus’ history of the work of Eudoxus and Callippus; Theon of Smyrna, Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platone mutilium, E. Hiller, ed. (Leipzig, 1878), which covers much the same ground as Simplicius in his section on the planets; Geminus, Elementa astronomiae, or Isagoge, C. Manitius, ed. (Leipzig, 1898), pp. 120–122, an account of the period of Callippus, with number of months, including intercalary, and days in the cycle; Ars Eudoxi, Blass, ed. (Kiel, 1887), which gives lengths of seasons as determined by Callippus; and Ptolemy, Almagest, J. L. Heiberg, ed. (Leipzig, 1898), and Taliaferro, tr., Great Books of the Western World, vol. XVI, which frequently mentions the Callippic period.
Modern works are Sir Thomas Heath, Aristarchus of Samos (Oxford, 1913), which contains the best Englishlanguage appreciation of Callippus and refers to the relevant modern literature on him; and Pauly-Wissowa, X, pt. 2, cols. 1662 f., which gives an exhaustive account of the seventy-six-year cycle, with full references to ancient sources and modern discussions.
John S. Kieffer
"Callippus." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Encyclopedia.com. (December 13, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/callippus
"Callippus." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. . Retrieved December 13, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/callippus
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.