Middendorf v. Henry 425 U.S. 25 (1976)
MIDDENDORF v. HENRY 425 U.S. 25 (1976)
A 5–3 Supreme Court ruled that servicemen have no right to counsel in summary courts-martial. Justice william h. rehnquist's majority opinion concluded that such proceedings did not constitute criminal prosecutions within the Sixth Amendment's guarantee, and he also disposed of a Fifth Amendment due process claim as without merit.
David Gordon
(1986)
More From encyclopedia.com
Barron V. Baltimore , Barron v. Baltimore
In Barron v. City of Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243, 8 L.Ed. 672 (U.S. 1833), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendm… Romer V. Evans , Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 116 S. Ct. 1620, 134 L. Ed. 2d 855 (1996), is a landmark and controversial decision, in which the U.S. S… John Paul Stevens , Stevens, John Paul
STEVENS, JOHN PAUL
A member of the U.S. Supreme Court since 1975, John Paul Stevens has developed a reputation as a judicial centr… Incorporation , According to the incorporation doctrine the fourteenth amendment incorporates or absorbs the bill of rights, making its guarantees applicable to the… Antonin Scalia , Scalia, Antonin
SCALIA, ANTONIN
In 1986, Antonin Scalia was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President ronald reagan, becoming the first Americ… Gideon V Wainwright , Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established an in…
About this article
Middendorf v. Henry 425 U.S. 25 (1976)
You Might Also Like
NEARBY TERMS
Middendorf v. Henry 425 U.S. 25 (1976)