|
Search over 100 encyclopedias and dictionaries: |
Research categories | Follow us on Twitter |
Research categories
View all topics in the newsView all reference sources at Encyclopedia.com |
|||
motion pictures
motion pictures movie-making as an art and an industry, including its production techniques, its creative artists, and the distribution and exhibition of its products (see also motion picture photography ; Motion Picture Cameras under camera ).
|
|
|
Cite this article
"motion pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "motion pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-mopicts.html "motion pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-mopicts.html |
|
Motion Pictures
MOTION PICTURESThe statement "Cinema is for us the most important of all arts" has been attributed to Vladimir Lenin. This statement, whether apocryphal or not, became the motto of the Soviet motion picture industry. Because of the central part the movies played in Soviet propaganda, the motion picture industry had an enormous impact on culture, society, and politics. early russian cinema, 1896–1918The moving picture age began in Russia on May 6, 1896, at the Aquarium amusement park in St. Petersburg. By summer of that year, the novelty was a featured attraction at the popular provincial trading fairs. Until 1908, however, the vast majority of movies shown in Russia were French. That year, Alexander Drankov (1880–1945), a portrait photographer and entrepreneur, opened the first Russian owned and operated studio, in St. Petersburg. His inaugural picture, Stenka Razin, was a great success and inspired other Russians to open studios. By 1913, Drankov had been overshadowed by two Russian-owned production companies, Khanzhonkov and Thiemann & Reinhardt. These were located in Moscow, the empire's Hollywood. The outbreak of war in 1914 proved an enormous boon to the fledgling Russian film industry, since distribution paths were cut, making popular French movies hard to come by. (German films were forbidden altogether.) By 1916 Russia boasted more than one hundred studios that produced five hundred pictures. The country's four thousand movie theaters entertained an estimated 2 million spectators daily. Until 1913 most Russian films were newsreels and travelogues. The few fiction films were mainly adaptations of literary classics, with some historical costume dramas. The turning point in the development of early Russian cinema was The Keys to Happiness (1913), directed by Yakov Protazanov (1881–1945) and Vladimir Gardin (1881–1945) for the Thiemann & Reinhardt studio. This full-length melodrama, based on a popular novel, was the legendary blockbuster of the time. Although adaptations of literary classics remained popular with Russian audiences, the contemporary melodrama was favored during the war years. The master of the genre was Yevgeny Bauer (1865–1917). Bauer's complex psychological portraits, technical innovations, and painterly cinematic style raised Russian cinema to new levels of artistry. Bauer worked particularly well with actresses and made Vera Kholodnaya (1893–1919) a legend. Bauer's surviving films—which include Twilight of a Woman's Soul (1913), Child of the Big City (1914), Silent Witnesses (1914), Children of the Age (1915), The Dying Swan (1916), and To Happiness (1917)—provide a vivid picture of a lost Russia. The revolutionary year 1917 brought joy and misgiving to filmmakers. Political, economic, and social instability shuttered most theaters by the beginning of 1918. Studios began packing up and moving south to Yalta, to escape Bolshevik control. By 1920, Russia's filmmakers were on the move again, to Paris, Berlin, and Prague. Russia's great actor Ivan Mozzhukhin (1890–1939, known in France as "Mosjoukine") was one of few who enjoyed as much success abroad as at home. soviet silent cinema, 1918–1932The first revolutionary film committees formed in 1918, and on August 27, 1919, the Bolshevik government nationalized the film industry, placing it under the control of Narkompros, the People's Commissariat for Enlightenment. Nationalization represented wishful thinking at best, since Moscow's movie companies had already decamped, dismantling everything that could be carried. Filmmaking during the Civil War of 1917–1922 took place under extraordinarily difficult conditions. Lenin was acutely aware of the importance of disseminating the Bolshevik message to a largely illiterate audience as quickly as possible, yet film stock and trained cameramen were in short supply—not to mention projectors and projectionists. Apart from newsreels, the early Bolshevik repertory consisted of "agit-films," short, schematic, but exciting political messages. Films were brought to the provinces on colorfully decorated agit-trains, which carried an electrical generator to enable the agitki to be projected on a sheet. Innovations like these enabled Soviet cinema to rise from the ashes of the former Russian film industry, leading eventually to the formation of Goskino, the state film trust, in 1922 (reorganized as Sovkino in 1924). Since most established directors, producers, and actors had already fled central Russia for territories controlled by the White armies, young men and women found themselves rapidly rising to positions of prominence in the revolutionary cinema. They were drawn to film as "the art of the future." Many of them had some experience in theater production, but Lev Kuleshov (1899–1970), who had begun his cinematic career with the great prerevolutionary director Bauer, led the way, though he was still a teenager. By the end of the civil war, most of Soviet Russia's future filmmakers had converged on Moscow. Many of them (Kuleshov, Sergei Eisenstein, and their "collectives") were connected to the Proletkult theater, where they debated and dreamed. Because film stock was carefully rationed until the economy recovered in 1924, young would-be directors had to content themselves with rehearsing the experiments they hoped to film and writing combative theoretical essays for the new film journals. The leading director-theorists were Kuleshov, Eisenstein (1898–1948), Vsevolod Pudovkin (1893–1953), Dziga Vertov (1896–1954, born Denis Kaufman), and the "FEKS" team of Grigory Kozintsev (1905–1973) and Leonid Trauberg (1902–1990). Kuleshov wrote most clearly about the art of the cinema as a revolutionary agent, but Eisenstein's and Vertov's theories (and movies) had an impact that extended far beyond the Soviet Union's borders. The debates between Eisenstein and Vertov symbolized the most extreme positions in the theoretical conflicts among the revolutionary avantgarde of the 1920s. Eisenstein believed in acted cinema but borrowed Kuleshov's idea of the actor as a type; he preferred working with nonprofessionals. Vertov privileged non-acted cinema and argued that the movie camera was a "cinema eye" (kino-glaz ) that would catch "life off-guard" (zhizn vrasplokh )—yet he was an inveterate manipulator of time and space in his pictures. Eisenstein believed in a propulsive narrative driven by a "montage of attractions," with the masses as the protagonists, whereas Vertov was decisively anti-narrative, believing that a brilliantly edited kaleidoscope of images best revealed the contours of revolutionary life. Eisenstein's first two feature films, Strike (1925) and Battleship Potemkin (1926), enjoyed enormous success with critics and politicians but were much less popular with the workers and soldiers whose interests they were supposed to service. The same was true of Vertov's pictures. The intelligentsia loved Forward, Soviet! and One-Sixth of the World (both 1926), but proletarians were nonplussed. Kuleshov, Pudovkin, Kozintsev, and Trauberg (who directed as a team) were more successful translating revolutionary style and content for mass audiences because they retained plot and character at the heart of their films. The Extraordinary Adventures of Mr. West in the Land of the Bolsheviks (1924), one of Kuleshov's earliest efforts, appeared as a favorite film in audience surveys through the end of the 1920s. The same was true of Pudovkin's Mother (1926), a loose adaptation of Maxim Gorky's famous novel. Kozintsev and Trauberg's The Overcoat (1926) is a good example of the extremes to which young directors pushed the classical narrative. Despite this wealth of talent, Soviet avantgarde films never came close to challenging the popularity of American movies in the 1920s. Douglas Fairbanks's and Charlie Chaplin's pictures drew sell-out audiences. In response to the pressures to make Soviet entertainment films—and the need to show a profit—Goskino and the quasi-private studio Mezhrapbom invested more heavily in popular films than in the avant-garde, to the great dismay of the latter, but to the joy of audiences. The leading popular filmmaker was Protazanov, who returned to Soviet Russia in 1923 to make a string of hits, starting with the science fiction adventure, Aelita (1924). Also very successful with the spectators were the narrative films of younger directors such as Fridrikh Ermler (1898–1967, born Vladimir Breslav), Boris Barnet (1902–1965), and Abram Room (1894–1976). Ermler earned fame for his trenchant social melodramas (Katka's Reinette Apples, 1926 and The Parisan Cobbler, 1928). Barnet's intelligent comedies such as The Girl with the Hatbox (1927) sparkled, as did his adventure serial Miss Mend (1926),. Room was perhaps the most versatile of the three, ranging from a revolutionary adventure, Death Bay (1926), to a remarkable melodrama about a ménage à trois, Third Meshchanskaya Street (1927, known in the West as Bed and Sofa ). It must be emphasized that moviemaking was not a solely Russian enterprise, although distribution politics often made it difficult for films from Ukraine, Armenia, and Georgia to be considered more than exotica. The greatest artist to emerge from the non-Russian cinemas was certainly Ukraine's Alexander Dovzhenko (1894–1956), but Armenia's Amo Bek-Nazarov (1892–1965) and Georgia's Nikolai Shengelaya (1903–1943) made important contributions to early Soviet cinema as well. In 1927, as the New Economic Policy era was coming to a close, Soviet cinema was flourishing. Cinema had returned to all provincial cities and rural areas were served by cinematic road shows. There was a lively film press that reflected a variety of aesthetic positions. Production was more than respectable, about 140 to 150 titles annually. Six years later, production had plummeted to a mere thirty-five films. Many factors contributed to the crisis in cinema that was part of the Cultural Revolution. First, in 1927, sound was introduced to cinema, an event with significant artistic and economic implications. Second, proletarianist organizations such as RAPP, the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers, and ARRK, the Association of Workers in Revolutionary Cinematography were infiltrated by extremist elements who supported the government's aims to turn the film industry into a tool for propagandizing the collectivization and industrialization campaigns. This became apparent at the first All-Union Party Conference on Cinema Affairs in 1928. Third, in 1929, Anatoly Lunacharsky, the leading proponent of a diverse cinema, was ousted as commissar of enlightenment, and massive purges of the film industry began that lasted through 1931. These troubled times saw the production of four great films, the last gasp of Soviet silent cinema: Ermler's The Fragment of the Empire, Kozintsev and Trauberg's New Babylon, Vertov's The Man with the Movie Camera (all 1929), and the following year, Dovzhenko's Earth. stalinist cinema, 1932–1953By the end of the Cultural Revolution, it was clear to filmmakers that the era of artistic innovation had ended. Movies and their makers were now "in the service of the state." Although Socialist Realism was not formally established as aesthetic dogma until 1934, (reconfirmed in 1935 at the All-Union Creative Conference on Cinematographic Affairs), politically astute directors had for several years been making movies that were only slightly more sophisticated than the agit-films of the civil war. In the early 1930s, a few of the great artists of the previous decade attempted to adapt their experimental talents to the sound film. These efforts were either excoriated (Kuleshov's The Great Consoler and Pudovkin's The Deserter, both 1933) or banned outright (Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow, 1937). Film production plummeted, as directors tried to navigate the ever-changing Party line, and many projects were aborted mid-production. Stalin's intense personal interest and involvement in moviemaking greatly exacerbated tensions. Some of the early cinema elite avant-garde were eventually able to rebuild their careers. Kozintsev and Trauberg scored a major success with their popular adventure trilogy: The Youth of Maxim (1935), The Return of Maxim (1937), The Vyborg Side (1939). Pudovkin avoided political confrontations by turning to historical films celebrating Russian heroes of old in Minin and Pozharsky (1939), followed by Suvorov in 1941. Eisenstein likewise found a safe historical subject in the only undisputed masterpiece of the decade, Alexander Nevsky (1938). Others, such as Dovzhenko and Ermler, seriously compromised their artistic reputations by making movies that openly curried Stalin's favor. Ermler's The Great Citizen (two parts, 1937–1939) is a particularly notorious example. New directors, most of them not particularly talented, moved to the forefront. Novices such as Nikolai Ekk and the Vasiliev Brothers made two of the enduring classics of Socialist Realism: The Road to Life (1931) and Chapayev (1934). Another relative newcomer, Ivan Pyrev, churned out Stalin-pleasing conspiracy films such as The Party Card (1936), about a woman who discovers her husband is a traitor, before turning to canned socialist comedies, of which Tractor Drivers (1939) is the most typical. Some of the new generation managed to maintain artistic standards. Mikhail Romm's revisionist histories of the revolution, Lenin in October (1937) and Lenin in 1918 (1939), which placed Stalin right at Lenin's side, were the first major hits in his distinguished career. Mark Donskoy's three-picture adaptation of Maxim Gorky's autobiography, beginning with Gorky's Youth (1938) also generated popular acclaim. The most beloved of the major directors of the 1930s was, however, Grigory Alexandrov. Alexandrov, who had worked as Eisenstein's assistant until 1932, successfully distanced himself from the maverick director, launching a series of zany musical comedies starring his wife, Lyubov Orlova, in 1934 with The Jolly Fellows. When the German armies invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, the tightly controlled film industry easily mobilized for the wartime effort. Considered central to the war effort, key filmmakers were evacuated to Kazakhstan, where makeshift studios were quickly constructed in Alma-Ata. With very few exceptions—Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible (1944–1946) being most noteworthy—moviemaking during the war years focused almost exclusively on the war. Newsreels naturally dominated production. The fiction films that were made about the war effort were quite remarkable compared to those of the other combatant nations in that they focused on the active role women played in the partisan movement. One of these, Ermler's She Defends Her Motherland (1943), which tells the story of a woman who puts aside grief for vengeance, was shown in the United States during the war as No Greater Love. The postwar years, until Stalin's death in 1953, were a cultural wasteland. Film production nearly ground to a halt; only nine films were made in 1950. The wave of denunciations and arrests known as the anti-cosmopolitan campaign roiled the cultural intelligentsia, particularly those who were Jewish such as Vertov, Trauberg, and Eisenstein. Eisenstein's precarious health was aggravated by the extreme tensions of the time and the disfavor that greeted the second part of Ivan the Terrible. He became the most famous casualty among filmmakers, dying of a heart attack in 1948 at the age of only fifty. Cold War conspiracy melodramas dominated movie theaters (not unlike McCarthy era films in the United States a few years later), along with ever more extravagant panegyrics to Stalin. Georgian director Mikhail Chiaureli's first ode to Stalin, The Vow (1946), was followed by The Fall of Berlin (1949), which Richard Taylor has aptly dubbed "the apotheosis of Stalin's cult of Stalin." soviet cinema from the thaw through stagnation, 1953–1985By the mid-1950s, filmmakers were confident that the Thaw—as Khrushchev's relaxation of censorship was known-would last long enough for them to express long-dormant creativity. The move from public and political toward the private and personal became a hallmark of the period. Thaw pictures were appreciated not only at home, but also abroad, where they received numerous prizes at international film festivals. There was now a human face to the Soviet colossus. The greatest movies of the period rewrote the history of World War II, the Great Patriotic War. Mikhail Kalatozov's The Cranes Are Flying (1957) won the Palme d'Or at Cannes in 1958, signaling that Soviet cinema was once again on the world stage after nearly thirty years. Cranes is the story of a woman who betrays her lover, a soldier who is killed at the front, to marry his cousin, a craven opportunist. There is no upbeat ending, no neat resolution. The same can be said of Sergei Bondarchuk's The Fate of a Man and Grigory Chukhrai's The Ballad of a Soldier (both 1959). In the former, a POW returns home to find his entire family dead; in the latter, a very young soldier's last leave home to help his mother is movingly recorded. A film that is often considered the last important movie of the Thaw also launched the career of the greatest film artist to emerge in postwar Soviet cinema. This was Ivan's Childhood (1962, known in the United States as My Name Is Ivan ), a stunning antiwar film that won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival. The director was Andrei Tarkovsky (1932–1986). By the time Tarkovsky began work on Andrei Rublev in the mid-1960s, Khrushchev had been ousted, and Leonid Brezhnev's era of stagnation had begun. Cultural iconoclasm was no longer tolerated, and Tarkovsky's dystopian epic about medieval Russia's greatest painter was not released in the USSR until 1971, although it won the International Film Critics' prize at Cannes in 1969. Tarkovsky toiled defiantly in the 1970s to produce three more Soviet films, Solaris (1972), The Mirror (1975), and Stalker (1980). He emigrated to Europe in 1984 and died of cancer two years later. Filmmaking under Brezhnev was generally unremarkable, although two films, Bondarchuk's War and Peace (1966) and Vladimir Menshov's Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979) each won the Oscar for Best Foreign Film. The most interesting movies (such as Alexander Askoldov's The Commissar, 1967) were shelved, not to be released until the late 1980s as part of Mikhail Gorbachev's glasnost. Among the exceptions to the mundane fare were Larisa Shepitko's tale of World War II collaboration, The Ascent (1976), and Lana Gogoberidze's Several Interviews on Personal Questions (1979), which sensitively explored the drab, difficult lives of Soviet women. The best-known director to have started his career during the Brezhnev era is Nikita Mikhalkov (b. 1945). Son of Sergei Mikhalkov, a Stalinist writer of children's stories, the younger Mikhalkov first made a name for himself as an actor. Mikhalkov achieved his greatest successes in the 1970s and 1980s with his "heritage" films, elegiac recreations of Russian life in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, often adapted from literary classics, among them An Unfinished Piece for Player Piano (1977), Oblomov (1979), and Dark Eyes (1983). russian cinema in transition, 1985–2000When Gorbachev announced the advent of perestroika and glasnost in 1986, the Union of Cinematographers stood at the ready. After a sweeping purge of the union's aging and conservative bureaucracy, the maverick director Elem Klimov (b.1933) took the helm. Although Klimov had made a number of movies under Brezhnev, he did not emerge as a major director until 1985, with the release of his stunning antiwar film Come and See. Under Klimov's direction, the union began releasing the banned movies of the preceding twenty years, in effect rewriting the history of late Soviet cinema. The film that most captured the public's imagination in that tumultuous period was Georgian, not Russian. Tengiz Abuladze's Repentance (1984, released nationally in 1986) is a surrealistic black comedy-drama that follows the misdeeds of the Abuladze family, provided a scathing commentary on Stalinism. Although a difficult film designed to provoke rather than entertain, Repentance packed movie theaters and sparked a national debate about the legacy of the past and the complicity of the survivors. Television also became a major venue for filmmakers. Gorbachev's cultural policies encouraged publicistic documentaries that exposed either the evils of Stalin and his henchmen or the decay and degradation of contemporary Soviet life. Fiction films such as Little Vera (Vasily Pichul, 1988), Intergirl (Pyotr Todorovsky, 1989), and Taxi Blues (Pavel Lungin, 1990) followed suit by telling seamy tales about the Soviet underclass. The movie industry began to fragment even before the end of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Union of Cinematographers decentralized in mid-1990, and Goskino and Sovexportfilm, which provided central oversight over film production and distribution, had completely lost control by the end of 1990. The early 1990s saw the collapse of native film production in all the post-Soviet states. Centralization and censorship had long been the bane of the industry, but filmmakers had no idea how to raise money for their projects—and were even more baffled by being expected to turn a profit. Market demands became known as "commercial censorship." Filmmakers also had to contend for the first time with competition from Hollywood, as second-rate American films flooded the market. The Russian cinema industry began to rebound in the late 1990s. It now resembled other European cinemas quite closely, meaning that national production was carefully circumscribed, focusing on the art film market. Nikita Mikhalkov emerged the clear winner. By the turn of the century he became the president of the Russian Filmmakers' Union, the president of the Russian Cultural Foundation, and the president of the only commercially successful Russian studio, TriTe. He established a fruitful partnership with the French company Camera One, which coproduced his movies and distributed them abroad. He took enormous pride in the fact that Burnt by the Sun, his 1995 exploration of the beginnings of the Great Terror, won the Oscar for Best Foreign Picture that year, only the third Russian-language film to have done so, and certainly the best. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, therefore, it seems that the glory days of Russian cinema are past. This past, however, has earned Russian and Soviet films and filmmakers an enduring place in the history of global cinema. See also: agitprop; alexandrov, grigory alexandrovich; bauer, yevgeny frantsevich; chapayev, vasily ivanovich; cultural revolution; eisenstein, sergei mikhailovich; mikhalkov, nikita sergeyevich; orlova, lyubov petrovna; socialist realism; tarkovsky, andrei arsenievich; thaw, the bibliographyHorton, Andrew, and Brashinsky, Mikhail. (1992). The Zero Hour: Glasnost and Soviet Cinema in Transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Kenez, Peter. (2001). Cinema and Soviet Society from the Revolution to the Death of Stalin. London: I. B. Tauris. Lawton, Anna. (1992). Kinoglasnost: Soviet Cinema in Our Time. New York: Cambridge University Press. Leyda, Jay. (1960). Kino: A History of the Russian and Soviet Film. London: Allen & Unwin. Taylor, Richard. (1979). The Politics of the Soviet Cinema, 1917–1929. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Richard. (1998). Film Propaganda: Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, 2nd rev. ed. London: I. B. Tauris. Taylor, Richard, and Christie, Ian, eds. (1988). The Film Factory: Russian and Soviet Cinema in Documents, 1896–1939. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tsivian, Yuri, comp. (1989). Silent Witnesses: Russian Films, 1908–1919. Pordenone and London, 1989. Tsivian, Yuri. (1994). Early Cinema in Russia and Its Cultural Reception. Friuli-Venezia: Edizioni Biblioteca dell'immagine; London: British Film Institute. Woll, Josephine. (2000). Real Images: Soviet Cinema and the Thaw. London: I. B. Tauris. Youngblood, Denise J. (1991). Soviet Cinema in the Silent Era, 1918-1935. Austin: University of Texas Press. Youngblood, Denise J. (1992). Movies for the Masses: Popular Cinema and Soviet Society in the 1920s. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Youngblood, Denise J. (1999). The Magic Mirror: Moviemaking in Russia, 1908-1918. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Denise J. Youngblood |
|
|
Cite this article
YOUNGBLOOD, DENISE J.. "Motion Pictures." Encyclopedia of Russian History. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. YOUNGBLOOD, DENISE J.. "Motion Pictures." Encyclopedia of Russian History. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404100866.html YOUNGBLOOD, DENISE J.. "Motion Pictures." Encyclopedia of Russian History. 2004. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404100866.html |
|
Moving Pictures
MOVING PICTURESChasersThe 1890s had been the decade of the moving picture—or so Americans thought. By 1903 audiences had become used to film technology and bored with the silent newsreels, parlor tricks, sight gags, stage scenes, and "panoramic" vistas that were the subjects of most screenings. Movies were shown at penny arcades on kinetoscopes—hand-turned viewing machines that presented about a half-minute of action. Films were also a staple of vaudeville bills, usually as "chasers"—concluding features meant to head the audience out the door before the next set of live acts began. Even the most rural communities were regularly visited by traveling projectionists. But although exhibitors sometimes provided piano music, accompanying lectures, and off-screen live actors who spoke dialogue, audiences were unimpressed with early-twentieth-century film. Then, in 1903, Edwin S. Porter, a director and cameraman for Thomas Edison's motion picture company, created a twelve-minute Western with continuous action from one scene to the next, as well as flashbacks: The Great Train Robbery became the most popular film of the decade in America. Because of Porter and those who hurried to imitate him, "the movies" became, virtually overnight, a booming industry and a budding art form. The IndustryThe Edison Company was producing, patenting, selling, licensing, and exhibiting films across the nation by 1900, but Edison had many eager competitors. Production companies that challenged Edison often found themselves in court, and the years 1900-1903 in particular were marked by litigation, although "out-of-court settlements"—in the form of smuggling, spying, theft, and physical altercations—also often determined ownership and distribution rights. By 1907 there were nine leading companies: Edison, Biograph, Vitagraph, Essanay, Lubin, Selig, Kalem and (from Europe) Méliès and Pathé; their business practices became standard, and the three-part structure of the American film industry—producer, distributor, and exhibitor—was established. In 1908 these nine companies combined to form the Motion Picture Patents Company, a monopolistic trust. Independent producers, among them Carl Laemmle and William Fox, urged fellow producers to join them in resisting the trust; Laemmle and Fox would, in future decades, head Universal Pictures and Fox Studios. Other independents prospered as well: the New York Motion Picture Company would foster the careers of Mack Sennett and Charlie Chaplin; Porter eventually left Edison to found the Rex Company, which would one day become Paramount Studios. Hollywood was not to become synonymous with the motion picture industry until the 1910s, but in New York City, Chicago, and elsewhere from 1900 to 1909, the movie industry was thriving. Storefronts and NickelodeonsIn 1902 the first permanent movie theater in the United States—Thomas Tally's Electric Theater in Los Angeles—opened its doors, featuring a continuous run of films from 7:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. and changing its program every four weeks. It was perhaps the best known of the "storefront" movie houses of the decade. Storefront theaters, which operated with minimal overhead (folding chairs, no live acts, and six shows a day) but charged ten-to-twenty-five-cent admission prices, were touch-and-go propositions. Even when featuring such technical wizardry as Georges Méliès's A Trip to the Moon (1902), storefront profits fluctuated and eventually fell. In 1905, however, a Pittsburgh storefront opened with plush seats, a piano, frequent program changes, and nickel admission. It was the first film theater to be called a "nickelodeon," and within four years there were over four thousand nickelodeons in the country. By 1908 it was estimated that eighty million nickelodeon tickets were sold every week. The movie theater era had begun. The ArtThe advent of the nickelodeon era created an enormous demand for film, but little demand for film as art. Comedies and melodramas on limited subjects were turned out by the dozens, with few American films of note. Biograph's Everybody Works but Father (1905) was based on the popular minstrel song; Edison's Dream of a Rarebit Fiend (1906), with its special hallucination effects, took an unprecedented two months to make, and Edison sold 192 copies to distributors in the first year of its release. The Whole Dam Family and the Dam Dog (1905) was adapted from a popular picture postcard. Vitagraph produced a fast-paced and violent crime drama called The Automobile Thieves (1906), an impressive twenty-three-shot reel. Sigmund Lubin's controversial 1907 film version of the Harry K. Thaw-Stanford White murder case, The Unwritten Law, highlighted White's supposed seduction of showgirl Evelyn Nesbitt (later Thaw's wife) and suggested Thaw's vengeful attack on White was justified by spousal prerogative. It was banned in many cities but was the biggest hit of the year in others. Clearly, cinema had a long way to go before it would begin to aspire to becoming an art form. Although in 1907 a French company, Film d'Art, was formed to explore the creative interpretation of the genre, and eventually drew the interest of American producer Adolph Zukor, U.S. studios shied away from the idea of longer or more-serious productions because it was felt that the film audience would not sit through a single picture that was longer than fifteen minutes. [This text has been suppressed due to author restrictions] InfancyThe art and craft of the moving picture that became associated globally with the United States in the later twentieth century was in its infancy from 1900 to 1909. Indoor scenes were static and lifeless; outdoor shots could be ruined by a day of rain or a wayward wind; plots revolved around jealousy, revenge, and innocents in peril—cinematography and screenwriting were as yet unheard-of professions. In 1908 the most important quality a film actor could have was skill at pantomime. Self-respecting theatrical performers and even vaudeville headliners refused to be seen on-screen; actors who did work in movies averaged five dollars a day. But the cinema industry was healthy and growing, despite the economic recession of 1907, and thanks to the creative individuals who nurtured it, within the next decade cinematic art also thrived. MoralityMovies were an inexpensive and fascinating amusement for the predominantly working-class audience that frequented the nickelodeons. Upper- and middle-class moviegoers—who generally saw the latest movies at the vaudeville show or between the acts of plays rather than in the nickel theaters—enjoyed a variety of movie types. Westerns, Civil War films, slapstick, and detective pictures were popular, as well as "moral" melodramas such as The Convict's Sacrifice (Biograph, 1908) and filmed classics (A Christmas Carol, 1908; Othello, 1909). Movies could be both entertaining and uplifting; and, it was said, motion pictures kept the lower classes away from the saloons. Why, then, did some Americans accuse the movies of fostering immorality? First, unattended children made up a large portion of the audience: working families had quickly discovered the child-care benefits of the nickelodeons, and "order" was a problem in many urban movie houses. Second, the theaters were dark and crowded, frequented as well by "sailors" and "foreigners" (according to an often-quoted Saturday Evening Post article), and the back rows were virtual invitations to illicit sexual behavior. Finally, there was the content of the films themselves: more frequent than moral melodramas were vulgar, low comedies, titillating scenes in such films as The Boy, The Bust, and the Bath (Vitagraph, 1907) and French films. These last, reported the trade periodical Moving Picture Magazine in 1908, were acted with "an abandonment of manner and dress," the sort of thing "Europe may like [but] we don't." By 1909 Moving Picture Magazine was proposing that certain distasteful subjects be omitted from films altogether: prison interiors and prisoners, police stations, sensational crimes, and comedies that degraded people or played on human defects. Reformers bent on rehabilitating the movie-house venue campaigned for lighted theaters, restrooms and nurseries, ushers, and refreshments; those who objected to film content succeeded in instituting a National Board of Censorship in 1909. The PioneersJ. Stuart Blackton, G. W. "Billy" Bitzer, Wallace McCutcheon, Edwin S. Porter, William Paley, and James White were all leading filmmakers in the 1900s; under one studio or another they all produced, filmed, and directed many moving pictures, and their remarkable talents laid the groundwork for the flowering of the motion picture as an art form under the second generation of American filmmakers, led by director D. W. Griffith. David Lewelyn Wark Griffith (1875-1948) was a theatrical actor and manager before he entered the movie industry in 1908; he directed his first film, The Adventures of Dolly, in that year—one of numerous one-reel pictures he put out weekly. The following year's productions included A Corner in Wheat (based on the Frank Norris novel The Pit) and Pippa Passes (from the poem by Robert Browning). Griffith was experimenting with new techniques, such as the long shot, deep focus, moving camera techniques, cross-cuts, and shifting emotional "beats" or moments, that would make him the first great director of American film. He also insisted on careful casting of actors, a subdued acting style more suitable to film, rehearsals, and ensemble playing. Among the other pictures Griffith made from 1908 to 1909 were melodramas {The Drunkard's Reformation and The Lonely Villa, both in 1909), American history films (1776; The Hessian Renegades, 1908), and moral allegories (The Devil, 1909). Within seven years Griffith had produced two great classics of the silent-film era, The Birth of a Nation (1915) and Intolerance (1916). PerformersMovies were sold by "brand" name in the early years of the century: moviegoers chose "Edison" or "Biograph" pictures rather than films by a particular director or with a certain performer. Production companies did not allow their actors and actresses to receive name billing, fearing that an interest in the players would detract from interest in the product—the name-brand film. The star system so prevalent in the other theatrical arts did not enter full force into the movie industry until the 1910s. Most film actors were minor stage players glad to have a job and were hired by the day, or at most, the week: Ben Turpin was a weekly performer with Essanay Pictures; D. W. Griffith and his wife, Linda Arvidson, were "day hires" when they first became involved in pictures. Although some were recognized by the public from one film to the next, most movie actors were anonymous faces to those who saw them on the silent screen. Mary Pickford (1893-1979) made her film debut in 1909; audiences loved her, but movie fans who wrote her letters wrote to "The Biograph Comedy Girl." Blanche Sweet, Mae Marsh, and Lillian Gish were all unnamed performers for Griffith in 1908-1909. Florence Turner was "The Vitagraph Girl"; Maurice Costello was "Dimples"; and fan letters came to Charles Inslee, who performed in many Westerns, addressed to "The Indian." By 1909 some companies were issuing group photos of their stock players, and by the first years of the next decade, motion picture companies were beginning to realize the money value of the "movie star." Performers' names and faces appeared in the new fan magazines, on posters and post-cards, and even on pillowcases given away as theater door prizes. Sources:Eileen Bowser, The Transformation of Cinema (New York: Scribners, 1990); Joseph Csida and June Bundy Csida, American Entertainment: A Unique History of Popular Show Business (New York: Watson-Guptill, 1978); Gerald Mast, A Short History of the Movies, revised by Bruce F. Kawin (New York: Macmillan, 1992); Charles Musser, The Emergence of Cinema (NewYork: Scribners, 1990). [This text has been suppressed due to author restrictions] |
|
|
Cite this article
"Moving Pictures." American Decades. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "Moving Pictures." American Decades. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3468300019.html "Moving Pictures." American Decades. 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3468300019.html |
|
motion picture photography
motion picture photography or cinematography, photographic arts and techniques involved in making motion pictures .
|
|
|
Cite this article
"motion picture photography." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "motion picture photography." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-mopixpho.html "motion picture photography." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-mopixpho.html |
|
Motion Pictures with Sound
MOTION PICTURES WITH SOUNDFlickersThe 1920s were the golden age of silent films, which flickered on the screen as a pianist played to enhance the mood set by the action. Large metropolitan theaters even had full orchestras to play live music for their patrons. There were rumors that a marriage might be arranged between the flickers and the phonograph, but the greatest American inventor of all time, Thomas A. Edison, had been working on the problem since 1888 and had succeeded in producing only the 1895 and 1913 Kinetophones—ignominious failures. The problem of synchronizing sound and picture seemed insurmountable, and other early-twentieth-century attempts—the Synchroscope, the Cinematophone, and the Cameraphone—had also failed. Silence Is GoldenThe sound fidelity of available audio systems was not good. Screen actors had been selected for their ability to act out roles physically, not for their speaking voices, while stage actors tended to over-project their voices, an acting style that would spoil the intimate effect created by the close-in cameras. Further-more, producers had another reason to oppose sound: it would cost them most of their lucrative foreign market. The printed titles (dialogue cards) could easily be translated into any language, while a talking picture would have to be "dubbed," and nobody was sure how that inevitably expensive process could be accomplished. Development of "Talkies."In the mid 1920s radio engineers at Western Electric and telephone engineers at Bell Labs worked on a system for making sound pictures. Sam Warner, one of the four brothers who founded Warner Bros, studio, heard about the effort and thought talkies that actually worked might get their young, struggling movie company into the big time. When he broached the subject to his brother Harry, Harry replied, "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" Nevertheless, Harry came around, and he and Sam worked out a deal with Western Electric in 1925. The new system needed a name by which to market it, and Warner Bros, settled on Vitaphone (life sound). New ProblemsThe culmination of years of effort at synchronizing an electronically driven sound system with a mechanically driven motion-picture projector, Vita-phone was a sound-on-disk system. (The innovation of putting the sound track on the same strip of film as the pictures came later.) With the advent of Vitaphone the old, hand-cranked movie camera had to be abandoned because the human arm could not be precise enough to synchronize audio and video accurately. Early power-driven cameras, however, had noisy motors whose sound was recorded along with the actors' voices. The Warners' first solution to the problem was to place cameras and cameramen in portable, stifling-hot soundproof booths. (Cameras with silent motors were eventually developed.) Traffic noises from outside the studio would also be picked up. Thus it was not just the climate and scenery of southern California that led Warner Bros, to join the exodus of movie studios from New York City to Hollywood. There they set up a thirteen-acre studio lot that was easier to soundproof than their studio in New York. The First Sound Motion Picture,Warner Bros, made the first sound movie, Don Juan (1926), in New York City before their move to Hollywood. It was not a feature-length motion picture, and the actors did not talk. The only sound was a synchronized musical score and sound effects. The Jazz Singer.Don Juan did not totally capture the public's imagination, but the following year Warner Bros, produced a real blockbuster, The Jazz Singer, filmed in Hollywood. The movie starred Al Jolson, a nationally known stage actor and singer who was eager to explore the new medium of sound pictures. The first fulllength feature film with synchronized dialogue and singing, the movie took four months to shoot and cost Warner Bros. a half million dollars, a colossal sum of money in 1927. Sam Warner died the evening before the New York premiere of the movie in October 1927. He never lived to see the great success of The Jazz Singer, a pioneering effort in the history of technology that put Warner Bros, into the big time at last. All AboardWalt Disney, the pioneer in movie cartoons, made his first sound cartoon in 1928. Fox Studios released the first talking western, In Old Arizona, in late 1928. Silent westerns had died a natural death earlier in the decade, but In Old Arizona revived the popularity of the genre. In 1929 Fox announced it was abandoning silent films. Paramount, M-G-M, and Universal soon did so as well. Things in the OffingTechnological advances of the late 1920s quite literally "set the stage" for the golden age of movies in the 1930s and 1940s. By the mid 1930s Vitaphone had been replaced. This separate-disk sound system got out of sync if the film broke during a showing and a few frames had to be clipped away in making a splice. Every time the film broke the picture got farther ahead of the audio. As early as 1928 Walt Disney was using an optical-sound-on-film system, a variation on the method invented by Lee De Forest in 1920. De Forest's method eliminated all need for synchronization gear, as the soundtrack was on the edge of the picture film itself. HERBERT HOOVER'S DECADEAs secretary of commerce from 1921 to 1928 and as president of the United States from 1929 to 1933, Herbert Hoover left his mark on business, industry, and technology during the 1920s. Always vitally interested in the development and regulation of aeronautics and radio, he called or caused to be called various conferences to deal with problems arising in those growth industries. Standards of licensing and performance had to be established, and confusion and overlapping claims had to be eliminated. In his memoirs Hoover recalled one of the problems he faced in trying to regulate the radio industry. During the early 1920s evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson was broadcasting randomly and widely all over the AM band and ignored frequent warnings to restrict her broadcasting to her own wavelength. Finally Hoover's local inspector "sealed up her station," and an enraged McPherson wrote Hoover:
"Finally," said Hoover, "our tactful inspector persuaded her to employ a radio manager of his own selection, who kept her upon her wave length." Source:Herbert Hoover, The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover, volume 2: The Cabinet and The Presidency, 1920-1933 (New York: Macmillan, 1952). Sources:Daniel Blum, A New Pictorial History of the Talkies, revised and enlarged by John Kobal (New York: Putnam, 1982); Alexander Walker, The Shattered Silents: How the Talkies Came to Stay (London: Elm Tree Books, 1978); Curt Wohleber, "How the Movies Learned to Talk," Invention and Technology, 10 (Winter 1995). COMPUTER BREAKTHROUGHDuring the 1920s Vannevar Bush and a team of scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology worked on a "differential analyzer"—the first modern analog computer. As their name suggests, analog computers work by physical analogy. For example, the spaces on a slide rule, which is a simple analog computer, correspond to numerical values. In contrast a digital computer, of which the abacus is the earliest and simplest example, works by counting discrete units. The modern electronic computers that started coming into use after World War II are digital. Bush needed an analog computer to help him in his research on electric power transmission, which required measurement of continuously varying electrical currents flowing in a power grid—a time-consuming task because it involved solving high-order differential equations by hand. Electrically operated, not electronic, the machine Bush and his colleagues completed in 1928 was a complicated mechanical apparatus containing an electrical meter, mechanical integrators, servo motors, torque amplifiers, and printers. With advent of the electrical analog computer it became possible to create simulations of proposed automobiles, aircraft, missiles, nuclear-power plants, and other technological designs. To build and test all envisaged systems would be prohibitively expensive. Analog computers gave manufacturers a relatively inexpensive way to determine what probably would work and what probably would not. Source:James M. Nyce and Paul Kahn, eds., From Memex to Hypertext: Vannevar Bush and The Mind's Machine (Boston: Academic Press, 1991). |
|
|
Cite this article
"Motion Pictures with Sound." American Decades. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "Motion Pictures with Sound." American Decades. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3468301002.html "Motion Pictures with Sound." American Decades. 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3468301002.html |
|
motion picture colorization
motion picture colorization electronic process that uses computers to add color to black-and-white movies, creating new colored videotape versions. Invented by Canadians Wilson Markle and Brian Hunt, the process was first used in 1970 and became viable in the late 1980s. Proponents of colorization argue that it makes old movies more acceptable to the public. The process was enthusiastically backed by Ted Turner , whose 1986 proposal to colorize all the black-and-white films in the MGM archives, which he owns, led to a storm of opposition and to denunciations by such figures as John Huston, Jimmy Stewart, and Woody Allen, among others, who saw colorization is a defilement of the original work. The process became particularly controversial in the late 1980s when such monochrome film classics as Casablanca,Citizen Kane, and It's a Wonderful Life were threatened with colorization. Since that time, the demand for colorized films has greatly diminished. Some old television programs, however, continue to appear in colorized versions. |
|
|
Cite this article
"motion picture colorization." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "motion picture colorization." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-colorizat.html "motion picture colorization." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-colorizat.html |
|
Motion Pictures
|
|
|
Cite this article
"Motion Pictures." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "Motion Pictures." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401802764.html "Motion Pictures." Dictionary of American History. 2003. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3401802764.html |
|
moving pictures
moving pictures see motion pictures . |
|
|
Cite this article
"moving pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. "moving pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-X-movingpi.html "moving pictures." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. 2011. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-X-movingpi.html |
|
Motion Pictures
Motion Pictures. See Film.
|
|
|
Cite this article
Paul S. Boyer. "Motion Pictures." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. 27 May. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>. Paul S. Boyer. "Motion Pictures." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Encyclopedia.com. (May 27, 2012). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O119-MotionPictures.html Paul S. Boyer. "Motion Pictures." The Oxford Companion to United States History. 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O119-MotionPictures.html |
|