Director: David Lean
Production: Rank/Cineguild; black and white, 35mm; running time: 118 minutes. Released May 1947 by Universal-International Pictures.
Producer: David Lean; screenplay: David Lean and Ronald Neame with Anthony Havelock-Allan, Kay Walsh and Cecil McGivern; from the novel by Charles Dickens; photography: Guy Green; editor: Jack Harris; art direction: John Bryan; music score: Walter Goehr.
Cast: John Mills (Mr. Pip); Anthony Wager (Pip as a boy); Valerie Hobson (Estella); Jean Simmons (Estella as a girl); Bernard Miles (Joe Gargery); Francis L. Sullivan (Jaggers); Finlay Currie (Magwitch); Alec Guinness (Herbert Pocket); John Forrest (Herbert as a boy); Martita Hunt (Miss Havisham); Ivor Bernard (Wemmick); Freda Jackson (Mrs. Joe); Torin Thatcher (Bentley Drummil); Eileen Erskine (Biddy); Hay Petrie (Uncle Pumblechook); George Hayes (Compeyson); Richard George (Sergeant); Everley Gregg (Sarah Pocket); John Burch (Mr. Wopsie); O. B. Clarence (Aged parent).
Awards: Oscars for Best Cinematography—Black and White and Best Art Direction, 1947.
Tynan, Kenneth, Alec Guinness, New York, 1954.
Durgnat, Raymond, A Mirror for England: British Movies fromAusterity to Affluence, New York, 1971.
Pratley, Gerald, The Cinema of David Lean, New York, 1974.
Silver, Alain, and James Ursini, David Lean and His Films, London, 1974; revised edition, 1991.
Zambrano, A. L., Dickens and Film, New York, 1977.
Castelli, Louis, and Caryn Lynn Cleeland, David Lean: A Guide toReferences and Resources, Boston, 1980.
Klein, Michael, and Gillian Parker, editors, The English Novel and theMovies, New York, 1981.
Hunter, Allan, Alec Guinness on Screen, London, 1982.
Anderegg, Michael A., David Lean, Boston, 1984.
Guinness, Alec, Blessings in Disguise, London, 1985.
Missler, Andreas, Alec Guinness: Seine Filme, sein Leben, Munich, 1987.
Von Gunden, Kenneth, Alec Guinness: The Films, Jefferson, North Carolina, 1987.
Silverman, Stephen M., David Lean, New York, 1989; updated version, 1992.
Brownlow, Kevin, David Lean, Gordonville, 1997.
Variety (New York), 25 December 1947.
New York Times, 23 May 1947.
Lejeune, C.A., "The Up and Coming Team of Lean and Neame," in New York Times, 15 June 1947.
Pichel, Irving, in Hollywood Quarterly, July 1947.
Ellin, Stanley, in Hollywood Quarterly, Fall 1947.
Thompson, Howard, "Career Inventory from the Lean Viewpoint," in New York Times, 9 November 1952.
Holden, J., "A Study of David Lean," in Film Journal (New York), April 1956.
Agee, James, Agee on Film 1, New York, 1958.
McVay, Douglas, "David Lean—Lover of Life," in Films andFilming (London), August 1959.
Watts, Stephen, "David Lean," in Films in Review (New York), April 1959.
McVay, Douglas, "Alec Guinness," in Films and Filming (London), May 1961.
Johnson, Ian, "Mills," in Films and Filming (London), June 1962.
Marill, Alvin, "John Mills," in Films in Review (New York), August-September 1971.
Silver, A., "The Untranquil Light: David Lean's Great Expectations," in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury, Maryland), Spring 1974.
Zambrano, in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury, Maryland), Spring 1974.
Wilson, D., "Gag Bag," in New Statesman (London), 9 January 1976.
MacKay, C. H., "A Novel's Journey into Film: The Case of Great Expectations," in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury, Maryland), April 1985.
Hedling, E., "Skuldens labyrint," in Filmhaftet (Uppsala, Sweden), December 1988.
"Great Expectations Section" in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury, Maryland), no. 1, 1992.
Reid's Film Index, no. 13, 1994.
O'Neill, Eithne, "Les grandes espérances: Là-bas, dans les marais grelottants," in Positif (Paris), no. 410, April 1995.
Baston, Jane, "Word and Image: The Articulation and Visualization of Power in Great Expectations," in Literature/Film Quarterly (Salisbury), vol. 24, no. 3, 1996.
Kendle, B., "Lean Dickens and Admirable Crichton: Film Adaptations of Literature," in Michigan Academician, vol. 28, no. 1, 1996.
Boxoffice (Chicago), vol. 133, December 1997.
* * *
David Lean was the Great White Hope of postwar British cinema. In Which We Serve, which Lean co-directed with Noël Coward, was the most popular British film of the war years, and Brief Encounter was seen by the critics as a breakthrough into serious adult realism— though working-class audiences found Celia Johnson and Trevor Howard's over-delicate sensibilities hard to comprehend. Great Expectations had a wider appeal. Richard Winnington, one of the most perceptive 1940s film critics, claimed it as "the first big British film to be made, a film that confidently sweeps our cloistered virtues into the open, it casts a complete spell derived from some inner power."
The film was a commercial success in Britain and America (so successful that Lean couldn't resist following it up with Oliver Twist), and it still stands out as one of the finest of all film adaptations of Dickens. John Bryan's art direction avoids the trap so many designers fall into of striving so hard to recreate authentic period detail that Dickens's richly imaginative world is lost amidst too solid and realistic sets. Bryan, in cooperation with the brilliant cinematographer Guy Green, succeeds in creating an evocative atmosphere which gives the film much of its power and resonance.
Lean, a showman as well as an artist, talks about the need to gain the attention of audiences with a dramatic opening sequence. In Great Expectations he succeeds almost too well: the evocation of the bleak East Kent marshes and Pip's nightmarish encounter with Magwitch in the churchyard sets such a standard of excitement that what follows is almost an anti-climax. It is to his credit, then, that he succeeds in moulding Dickens's rambling novel into a satisfying dramatic shape. Minor characters are sacrificed, but Finlay Currie's Magwitch, Martita Hunt's Miss Havisham, Bernard Miles's Joe Gargery, and Francis L. Sullivan's Jaggers are splendid creations against which all subsequent incarnations have to be measured. In comparison, John Mills's Pip is disappointingly colourless, and the metamorphosis of Estella from Jean Simmons to Valerie Hobson destroys the aura which surrounds her in the first half of the film.
Lean's interpretation of Dickens, like Olivier's interpretation of Shakespeare, is inevitably timebound. There will always be alternative ways of interpreting Great Expectations or Henry V, while a reinterpretation of Noël Coward's slight play which Lean transformed into Brief Encounter could only be a remake of the film.
Thus, where Brief Encounter's limitations—the prissiness of the lovers' attitudes to sex, the syrupy ending—seem movingly evocative of a lost age, Great Expectations's weaknesses—its lapses into whimsicality, the predominance of upper-middle-class accents— seem correctable faults. That said, no other film or television adaptation of Great Expectations has managed to achieve anything like the dramatic intensity and visual richness of Lean's film. Magwitch appearing like a terrifying apparition in the windswept churchyard; Miss Havisham and Estella in their eerie, cobweb-strewn mansion; the journey out to the riverside inn and the disastrous rendezvous with the packet steamer—these are so memorably filmed as to haunt the imagination for years afterwards.
"Great Expectations." International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. . Encyclopedia.com. (November 24, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/movies/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/great-expectations
"Great Expectations." International Dictionary of Films and Filmmakers. . Retrieved November 24, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/movies/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/great-expectations
Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).
Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:
Modern Language Association
The Chicago Manual of Style
American Psychological Association
- Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
- In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.