The War Powers Resolution
The Oxford Companion to American Military History
|
2000
|
|
© The Oxford Companion to American Military History 2000, originally published by Oxford University Press 2000. (Hide copyright information)
Copyright
The War Powers Resolution was passed by Congress, vetoed by President
Richard M. Nixon on 23 October 1973, and repassed over his veto on 7 November 1973. Enacted in the aftermath of the
Vietnam War and in the midst of the Watergate crisis, its purposes were to check the “imperial presidency” by ensuring that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the president would apply to the introduction of the military into potential or actual combat.
Section 3 of the resolution requires presidential consultation with Congress before sending U.S. armed forces into hostilities. Section 4 requires the president to report to Congress within forty‐eight hours after the introduction of U.S. forces into hostilities or imminent hostilities, and every six months thereafter. Section 5 provides that within sixty days after issuing the initial report, the president must receive either a declaration of war or a specific statutory authorization, or else an extension of the sixty‐day period; if Congress refuses, the president has thirty days to remove U.S. forces from hostilities. Section 5 also allowed Congress at any time to direct removal of the forces by concurrent resolution. Since 1983, an amendment has specified that removal of forces is directed by a joint resolution that must be submitted to the president and is subject to presidential veto.
Richard Nixon and all his successors have argued that the law undercuts U.S. credibility with its allies, gives adversaries reason to doubt U.S. determination to use force, and infringes on presidential prerogatives. Presidents have routinely ignored, evaded, or otherwise minimized the reach of the law, and by the end of the Reagan administration, Congress had abandoned it.
Federal courts have indicated their doubts about the constitutionality of many provisions of the law in
Crockett v.
Reagan,
Lowry v.
Reagan,
Dellums v.
Bush, and
Ange v.
Bush. The effect of these cases, and congressional unwillingness to use the procedures in the act, has essentially nullified it, although there appears to be significant public support for the concept behind it.
[See also
Civil‐Military Relations: Civilian Control of the Military;
Commander in Chief, President as;
Congress, War, and the Military.]
Bibliography
The War Power After 200 Years: Congress and the President at a Constitutional Impasse, Hearings Before the Special Subcommittee on War Powers, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess., 1988. The Constitutional Roles of Congress and the President in Declaring and Waging War, Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, 102nd Cong., 1st Sess., 1991.
Louis Fisher , Presidential War Power, 1995.
Richard M. Pious
Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
|
James Butler Ormonde, 2d duke of
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
James Butler Ormonde, 2d duke of 1665-1745, Irish soldier. He was the son of Thomas Butler, earl of Ossory, and grandson of the Ist duke, whom he succeeded in 1688. A staunch...
|
|
James Butler Ormonde, 12th earl and 1st duke of
Book article from: The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
James Butler Ormonde, 12th earl and 1st duke of , 1610-88, Irish...In Ireland from 1633, Ormonde gained the favor of Thomas...especially with the 2d duke of Buckingham , who...retirement only to oppose James II's attempt to dispense...
|