Visit our new topic page about Martin v. Hunters Lessee

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee

The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition | Date: 2008

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee case decided in 1816 by the U.S. Supreme Court. From 1779 to 1785, Virginia passed a series of laws by which the state confiscated all lands owned by foreigners. David Hunter was granted 800 acres of confiscated lands that had been willed to Denny Martin Fairfax, a British subject. Fairfax brought suit against Hunter for return of the land. On Fairfax's death the suit was taken over by his heir, Philip Martin. Martin argued that Fairfax's ownership had been protected by treaties between the United States and Great Britain guaranteeing British subjects the right to hold land in America. The Virginia court of appeals upheld the grant to Hunter, but on appeal the U.S. Supreme Court voided the grant (1813). The Virginia court refused to obey the Supreme Court ruling, declaring that it had no right to review the decisions of state courts under the U.S. Constitution. When the case again came before the Supreme Court, Justice Story ruled that section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the U.S. Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction over state courts in certain situations (as in this case, where a state court denied the validity of a federal statute), was constitutional. His decision affirmed the Supreme Court's right to review state court decisions.

Author not available, MARTIN V. HUNTER'S LESSEE., The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition 2008



The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Copyright 2008 Columbia University Press

Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles from HighBeam Research

"State Courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Protection of Civil Liberties"
Justice System Journal; 5/1/2007; Wasby, Stephen L; 274 words ; Robert M. Howard, Scott E. Graves, and Julianne Flowers, "State Courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Protection of Civil Liberties," Law and Society Review 40 (December 2006): 845-70. Through their examination of 1981-93 search-and-seizure cases decided by state courts of last resort (SCOLR), Read more
THE SUPREME COURT'S GVR POWER: DRAWING A LINE BETWEEN DEFERENCE AND CONTROL
Northwestern University Law Review; 1/1/2008; Ku, Sena; 12606 words ; INTRODUCTION 383 I. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GVR 387 A. History of the GVR 387 B. Sources of the GVR Power and Its Limitations 390 II. EXPRESS PURPOSES OF THE GVR 392 III. A LIMITED OR UNLIMITED AUTHORITY 396 A. The Intervening Event Justification 397 B. Problems-with the Youngblood Doctrine 399 C. Read more
Interview: Professor Akhil Reed Amar of Yale University talks about the US Supreme Court's involvement in the Florida elections
Weekend Edition - Sunday (NPR); 11/25/2000; LISA SIMEONE; 802 words ; 00-00-0000 Interview: Professor Akhil Reed Amar of Yale University talks about the US Supreme Court's involvement in the Florida elections Host: LISA SIMEONE Time: 8:00-9:00 PM LISA SIMEONE, host: Next Friday, the highest court in the country will hear arguments over whether Florida's manual Read more
SUPREME COURT RULING RESTRICTS INMATE APPEALS CLAIMS CAN'T BYPASS STATE SYSTEM.(News)
Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, WA); 6/8/1999; 543 words ; The U.S. Supreme Court further limited state prison inmates' access to federal courts yesterday, ruling that prisoners generally cannot pursue claims they did not raise before their states' highest courts. In the 6-3 ruling, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote that if a state allows an inmate to ask Read more
State Supreme Court decision making in confession cases
Justice System Journal; 1/1/2002; Benesh, Sara C; Martinek, Wendy L; 8225 words ; State Supreme Court Decision Making in Confession Cases* The federal nature of the American judiciary suggests that a state court of last resort may evade decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court if those decisions do not comport with the preferences of the state supreme court judges or are in conflict Read more
How cases reach the Supreme Court.(Skills Master 2)
Junior Scholastic; 1/5/2004; 526 words ; The Supreme Court decides about 150 cases a year. The chart below shows the basic structure of the U.S. court system, and the ways in which cases reach the Supreme Court. It also explains the Court's jurisdiction (area over which an individual or group has legal authority), and the roles of lower Read more
SHAPING THE SUPREME COURT'S FEDERAL CERTIORARI DOCKET*
Justice System Journal; 1/1/2006; Scott, Kevin M; 7303 words ; The size of the Supreme Court's discretionary docket has varied considerably over the last fifty years, and that variation has received more attention in both scholarly and journalistic circles in light of declines over the past fifteen years. To understand the sources of such variation, one must Read more
California Supreme Court Allows Class-Action Suits to Proceed.
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News; 1/4/1999; Mintz, Howard; 877 words ; Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News Jan. 5 -- The California Supreme Court ... been filed in Santa Clara County. The good news for the high-tech industry is that under ... World Wide Web site of the San Jose Mercury News, at http://www.sjmercury.com Read more
A SETBACK FOR GOP U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST PARTY'S REDISTRICTING MAP
Rocky Mountain News; 1/30/2004; John J. Sanko And M.E. Sprengelmeyer, Rocky Mountain News; 882 words ; The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday turned down Colorado Republican lawmakers in their bid to use a GOP-drawn congressional redistricting map in the November elections. The rejection means Coloradans will cast votes in the same seven- district configuration ordered by state courts in 2002 and used in Read more
A SETBACK FOR GOP U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST PARTY'S REDISTRICTING MAP.(City Desk/Local)
Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO); 1/30/2004; 888 words ; Byline: John J. Sanko And M.E. Sprengelmeyer, Rocky Mountain News The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday turned down Colorado Republican lawmakers in their bid to use a GOP-drawn congressional redistricting ... Read more

Related entries from encyclopedias, dictionaries, and thesauruses

Joseph Story
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia ... John Marshall in interpreting the U.S. Constitution in a manner favouring the expansion of federal power. His opinion in Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) established the court's appellate authority over the highest state courts. During his tenure on the court, he ... Read more
United States Supreme Court
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition ... that it was entering a political thicket, ruled in Baker v. Carr that the legislatures of several states must correct ... citizenship. The court somewhat later decided (in 1842 in Swift v. Tyson ) that in diversity suits it would follow not ... Chief Justice. Marshall, a strong Federalist, in Marbury v ... . Read more

Related research topics

Online videos

Martin V. Hunter's Lessee