Skip to main content

Lamson & Sessions Co.

Lamson & Sessions Co.

25701 Science Park Drive
Beachwood, Ohio 44122-9803
(216) 464-3400
Fax: (216) 464-1455

Public Company
Incorporated: 1883
Employees: 1,325
Sales: $287.65 million
Stock Exchanges: New York Pacific
SICs: 3644 Noncurrent-Carrying Wiring Devices; 3661 Telephone & Telegraph Apparatus; 3084 Plastics Pipe; 3782 Aircraft Parts and Equipment, Not Elsewhere Classified.

For the vast majority of its over 125 years in business, Lamson & Sessions Co. was a top manufacturer of industrial fastenersincluding nuts, bolts, screws, and some exclusive partsfor original equipment manufacturers. But when inexpensive imports infiltrated the companys traditional markets beginning in the late 1960s, Lamson & Sessions made an ill-advised diversification into the manufacture of railroad freight cars. The utter collapse of that market in the early 1980s nearly caused the companys demise. After a series of debt restructurings and strategic acquisitions, the reformed company was primarily involved in the production of industrial and construction products. Spearheaded by its Carlon division, Lamson & Sessions ranked as Americas top manufacturer of thermoplastic (i.e., polyvinyl chloride or PVC) pipe, conduit, enclosures, wiring devices, and accessories for the construction, consumer, power, and communications markets. The manufacture of aircraft partsthe result of another 1960s-era diversificationcontributed 6 percent of annual sales into the mid-1990s. At that time, the company boasted operations in Ohio, Iowa, California, Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Canada.

Lamson & Sessions was founded as a partnership among three menbrothers Thomas H. and Isaac P. Lamson, and Samuel W. Sessions. Their Connecticut business hand-forged nuts and bolts for carriages and wheels using a technique developed during the Civil War. Each of the partners contributed his own expertise to the company: Sam was the office manager, Isaac managed the seven employees on the shop floor, and Thomas was in charge of packing and shipping. The companys 30-product line generated $20,000 in annual sales by 1867.

Growing markets, little competition, and plentiful sources of raw materials, fuel, labor, and transportation drew Lamson & Sessions to the banks of northeast Ohios Cuyahoga River in 1869. Lamson & Sessions moved to a larger plant in 1882 and was incorporated in Cleveland in 1883. By the turn of the century, the company had begun producing standardized fasteners for the automotive industry. Production for the U.S. effort in World War I drove sales over the $1 million mark in 1916 and past the $2 million level in 1918.

Under a plan devised by George S. Case Jr. and Roy Smith in the 1920s, the company grew through acquisition and internal expansion to become a leading producer of industrial fasteners. Lamson & Sessions acquired Falls Rivet Company in 1921, merged with the Kirk-Latty Manufacturing Company five years later, and added Foster Nut & Bolt Company, Lake Erie Bolt & Nut Company, and American Bolt Company in 1929. A new plant was constructed in Birmingham, Alabama, during this period as well. These additions not only expanded Lamson & Sessions geographic reach, but also broadened its line of fasteners to include parts for the railroad and auto industries, among others. The company made an initial public stock offering of 20,000 shares and earned a listing on the Cleveland Stock Exchange in 1928. Having achieved a successful expansion, George Case Jr. was elected president of Lamson & Sessions in 1929.

In spite of the stock market crash in 1929 and the ensuing Depression that gripped the economy, Lamson & Sessions boasted eight plants and $11 million in annual revenues by 1930. But as the economic crisis deepened, the companys cash flow dried up. A $750,000 Reconstruction Finance Corporation loan kept the company afloat in 1935. Following the companys emergence from the Great Depression, Case added chairman of the board to his title. He would serve in that capacity through the late 1960s, overseeing an eight-fold increase in annual revenues, from $11 million in 1930 to $89 million in 1969.

World War II-driven demand helped fuel another upturn at Lamson & Sessions in the 1940s, and the company was able to resume its growth through acquisition in the 1950s. The purchase of Stoker Locknut and Machinery Corporation (Pennsylvania) in 1954 was followed by Lamson & Sessions first foray outside the fastener industry with its 1955 acquisition of Kent Machine Company, a job machine shop. The firm constructed new plants in Chicago and Cleveland and consolidated several operations in those cities over the course of the next two years. Lamson & Sessions closed the decade with the 1959 acquisition of a majority interest in Industria de Parafasos Mapri, S.A., a Brazilian company that ranked as South Americas pre-eminent producer of nuts and bolts. The corporation ventured across the Atlantic Ocean to acquire a controlling interest in a West German fastener maker, Fastenrath-Lamson & Sessions GmbH, in 1964.

The growing company undertook a more deliberate diversification in the mid- to late 1960s. In 1966, the firm acquired Angell Manufacturing Company (Kentucky), manufacturer of decorative metal trim and brand identification plates for appliances. Lamson & Sessions also established a Canadian subsidiary that year, in Toronto, to make and distribute all its products in that country. The purchase two years later of Standard Mirror Company (New York) added a leading producer of automotive mirrors to Lamson & Sessions roster of businesses. Seeking a high-margin niche in the fastener industry, Lamson & Sessions acquired Valley Bolt Corporation, a California manufacturer of specialized fasteners for the aerospace and aircraft industries, in the mid-1960s. Lamson & Sessions bought Todeco, Inc., another California producer of bearings and other engineered machine components for the same field, and merged the two as the Valley-Todeco, Inc. subsidiary. The 1970 purchase of Expert, Inc. (Michigan) expanded machining operations to include manufacture of machinery for automated assembly systems.

Harold F. Nunn succeeded George Case as president and CEO in 1968. When Nunn was sidelined just two years later with an illness, the board selected George Grabner to lead Lamson & Sessions. Although the company sold its Brazilian fastener subsidiary to U.S. Steel in 1970, it bolstered its domestic fastener business with the acquisition of Zimmer Manufacturing Industries, Inc. (Michigan) and American Screw Products Company (Ohio) in 1973 and 1974, respectively. But when cheap imports began to infiltrate the industry in the 1960s and competition intensified in the 1970s, the firms management began to question their dedication to the fastener industry.

In the late 1970s, Lamson & Sessions began a new program of diversification that focused on transportation. Specifically, the company acquired Youngstown Steel Door Company, the leading manufacturer of railroad freight cars and components in the United States, in 1976, and added United-American Car, another company in that field, in 1979. Lamson & Sessions merged with Midsco, Incorporated in 1979 as well. Midscos lead company was Midland Steel Products Co., the countrys preeminent producer of mid-sized truck frames.

The entry into railcar manufacture could not have been more poorly timed. Lamsons two primary businesses, industrial fasteners and railcars, were in swift and irreversible decline. Worse, a recession bruised the companys truck frame business. Lamson & Sessions suffered a $15.5 million loss that year.

Grabner brought in Russel B. Every, who had been chairman and president of Midsco, to be president of Lamson & Sessions in 1980. The two men struggled mightily to stop the companys downward spiral. From 1981 through 1985, they divested the fastener interests, sold several losing divisions, and shut down foundry and die casting operations. The divestments and layoffs slashed employment by 78 percent, from 6,000 to 1,300. The company also reduced its selling and administrative expenses by more than half, from $31 million in 1980 to $14 million by 1986, and cut its debt from $100 million to $52 million through belt-tightening measures. Nonetheless, Lamson & Sessions losses continued to mount, while annual revenues dropped. Sales declined from $215.98 million in 1981 to $130 million in 1982, while losses increased from $9 million to $18.8 million during the same period. The companys net worth plummeted from nearly $88 million in 1979 to just $300,000 in 1983, when net losses peaked at $44 million. Investors balked after Lamson & Sessions eliminated its dividend, depreciating the stock from $19 in 1980 to $1.75 per share in 1983.

According to an April 1983 article in the Plain Dealer, Grabner continued to express confidence in the doomed railcar industry, asserting that the market may be dormant right now, but demand for railroad cars and trucks will return. Unfortunately, he was wrong. Railroad car orders overall plummeted from 119,000 in 1979 to only 6,300 in 1982 and box car orders plunged from 4,200 to 250 over the same period.

In 1987, Russel B. Every told the Cleveland chapter of the Association for Corporate Growth, in a speech reprinted in the Journal of Corporate Growth, that the sale of United-American Car in early 1984 saved Lamson & Sessions. That February, Emery and Grabner cut a hand-written, midnight deal for the divestment of United-American Car, thereby bringing in $10 million cash. According to Every, That sale gave [Lamson & Sessions] the cash infusion we needed to make our massive debt restructuring program viable.

The executives had started bargaining with the companys 24 debt-holders, mostly insurance companies and banks, to restructure Lamson & Sessions debt in 1983. Early in 1984, they used $15 million borrowed from Congress Financial Corp. to retire about $13 million of its $54 million debt. New, two-year notes for the remaining $41 million of the obligations were issued as interim financing. That July, Lamson & Sessions exchanged $12 million of the short-term notes for $12 million in newly created preferred stock that could be converted into about one-third of Lamsons common shares. The company completed the first phase of its financial restructuring by converting the remaining $29 million debt into low- and no-interest notes. These efforts helped lower annual debt service, free up operating capital, and thereby allowed the company to avoid Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Every succeeded Grabner as CEO that same year and was elected chairman early in 1985 upon his predecessors retirement. Every soon realized that Lamson & Sessionss contraction had positioned it primarily in mature and possibly shrinking markets, as he noted in the Journal of Corporate Growth. The new CEO was convinced that his company would not be able to achieve real health without a major acquisition of a company serving a growing market. The firms creditors, however, had made strictures against the company assuming more debt part of their restructuring agreement, and they were extremely reluctant to abandon that safety valve. Over six months of what Every called lengthy and very difficult negotiations, Lamson & Sessions talked its creditors into taking $17.5 million in cash (part of which was again borrowed from Congress Financial) in exchange for the $31.4 million in securities and interest owed them. The lenders also surrendered part of their preferred stock in exchange for warrants to purchase 500,000 common shares. The restructuring gave Lamson & Sessions an extraordinary gain of $13.3 million and made possible the financing of a sizable acquisition.

Although Lamson & Sessions thought it had the wherewithal to make a major purchase, some industry observers disagreed. In 1986, the company targeted the Carlon division of TBG Inc. (New York), which ranked as a top American manufacturer of thermoplastic accessories for electrical applications. But neither Carlons European owners nor their financiers, Salomon Brothers, believed that Lamson & Sessions would be able to garner the financing commitments necessary to acquire Carlon. According to December 1987 coverage in the Plain Dealer, Carlon was over twice the size of Lamson & Sessions. Every, however, had earned the confidence of Congress Financial Corp., which increased the companys $20 million credit line more than fivefold, to $110 million, in order to enable Lamson & Sessions to make the purchase. At the time, it was Congress Financials largest-ever acquisition line of credit. The company completed its $85 million leveraged buyout of Carlon late in 1986.

Transformed over the space of a few years from a company with 78 percent of its sales in the railroad and fastener businesses to one with 62 percent of its annual revenues in industrial construction, Lamson & Sessions was reorganized around its new subsidiary. It even moved its headquarters to the east Cleveland suburb of Beachwood, where Carlon was based. After the 1988 divestments of the Youngstown Steel Door Company (spun off to a management group) and a couple of other unrelated businesses, Lamson & Sessions was reorganized around its two remaining businesses. Midland Steel Products Co. and Valley-Todeco were organized as the Transportation Equipment Products division, while Carlon formed the Industrial/Construction Products division.

As it turned out, the Carlon acquisition was infinitely better timed than Lamson & Sessions railroad fiasco. The division, which contributed 65 percent of the parents 1987 sales of $340.4 million, prospered in the burgeoning construction environment of the late 1980s, posting a record-high net income of $9.4 million in fiscal 1988. Lamson & Sessions quickly became a darling of Wall Street investors. A 1987 stock offering raised about $58 million for debt reduction, and from January to October 1988 the shares appreciated 243.3 percent to almost $19. By mid-1988, Lamson & Sessions net worth had rebounded to $56 million.

Although he had barely served a year with Lamson & Sessions, president and chief operating officer John B. Schulze was selected to succeed Russel B. Every as chief executive officer in January 1989. Schulze advanced to chairman upon Everys retirement one year later.

Unfortunately, the early 1990s brought a recession that hit Lamson & Sessionss chief markets, construction and trucking, especially hard. The companys annual sales declined slightly in 1991 and continued to slip in 1992. And although revenues started to climb in 1993 and 1994, the company was unable to record a profit in any of these fiscal years. Losses totaled over $70 million and the stock dropped to just under $5 in early 1994.

It was around that time that Lamson & Sessions elected to exit the truck business. Midland Steel Products was sold to a subsidiary of lochpe-Maxion S.A., a Brazilian firm, in mid-1994. The proceeds of the divestment were used to lower the companys debt service. In a seeming vindication of the decision, Lamson & Sessions reported that the years fourth quarter was the companys first profitable quarter in five years.

Although Carlon has also been characterized as a cyclical business, CEO Schulze hoped that expanding its markets to include the consumer do-it-yourself segment would help to smooth the ups and downs. By 1994, that segment contributed 17 percent of annual revenues. Research and development outlays averaging just over $3 million per year were expected to add new proprietary products to the mix. In an early 1995 press release, Schulze cited strengthening our balance sheet performance and reducing the cost of our debt as primary corporate goals.

Principal Subsidiaries: Carlon Canada Ltd.; Carlon Chimes Co.

Further Reading

Every, Russel B., The Rebuilding of Lamson & Session: An American Success Story, Journal for Corporate Growth, June 1988, pp. 99-105.

Gerdel, Thomas W., Lamson Revamps Debt Structure, Looks to Future, Plain Dealer (Cleveland), March 31, 1984, p. C1.

Gleisser, Marcus, Lamson & Sessions Chief Is Optimistic, Plain Dealer, April 23, 1983, p. C7.

History of the Lamson & Sessions Co., Cleveland: Lamson & Sessions Co., 1975.

Karle, Delinda, Lamson & Sessions Continues Growth, Plain Dealer, December 10, 1987, p. F9.

_____, Lamson Rebounds from Deep Plunge, Plain Dealer, July 25, 1988, p. C9.

Lamson Buys Back All Its Debt at a Discount, Plain Dealer, June 7, 1985, p. B18.

Rose, William Ganson, Cleveland: The Making of a City, Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1950.

Sabath, Donald, Lamson Meeting Hears Good News, Plain Dealer, June 29, 1984, p. C8.

Sabath, Weakness in Two Markets Leads to Loss at Lamson, Plain Dealer, April 27, 1991, p. D3.

Van Tassel, David D., and John J. Grabowski, The Encyclopedia of Cleveland History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

April D. Gasbarre

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Lamson & Sessions Co.." International Directory of Company Histories. . 23 Oct. 2017 <>.

"Lamson & Sessions Co.." International Directory of Company Histories. . (October 23, 2017).

"Lamson & Sessions Co.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved October 23, 2017 from

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.