Sorrentino, Gilbert 1929–

views updated

SORRENTINO, Gilbert 1929–

PERSONAL:

Born April 27, 1929, in Brooklyn, NY; son of August E. and Ann Marie Sorrentino; married Elsene Wiessner (divorced); married Vivian Victoria Ortiz; children: Jesse, Delia, Christopher. Education: Attended Brooklyn College (now Brooklyn College of the City University of New York), 1950-51, 1955-57.

ADDRESSES:

Home—Brooklyn, NY. Agent—Mel Berger, William Morris Agency, 1325 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019.

CAREER:

Writer. Worked in various jobs, 1947-65, including reinsurance clerk, messenger, packer, and shipping room supervisor; Neon (magazine), New York, NY, editor and publisher, 1956-60; Kulcher, New York, NY, book editor, 1961-63; Grove Press, New York, NY, editor, 1965-70; Columbia University, New York, NY, faculty member, 1965; Aspen Writers Workshop, Aspen, CO, instructor, 1967; Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY, faculty member, 1971-72; New School for Social Research, New York, NY, faculty member, 1976-79, 1980-82; University of Scranton, Scranton, PA, Edwin S. Quain Professor of Literature, 1979; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, professor of English, 1982-99, professor emeritus, 1999—. Member of advisory committee, Stanford Humanities Review; editorial consultant, Contemporary Literature. Military service: U.S. Army, 1951-53; medical corps.

MEMBER:

PEN, American Center.

AWARDS, HONORS:

Guggenheim fellow in fiction, 1973-74, 1987-88; Samuel S. Fels Award in fiction, 1974, for short story "Catechism"; Creative Artists Public Service grant, 1974-75; Ariadne Foundation grant, 1975; National Endowment for the Arts grant, 1975-76, 1978-79, and 1983-84; John Dos Passos Prize for literature, 1981; Mildred and Harold Strauss Livings award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters (declined), 1982; American Academy and Institute of Arts and Letters Award for literature, 1985; Lannan Literary Award for fiction, 1992; Little Casino was nominated for the PEN/Faulkner Award, 2003.

WRITINGS:

poetry

The Darkness Surrounds Us, Jargon Society (Highlands, NC), 1960.

Black and White, Totem Press (New York, NY), 1964.

The Perfect Fiction, Norton (New York, NY), 1968.

Corrosive Sublimate, Black Sparrow Press (Los Angeles, CA), 1971.

A Dozen Oranges, Black Sparrow Press (Santa Barbara, CA), 1976.

White Sail, Black Sparrow Press (Santa Barbara, CA), 1977.

The Orangery, University of Texas Press (Austin, TX), 1978.

Selected Poems, 1958-1980, Black Sparrow Press (Santa Barbara, CA), 1981.

novels

The Sky Changes, Hill & Wang (New York, NY), 1966, revised and enlarged edition, North Point Press (San Francisco, CA), 1986.

Steelwork, Pantheon (New York, NY), 1970.

Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things, Pantheon (New York, NY), 1971.

Splendide-Hôtel, New Directions (New York, NY), 1973, new edition, with an afterword by Robert Creeley, Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1984.

Mulligan Stew, Grove Press (New York, NY), 1979.

Aberration of Starlight, Random House (New York, NY), 1980.

Crystal Vision, North Point Press (San Francisco, CA), 1981.

Blue Pastoral, North Point Press (San Francisco, CA), 1983.

Odd Number, North Point Press (San Francisco, CA), 1985.

Rose Theatre, Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1987.

Misterioso, Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1989.

Under the Shadow, Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1991.

Red the Fiend, Gromm International (New York, NY), 1995.

Pack of Lies: A Trilogy (contains Odd Number, Rose Theatre, and Misterioso), Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1997.

Gold Fools, Green Integer Books (Los Angeles, CA), 2001.

Little Casino, Coffee House Press (Minneapolis, MN), 2002.

A Strange Commonplace, Coffee House Press (Minneapolis, MN), 2006.

other

Flawless Play Restored: The Masque of Fungo (novel fragment presented in play form), Black Sparrow Press (Los Angeles, CA), 1974.

(Translator) Sulpiciae Elegidia/Elegiacs of Sulpicia: Gilbert Sorrentino Versions, Perishable Press (Mount Horeb, WI), 1977.

Something Said: Essays, North Point Press (San Francisco, CA), 1984, new and expanded edition, Dalkey Archive Press (Normal, IL), 2001.

A Beehive Arranged on Humane Principles (novella), linocuts by David Storey, Grenfell Press (New York, NY), 1986.

The Moon in Its Flight: Stories, Coffee House Press (Minneapolis, MN), 2004.

Lunar Follies (satire), Coffee House Press (Minneapolis, MN), 2005.

Also contributor to anthologies, including: The New American Poetry, 1945-1960, edited by Donald Allen, Grove Press (New York, NY), 1960; Poesia Americana del '900, Guanda, 1963; The New Writing in the U.S.A., Penguin (New York, NY), 1967; Grenfell Press Archive Collection, Grenfell Press (New York, NY), 1979—; The Best American Short Stories, Houghton Mifflin (Boston, MA), 1978; Many Windows: 22 Stories from "American Review," Harper (New York, NY), 1982; Contemporary American Fiction, Sun & Moon Press (Los Angeles, CA), 1983, and The Pushcart Prize 9, Pushcart Press (Wainscott, NY), 1984. Contributor of short stories, poetry, and essays to New American Review, Chicago Review, Nation, New York Times, Esquire, Partisan Review, TriQuarterly, Poetry, Harper's, Atlantic, and other periodicals.

Author's papers are housed at the Department of Special Collections, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, CA.

ADAPTATIONS:

A sound recording of Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things was made by Pacifica Radio Archive (Los Angeles, CA), 1983.

SIDELIGHTS:

Gilbert Sorrentino has earned critical praise for his highly innovative poetry and fiction. The structures of his novels are of particular importance because Sorrentino holds that form is more important than content. "Form not only determines content," he told Charles Trueheart of Publishers Weekly, "but form invents content." Accordingly, all of Sorrentino's novels are structured in unique ways. "His is a voice," wrote a contributor to the Dictionary of Literary Biography, "that consistently and with ever-increasing originality stands out from the literary chorus."

Sorrentino had published two books of poetry, The Darkness Surrounds Us, dedicated to his first wife, Elsene Wiessner, and Black and White, dedicated to his children, Jesse and Delia, before his first novel, The Sky Changes, was published, in 1966. He had six more books of poetry, including a collection, published by 1981. Most of his poetry concerns his native Brooklyn, New York, and its people. A Contemporary Poets, contributor reflected that "many of Sorrentino's poems are photos, glossies on this blank world, and his language is hard and clear, often New York vernacular, his subjects the surfaces of New York." Sorrentino's poetry, like his novels, is more focused on language than on narrative. "His work invites the reader simply to experience the poem; there is no morality, no vision, simply the thing itself," the Contemporary Poets contributor wrote. The writer added: "Although some of his poems extend to specific survivors of American history—veterans, Indians, miners—his finest poems are the personal ones, those occasional moments of bittersweet nostalgia for the past and his own lost innocence."

A Contemporary Novelists contributor noted that Sorrentino's novels were created based on the propositions "that space, rather than time, is the most revealing principle for narrative structure; that the physical texture of language, rather than its semantic properties, is the key to communication between a novelist and the reader; and that an awareness of the author's act of writing … yields the greatest pleasure in experiencing a novel." Sorrentino's novels have much in common with his poetry. Sorrentino was quoted in Contemporary Poets as saying, "I have attempted to make the language of my fiction function in the way that the language of my verse functions, i.e. poetically."

Sorrentino's first novel, The Sky Changes, concerns an unhappy married couple and their journey across America seeking a way to keep their marriage together. Their two children become caught up in their parents' failure to mend the marriage. A mutual friend of the couple's comes along to do the driving, and distrust and a strained silence develop as this man and his wife seem to get closer. Richard Elman, writing in the Review of Contemporary Fiction, stated that he knew "of few works … which are so subtle, and touching, in depicting the pain of being mismatched." Each chapter of the novel is named for a town the couple visits on their journey from New York to San Francisco and relates the events that occur in that town. Sorrentino's narrative ignores time sequence in favor of spatial continuity. He stated in the Grosseteste Review: "The past, the present, the future are mixed together in order to show very clearly that there is really no past that is worse than the present and there is no future that will be better than the present." American corruption and commercialism, as well as the unhappiness glimpsed in other families along the trip, show a tendency toward misery throughout the nation. A contributor to the Center for Book Culture Web site wrote that "no other novel so perfectly captures the moral bankruptcy of the United States as a background to divorce." Richmond Review critic Scott Adlerberg wrote: "In 139 dense pages [Sorrentino] charts with beauty and precision a trip through a world of hope, loss, and pain."

Sorrentino's second novel, Steelwork, also employs a nonchronological structure. Concerned with the sites and characters of his Brooklyn childhood, between 1935 and 1951, it employs "an utterly different, quite original method of narration," wrote Shaun O'Connell in the Nation. The novel "is made up of ninety-six separate but interlocking dramatic vignettes, scenes which, in their arrangement within the novel, scramble chronology." Jerome Klinkowitz, writing in Literary Disruptions: The Making of a Post-Contemporary American Fiction, found Steelwork's narrative structure to be appropriate to its theme. The novel deals with a single Brooklyn neighborhood, which becomes the protagonist apart from individual residents, as it experiences the changes and corruption wrought by the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, and events leading to the Cold War. "The subject is change," Klinkowitz wrote, "and the book's form comes to terms with this reality, grasped imaginatively." A Kirkus Reviews contributor wrote that "what comes through most clearly is a general sense of souring as poverty and expectations fade together."

In Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things, Sorrentino satirizes the New York avant-garde art world of the 1950s and 1960s, a world in which he played a part. "While each chapter is largely devoted to one of eight characters," wrote a Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor, "the novel proceeds by way of digression, anecdote, asides, and itemizations, all filtered through a narrator whose rage and urbane wit mix into a strangely compassionate yet unsentimental treatment of these meretricious, sometimes gifted artists." Washington Post Book World contributor Paul Theroux found Sorrentino's satire effective but believed the author unconsciously echoes what he attacks. "Few people are able to write as well as Sorrentino does here of literary posturing," Theroux observed, "but the trouble is that the book assumes an elaborate posture of its own, and so does the narrator …; the book contains many of the affectations it condemns." In contrast to this view, Klinkowitz saw Imaginative Qualities as "Sorrentino's most fully realized expression of the novelist's proper role. Throughout he fights against the poor writing and misguided aesthetics that characterizes so much of recent conventional fiction." Writing about Sorrentino in Contemporary Novelists, Klinkowitz said Imaginative Qualities "is in fact a demonstration of Sorrentino's pleasure in writing a novel."

A Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor believed that "the technical achievements in [Imaginative Qualities] opened up a world of possibilities for future novels." These possibilities are partly explored by Sorrentino in Splendide-Hôtel, a short book consisting of twenty-six sections, each based on a letter of the alphabet and the images it suggests. Influenced by the poetry of William Carlos Williams and Arthur Rimbaud—the title is taken from Rimbaud's "Les Illuminations"—Splendide-Hôtel rescues the poetic language from the grasp of commercialism. Klinkowitz, writing in an article for the Village Voice, viewed this alphabetic structure as a method to make the reader deliberately aware of the novel as writing. It "keeps us right on the pages, like a painter keeps us on the canvas," he explained. "All Gilbert Sorrentino's work refuses to be bland meta-fiction," Klinkowitz concluded, "recounting in second-order terms a story about another reality. It is instead something made and placed in the world, standing for nothing but itself." A Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor noted: "The parts of the book [Splendide-Hôtel] constitute a celebration of language and of creativity and are written in the faith that art is the last bastion of genuine life, rather than some pallid imitation."

One of Sorrentino's most acclaimed novels is Mulligan Stew, a book a Dictionary of Literary Biography essayist called "literally a synthesis of almost everything Sorrentino had read and written in the past twenty-five years." The novel is such a tour de force that New York Times contributor John Leonard believed there was "a very real question as to whether avant-garde fiction can survive Gilbert Sorrentino's new novel." Drawing elements from a wide range of popular and serious literature, Mulligan Stew parodies its components. Sorrentino borrows characters from Dashiell Hammett's The Glass Key, Flann O'Brien's At Swim-Two-Birds, and from works by James Joyce and F. Scott Fitzgerald. The character from Flann O'Brien's novel, Antony Lamont, is writing a novel within Sorrentino's novel, and midway through the book, Lamont's characters try to escape and go their own way. "A work of true comic genius," Al Lacy wrote in Books and Art, "[Mulligan Stew] not only entertains and engages the intelligent reader, but also manages to shed light on the processes of literary creation, on the making of bad novels as well as good ones." Similarly, Malcolm Bradbury observed in the New York Times Book Review that Mulligan Stew "is a neo-Joycean concoction, spawning invention, delighting in lists, inventing languages, animating the endlessly comic fact that every sentence we write may generate its opposite, every structure of significance, every generative element in any story can move in an infinitude of directions. Mulligan Stew mocks the act of creation. It also thrives on it, turning itself into an abundant and extravagantly decorated display of the pleasures of the imagination." A Contemporary Novelists contributor called the book "Sorrentino's fullest repertoire of writing talent." Michael Dirda of the Washington Post Book World also called it "perhaps the most corrosive satire of the literary scene since early Aldous Huxley. This is a novel with all the stops pulled out, Gilbert Sorrentino's masterpiece." Kenneth John Atchity, reviewing the novel for the Los Angeles Times Book Review, similarly labeled it a "masterpiece." He described it as a "singular event in the history of wit and imagination." Atchity went on to note: "Mulligan Stew is the end of the self-reflexive novel: Sorrentino brains the genre against the walls of prose. As we watch, we become accomplices, laughing at the murder—because it is a ritual, comic suicide—with a mixture of horror and relief. It's as though Sorrentino, broom and dustpan in hand, has swept into one large steamer trunk—or one pot of Mulligan stew—all the literary leftovers from the past quarter-century." According to Stuart Dybek, writing in the Detroit News, Mulligan Stew "catapulted Gil Sorrentino's reputation out of the literary underground. In great abundance, it [demonstrates] Sorrentino's collection of modernist techniques and devices as well as his special gift, the ability to blend them in the service of lucidity rather than mystification."

In his next novel, Aberration of Starlight, Sorrentino turns from extreme experimentation to a more conventional form. Set on the New Jersey coast near the end of the Great Depression, the novel concerns four characters: a divorcee, Marie Recco; her ten-year-old son, Billy; her controlling father, John McGrath; and Tom Thebus, the unsavory salesman they meet on their vacation. A Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor called it "a novel told from four different points of view that construct four distinct realities from the events of thirty-six hours at a New Jersey boardinghouse." Dybek noted: "It's the kind of plot that could easily become melodrama in the hands of a less acid writer than Sorrentino." Sorrentino uses a variety of literary techniques, including letters, a narrative question-and-answer, bits of dialogue, footnotes, and flashbacks, to disrupt the reader while moving the story forward. A Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor observed that, although the novel is without sentimentality or melodrama, Sorrentino "portrays mundane failures of human love and intelligence and characters whose lack of insight or care leaves them participants in their own degradation."

Chicago Review contributor John Morse viewed Aberration of Starlight as quite different from Mulligan Stew. It "is disciplined in length and form, modest in ambition, and downright decorous in tone," he noted. Writing in the New York Review of Books, Josh Rubins also saw a great difference between the two books. After rejecting the possibility that Sorrentino may again be writing parody, Rubins believed that the novel is really about five characters—the four fictional characters and Sorrentino himself. "But if Aberration of Starlight does indeed tell a story of five characters," he wrote, "offering more of the traditional novelistic values … than Sorrentino has allowed himself in years, it is also his most 'experimental' fiction yet, in the sense that an experiment is something whose outcome you don't know in advance."

Published one year after Aberration of Starlight, Sorrentino's novel Crystal Vision is composed of fictional conversations in seventy-eight chapters organized according to the cards in a Tarot deck, without a story being told in the conventional sense. This novel is set in the Brooklyn neighborhood introduced in Steelwork, and some of the same characters reappear. The reader hears from Doc Friday, Irish Bill, Fat Frankie, the Arab, the Magician, and many others. "Their language expands the author's previous vision, showing how they have the vitality to survive on their own in fiction, without narrative's customary supporting devices," wrote a Contemporary Novelists contributor. A contributor to the Center for Book Culture Web site concluded: "Through formal inventiveness, Sorrentino liberates these characters from the confines of realism and gives us their world—zany, vulgar, hilarious, and exuberant." Another writer observed in the Dictionary of Literary Biography that the creative seed for the book could be traced to William Carlos Williams's theory that conversation is pure design. "Stylization of dialogue, not transmission of information, is Sorrentino's preoccupation in Crystal Vision," wrote the Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor.

In Blue Pastoral, Sorrentino takes another family on a cross-country trip from New York to San Francisco, as he did in The Sky Changes, but this time the story revolves around "Blue" Serge Gavotte, "a modern-day Candide who quits his job, mounts a piano atop a broken-down pushcart and sets off with his wife and child on a visionary quest … in search of the 'Perfect Musical Phrase,'" according to a contributor to the Center for Book Culture Web site. A parody of the pastoral form, this novel is "arguably [Sorrentino's] finest comic achievement to date," wrote a Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor. Its dominant voice "is an imitation of English Renaissance prose peppered with Brooklyn colloquialisms, an incongruous mix that sits yet more incongruously with the tale it relates," the Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor added. Writing in Library Journal, Michael Rogers called the novel "a hive of Joycean wordplay."

With his complicated and uncompromising trilogy of postmodern fiction, Odd Number, Rose Theatre, and Misterioso—republished as Pack of Lies: A Trilogy—Sorrentino reconsiders and restructures his earlier novel, Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things. Part One of Odd Number consists of a series of questions asked first of a reticent character and then of an unreliable one in an attempt to discover exactly what happened in the original novel. Part Two gives a conversational account of the events, but Part Three produces evidence contradicting the first two parts, "virtually unmaking the novel which has been read," explained a Contemporary Novelists contributor. Rose Theatre employs a range of narrative styles that change from one chapter to the next, as the female characters from Odd Number attempt to correct misinformation from that novel, which invites further uncertainties and need for clarification, since fiction itself cannot be verified. The fifteen chapters in Rose Theatre are named for an inventory of props found in London's Rose Theatre in 1598. Misterioso, set in a supermarket, concludes the trilogy with an encyclopedic, alphabetical listing of "all the people, places and objects from the two earlier novels," Larry McCaffery wrote in the Los Angeles Times Book Review, accompanied by a cast of demons and flight attendants. Using the supermarket's magazine rack to generate "a trashery of ludicrous and perverse exploits and ads well suited to the actions of the novel's large cast," according to the Center for Book Culture Web site contributor, Misterioso goes no farther toward finding the truth than the first two novels in the trilogy. This third novel takes its title from a song by Thelonious Monk, the great jazz pianist and composer, whom Sorrentino admired. In his review of Misterioso, McCaffery stated that it is "rich in voice, devastating in its satiric impulses and startling in its formal ingenuity." McCaffery added: "A literary game which not only imitates, parodies, satirizes and elaborates upon the fantasies, pleasures, surprises, and disappointments of American life, it also most tellingly invents specific possibilities of which American life is incapable." Wildly comic, the trilogy "shows just how disjointed, trivial and enigmatic the lives of most Americans really are," McCaffery wrote. "It would be easy," Jeffrey A. Frank noted in the Washington Post Book World, "and probably wrong, to put a label like 'satire' on this odd piece of fiction." Frank believed that Sorrentino's comedy "comes close to being literary schtick." A Center for Book Culture Web site contributor called the trilogy "a vicious comedy portraying a world of fraud and mayhem." A contributor to Cups praised the work's "lampooning of everything from the art world to the conventions of Boy's Books to radical feminism to Nazi Germany."

Sorrentino's next novel, Under the Shadow, has been highly praised and recommended by reviewers as one of his most masterful performances as a literary artist. Built from fifty-nine separate but ultimately coherent vignettes, each with a simple noun for a title, the novel is at once surreal, humorous, and Freudian. A Publishers Weekly contributor called it a rare "intellectual page-turner." A contributor to the Center for Book Culture Web site observed of the passages that many "read like primal scenes of private pathologies; others are memories that, many years later, retain their power to haunt." The setting and time period of these recollections are vague; they seem to have occurred long ago and read as if they are being recounted through old newspaper articles, biographies, and file documents. A Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor wrote that the novel's coherence "is that of a collage rather than of a narrative, but cross-references between the vignettes create a shadowy, intense yet blurred impression of events."

Sorrentino returns to the neighborhood and some of the characters from Steelwork for his 1995 novel, Red the Fiend, which reveals "scenes from an Irish American Roman Catholic boyhood," according to a Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor. Red Mulvaney, in his early twenties in Steelwork, is a boy of twelve in Red the Fiend, living with his mother and his sadistic grandmother, with his estranged father nearby. The novel chronicles the year 1940, which brings about Red's change from a suffering masochist to a bully who learns to quell his own fears by inflicting pain on others. "Sorrentino creates a subtle voice to render Red's perceptions of and responses to an environment that is all too often incomprehensible, hostile, and menacing," wrote a Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor. A Publishers Weekly contributor found Sorrentino's characters in Red the Fiend "grim, gray and mutilated." However, Jack Byrne, writing in the Review of Contemporary Fiction, commented that the book "only whets the appetite for more of what Sorrentino calls his 'ordinary folks.'"

Sorrentino's novel Gold Fools is a "fond and wildly comic burlesque of a 1924 boys' adventure book," said Dave Andrews in the Review of Contemporary Fiction. He compared the novel to Blue Pastoral. The plot involves three teenage boys—two brothers, Nort and Dick Shannon, and their friend Bud Merkel—who go in search of gold in the Gila Desert, accompanied by two leathery old guides. This seemingly typical Old West tale also has two "bad guys," Del Pinzo and his Indian companion Zapto, who want the gold for themselves. Sorrentino's story is told entirely in interrogative sentences that must be answered by the reader. As the author lays out all the clichés of the genre and then breaks them apart and mixes them with other overworked phrases from academia and the media, the innocent tale becomes an absurdly funny commentary on speech itself.

Little Casino, published in 2002, focuses on postwar golden-age Brooklyn residents, from tough immigrant boys to painted women. It is built on fifty-two narratives making a whole that "zooms across time and geography on a dizzy journey of names, memories and tangents," commented a Publishers Weekly contributor. Multiple plots, stream-of-consciousness writing, and detours into subplots and the language itself make Little Casino a bit hard to follow as a whole, wrote the reviewer, but the individual chapters "are easily digestible morsels of delicious prose."

In his collection The Moon in Its Flight: Stories, Sorrentino presents both new and old stories, with many focusing on the artistic worlds of San Francisco and New York and their self-centered, overindulgent inhabitants. Noting "the caustic realism of these stories," a Publishers Weekly contributor wrote that the stories are also "an ironic meta-commentary on the falsity of literary realism itself." The reviewer went on to comment that the tales also show the author is "a romantic at heart." Martin Riker, writing in the Review of Contemporary Fiction, noted that he believes "that the title piece of this collection is among the ten best stories in the history of American literature." Riker went on to write that in the collection, "all the qualities that make Gilbert Sorrentino's writing unique are at work."

The author focuses his satirical barbs on the art world in his book Lunar Follies, which consists of a series of fifty-three mock reviews of art exhibits, installation pieces, underground art films, and other works, with each named after a landmark on the moon. The author excludes any form of straightforward narrative or traditional characters in the book, instead providing his view of the "lunacy" of the esoteric art world and the academic language used to describe it. A Publishers Weekly contributor noted Sorrentino's "dead-on appropriation of the pretentious critic's voice" and also called the book a "clever parodic take on the contemporary art world." John Leonard, writing in Harper's, commented that the reviews are "all hilarious." In a review in the Washington Post, Michael Dirda wrote: "The book is a relentlessly thorough scourging of the rhetoric of criticism." Calling many of the reviews "fun," Dirda went on to comment that the author "also leaves one shaken, wary of language altogether, unsure whether sentences communicate anything at all. Suddenly, words no longer feel like tokens of meaning or things of beauty but like cheap baubles, utterly gimcrack, completely phony. The satire of Lunar Follies hews so close to the bone that it saws right through it and leaves one crippled." Writing in the Review of Contemporary Fiction, Jeremy M. Davis noted: "No one is better at showing us how sentiment and self-importance go wrong, or at illuminating the real tragedy behind the sham art he excoriates with such precision."

In A Strange Commonplace, Sorrentino presents a two part book in which the title of each chapter or tale in the first part has a corresponding title in the second part. However, the tales do not directly relate or interconnect in a traditional sense, even though characters may share names and certain situations. The one commonality among the stories is that they are all about infidelity, doomed relationships, or the intense battles and revenge that go on between couples. A Publishers Weekly contributor wrote that the author's "virtuosic vernacular shifts convincingly to match different genders and stations." Writing in Kirkus Reviews, a reviewer called the book "savage, baffling, and beguiling." The reviewer went on to comment on Sorrentino's approach in telling the stories, noting that "by making specific details irrelevant, he exposes his characters' sad, self-destructive sameness."

Commenting on Sorrentino's career, Newsweek writer Ray Sawhill declared that "Sorrentino has the mind of an avant-garde experimentalist and the instincts of a profane showman. His novels overflow with elaborate literary contrivances and games, and the titles he gives them … lead you to expect one hall of mirrors after another. But there's nothing dry or ingrown about his writing. His novels have the kind of physical charge and excitement more often associated with jazz and improvisational comedy than with literature."

BIOGRAPHICAL AND CRITICAL SOURCES:

books

Contemporary Literary Criticism, Thomson Gale (Detroit, MI), Volume 3, 1975, Volume 7, 1977, Volume 14, 1980, Volume 22, 1982, Volume 40, 1986.

Contemporary Novelists, sixth edition, St. James Press (Detroit, MI), 1996.

Contemporary Poets, sixth edition, St. James Press (Detroit, MI), 1996.

Dictionary of Literary Biography, Thomson Gale (Detroit, MI), Volume 5: American Poets since World War II, 1980, Volume 173: American Novelists since World War II, Fifth Series, 1997.

Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook: 1980, Thomson Gale (Detroit, MI), 1981.

Klinkowitz, Jerome, Literary Disruptions: The Making of a Post-Contemporary American Fiction, University of Illinois Press (Urbana, IL), second edition, 1980.

Mackey, Louis, Fact, Fiction, and Representation: Four Novels by Gilbert Sorrentino, Camden House, 1997.

McPheron, William, Gilbert Sorrentino: A Descriptive Bibliography, Dalkey Archive Press (Elmwood Park, IL), 1991.

Ossmann, David, The Sullen Art: Interviews with Modern American Poets, Corinth Books (New York, NY), 1963.

Phelps, Donald, Covering Ground: Essays for Now, Corinth Books (New York, NY), 1969.

periodicals

American Book Review, February, 1992, review of Under the Shadow, p. 17; March, 1998, review of Pack of Lies: A Trilogy, p. 24.

Booklist, November 15, 1991, review of Under the Shadow, p. 602.

Books and Art, July 23, 1979, Al Lacy, review of Mulligan Stew.

Book World, December 22, 1991, reviews of Under the Shadow and Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things, p. 9; June 14, 1992, review of Steelwork, p. 12; November 15, 1992, review of Under the Shadow, p. 12; February 5, 1995, review of Red the Fiend, p. 5; June 22, 1997, review of Book World, p. 12; March 25, 2001, review of Gold Fools, p. 5.

Chicago Review, autumn, 1980, John Morse, review of Aberration of Starlight.

Cups, August-September, 1997, review of Pack of Lies.

Detroit News, August 24, 1980, Stuart Dybek, reviews of Mulligan Stew and Aberration of Starlight.

Grosseteste Review, Volume 6, numbers 1-4, 1973, John O'Brien, "Imaginative Qualities of Gilbert Sorrentino: An Interview," pp. 69-84.

Harper's, April, 2005, John Leonard, review of Lunar Follies, p. 85.

Kirkus Reviews, August 1, 1970, review of Steelwork; September 1, 1991, review of Under the Shadow, p. 1116; October 1, 1994, review of Red the Fiend, p. 1304; February 15, 2006, review of A Strange Commonplace, p. 158.

Library Journal, October 15, 1991, review of Under the Shadow, p. 82; December, 1991, review of Imaginative Qualities, p. 204; November 1, 1994, review of Red the Fiend, p. 112; November 1, 1995, review of The Orangery, p. 112; February 15, 1996, review of Mulligan Stew, p. 180; July, 1997, review of Pack of Lies, p. 132; December, 1999, review of Crystal Vision, p. 194; August, 2001, Michael Rogers, review of Blue Pastoral, p. 172; March 15, 2002, Michael Rogers, review of Something Said: Essays, p. 113.

Los Angeles Times Book Review, July 8, 1979, Kenneth John Atchity, review of Mulligan Stew; December 10, 1989, Larry McCaffery, review of Odd Number, Rose Theatre, and Misterioso; July 2, 1995, review of Red the Fiend, p. 6.

Nation, October 14, 1961; June 21, 1971, Shaun O'Connell, review of Steelwork; August 21, 1972.

Newsweek, July 4, 1983, Ray Sawhill.

New York Review of Books, July 19, 1979; December 18, 1980, Josh Rubins, review of Aberration of Starlight.

New York Times, May 24, 1979, John Leonard, review of Mulligan Stew.

New York Times Book Review, July 2, 1972; May 24, 1979; August 26, 1979; August 10, 1980; November 8, 1981; June 19, 1983; January 14, 1990; April 26, 1992, review of Under the Shadow, p. 18; December 27, 1992, review of Steelwork, p. 20; March 19, 1995, review of Red the Fiend, p. 22; September 18, 2005, Gregory Cowles, review of Lunar Follies, p. 22.

Publishers Weekly, May 27, 1983, Charles Trueheart, "PW Interviews Gilbert Sorrentino," pp. 70-71; September 6, 1991, review of Under the Shadow, p. 95; November 1, 1991, review of Imaginative Qualities, p. 78; January 11, 1993, review of Under the Shadow, p. 62; May 17, 1993, review of Aberration of Starlight, p. 76; November 21, 1994, review of Red the Fiend, p. 68; May 26, 1997, review of Pack of Lies, p. 83; April 2, 2001, review of Gold Fools, p. 41; March 4, 2002, review of Little Casino, p. 53; April 5, 2004, review of The Moon in Its Flight, p. 40; February 14, 2005, review of Lunar Follies, p. 50; February 13, 2006, review of A Strange Commonplace, p. 60.

Rain Taxi Review of Books, fall, 1997, review of Pack of Lies.

Review of Contemporary Fiction, spring, 1981 (special issue on Sorrentino), Richard Elman, review of The Sky Changes; spring, 1995, Jack Byrne, review of Red the Fiend, p. 162; summer, 2001, Dave Andrews, review of Gold Fools, p. 152; spring, 2003, Stacy Olster, "Gilbert Sorrentino's Problematic Middle Child: Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things," p. 70, and Joseph Tabbi, "Matter into Imagination: The Cognitive Realism of Gilbert Sorrentino's Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things," p. 90; fall, 2004, Martin Riker, review of The Moon in Its Flight, p. 129; summer, 2005, Jeremy M. Davies, review of Lunar Follies, p. 131.

San Francisco Review of Books, March, 1995, review of Red the Fiend, p. 35.

Times Literary Supplement, December 13, 1991, review of Under the Shadow, p. 20.

Tribune Books (Chicago, IL), February 12, 1995, review of Red the Fiend, p. 5.

Village Voice, November 22, 1973, Jerome Klinkowitz, review of Spendide-Hôtel; May 28, 1979.

Vort, fall, 1974, Barry Alpert, "Gilbert Sorrentino—An Interview," pp. 3-30, Robert L. Caserio, "Gilbert Sorrentino's Prose Fiction," pp. 63-69, John O'Brien, "Gilbert Sorrentino: Some Various Looks," pp. 79-85, and Stephen Emerson, "Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things," pp. 85-89.

Washington Post, May 1, 2005, Michael Dirda, review of Lunar Follies, p. BW15.

Washington Post Book World, November 7, 1971, Paul Theroux, review of Imaginative Qualities; June 17, 1979, Michael Dirda, review of Mulligan Stew; August 31, 1980; August 2, 1981; December 20, 1981; May 22, 1983; January 7, 1990, Jeffrey A. Frank, review of Misterioso.

online

Center for Book Culture,http://www.centerforbookculture.org/ (May 29, 2006), John O'Brien, "Interview with Gilbert Sorrentino by John O'Brien"; and brief biography of author.

Fantastic Fiction,http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/ (May 29, 2006), brief biography of author.

Richmond Review,http://www.richmondreview.co.uk/ (May 29, 2006), Scott Adlerberg, review of The Sky Changes.

Stanford University, American Literary Studies,http://library.stanford.edu/ (May 1, 2002), "Gilbert Sorrentino Papers."*