Daniel Carter Beard 1850-1941, American illustrator and naturalist, b. Cincinnati, Ohio, studied at the Art Students League, New York City. He illustrated many books (among them the first edition of Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee at King Arthur's Court ) and taught animal drawing. He became interested in work for boys, and his best-known book, The American Boys' Handy Book, was published in 1882. One of the founders (1910) of the Boy Scouts of America, he served for the remainder of his life as national scout commissioner. To boys all over the country he was known as Uncle Dan. Mt. Beard, adjoining Mt. McKinley, is named for him. In addition to many articles on woodcraft and nature study, Beard wrote Boy Pioneers and Sons of Daniel Boone (1909), American Boys' Book of Wild Animals (1921), and Wisdom of the Woods (1927).

Bibliography: See his autobiography, Hardly a Man Is Now Alive (1939).

Frohman, Daniel (1851–1940), producer. Like his younger brother, Charles Frohman, he was born in Sandusky, Ohio, and came to New York, where he served in various capacities on several newspapers, including the Tribune, the Standard, and the Daily Graphic, before becoming an advance man for the Georgia Minstrels from 1874 to 1879. With Charles and his other brother, Gustave, he then helped manage Steele MacKaye's Madison Square Theatre, also assisting in sending out road companies of the theatre's hits. In 1885 he took over the old Lyceum Theatre and opened it with In Spite of All. Employing an excellent stock company that he developed there, Frohman quickly mounted such successes as The Highest Bidder (1887), The Wife (1887), Lord Chumley (1888), and The Charity Ball (1889). The performances of E. H. Sothern in two of these helped start that actor on his career as a major figure. An important later success was The Prisoner of Zenda (1895). He also produced several plays by Henry Arthur Jones and Arthur Wing Pinero, offering the American premieres of such plays as The Case of Rebellious Susan (1894) and Trelawny of the Wells (1898). For a time in 1899, after Daly's death, he managed Daly's Theatre. After the Lyceum was demolished in 1902, he built a new (and current) Lyceum a year later. With time he gradually abandoned producing but remained active in theatrical affairs. From 1904 until his death he served as president of the Actors' Fund of America. He found time as well to write several books, including two volumes of reminiscences, Memories of a Manager (1911) and Daniel Frohman Presents (1935), and a collection of essays on theatrical history, Encore (1937). Unlike his squat, clean‐shaven brother Charles, he was a wiry, balding man with a closely cropped beard and moustache.

PARTICIPLE In grammatical description, the term for two non-finite VERB forms, the -ing participle (known traditionally as the present participle) and the -ed participle (known traditionally as the past participle or passive participle).

The -ing (present) participle

This verb form ends with the inflection -ing and is used in combination with a form of the auxiliary be for the progressive continuous, as in: am driving, was playing, will be going, has been talking. It is also used as the verb in an -ing participle clause, as in: Marvin and Jane liked playing with their grandchildren; Despite his protestations, Stanley was not averse to having a birthday party; John and Linda were happy to see Daniel behaving himself during the meal; After giving her lecture, Venetia had lunch with me at the College; The young man driving me to the shopping centre was Jeremy.

The -ed (past) participle

This verb form ends with the inflection spelled -ed, -d, or -t for all regular verbs and many irregular verbs, but many irregular verbs form it with an -en or -n inflection (as in stolen, known) or with a change in the middle vowel (as in sung, in which case it is often identical with the simple past form, as with sat), or a combination of the two methods (as with written). The -ed participle combines with a form of the auxiliary have for the perfect: has cared, had said, may have walked. It combines with a form of the auxiliary be for the passive: is paid, was told, are being auctioned, could have been seen. It is also used as the verb in an -ed participle clause: I had my study redecorated; Asked for his opinion, Ian was non-committal; Among the objects recovered from the ship was a chair stamped with the captain's initials.

Attributive uses

Both participles may be used in the attributive position like an adjective, but only if the participle indicates some sort of permanent characteristic: running water, the missing link, a broken heart, lost property. The phrase The Laughing Cavalier is possible as the name of a picture (the man is laughing for all time), but *Who is that laughing man? would be odd in most contexts. The -ed participle usually has a passive meaning (listed buildings, burnt almonds, written instructions), but may be used actively with some intransitive verbs (an escaped prisoner). Some participles that are not permanent enough to be used attributively alone are acceptable when modified (their long-awaited visit).

Participles and word-formation

There is a range of usage between participles which remain fully verbal (running in swiftly running water) and those that in some contexts are completely adjectival (interesting in a very interesting idea; disappointed in a very disappointed man). There are also some participle-like formations for which there are no corresponding verbs: an unexplained discrepancy, an unconvincing narrative, for which there are no conventional verbs *to unexplain and *to unconvince; a bearded man, a forested hillside, a blue-eyed cat, a one-armed bandit, common constructions which are aspects of word-formation rather than grammar.

Participial clauses

Traditionally known as participial phrases, such clauses function in various ways: (1) They can follow noun phrases (like abbreviated relative clauses): ‘The train (which is) now standing at Platform 5 is …’, ‘The food (that was) served on the plane was …’. (2) They can function rather like finite subordinate clauses, with or without a conjunction, and with various meanings, often of time (‘While running for the train, he lost his wallet’), reason (‘Jostled by the crowd, he did not really see what happened’), or result (‘The train started suddenly, throwing an elderly passenger to the floor’). (3) They can follow an object + verb of the senses: ‘We could all hear him singing in the bath’; ‘He didn't see the soap lying on the floor.’ Occasionally this multiplicity of functions may lead to ambiguity: ‘I witnessed a sergeant push his way past supporters drinking openly in the aisle’ (letter in the Daily Telegraph, 27 May 1988).

The dangling participle

When a participial clause contains its own subject, it is called an ABSOLUTE CLAUSE, as in ‘Weather permitting, we'll go sailing this weekend’. When, as is more usual, such a clause does not contain a subject, it normally refers grammatically to the subject of the main clause: in ‘I made my way, depressed, to the ticket office’, it is clear who was depressed, and in ‘The woman on the chair beside me was tipped on to my lap, complaining all the time’ it is clear who was complaining (both from Colin Thubron, Behind the Wall, 1987). Failure to maintain such a clear relationship leads to the so-called dangling, hanging, misrelated, or unattached participle, as in: ‘Her party was the first to discover that there were no sleepers left. The entire section had been booked. Faced with a forty-four hour journey, this was not good news’ ( Patrick Marnham, So Far from God, 1985).

With participles that attach themselves to the wrong noun, the effect may be momentarily confusing even if the writer's meaning is clear: ‘[ Sir Mortimer Wheeler's] celebrity on television was so great that, boarding an empty bus late one rainy night when in a white tie with rows of medals, a conductress arranged with the driver to take him to the door of Wheeler's small house off Haymarket’ ( Anthony Powell, To Keep the Ball Rolling, 1982). Here, the meaning may be fairly obvious, but on first reading it is the conductress who boards the bus. In the following example, it is the lines that apparently provided the clues ‘By taking a great many such observations and analysing them statistically, the lines gave crucial clues about the intervening space between us and quasars, and therefore of the early universe's history’ (in ‘Bonfire of the Cosmos’, Observer, 16 Apr. 1989). Sometimes, the pictures presented are simply absurd: ‘After travelling by road all day …, the 123-room Sahara Palace is an air-conditioned all-mod-cons watering hole’ (Daily Telegraph, 22 Sept. 1984); ‘There, coasting comfortably down the attractive green coastline, the town of Malacca with its prominent hill was very evident’ ( Tim Severin, The Sindbad Voyage, 1982).

Participial prepositions and conjunctions

Apparent exceptions to the rule that participles should be properly attached are a number of participle forms that now function as prepositions, such as following in ‘There was tremendous clearing up to do following the storm’, and including in ‘We all enjoyed ourselves, including the dog’; and participle forms that are now conjunctions, such as providing (that) and provided (that) in ‘Everything will be all right, providing/provided you don't panic’, and given in ‘Given the difficulties, I'd say it was a success.’