Skip to main content
Select Source:

The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
U.S.A.
Telephone: (212) 704-1200
Fax: (212) 704-1201
Web site: http://www.interpublic.com

Public Company
Incorporated:
1961
Employees: 43,000
Gross Billings: $6.39 billion (2004)
Stock Exchanges: New York
Ticker Symbol: IPG
NAIC: 541810 Advertising Agencies

Once the world's largest advertising company, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. fell on hard times in the early 2000s, dropping to third in worldwide standing behind rivals Omnicom Group and WPP Group. Set to rebound in 2006 and 2007, Interpublic through its numerous subsidiaries still ranks among the world's top advertising and marketing firms, with offices in 120 countries and employees numbering more than 43,000. Through its independently operating agencies, Interpublic provides advertising programs, direct marketing, market research, and other media services. Although Interpublic's advertising agencies compete against one another for clients, all benefit from the resources and connections of their parent company. With worldwide billings of $6.39 billion, Interpublic remains a force to be reckoned with in the advertising world.

In the Beginning: 1910s60s

The history of Interpublic began 50 years before its incorporation in 1961. In 1911 the U.S. Supreme Court dismantled the Rockefeller Standard Oil Trust and divided it into 37 different companies. The largest of these was Standard Oil of New Jersey (now Exxon). Harrison McCann, who had been advertising manager at the Rockefeller Trust for a number of years, opened up his own ad agency and took on Jersey Standard as his first client. The age of the automobile was soon to come and with it an increase in the demand for refined petroleum products. As the advertising man for the world's largest oil company, McCann was poised for success.

In 1930 McCann merged his agency with that of Alfred Erickson to form the McCann-Erickson Company. Despite the Depression and World War II, the newly conjoined firm managed to grow in billings and importance; by 1945 McCann-Erickson was doing close to $40 million in business, making it the fifth largest advertising firm in the United States.

Marion Harper began working at the McCann-Erickson agency in the 1930s as a clerk in the mailroom. After delivering the day's mail he would visit the research department and learn what he could. He proved a remarkable student; he was made manager of copy research at the age of 26 and then promoted to director of research at 30. Two years later, Harrison McCann promoted Harper again, this time to president of McCann-Erickson Advertising.

During Harper's rise from mail clerk to president, McCann-Erickson experienced the most lucrative decade of its history. In 1954 the agency surpassed $100 million in billings for the first time. Between 1955 and 1956 the agency added over $45 million worth of new business, including the Westinghouse appliance division, Chesterfield tobacco, and Mennen personal hygiene products. These accounts, however, were overshadowed by the fourth new customer gained by McCann at this time, Coca-Cola. Though Coke was a $15 million account in 1956, it was the soft drink company's potential for future growth that made it such an attractive customer. For McCann-Erickson, Coca-Cola was an investment in the coming era of "recreation and refreshment."

During this heady era, Harper, as chief executive officer and chairman of McCann-Erickson, began to implement his vision of fashioning an advertising company modeled after General Motors, a vigorous conglomerate consisting of equally vigorous but largely autonomous divisions. He arranged for McCann-Erickson to buy the Marshalk advertising firm of New York. The move was unprecedented because Harper declared that the two agencies (McCann-Erickson and Marshalk) would be operated as competing companies. Harper's intention was to avoid the conflict of interest problem that plagued all agencies attempting to procure accounts from competing clients. He felt if Marshalk and McCann were run separately, a camera manufacturer looking to hire McCann would not care that Marshalk did the advertising for another camera manufacturer. Most people within the industry viewed the idea with skepticism, but Harper proved them wrong. Both agencies continued to grow while often servicing rival clients.

McCann-Erickson had also moved to establish itself in a variety of less conventional foreign advertising markets. Long the leading agency in Latin America and Europe, the company purchased the third largest ad firm in Australia and began to actively pursue business in Asia. By 1960 McCann-Erickson had billings of $100 million outside the United States, with a substantial portion coming from the Asia-Pacific area.

The Formation of Interpublic: 1960s70s

In January 1961 Interpublic was established as a holding company with McCann-Erickson becoming its largest subsidiary. What followed was a rapid, occasionally reckless, six-year period of expansion and acquisition. Harper purchased majority interests in a variety of advertising firms all over the world. The network of affiliates was global, but it was also chaotic, mismanaged, and unprofitable. In 1966 Harper's sprawling conglomerate included 24 divisions, 8,300 employees, a fleet of five airplanes, and billings of $711 million. The following year Interpublic incurred a $3 million deficit and defaulted on agreements with two New York banks. At one point in 1967 a group of investment bankers offered to buy Interpublic in its entirety for the small sum of $5 million, but the deal was never finalized.

Unable to repay its loans, the company nearly went into receivership. Only through a radical restructuring of management practices and sales of subsidiaries was the agency saved. One of the casualties was Marion Harper himself; he was ousted from the chairmanship of the company by the governing board. The man responsible for instituting Interpublic's changes was Robert Healy, an executive at the firm for a number of years, who had gone into voluntary exile in Switzerland over managerial differences with Harper. In the autumn of 1967 the board brought Healy back from Geneva to reverse the company's mismanaged expansion. Healy was put in charge and given a short time by Interpublic's creditors to stabilize the company. He persuaded his employees to loan the company $3.5 million in return for convertible debentures. In addition, a number of clients agreed to pay in advance for future advertising services. These two factors permitted Interpublic to remain in business. With the help of an additional $10 million in loans, the company went public in 1971.

By selling public stock and reducing its high payroll costs, Interpublic stabilized its finances. It began operating again at a profit. In 1973 Paul Foley succeeded Healy as chief executive and chairman, ushering in a new era of growth at the company. Billings topped $1 billion for the first time in 1974 and plans were drawn up for renewed expansion. The Campbell-Ewald company, longtime ad agency for Chevrolet, was acquired in 1973. This move was followed five years later by the $32 million purchase of the SSC&B firm, the largest merger in advertising history at the time. These two acquisitions, along with Interpublic's strong overseas presence at a time when the American dollar was weak, led the company to record profits. At the end of 1978 Interpublic was billing in excess of $2 billion.

New Management: 1980s90s

In the early 1980s Philip Geier was appointed chief executive and chairman of Interpublic, which angered two of the firm's most distinguished ad men, Bill Backer and Carl Spielvogel. Backer and Spielvogel had worked wonders with such prominent clients as Coke and Miller Beer. When Geier took the reins of Interpublic, Backer and Spielvogel left to start their own agency and took the Miller Beer account with them. News of their departure made Interpublic's stock price fall five points.

Coca-Cola, feeling pressure from Pepsi and upset with the departure of Backer and Spielvogel, issued an ultimatum to McCann-Erickson to come up with a new campaign in three months or the company would take its $750 million account elsewhere. Fortunately, the account was saved by the phrase "Have a Coke and a smile," and a commercial featuring Pittsburgh Steeler football player "Mean" Joe Green giving a young fan the uniform off his back.

After this initial scare Geier became more comfortable in his post as chief executive, though Interpublic's billings had begun to decline in Europe. The offices in Great Britain and France lost a variety of important clients, including Bass Ale and Gillette, and Campbell-Ewald's European division was operating at a loss. These difficulties were particularly troublesome to Interpublic since 65 percent of its billings were outside of the United States. Geier fought back, increasing Interpublic's expansion in Asia where the firm ranked as the number one American-based agency.

By the end of the decade Interpublic had 166 offices in 50 countries. The four company divisions created advertising for such products as: Coca-Cola, Buick, Viceroy cigarettes, Inglenook wine, Exxon, Early Time bourbon, and Kentucky Fried Chicken (McCann-Erickson); Pall Mall and Lucky Strike cigarettes, Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo, Lipton tea, Noxzema, and Bayer aspirin (SSC&B); Chevrolet and Smirnoff vodka (Campbell-Ewald); as well as Minute Maid, Sprite, A-1 Steak Sauce, and Grey Poupon mustard (Marshalk).

Company Perspectives:

From McCann to Draft, from Jack Morton to R/GA, the companies of Interpublic add color to local and global brands and breathe life into their relationship with consumers. The work our agencies produce can move markets or change behavior; our agencies inform, entertain and ultimately make powerful connections on behalf of our clients.

Growth in the 1990s

As Interpublic entered the 1990s Geier and his chief financial officer, Eugene Beard, had made impressive financial gains after their first decade in control of the company. Revenues had more than tripled between the early 1980s and early 1990s, rising to $1.9 billion in 1992. Interpublic's stock demonstrated a more animated leap, increasing 15-fold between 1982 and 1992. Much of this growth had been achieved during the 1980s, when the advertising industry grew robustly. It was only when the advertising industry's years of vigorous growth came screeching to a halt in 1990, that the full measure of Geier's influence could be gauged.

During the recessive early 1990s, other international advertising conglomerates suffered miserably. Companies such as WPP Group and Saatchi & Saatchi watched their business evaporate and their earnings erode, as an era of corporate cutbacks and wholesale downsizing began. In contrast to the decade before, the early 1990s were years in which advertising agencies were forced to sell not only advertising ideas to corporate America, but the value of advertising itself. For many of Interpublic's ilk, the transition was not a smooth one: business was down on all fronts and advertising agencies floundered. Interpublic, however, distinguished itself from the industry pack and continued to radiate remarkable financial health.

The company's success during the transition in the 1990s was attributed to Geier, whose penchant for cost control maintained the momentum built up during the 1980s. Further, Geier was lauded for his practice of ceding creative authority to Interpublic's four agencies, which by this point served 4,000 clients in 91 countries. As the recession intensified, Interpublic continued to shine. In late 1993 the company registered one of the most prolific growth spurts in the history of the media industry, landing $1 billion worth of business during a three-day period. On a Monday in early December 1993, McCann-Erickson was awarded a $200 million Johnson & Johnson account for national television advertising. Two days later, General Motors handed McCann-Erickson its $300 million national print advertising account and Lintas delivered its $500 million national television advertising account, giving all those at Interpublic, and particularly those at McCann-Erickson, ample cause for celebration.

In early 1994 Geier exercised his role as chief strategist for all Interpublic agencies by advising the company's subsidiaries to develop interactive media capabilities. Geier was intent on securing a leading position in a burgeoning area of advertising, and McCann-Erickson was the first to respond by forming a business unit called McCann Interactive. Other Interpublic agencies followed suit, until all of Interpublic's interactive operations were organized into one entity in early 1995, an Interpublic subsidiary christened Allied Communications Group.

On the heels of this development, Interpublic suffered its first meaningful setback during the first half of the decade. In mid-1995 McCann-Erickson lost Coca-Cola's advertising contract, an account it had held for 40 years. Although McCann-Erickson retained Coke's media account, the news was devastating. Following the worrisome news, Interpublic proved to be more resilient than some expected. Financially, the company did not miss a beat, registering strong gains in revenues in 1995 and 1996. Interpublic eclipsed the $2 billion in commissions and fees in 1995 and collected more than $2.5 billion in revenues the following year.

Interpublic's continued good fortune was primarily attributable to Geier's worldwide expansion, in particular several key acquisitions over the next three years, including the purchase of DraftDirect Worldwide, the largest independent direct marketing firm in the world; the United Kingdom's International Public Relations, plc; the Atlanta, Georgia-based Austin Kelly Advertising; NFO Worldwide, Inc. of Greenwich, Connecticut; and one of the country's leading Hispanic agencies, Casanova Pendrill Publicidad. By the end of the decade, Geier had masterminded the acquisition of some 400 companies of varying size. Interpublic finished 1999 with 28,000 employees in 120 countries and gross income of $4.5 billion. There was, however, trouble on the horizon.

Trouble Looming in the New Millennium: 2000s

Interpublic started the new century as it had ended the previous one: with more acquisitions. In January the firm acquired a stake in Suissa Miller, a Los Angeles-based advertising agency, as Geier unveiled plans for his retirement. John Dooner, chief executive of McCann-Erickson Worldgroup, had been hand-picked by Geier as Interpublic's new president and chief operating officer and took up the posts in March 2000. As the end of the year neared, Geier went out with a bang, managing to convince Donny Deutsch to join the Interpublic fold and announcing year-end worldwide revenues of $5.6 billion with earnings topping $349 million.

Key Dates:

1930:
McCann-Erickson advertising agency is formed.
1961:
Interpublic Group is incorporated as a holding company.
1971:
Interpublic goes public on the New York Stock Exchange.
1974:
Earnings top $1 billion for the first time.
1989:
Interpublic has 166 offices in 50 countries worldwide.
1995:
The company fuels growth through international expansion.
2000:
Interpublic announces it will buy Deutsch.
2001:
True North Communications agrees to merge with Interpublic, creating the world's largest advertising conglomerate.
2002:
Accounting irregularities at McCann spark an SEC investigation.
2005:
Interpublic has to restate its financials or be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.
2006:
Interpublic begins to regain its footing in the advertising industry.

In January 2001 Dooner took over as CEO as Geier left the firm after 20 years at the helm. Interpublic made big news soon after by announcing it would acquire Chicago-based True North Communications and become the world's largest advertising holding company. The acquisition of True North ushered in a new era at Interpublic; it was not, however, one of continued prosperity or worldwide domination of the advertising industry. In the third quarter Interpublic posted its largest loss ever ($477 million) amidst falling revenues and steep restructuring costs; the company's stock, however, surged 20 percent to over $29 a share. The losses were a harbinger of what was to come, as Interpublic ended the year with worldwide revenues of $6.7 billion, down over 6 percent from the previous year's $7.2 billion.

In early 2002 Dooner was replaced as chief executive by David Bell, who had come to Interpublic from True North. Dooner remained chairman but relinquished his Interpublic CEO duties to return to his former stomping grounds, McCann. At McCann, however, a series of billing irregularities had been discovered. As trouble brewed at McCann over years of financial mismanagement, it led to scrutiny of Interpublic as a whole as well as its many independent units. Once the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) got wind of the financial irregularities, Interpublic went from worldwide advertising leader to fighting for its very survival.

In 2003 Interpublic was given an ultimatum: provide restated financials by November 2005 or face delisting from the New York Stock Exchange. Bell and Dooner vowed to have the numbers ready and worked hard at not only keeping Interpublic's clients but redeeming its reputation throughout the next year. As 2004 ended with rumors flying about criminal misdeeds and widespread accounting imbalances, Michael Roth, formerly of MONY and a member of Interpublic's board since 2002, was brought in as the company's chairman. In January 2005 Roth added the duties of chief executive as the firm faced the final months before the SEC's deadline.

When Roth presented Interpublic's restated financials, the documents revealed years of unreconciled accounts, liberal "media credits" (i.e., kickbacks), and a string of losses, including a staggering loss of $558 million for the first three quarters of 2004. Roth issued a public mea culpa and Interpublic's annual meeting was held in November (delayed from May). At the meeting, former CEOs and Chairmen David Bell and John Dooner were kicked off the board amid accusations of mismanagement. In addition, shareholders discussed but did not force the issue of breaking up the company and selling it to rivals.

Interpublic's stock hit a low of $10 per share in late 2005, but Roth took this in stride, reminding anyone who would listen that Interpublic's troubles were behind it and a number of its agencies were actually gaining ground and making a profit. Though Interpublic's overall financial performance remained weak, Roth firmly believed the venerable behemoth was poised for a turnaround.

Principal Subsidiaries

Campbell-Ewald; Campbell Mithun; Carmichael Lynch; Casanova Pendrill; Dailey & Associates; Deutsch; DeVries Public Relations; Draft Healthcare; Draft Worldwide; DraftDigital; Foote Cone & Belding; FutureBrand; GolinHarris International; Gotham Inc.; Hill Holliday; Hill Holliday Hispanic; Initiative Media; IW Group; Jack Morton Worldwide; Jay Advertising; Kaleidoscope; Lowe Worldwide; MAGNA Global; MRM Worldwide; McCann Erickson Worldwide; McCann WorldGroup; Media Partnership Corporation; MWW Group; Newspaper Services of America; Octagon; R/GA; Siboney USA; The Sloan Group; Springer & Jacoby; Universal Worldwide McCann; Walhstrom Group; Weber Shandwick; Women2Women Communications; Zipatoni.

Principal Competitors

Omnicom Group Inc.; Publicis Groupe S.A., WPP Group, Plc.

Further Reading

Bulik, Beth Snyder, "Dooner, Geier to Reinvent Interpublic," Advertising Age, March 27, 2000, p. 69.

Creamer, Matthew, "IPG's New CEO Must Make the Tough Calls," Advertising Age, January 24, 2004, p. 3.

Davis, Wendy, "Deutsch Now Part of Interpublic Empire," Advertising Age, December 4, 2000, p. 1.

Dougherty, Philip, "Backer and Spielvogel Set the Standard for Growth," New York Times, June 1, 1980.

Feuer, Jack, "Omnicom & IPG: A Continental Divide," ADWEEK, May 26, 2003, p. 18.

Fox, Stephen, The Mirror Makers, New York: Morrow, 1984.

Harrington, John, "Interpublic Looks North for True Growth," Crain's New York Business, March 26, 2001, p. 46.

Hughes, Laura K., "Interpublic Still Faces Hurdles in True North Deal," Advertising Age, March 26, 2001, p. 3.

Khermouch, Gerry, "IPG: Synergyor Sinkhole?," Business Week, April 21, 2003, p. 76.

"Late News: Bell, Dooner to Exit IPG Board," ADWEEK Eastern Edition, October 24, 2005, p. 1.

MacArthur, Kate, "The Dooner Party: Interpublic's CEO Inherited a Global Giant," Advertising Age, July 30, 2001, p. 1.

Machan, Dyan, "I Will Not Be Denied: Interpublic Group Companies CEO John Dooner, Jr.," Forbes, October 16, 2000, p. 166.

Marshall, Caroline, "Quiet American Stays Mum As Coke Loosens Ties," Campaign, July 14, 1995, p. 10.

McMains, Andrew, "Critics Get Louder on IPG Board," ADWEEK Midwest Edition, January 27, 2003, p. 3.

, "Interpublic Posts Quarterly Loss of $327 Million," ADWEEK Online, November 11, 2003.

, "IPG Stock Sinks to 52-Week Low," ADWEEK Online, October 18, 2005.

, "IPG to Report on Restructuring Plan," ADWEEK, August 11, 2003, p. 7.

Morgenson, Gretchen, "Sibling Rivalry," Forbes, February 15, 1993, p. 119.

O'Leary, Noreen, "Above It All? Can a Confident Michael Roth Save the Faltering IPG?," ADWEEK, October 3, 2005, p. 34.

, "Damage Control at IPG," ADWEEK, June 28, 2004, p. 8.

, and Andrew McMains, "Criminal Confessions Rock IPG Shops," ADWEEK Online, September 19, 2005.

Snyder, Beth, "Mating Mania. With the Landscape Picked Clean of Independents, the Giants Circle Each Other," Advertising Age, April 5, 1999, p. 3.

Steinberg, Brian, "Interpublic's Troubles Mount As Revenues Fall at Key Units," Wall Street Journal Eastern Edition, November 10, 2005, p. B5.

Wall, Kathleen, "At Interpublic, Family Feud Over Motorola," ADWEEK Eastern Edition, November 13, 1995, p. 5.

Willott, Bob, "IPG Braces for Next Round of Troubles," Campaign, October 7, 2005, p. 6.

, "The Grapes of Roth: How It All Went Sour at IPG," Campaign, April 1, 2005, p. 19.

              updates: Jeffrey L. Covell; Nelson Rhodes

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. 14 Dec. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. (December 14, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/interpublic-group-companies-inc

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved December 14, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/interpublic-group-companies-inc

The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
U.S.A.
(212) 399-8000

Fax: (212) 399-8130

Public Company
Incorporated: 1961
Employees: 21,700
Gross Billings: $2.53 billion (1996)
Stock Exchanges: New York
SICs: 7311 Advertising Agencies; 8741 Management Services 6719 Holding Companies, Not Elsewhere Classified; 4841 Cable & Other Pay Television Services

The second-largest advertising company in the world, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. operates as a holding company for a group of advertising agencies and media firms that include McCann-Erickson Worldwide, Ammirati Puris Lintas, the Lowe Group, and Western International Media. Through its subsidiaries, Interpublic serves more than 4,000 clients in more than 110 countries, providing advertising programs, direct marketing, market research, and other marketing services. Interpublics advertising agencies compete against one another for clients, yet all benefit from the resources and connections of their parent company, Interpublic.

Origins

In 1956 Marion Harper, then chief executive officer and chairman of McCann-Erickson, began to implement his vision of fashioning an advertising company modeled after General Motors, a vigorous conglomerate consisting of equally vigorous but largely autonomous divisions. He arranged for McCann-Erickson to buy the Marshalk Company advertising firm of New York. The move was unprecedented because Harper declared that the two agencies (McCann-Erickson and Marshalk) would be operated as competing companies. Harpers intention was to avoid the conflict of interest problem that plagued all agencies attempting to procure accounts from competing clients. He felt that if Marshalk and McCann were separately run, a camera manufacturer looking to hire McCann would not care that Marshalk did the advertising for another camera manufacturer. Most people within the industry viewed the idea with skepticism, but Harper proved them wrong. Both agencies continued to grow while often servicing rival clients.

That was only the beginning. In January 1961 Interpublic was established as a holding company, and McCann-Erickson became its largest subsidiary. What followed was a rapid, occasionally reckless, six-year period of expansion and acquisition. Harper purchased majority interests in a variety of advertising firms all over the world. The network of affiliates was global; but it was also chaotic, mismanaged, and unprofitable. In 1967 Interpublic was billing at over $700 million, yet still insolvent. Unable to repay its loans, the company nearly went into receivership. Only through a radical restructuring of management practices and sales of subsidiaries was the agency saved. One of the casualties was Marion Harper himself. He was ousted from the chairmanship of the company by the governing board. Harper was therefore not able to personally direct his dream-agency to fruition. Doing so was left to others.

Although Interpublic was not officially incorporated until 1961, its history dates back 50 years earlier. In 1911 the U.S. Supreme Court dismantled the Rockefeller Standard Oil Trust and divided it into 37 different companies. The largest of these was Standard Oil of New Jersey (now Exxon). Harrison McCann, who had been advertising manager at the Rockefeller Trust for a number of years, opened up his own ad agency and took on Jersey Standard as his first client. The age of the automobile was soon to come and with it an increase in the demand for refined petroleum products. As the advertising man for the worlds largest oil company, McCann was poised for success.

In 1930 McCann merged his agency with that of Alfred Erickson to form the McCann-Erickson Company. Despite the Depression and World War II, the newly conjoined firm managed to grow in billings and importance; by 1945 McCannErickson was doing close to $40 million in business, making it the fifth-largest advertising firm in the United States.

When Marion Harper began working at the McCann-Erickson agency in the 1930s, he was employed neither as a copywriter nor as an account executive; he was a clerk in the mail-room. After delivering the days mail he would visit the research department and learn what he could. He proved a remarkable student; he was made manager of copy research at the age of 26 and then promoted to director of research at 30. Two years later, Harrison McCann promoted Harper again this time to president of McCann-Erickson Advertising. In the short span of nine years Harper rose through the ranks of the agency to become president of the company.

During the period of Harpers mercurial ascendancy, McCann-Erickson was experiencing the most lucrative decade of its history. In 1954 the agency surpassed $100 million in billings for the first time. Then, between 1955 and 1956, the agency added over $45 million worth of new business to its balance sheet. Among the new clients were the Westinghouse appliance division, Chesterfield tobacco, and Mennen personal hygiene products. However, these accounts were overshadowed by the fourth new customer gained by McCann at this time, namely, Coca-Cola. Though Coke was a large $15 million account in 1956, it was the soft drink companys potential for future growth that made it such an attractive customer. For McCann-Erickson, Coca-Cola was an investment in the coming era of recreation and refreshment. Today it remains the most coveted and guarded member of McCann-Ericksons client roster.

Also at this time McCann-Erickson moved to establish itself in a variety of less conventional foreign advertising markets. Long the leading agency in Latin America and Europe, the company purchased the third-largest ad firm in Australia and began to actively pursue business in the Orient. By 1960 McCann-Erickson had billings of $100 million outside the U.S., with a substantial portion coming from the Asia-Pacific area.

Interpublic Formed in 1961

When Marion Harper became president of McCann-Erickson the agency was considered a research-oriented firm that took a methodical approach to its advertising. It was the organization mans agency. Like Stanley Resor at the rival J. Walter Thompson company, Harper was a firm believer in the use of social science techniques in advertising. He was always looking for a way to accurately predict consumer response and had a bureaucrats love for statistics. In fact, he had such reverence for facts and figures that he would occasionally sacrifice loyalty for the prospect of future earnings. In one instance he voluntarily resigned the large and longstanding Chrysler account to take on the smaller but potentially more lucrative business of General Motors Buick division. A tireless worker, Harper would often labor at his desk for 48 hours at a stretch. He once confided in a friend, I have been captured by what I chased. In 1960 he took his first vacation since being hired by McCann. A year later Interpublic was established, and Harper was forced to work more feverishly than ever.

Interpublic was envisioned by Harper as a family of rival sons. The various affiliates and subsidiaries would compete against each other for accounts and would operate separately. The one thing binding them together would be their mutual membership in the holding company and their ties to the parent agencys financial and informational resources. It was intended to be a horizontal system: the different Interpublic divisions could produce campaigns for competing products. The structure, though an ingenious way of getting around the conflict of interest problem that can make agency growth difficult, did not always work. For instance, Nestles chocolate, a longtime McCann client, left Interpublic in 1963 after the purchase of the Erwin Wasey firm brought Carnation onto the Interpublic roster. In addition, the cost of buying so many small and medium-sized ad shops, not to mention the occasional acquisition of a large agency, was prohibitive. The overhead involved in keeping the entire business operational was staggering. The rapid expansion of Interpublic required the one thing that Marion Harpers intellect could not provide, namely, adequate management. In 1966 Harpers sprawling conglomerate included 24 divisions, 8,300 employees, a fleet of five airplanes, and billings of $711 million. Yet it rarely broke even. The following year Interpublic and Harper reached their collective nadir. The company incurred a $3 million deficit and defaulted on agreements with two New York banks. At one point in 1967 a group of investment bankers offered to buy Interpublic in its entirety for the small sum of $5 million, but the deal was never finalized.

With the danger of receivership imminent, Interpublic needed to take drastic measures to save itself. The man responsible for instituting the changes was Robert Healy. Healy had been an executive at the firm for a number of years but went into voluntary exile in Switzerland over managerial differences with Marion Harper. In the autumn of 1967 the board brought Healy back from Geneva to reverse the mismanaged expansion that was hurting Interpublic. After Marion Harper was ousted as the chief executive officer and chairman, Healy was put in charge. Given a short time allowance by Interpublics creditors, Healy persuaded his employees to loan the company $3.5 million in return for convertible debentures. In addition, a number of clients agreed to pay in advance for future advertising services. These two factors permitted Interpublic to remain in business. Then, with the help of an additional $10 million in loans, the company went public in 1971.

Company Perspectives:

It is always useful to reflect on how our Company has succeeded in posting such strong and consistent gains over the past 20 years. Interpublic pioneered the concept of complementary but competing networks back in the 60s. Our mission is the same now as it was then: Our agencies concentrate on developing their unique positioning, philosophy and communication skills and then bring that fully to bear in working with their clients and growing their business, while we at the parent company develop overall strategy, provide management oversight and assume any and all functions that economically can best be performed centrally.

When Marion Harper walked out of the Interpublic office he left behind the prototype of the mega-agencies which emerged in the late 1970s and 1980s. He also left behind a personal mystique. After being forced out of Interpublic he opened up his own small boutique agency, but this venture only lasted a year or two. He then kept himself out of public view for over a decade. In 1980 he was discovered living at his mothers house in Oklahoma Citypenniless.

By selling public stock and reducing its comparatively high payroll costs (59 percent of gross income), Interpublic stabilized its finances. It began operating again at a profit. In 1973 Paul Foley succeeded Robert Healy as chief executive officer and chairman and ushered in a new era of growth at the company. Billings topped $ 1 billion for the first time in 1974 and plans were drawn up for renewed expansion. The Campbell-Ewald company, longtime ad agency for Chevrolet, was acquired in 1973. This move was followed five years later by the $32 million purchase of the SSC&B firm, the largest merger in advertising history at the time. These two acquisitions, along with Interpublics strong overseas presence at a time when the American dollar was weak, led the company to record profits. At the end of 1978 Interpublic was billing in excess of $2 billion.

New Management for 1980s, 1990s

Throughout Interpublics history its largest and most important clients have been Exxon and Coca-Cola. Then in the mid-1970s Lever Brothers came to Interpublic with SSC&B and Chevrolet with Campbell-Ewald. By 1979 Miller Beer would also come to rank near the top four. Miller came to McCann-Erickson as a struggling $20 million client in 1970. Bill Backer (who had coined the phrases Things Go Better with Coke and Its the Real Thing) and Carl Spielvogel went to work on Millers market share. They came up with the Miller Time slogan and were responsible for the Miller Lite commercials which feature famous athletes. Between 1970 and 1979 Miller Beer prospered. Spielvogel thought that his success, not only with Miller but also with Coca-Cola and various other accounts, would gain him the position of chairman at Interpublic when Foley retired. The job went to Spielvogels rival Philip Geier. Both Backer and Spielvogel resigned and formed their own agency, taking the Miller business away from McCann-Erickson in the process. Miller was no longer a $20 million account; it was now worth over $100 million. News of the defection dropped Interpublics stock price five points.

Coca-Cola, feeling pressure from Pepsi and upset with the departure of Backer and Spielvogel, issued an ultimatum to McCann-Erickson: 90 days to come up with a new campaign or we take our $750 million account somewhere else. Fortunately, the account was saved by the phrase Have a Coke and a smile, and a commercial which featured Pittsburgh Steeler football player Mean Joe Green giving a young fan the uniform off his back.

After this initial scare Philip Geier became more comfortable as chief executive officer and chairman of Interpublic, but not too comfortable. In the 1980s Interpublic suffered a decline of business in Europe. The offices in Great Britain and France lost a variety of important clients (e.g., Bass Beer and Gillette), and Campbell-Ewalds European division operated at a loss. These difficulties were particularly troublesome to Interpublic since 65 percent of its billings were outside of the United States. Geier fought back, increasing Interpublics expansion in Asia where Interpublic ranked as the number one American-based agency.

By the late 1980s, Interpublic had 166 offices in 50 countries. The four company divisions created advertising for such products as: Coca-Cola, Buick, Viceroy cigarettes, Inglenook wine, Exxon, Early Time bourbon, and Kentucky Fried Chicken (McCann-Erickson); Pall Mall and Lucky Strike cigarettes, Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo, Lipton tea, Noxzema, and Bayer aspirin (SSC&B); Chevrolet and Smirnoff vodka (Campbell-Ewald); Minute Maid, Sprite, A-l Steak Sauce, and Grey Poupon mustard (Marshalk).

1990s Growth

Although the appointment of Geier to Interpublics top post sparked some resentment, at least in Spielvogels case, few were dismayed by the results Geier achieved, particularly the companys shareholders, who watched their investments swell under Geiers tenure. As the company entered the 1990s, Geier and his chief financial officer, Eugene Beard, could point to impressive financial gains after their first decade of control over the fortunes of Interpublic. Revenues more than tripled between the early 1980s and early 1990s, rising to $1.9 billion in 1992. Interpublics stock demonstrated a more animated leap, increasing 15-fold between 1982 and 1992. Much of this growth was achieved during the 1980s, when the advertising industry was growing robustly, but when the advertising industrys years of vigorous growth came screeching to a halt in 1990, the full measure of Geiers influence could be gauged.

When the advertising industry fell on hard times along with other sectors of the nations economy during the recessive early 1990s, other international agglomerations of advertising agencies suffered miserably. Companies such as WPP Group and Saatchi & Saatchi watched their business evaporate and their earnings erode, as an era of corporate cutbacks and wholesale downsizing began. In contrast to the 1980s, the early 1990s were years in which advertising agencies were forced to sell not only advertising ideas to corporate America, but the value of advertising itself. For many of Interpublics ilk, the transition from the fertile 1980s to the sterile 1990s was not a smooth segue. Business was down on all fronts, and inured to the prosperous years of the 1980s, advertising agencies floundered financially. Interpublic, however, distinguished itself from the industry pack and continued to radiate remarkable financial health during the early 1990s.

The companys success during the transition from the 1980s to the 1990s was attributed to Geier, whose penchant for assiduous cost control maintained the momentum built up during the 1980s. Further, Geier was lauded for his practice of ceding creative authority to Interpublics four agencies, which by this point served 4,000 clients in 91 countries. Its tricky in any business to balance the need for creative independence in a far-flung enterprise with the need for accountability and controls, noted one industry observer. Interpublic shows that it can be done even in a particularly volatile business.

As the recession intensified during the early 1990s, Interpublic continued to shine. In late 1993, the company registered one of the most prolific growth spurts in the history of the media business, landing $1 billion worth of business during a three-day period. On a Monday in early December 1993, McCann-Erickson was awarded a $200 million Johnson & Johnson account for national television advertising. Two days later, General Motors handed McCann-Erickson its $300 million national print advertising account and Lintas delivered its $500 million national television advertising account, giving all those at Interpublic, and particularly those at McCann-Erickson, ample cause for celebration.

In early 1994, Geier exercised his role as chief strategist for all Interpublic agencies by advising the companys subsidiaries to develop interactive media capabilities. Geier was intent on securing a leading position in a burgeoning area of advertising, and McCann-Erickson was the first to respond by forming a business unit called McCann Interactive. Other Interpublic agencies followed suit, until all of Interpublics interactive activities were organized into one entity in early 1995, an Interpublic subsidiary christened Allied Communications Group.

On the heels of this development, Interpublic suffered its first meaningful setback during the first half of the decade. In mid-1995, McCann-Erickson lost Coca-Colas advertising contract, an account it had held for 40 years. Although McCann-Erickson retained Coca-Colas media account, the news was devastating, although not unexpected. In late 1992, Coca-Cola had transferred the work on its main brand to Creative Artists Agency, which marked the beginning of a painful, two-year period for McCann-Erickson executives as they awaited further word from Coca-Cola. The 1995 decision by Coca-Cola was expected to damage Interpublics reputation as much as its financial status, but Geier was not about to let Coca-Colas departure from Interpublics portfolio derail his strategy of global expansion.

Following the worrisome news in 1995, Interpublic proved to be more resilient than some expected. Financially, the company did not miss a beat, registering strong gains in revenues in 1995 and 1996. Interpublic eclipsed the $2 billion in commissions and fees in 1995 and collected more than $2.5 billion in revenues the following year. These increases were primarily attributable to the continued worldwide expansion of the companys business through strategic acquisitions and investments, the main thrust of Geiers strategy. No acquisition was larger during the mid-1990s than the May 1996 purchase of Draft-Direct Worldwide, the largest independent direct marketing firm in the world. As Geier plotted the future course of the Interpublic family of agencies, further acquisitions were expected, acquisitions that would enable Geier to create the best advertising and communications company in the world. With this lofty goal underpinning Interpublics strategy for the future, the company headed into the late 1990s intent on developing the fullest possible range of communications capabilities.

Principal Subsidiaries

McCann-Erickson Worldwide; Ammirati Puris Lintas; Camp-bell-Ewald; The Lowe Group; DraftDirect Worldwide; Western International Media; Allied Communications Group.

Further Reading

Dougherty, Philip, Backer and Spielvogel Set the Standard for Growth, New York Times, June 1, 1980.

Fox, Stephen, The Mirror Makers, New York: Morrow, 1984.

Interpublic Group Reports Results for Second Quarter 1997, PR Newswire, July 24, 1997, p. 72.

Marshall, Caroline, Quiet American Stays Mum As Coke Loosens Ties, Campaign, July 14, 1995, p. 10.

Morgenson, Gretchen, Sibling Rivalry, Forbes, February 15, 1993, p. 119.

Wall, Kathleen, At Interpublic, Family Feud Over Motorola,ADWEEK Eastern Edition, November 13, 1995, p. 5.

updated by Jeffrey L. Covell

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. 14 Dec. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Encyclopedia.com. (December 14, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/interpublic-group-companies-inc-0

"The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.." International Directory of Company Histories. . Retrieved December 14, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/interpublic-group-companies-inc-0