Select Source:

Proof

What do the statements 2 + 2 = 4 and "the sky is blue" have in common? One might say that they are both true. The statement about the sky can be confirmed by going outside and observing the color of the sky. How, then, can one confirm the truth of the statement 2 + 2 = 4? A statement in mathematics is considered true, or valid, on the basis of whether or not the statement can be proved within its mathematical system.

What does it mean to prove something mathematically? A mathematical proof is a convincing argument that is made up of logical steps, each of which is a valid deduction from a beginning statement that is known to be true. The reasons used to validate each step can be definitions or assumptions or statements that have been previously proved.

As an example of a proof, look at finding the sum of the first n whole numbers.

The sum of the first three whole numbers is 1 + 2 + 3, so n = 3, and the sum is 6.

The sum for n = 4 is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, and this sum is 10.

Is there a pattern here? Can the sum be found (without doing all the addition) for n = 8?

In 1787, a teacher gave this problem to a 10-year-old boy, Carl Friedrich Gauss. Gauss pointed out the following pattern:

What is the sum of each of the number pairs indicated by the arrows? The sum is four pairs that sum to 9, and there are eight numbers in all.

What would the mean of these numbers be? The mean is (4 × 9) divided by 8. The mean of the whole set is which is also the mean of the first and last numbers in the set. The sum of eight numbers, whose mean is , is 8 , or 4 × 9, which is 36. Maybe the sum of the first n whole numbers can be found by finding the mean of the first and last whole numbers, and then multiplying that mean by n.

Try the following pattern to see if it works for other values of n. What happens if an odd number is chosen for n ?

Is the sum the same as the mean of 9 and 1 ( or 5) multiplied by n (which is 9 in this case)? Is the sum 5 × 9, or 45?

Is the sum of the first n whole numbers always equal to the mean of the first and last multiplied by n ? This seems to be true, but in mathematics even a huge number of examples is not enough to prove the truth of the statement. Therefore, a proof is needed.

The first number in the sum is always 1. The last number in the sum is always n. The mean of n and 1 is according to the definition of mean. In algebra, n multiplied by this mean looks like . A proof must show that the sum of the first n whole numbers is always .

First, consider n as an even number. In that case, there is an even number of pairs, and each pair has a sum of n + 1, regardless of the size of n. The truth of this pattern does not depend on the size of n, as long as n is an even number so pairs can be made, each of which adds to (n + 1).

There are pairs, each of which adds to (n + 1), so the total is or . This means that the pattern is proved true as long as n is an even number.

Next, consider the case where n is an odd number:

The circled number in the middle will always be the mean of the first and last numbers. In algebra, the middle number will be . So the middle number adds one more mean to the (n 1) means that were made by the paired numbers.

So, again, the total sum is n multiplied by the mean of the first and last numbers, or . These two cases, for n, an even number, and n, an odd number, together make up the proof.

There are several forms of mathematical proofs. The one just given is a direct proof. Indirect reasoning, or proof by contradiction, can also be used. A third kind of proof is called mathematical induction.

Although many examples do not prove a statement, one counterexample is enough to disprove a statement. For example, is it true that y + y = y × y ? Try substituting values of 0 and then 2 for y. Although the statement is true for 0 and 2, it is not true in general. One counter-example is y = 1, since 1 + 1 is not equal to 1 × 1 because 2 is not equal to 1.

Here is a well-known proof that 0 = 1. Try to find the flaw, or mistake, in this proof.

1. Assume that x = 0. Assumption
2. x (x 1) = 0 Multiplying each side by (x 1)
3. (x 1) = 0 Dividing each side by x
4. x = 1 Adding 1 to each side
5. 0 = 1 Substitute x = 0, the original assumption

All the steps except one are valid. In Step 3, the proof divided each side by x. The reason for this is that, if a = b, then if c is not equal to 0. But the original assumption said that x was equal to 0, so Step 3 involved dividing by 0, which is undefined. Allowing division by 0 can lead to proving all sorts of untruths!

Lucia McKay

Bibliography

Bergamina, David, and editors of Life. Mathematics. New York: Time Incorporated, 1963.

Hogben, Lancelot. Mathematics in the Making. New York: Crescent Books, Incorporated, 1960.

Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

• MLA
• Chicago
• APA

"Proof." Mathematics. . Encyclopedia.com. 21 Aug. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Proof." Mathematics. . Encyclopedia.com. (August 21, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/education/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/proof

"Proof." Mathematics. . Retrieved August 21, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/education/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/proof

Proof

A proof is a logical argument demonstrating that a specific statement, proposition, or mathematical formula is true. It consists of a set of assumptions (also called premises) that are combined according to logical rules in order to establish a valid conclusion. This validation can take one of two forms. In a direct proof, a given conclusion can be shown to be true. In an indirect proof, a given conclusion can be shown not to be false and, therefore, presumably to be true.

Direct proofs

A direct proof begins with one or more axioms or facts. An axiom is a statement that is accepted as true without being proved. Axioms are also called postulates. Facts are statements that have been proved to be true to the general satisfaction of all mathematicians and scientists. In either case, a direct proof begins with a statement that everyone can agree with as being true. As an example, one might start a proof by saying that all healthy cows have four legs. It seems likely that all reasonable people would agree that this statement is true.

The next step in developing a proof is to develop a series of true statements based on the beginning axioms and/or facts. This series of statements is known as the argument of the proof. A key factor in any proof is to be certain that all of the statements in the argument are, in fact, true statements. If such is the case, one can use the initial axioms and/or facts and the statements in the argument to produce a final statement, a proof, that can also be regarded as true.

As a simple example, consider the statement: "The Sun rises every morning." That statement can be considered to be either an axiom or fact. It is unlikely that anyone will disagree it.

One might then look at a clock and make a second statement: "The clock says 6:00 a.m." If we can trust that the clock is in working order, then this statement can be regarded as a true statementthe first statement in the argument for this proof.

The next statement might be to say that "6:00 a.m. represents morning." Again, this statement would appear to be one with which everyone could agree.

The conclusion that can be drawn, then, is: "The Sun will rise today." The conclusion is based on axioms or facts and a series of two true statements, all of which can be trusted. The statement "The Sun will rise today" has been proved.

Indirect proofs

Situations exist in which a statement cannot be proved easily by direct methods. It may be easier to disprove the opposite of that statement. For example, suppose we begin with the statement "Cats do not meow." One could find various ways to show that that statement is not truethat it is, in fact, false. If we can prove that the statement "Cats do not meow" is false, then it follows that the opposite statement "Cats meow" is true, or at least probably true.

Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

• MLA
• Chicago
• APA

"Proof." UXL Encyclopedia of Science. . Encyclopedia.com. 21 Aug. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Proof." UXL Encyclopedia of Science. . Encyclopedia.com. (August 21, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/proof

"Proof." UXL Encyclopedia of Science. . Retrieved August 21, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/proof

proof (in mathematics)

proof, in mathematics, finite sequence of propositions each of which is either an axiom or follows from preceding propositions by one of the rules of logical inference (see symbolic logic). Mathematical proofs are quite distinct from inductive, statistical, heuristic, analogical, and other types of reasoning or persuasion that are sometimes accepted as proofs in other fields of science or human affairs. Proof theory has developed into one of the important branches of modern mathematical logic. Some schools of mathematical logic reject certain methods in proofs, such as use of the law of excluded middle (either p is true or p is false) or of mathematical definitions involving properties that are not effectively verifiable.

Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

• MLA
• Chicago
• APA

"proof (in mathematics)." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Encyclopedia.com. 21 Aug. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"proof (in mathematics)." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Encyclopedia.com. (August 21, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/proof-mathematics

"proof (in mathematics)." The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed.. . Retrieved August 21, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/proof-mathematics

proof

proof Informally, a form of deduction associated with a deductive logic. More formally, when applied to a formal system F, a proof is a sequence of well-formed formulas with each item in the sequence being either an axiom of F or being derived from previous items through the application of an inference rule of F.