Skip to main content

Loving v. Virginia

LOVING V. VIRGINIA

LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). In Loving v. Virginia the Supreme Court of the United States held that laws prohibiting interracial marriage violate the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, an African American woman, were arrested when they returned to Virginia following their marriage in Washington, D.C. They were convicted for violating Virginia's antimiscegenation laws, which made the marriage "between a white person and a colored person a felony." Virginia's antimiscegenation laws, however, did not formally ban marriage between any other races. The trial courts and the Supreme Court of Virginia had upheld the Lovings' convictions.

Previously the U.S. Supreme Court had been hesitant to address the constitutionality of antimiscegenation laws. The Court had refused to review the constitutionality of a conviction under a state antimiscegenation law shortly after Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the landmark school desegregation case. Surprisingly the Loving decision did not provoke the angry controversy that followed the Brown decision. The ban on interracial marriages was one of the last vestiges of legal racial discrimination. At the time this case was heard by the Supreme Court, fifteen states still had prohibitions against interracial marriage. The ruling in Loving, however, was not difficult to predict. In the 1964 case McLaughlin v. Florida the Court had held unconstitutional bans on interracial cohabitation.

In previous cases the Court held that state-mandated racial discrimination, in order to pass constitutional muster, would have to meet a "strict" standard of review. The strict standard of review requires a state to demonstrate that its laws mandating racial discrimination are necessary to the accomplishment of a "permissible state objective." The Court, in a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, found that Virginia's antimiscegenation laws did not pass this strict test. The Court did not accept Virginia's argument that the antimiscegenation laws applied equally among races by punishing both the white and the black person attempting to marry and therefore did not discriminate based on race. The Court determined that marriage is a basic civil right in the United States, and the denial of this fundamental right on the basis of race violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baer, Judith A. Equality under the Constitution. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983.

Mezey, Susan Gluck. In Pursuit of Equality. New York: St. Martin's, 1992.

Moran, Rachel F. Interracial Intimacy: The Regulation of Race and Romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.

Sollors, Werner, ed. Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Spann, Girardeau A. Race against the Court: Supreme Court and Minorities in Contemporary America. New York: New York University Press, 1993.

Akiba J.Covitz

Esa LianneSferra

Meredith L.Stewart

See alsoBrown v. Board of Education of Topeka ; Miscegenation .

Cite this article
Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.

  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • APA

"Loving v. Virginia." Dictionary of American History. . Encyclopedia.com. 19 Aug. 2017 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

"Loving v. Virginia." Dictionary of American History. . Encyclopedia.com. (August 19, 2017). http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/loving-v-virginia

"Loving v. Virginia." Dictionary of American History. . Retrieved August 19, 2017 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/loving-v-virginia

Learn more about citation styles

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

http://www.mla.org/style

The Chicago Manual of Style

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

American Psychological Association

http://apastyle.apa.org/

Notes:
  • Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.
  • In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.